769 Is the Eosinophyl Cationic Protein a Predictive Marker of Allergic Risk in Newborns?

Aim: To evaluate a) relationships between eosinophyl cationic protein (ECP) in cord blood serum and eosinophyl counts (EC) in nasal and rectal mucosas in newborns with family history of allergic diseases (FHa) and intrauterine exposition to allergens (IEA); b) to set up a diagnostic score for the pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatric research 2010-11, Vol.68 (Suppl 1), p.389-389
Hauptverfasser: Baldassarre, M E, Frezza, R, Laforgia, N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 389
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page 389
container_title Pediatric research
container_volume 68
creator Baldassarre, M E
Frezza, R
Laforgia, N
description Aim: To evaluate a) relationships between eosinophyl cationic protein (ECP) in cord blood serum and eosinophyl counts (EC) in nasal and rectal mucosas in newborns with family history of allergic diseases (FHa) and intrauterine exposition to allergens (IEA); b) to set up a diagnostic score for the predictivity of allergic diseases. Patients and Methods: 27 newborns (13 F, mean GA : 277 days, mean BW: 3890 g) were included ; FHa and IEA was evaluated, a blood sample collected from cord blood to measure serum ECP, nasal and rectal tampons executed at birth to count eosinophyls. Statist ical analysis: Anova test and t-student test. Results: 11 newborns had FHa, and 2 had IEA (group A). We attributed a score from 0 to 3 at the FHa and the IEA. Group A got 11 points, while the group without a family risk of atopy got 4 points. The mean values of ECP value was 65.5 µ/ml in group A and 7.8 µ/ml in group B (p< 0.05). The exposition frequency was 61% in group A and 33% in group B. The cytologic research did not find any eosinophilic cell in rectal or nasal mucosa. Conclusions: The difference of exposition frequencies between the 2 groups suggests more intensive eosinofilic activation in exposed newborns. The identification of newborns at “extremely high atopic risk” (ECP>13,5 µg/l, FHa and IEA) with the assignment of a diagnostic score in clinical practice can be useful to apply early environmental and dietary prevention measures.
doi_str_mv 10.1203/00006450-201011001-00769
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_sprin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1203_00006450_201011001_00769</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1203_00006450_201011001_00769</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1499-d3604367663ed50257d16ce35113f67e947a0169ee1d95092a8633607d6a632d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQAC0EEqXwD_6BwG78SHxCVVWgUnkIgcQtMsmmdRtiZAdQ_x5DgSu-rA8zq9UwxhFOMQdxBulpqSDLAQERADOAQps9NkIlIAMpi302AhCYCWPKQ3YU4zphUpVyxJ4SyueRDyviMx9d719X245P7eB872p-F_xAruc2_ahx9eDeiV_bsKHAfcsnXUdhmbh7Fzc8cTf08exDH8-P2UFru0gnP3PMHi9mD9OrbHF7OZ9OFlmN0pisERqk0IXWghoFuSoa1DUJhShaXZCRhQXUhggbo8DkttQiOUWjrRZ5I8as3O2tg48xUFu9Bvdiw7ZCqL4KVb-Fqr9C1XehpJqdGpPSLylUa_8W-nTt_-4nvR9nEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>769 Is the Eosinophyl Cationic Protein a Predictive Marker of Allergic Risk in Newborns?</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Baldassarre, M E ; Frezza, R ; Laforgia, N</creator><creatorcontrib>Baldassarre, M E ; Frezza, R ; Laforgia, N</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: To evaluate a) relationships between eosinophyl cationic protein (ECP) in cord blood serum and eosinophyl counts (EC) in nasal and rectal mucosas in newborns with family history of allergic diseases (FHa) and intrauterine exposition to allergens (IEA); b) to set up a diagnostic score for the predictivity of allergic diseases. Patients and Methods: 27 newborns (13 F, mean GA : 277 days, mean BW: 3890 g) were included ; FHa and IEA was evaluated, a blood sample collected from cord blood to measure serum ECP, nasal and rectal tampons executed at birth to count eosinophyls. Statist ical analysis: Anova test and t-student test. Results: 11 newborns had FHa, and 2 had IEA (group A). We attributed a score from 0 to 3 at the FHa and the IEA. Group A got 11 points, while the group without a family risk of atopy got 4 points. The mean values of ECP value was 65.5 µ/ml in group A and 7.8 µ/ml in group B (p&lt; 0.05). The exposition frequency was 61% in group A and 33% in group B. The cytologic research did not find any eosinophilic cell in rectal or nasal mucosa. Conclusions: The difference of exposition frequencies between the 2 groups suggests more intensive eosinofilic activation in exposed newborns. The identification of newborns at “extremely high atopic risk” (ECP&gt;13,5 µg/l, FHa and IEA) with the assignment of a diagnostic score in clinical practice can be useful to apply early environmental and dietary prevention measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-3998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0447</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1203/00006450-201011001-00769</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Nature Publishing Group US</publisher><subject>Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Pediatric Surgery ; Pediatrics</subject><ispartof>Pediatric research, 2010-11, Vol.68 (Suppl 1), p.389-389</ispartof><rights>International Pediatrics Research Foundation, Inc. 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1203/00006450-201011001-00769$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1203/00006450-201011001-00769$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baldassarre, M E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frezza, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laforgia, N</creatorcontrib><title>769 Is the Eosinophyl Cationic Protein a Predictive Marker of Allergic Risk in Newborns?