Updating Situation Models From Descriptive Texts: A Test of the Situational Operator Model

A model of situation model construction suitable for descriptive text, called the Situational Operator Model, was tested in 2 experiments. It assumes that situation models for descriptions are built incrementally by using basic operations that are triggered by text content. In both experiments, part...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Discourse processes 2000-01, Vol.30 (3), p.201-236
Hauptverfasser: Millis, Keith K., King, Anne, Kim, Hyun-Jeong J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 236
container_issue 3
container_start_page 201
container_title Discourse processes
container_volume 30
creator Millis, Keith K.
King, Anne
Kim, Hyun-Jeong J.
description A model of situation model construction suitable for descriptive text, called the Situational Operator Model, was tested in 2 experiments. It assumes that situation models for descriptions are built incrementally by using basic operations that are triggered by text content. In both experiments, participants read and reread texts that described simple machines. Sentence reading times were predicted by the number of operations along with variables associated with text-level features. The impact of the number of operations predicted reading times more consistently for better readers than for poorer readers and for the second reading as opposed to the first. The presence of a drawing task (Experiment 1) or learning a diagram of the machines (Experiment 2) increased the correlation between the number of operators and reading time for better readers but lowered them for poorer readers (Experiment 1). The results provided initial support for the model, and its relation to other models of comprehension is discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1207/S15326950dp3003_1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1207_S15326950dp3003_1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>85533892</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-d9a86240957225440310c0e34c4cdf9946184f0098b8a237ad288ce12c2336083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAcxYMoOKd_gLecvFW_-dE2FS9jOhUmO2wD8RJimmqkbWqSqfvv7ajgQTx9H4_3eXx5CJ0SOCcU8oslSRnNihTKjgEwSfbQaGclO28fjYBkLBEpezxERyG8AQDleTZCT-uuVNG2L3hp46ZXrsUPrjR1wDPvGnxtgva2i_bD4JX5iuEST3oRInYVjq_mF1M1XnTGq-j80HCMDipVB3Pyc8doPbtZTe-S-eL2fjqZJ5rRPCZloURGORRpTmnKOTACGgzjmuuyKgqeEcErgEI8C0VZrkoqhDaEaspYBoKN0dnQ23n3vulfk40N2tS1ao3bBCnSlDFR0D5IhqD2LgRvKtl52yi_lQTkbkX5Z8WeuRoY21bON-rT-bqUUW1r5yuvWm2DZP_j3-bLeBk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85533892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Updating Situation Models From Descriptive Texts: A Test of the Situational Operator Model</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Millis, Keith K. ; King, Anne ; Kim, Hyun-Jeong J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Millis, Keith K. ; King, Anne ; Kim, Hyun-Jeong J.</creatorcontrib><description>A model of situation model construction suitable for descriptive text, called the Situational Operator Model, was tested in 2 experiments. It assumes that situation models for descriptions are built incrementally by using basic operations that are triggered by text content. In both experiments, participants read and reread texts that described simple machines. Sentence reading times were predicted by the number of operations along with variables associated with text-level features. The impact of the number of operations predicted reading times more consistently for better readers than for poorer readers and for the second reading as opposed to the first. The presence of a drawing task (Experiment 1) or learning a diagram of the machines (Experiment 2) increased the correlation between the number of operators and reading time for better readers but lowered them for poorer readers (Experiment 1). The results provided initial support for the model, and its relation to other models of comprehension is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-853X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6950</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1207/S15326950dp3003_1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DIPRDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</publisher><ispartof>Discourse processes, 2000-01, Vol.30 (3), p.201-236</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-d9a86240957225440310c0e34c4cdf9946184f0098b8a237ad288ce12c2336083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-d9a86240957225440310c0e34c4cdf9946184f0098b8a237ad288ce12c2336083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/S15326950dp3003_1$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1207/S15326950dp3003_1$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,59646,60435</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Millis, Keith K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun-Jeong J.