Lack of Standardized Coding Limits Accuracy of Electronic Clinical Quality Measure for Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis

Introduction: ASH Guidelines for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) start with risk assessment using a pretest probability tool (PTP) followed by D-dimer testing or CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) depending on risk. We aimed to develop an electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) to encourage bro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood 2023-11, Vol.142 (Supplement 1), p.3687-3687
Hauptverfasser: Baumann Kreuziger, Lisa, Keenan, Megan, Dykhoff, Hayley, Hall, Marie, Campbell, Kyle, Cahill, Emily, Hanson, Ryan, McEvoy, Dustin, He, Wei, Dutta, Sayon, Rosovsky, Rachel P., Houghton, Damon E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3687
container_issue Supplement 1
container_start_page 3687
container_title Blood
container_volume 142
creator Baumann Kreuziger, Lisa
Keenan, Megan
Dykhoff, Hayley
Hall, Marie
Campbell, Kyle
Cahill, Emily
Hanson, Ryan
McEvoy, Dustin
He, Wei
Dutta, Sayon
Rosovsky, Rachel P.
Houghton, Damon E.
description Introduction: ASH Guidelines for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) start with risk assessment using a pretest probability tool (PTP) followed by D-dimer testing or CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) depending on risk. We aimed to develop an electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) to encourage broader use of a validated PTP scoring tool in emergency departments (EDs). The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services require reporting of eCQMs which consist of value sets or lists of standardized codes linked to patient data within the electronic health record. We sought to identify a standardized way to identify CTPA and abnormal D-dimer tests using administrative codes (i.e. CPT, LOINC, SNOMEDCT codes) across three institutions. Methods: Value sets identifying CTPA and D-dimers were reviewed from existing eCQMs. Three institutions representing 38 EDs from across the country submitted data from all ED encounters between September 12, 2022 and January 11, 2023. Imaging types were reviewed from each of the CPT codes and LOINC (Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes). We determined the number of ED encounters, pre-test probability tool use, and diagnosis of PE using different codes. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV, respectively). Results: Over the 4-month study period, 270,214 encounters were identified across 38 EDs. Each institution identified CTPA with site-specific codes (Table 1). The Full CTPA Value Set identified 55% more encounters than the site-specific codes (Full set 15,054/9679 site-specific codes). LOINC code 88322-3 was only used at one site. CPT code 71275 had the best sensitivity and specificity, but still had false positives (PPV 82%) (Table 2). D-dimer values were identified as LOINC code 48065-7 and 91556-1 at Site 1 and 48067-3 at Site 2. SNOMEDCT codes were not used at any site despite being the way other eCQMs identify elevated D-dimer results. Different D-dimer tests with different normal ranges were used at each site. All sites did not have an electronically extractable positive indicator for D-dimer. Conclusion: Due to persistent false positives using CPT Code 71275 for identification of CTPA, using this code would lead to inclusion of patients for whom PTP was not required or recommended. Additionally, coding for an abnormal D-dimer test result are not standardized across institutions. Therefore, administrative codes cannot be used to develop eCQMs whose aim is to eval
doi_str_mv 10.1182/blood-2023-180864
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1182_blood_2023_180864</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006497123102898</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0006497123102898</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1374-90d69ff39f895fbcd1c7d47c441aca97405637308855c63c1f69251076f80dd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAez8A4Fx7CS2WFWhPKQiQMDacv2oDE6M7ASpfD0pZc3qbuZc3TkInRO4IISXl-sQoylKKGlBOPCaHaAZqUpeAJRwiGYAUBdMNOQYneT8DkAYLasZyiulP3B0-GVQvVHJ-G9rcBuN7zd45Ts_ZLzQekxKb3dny2D1kGLvNW6Dn0IF_Dyq4IctfrAqj8liFxN-GkMXe5W2eNmtY_C5w9debfqYfT5FR06FbM_-co7ebpav7V2xery9bxerQhPasEKAqYVzVDguKrfWhujGsEYzRpRWomFQ1bShwHlV6Zpq4mpRVgSa2nEwRtA5IvtenWLOyTr5mXw3bZIE5M6a_LUmd9bk3trEXO0ZOw378jbJrL3ttTU-TZ9LE_0_9A_D_3X9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lack of Standardized Coding Limits Accuracy of Electronic Clinical Quality Measure for Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Baumann Kreuziger, Lisa ; Keenan, Megan ; Dykhoff, Hayley ; Hall, Marie ; Campbell, Kyle ; Cahill, Emily ; Hanson, Ryan ; McEvoy, Dustin ; He, Wei ; Dutta, Sayon ; Rosovsky, Rachel P. ; Houghton, Damon E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Baumann Kreuziger, Lisa ; Keenan, Megan ; Dykhoff, Hayley ; Hall, Marie ; Campbell, Kyle ; Cahill, Emily ; Hanson, Ryan ; McEvoy, Dustin ; He, Wei ; Dutta, Sayon ; Rosovsky, Rachel P. ; Houghton, Damon E.