The Rhetoric of Cells: Understanding Molecular Biology in the Twenty-First Century

Recent discussions of metaphor illuminate its function as a paradigm-building trope with significant rhetorical and epistemological power. Historical and current discourse within biological science provide a complex and poignant example of metaphor's influence: Throughout much of the twentieth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rhetoric review 2006-01, Vol.25 (1), p.58-75
1. Verfasser: Sidler, Michelle
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 75
container_issue 1
container_start_page 58
container_title Rhetoric review
container_volume 25
creator Sidler, Michelle
description Recent discussions of metaphor illuminate its function as a paradigm-building trope with significant rhetorical and epistemological power. Historical and current discourse within biological science provide a complex and poignant example of metaphor's influence: Throughout much of the twentieth century, the field operated under a deterministic assumption that DNA is the "genetic code." Though this reductionist association still shapes biological research, postgenomic discoveries are now reconceiving the connection between DNA and cells in more complex ways. The ensuing scientific debate demonstrates that rhetoric and language have primary roles in the discourse of contemporary biology, creating a rhetoric of cells.
doi_str_mv 10.1207/s15327981rr2501_4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1207_s15327981rr2501_4</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20176699</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20176699</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-f799fd7fb7d9dd673fbe55b3469049098577c3bc3c92306ee44b062410b5ba423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEYhYMoWC8P4ELIC4zmnkbcaLEqVITSrodMJmlT0kSSKWXe3ikVN-Lqh3POd-A_ANxgdIcJkvcFc0qkGuOcCUe4ZidgdJCqg3YKRkhSXiGsxufgopQNQlhIKUZgvlhbOF_bLmVvYHJwYkMoD3AZW5tLp2Pr4wp-pGDNLugMn30KadVDH2E3kIu9jV1fTf2QHdDY7XJ_Bc6cDsVe_9xLsJy-LCZv1ezz9X3yNKsMobyrnFTKtdI1slVtKyR1jeW8oUwoxBRSYy6loY2hRhGKhLWMNUgQhlHDG80IvQT42GtyKiVbV39lv9W5rzGqD6PUf0YZmNsjsynDx78AQVgKodTgPx59H13KW71PObR1p_uQsss6Gl9q-n_9Nyhkc0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Rhetoric of Cells: Understanding Molecular Biology in the Twenty-First Century</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Sidler, Michelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Sidler, Michelle</creatorcontrib><description>Recent discussions of metaphor illuminate its function as a paradigm-building trope with significant rhetorical and epistemological power. Historical and current discourse within biological science provide a complex and poignant example of metaphor's influence: Throughout much of the twentieth century, the field operated under a deterministic assumption that DNA is the "genetic code." Though this reductionist association still shapes biological research, postgenomic discoveries are now reconceiving the connection between DNA and cells in more complex ways. The ensuing scientific debate demonstrates that rhetoric and language have primary roles in the discourse of contemporary biology, creating a rhetoric of cells.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-0198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1207/s15327981rr2501_4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</publisher><subject>Biology ; DNA ; Evolutionary genetics ; Genetic code ; Genetic research ; Genomes ; Human genetics ; Metaphors ; Molecular biology ; Scientific discourse</subject><ispartof>Rhetoric review, 2006-01, Vol.25 (1), p.58-75</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2006</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-f799fd7fb7d9dd673fbe55b3469049098577c3bc3c92306ee44b062410b5ba423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-f799fd7fb7d9dd673fbe55b3469049098577c3bc3c92306ee44b062410b5ba423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20176699$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20176699$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sidler, Michelle</creatorcontrib><title>The Rhetoric of Cells: Understanding Molecular Biology in the Twenty-First Century</title><title>Rhetoric review</title><description>Recent discussions of metaphor illuminate its function as a paradigm-building trope with significant rhetorical and epistemological power. Historical and current discourse within biological science provide a complex and poignant example of metaphor's influence: Throughout much of the twentieth century, the field operated under a deterministic assumption that DNA is the "genetic code." Though this reductionist association still shapes biological research, postgenomic discoveries are now reconceiving the connection between DNA and cells in more complex ways. The ensuing scientific debate demonstrates that rhetoric and language have primary roles in the discourse of contemporary biology, creating a rhetoric of cells.