</creatorcontrib><title>Updating Situation Models From Descriptive Texts: A Test of the Situational Operator Model</title><title>Discourse processes</title><description>A model of situation model construction suitable for descriptive text, called the Situational Operator Model, was tested in 2 experiments. It assumes that situation models for descriptions are built incrementally by using basic operations that are triggered by text content. In both experiments, participants read and reread texts that described simple machines. Sentence reading times were predicted by the number of operations along with variables associated with text-level features. The impact of the number of operations predicted reading times more consistently for better readers than for poorer readers and for the second reading as opposed to the first. The presence of a drawing task (Experiment 1) or learning a diagram of the machines (Experiment 2) increased the correlation between the number of operators and reading time for better readers but lowered them for poorer readers (Experiment 1). The results provided initial support for the model, and its relation to other models of comprehension is discussed.</description><issn>0163-853X</issn><issn>1532-6950</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAcxYMoOKd_gLecvFW_-dE2FS9jOhUmO2wD8RJimmqkbWqSqfvv7ajgQTx9H4_3eXx5CJ0SOCcU8oslSRnNihTKjgEwSfbQaGclO28fjYBkLBEpezxERyG8AQDleTZCT-uuVNG2L3hp46ZXrsUPrjR1wDPvGnxtgva2i_bD4JX5iuEST3oRInYVjq_mF1M1XnTGq-j80HCMDipVB3Pyc8doPbtZTe-S-eL2fjqZJ5rRPCZloURGORRpTmnKOTACGgzjmuuyKgqeEcErgEI8C0VZrkoqhDaEaspYBoKN0dnQ23n3vulfk40N2tS1ao3bBCnSlDFR0D5IhqD2LgRvKtl52yi_lQTkbkX5Z8WeuRoY21bON-rT-bqUUW1r5yuvWm2DZP_j3-bLeBk</recordid><startdate>20000101</startdate><enddate>20000101</enddate><creator>Millis, Keith K.</creator><creator>King, Anne</creator><creator>Kim, Hyun-Jeong J.</creator><general>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000101</creationdate><title>Updating Situation Models From Descriptive Texts: A Test of the Situational Operator Model</title><author>Millis, Keith K. ; King, Anne ; Kim, Hyun-Jeong J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-d9a86240957225440310c0e34c4cdf9946184f0098b8a237ad288ce12c2336083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Millis, Keith K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun-Jeong J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Discourse processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Millis, Keith K.</au><au>King, Anne</au><au>Kim, Hyun-Jeong J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Updating Situation Models From Descriptive Texts: A Test of the Situational Operator Model</atitle><jtitle>Discourse processes</jtitle><date>2000-01-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>236</epage><pages>201-236</pages><issn>0163-853X</issn><eissn>1532-6950</eissn><coden>DIPRDG</coden><abstract>A model of situation model construction suitable for descriptive text, called the Situational Operator Model, was tested in 2 experiments. It assumes that situation models for descriptions are built incrementally by using basic operations that are triggered by text content. In both experiments, participants read and reread texts that described simple machines. Sentence reading times were predicted by the number of operations along with variables associated with text-level features. The impact of the number of operations predicted reading times more consistently for better readers than for poorer readers and for the second reading as opposed to the first. The presence of a drawing task (Experiment 1) or learning a diagram of the machines (Experiment 2) increased the correlation between the number of operators and reading time for better readers but lowered them for poorer readers (Experiment 1). The results provided initial support for the model, and its relation to other models of comprehension is discussed.</abstract><pub>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</pub><doi>10.1207/S15326950dp3003_1</doi><tpages>36</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0163-853X
ispartof Discourse processes, 2000-01, Vol.30 (3), p.201-236
issn 0163-853X
1532-6950
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1207_S15326950dp3003_1
source Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
title Updating Situation Models From Descriptive Texts: A Test of the Situational Operator Model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A09%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Updating%20Situation%20Models%20From%20Descriptive%20Texts:%20A%20Test%20of%20the%20Situational%20Operator%20Model&rft.jtitle=Discourse%20processes&rft.au=Millis,%20Keith%20K.&rft.date=2000-01-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=236&rft.pages=201-236&rft.issn=0163-853X&rft.eissn=1532-6950&rft.coden=DIPRDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1207/S15326950dp3003_1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85533892%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85533892&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true