</title><title>Pediatric research</title><addtitle>Pediatr Res</addtitle><description>Aim: To evaluate a) relationships between eosinophyl cationic protein (ECP) in cord blood serum and eosinophyl counts (EC) in nasal and rectal mucosas in newborns with family history of allergic diseases (FHa) and intrauterine exposition to allergens (IEA); b) to set up a diagnostic score for the predictivity of allergic diseases. Patients and Methods: 27 newborns (13 F, mean GA : 277 days, mean BW: 3890 g) were included ; FHa and IEA was evaluated, a blood sample collected from cord blood to measure serum ECP, nasal and rectal tampons executed at birth to count eosinophyls. Statist ical analysis: Anova test and t-student test. Results: 11 newborns had FHa, and 2 had IEA (group A). We attributed a score from 0 to 3 at the FHa and the IEA. Group A got 11 points, while the group without a family risk of atopy got 4 points. The mean values of ECP value was 65.5 µ/ml in group A and 7.8 µ/ml in group B (p&lt; 0.05). The exposition frequency was 61% in group A and 33% in group B. The cytologic research did not find any eosinophilic cell in rectal or nasal mucosa. Conclusions: The difference of exposition frequencies between the 2 groups suggests more intensive eosinofilic activation in exposed newborns. The identification of newborns at “extremely high atopic risk” (ECP&gt;13,5 µg/l, FHa and IEA) with the assignment of a diagnostic score in clinical practice can be useful to apply early environmental and dietary prevention measures.</description><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Pediatric Surgery</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><issn>0031-3998</issn><issn>1530-0447</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQAC0EEqXwD_6BwG78SHxCVVWgUnkIgcQtMsmmdRtiZAdQ_x5DgSu-rA8zq9UwxhFOMQdxBulpqSDLAQERADOAQps9NkIlIAMpi302AhCYCWPKQ3YU4zphUpVyxJ4SyueRDyviMx9d719X245P7eB872p-F_xAruc2_ahx9eDeiV_bsKHAfcsnXUdhmbh7Fzc8cTf08exDH8-P2UFru0gnP3PMHi9mD9OrbHF7OZ9OFlmN0pisERqk0IXWghoFuSoa1DUJhShaXZCRhQXUhggbo8DkttQiOUWjrRZ5I8as3O2tg48xUFu9Bvdiw7ZCqL4KVb-Fqr9C1XehpJqdGpPSLylUa_8W-nTt_-4nvR9nEg</recordid><startdate>201011</startdate><enddate>201011</enddate><creator>Baldassarre, M E</creator><creator>Frezza, R</creator><creator>Laforgia, N</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group US</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201011</creationdate><title>769 Is the Eosinophyl Cationic Protein a Predictive Marker of Allergic Risk in Newborns?</title><author>Baldassarre, M E ; Frezza, R ; Laforgia, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1499-d3604367663ed50257d16ce35113f67e947a0169ee1d95092a8633607d6a632d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Pediatric Surgery</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baldassarre, M E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frezza, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laforgia, N</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Pediatric research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baldassarre, M E</au><au>Frezza, R</au><au>Laforgia, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>769 Is the Eosinophyl Cationic Protein a Predictive Marker of Allergic Risk in Newborns?</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric research</jtitle><stitle>Pediatr Res</stitle><date>2010-11</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>389</spage><epage>389</epage><pages>389-389</pages><issn>0031-3998</issn><eissn>1530-0447</eissn><abstract>Aim: To evaluate a) relationships between eosinophyl cationic protein (ECP) in cord blood serum and eosinophyl counts (EC) in nasal and rectal mucosas in newborns with family history of allergic diseases (FHa) and intrauterine exposition to allergens (IEA); b) to set up a diagnostic score for the predictivity of allergic diseases. Patients and Methods: 27 newborns (13 F, mean GA : 277 days, mean BW: 3890 g) were included ; FHa and IEA was evaluated, a blood sample collected from cord blood to measure serum ECP, nasal and rectal tampons executed at birth to count eosinophyls. Statist ical analysis: Anova test and t-student test. Results: 11 newborns had FHa, and 2 had IEA (group A). We attributed a score from 0 to 3 at the FHa and the IEA. Group A got 11 points, while the group without a family risk of atopy got 4 points. The mean values of ECP value was 65.5 µ/ml in group A and 7.8 µ/ml in group B (p&lt; 0.05). The exposition frequency was 61% in group A and 33% in group B. The cytologic research did not find any eosinophilic cell in rectal or nasal mucosa. Conclusions: The difference of exposition frequencies between the 2 groups suggests more intensive eosinofilic activation in exposed newborns. The identification of newborns at “extremely high atopic risk” (ECP&gt;13,5 µg/l, FHa and IEA) with the assignment of a diagnostic score in clinical practice can be useful to apply early environmental and dietary prevention measures.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group US</pub><doi>10.1203/00006450-201011001-00769</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-3998
ispartof Pediatric research, 2010-11, Vol.68 (Suppl 1), p.389-389
issn 0031-3998
1530-0447
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1203_00006450_201011001_00769
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Pediatric Surgery
Pediatrics
title 769 Is the Eosinophyl Cationic Protein a Predictive Marker of Allergic Risk in Newborns?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T21%3A57%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_sprin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=769%20Is%20the%20Eosinophyl%20Cationic%20Protein%20a%20Predictive%20Marker%20of%20Allergic%20Risk%20in%20Newborns?&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20research&rft.au=Baldassarre,%20M%20E&rft.date=2010-11&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=389&rft.epage=389&rft.pages=389-389&rft.issn=0031-3998&rft.eissn=1530-0447&rft_id=info:doi/10.1203/00006450-201011001-00769&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_sprin%3E10_1203_00006450_201011001_00769%3C/crossref_sprin%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true