</description><subject>Biology</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Evolutionary genetics</subject><subject>Genetic code</subject><subject>Genetic research</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Human genetics</subject><subject>Metaphors</subject><subject>Molecular biology</subject><subject>Scientific discourse</subject><issn>0735-0198</issn><issn>1532-7981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEYhYMoWC8P4ELIC4zmnkbcaLEqVITSrodMJmlT0kSSKWXe3ikVN-Lqh3POd-A_ANxgdIcJkvcFc0qkGuOcCUe4ZidgdJCqg3YKRkhSXiGsxufgopQNQlhIKUZgvlhbOF_bLmVvYHJwYkMoD3AZW5tLp2Pr4wp-pGDNLugMn30KadVDH2E3kIu9jV1fTf2QHdDY7XJ_Bc6cDsVe_9xLsJy-LCZv1ezz9X3yNKsMobyrnFTKtdI1slVtKyR1jeW8oUwoxBRSYy6loY2hRhGKhLWMNUgQhlHDG80IvQT42GtyKiVbV39lv9W5rzGqD6PUf0YZmNsjsynDx78AQVgKodTgPx59H13KW71PObR1p_uQsss6Gl9q-n_9Nyhkc0A</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Sidler, Michelle</creator><general>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</general><general>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>The Rhetoric of Cells: Understanding Molecular Biology in the Twenty-First Century</title><author>Sidler, Michelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-f799fd7fb7d9dd673fbe55b3469049098577c3bc3c92306ee44b062410b5ba423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Biology</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Evolutionary genetics</topic><topic>Genetic code</topic><topic>Genetic research</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Human genetics</topic><topic>Metaphors</topic><topic>Molecular biology</topic><topic>Scientific discourse</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sidler, Michelle</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Rhetoric review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sidler, Michelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Rhetoric of Cells: Understanding Molecular Biology in the Twenty-First Century</atitle><jtitle>Rhetoric review</jtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>58</spage><epage>75</epage><pages>58-75</pages><issn>0735-0198</issn><eissn>1532-7981</eissn><abstract>Recent discussions of metaphor illuminate its function as a paradigm-building trope with significant rhetorical and epistemological power. Historical and current discourse within biological science provide a complex and poignant example of metaphor's influence: Throughout much of the twentieth century, the field operated under a deterministic assumption that DNA is the "genetic code." Though this reductionist association still shapes biological research, postgenomic discoveries are now reconceiving the connection between DNA and cells in more complex ways. The ensuing scientific debate demonstrates that rhetoric and language have primary roles in the discourse of contemporary biology, creating a rhetoric of cells.</abstract><pub>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</pub><doi>10.1207/s15327981rr2501_4</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-0198
ispartof Rhetoric review, 2006-01, Vol.25 (1), p.58-75
issn 0735-0198
1532-7981
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1207_s15327981rr2501_4
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Biology
DNA
Evolutionary genetics
Genetic code
Genetic research
Genomes
Human genetics
Metaphors
Molecular biology
Scientific discourse
title The Rhetoric of Cells: Understanding Molecular Biology in the Twenty-First Century
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A23%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Rhetoric%20of%20Cells:%20Understanding%20Molecular%20Biology%20in%20the%20Twenty-First%20Century&rft.jtitle=Rhetoric%20review&rft.au=Sidler,%20Michelle&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=75&rft.pages=58-75&rft.issn=0735-0198&rft.eissn=1532-7981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1207/s15327981rr2501_4&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E20176699%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20176699&rfr_iscdi=true