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: ASH Guidelines for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) start with risk assessment using a pretest probability tool (PTP) followed by D-dimer testing or CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) depending on risk. We aimed to develop an electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) to encourage broader use of a validated PTP scoring tool in emergency departments (EDs). The Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services require reporting of eCQMs which consist of value sets or lists of standardized codes linked to patient data within the electronic health record. We sought to identify a standardized way to identify CTPA and abnormal D-dimer tests using administrative codes (i.e. CPT, LOINC, SNOMEDCT codes) across three institutions. Methods: Value sets identifying CTPA and D-dimers were reviewed from existing eCQMs. Three institutions representing 38 EDs from across the country submitted data from all ED encounters between September 12, 2022 and January 11, 2023. Imaging types were reviewed from each of the CPT codes and LOINC (Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes). We determined the number of ED encounters, pre-test probability tool use, and diagnosis of PE using different codes. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV, respectively). Results: Over the 4-month study period, 270,214 encounters were identified across 38 EDs. Each institution identified CTPA with site-specific codes (Table 1). The Full CTPA Value Set identified 55% more encounters than the site-specific codes (Full set 15,054/9679 site-specific codes). LOINC code 88322-3 was only used at one site. CPT code 71275 had the best sensitivity and specificity, but still had false positives (PPV 82%) (Table 2). D-dimer values were identified as LOINC code 48065-7 and 91556-1 at Site 1 and 48067-3 at Site 2. SNOMEDCT codes were not used at any site despite being the way other eCQMs identify elevated D-dimer results. Different D-dimer tests with different normal ranges were used at each site. All sites did not have an electronically extractable positive indicator for D-dimer. Conclusion: Due to persistent false positives using CPT Code 71275 for identification of CTPA, using this code would lead to inclusion of patients for whom PTP was not required or recommended. Additionally, coding for an abnormal D-dimer test result are not standardized across institutions. Therefore, administrative codes cannot be used to develop eCQMs whose aim is to evaluate whether CTPA is ordered appropriately based on the PTP risk level and laboratory testing. Rosovsky:Pulmonary Embolism Response Team: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: President-Elect; BMS: Consultancy; Dova: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Research funding is to my institution, Research Funding; Abbott: Consultancy; Penumbra: Consultancy, Other: National Lead Investigator for STORM PE; Inari: Consultancy. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-4971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-180864</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Blood, 2023-11, Vol.142 (Supplement 1), p.3687-3687</ispartof><rights>2023 The American Society of Hematology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baumann Kreuziger, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keenan, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dykhoff, Hayley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cahill, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEvoy, Dustin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutta, Sayon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosovsky, Rachel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houghton, Damon E.</creatorcontrib><title>Lack of Standardized Coding Limits Accuracy of Electronic Clinical Quality Measure for Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis</title><title>Blood</title><description>Introduction: ASH Guidelines for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) start with risk assessment using a pretest probability tool (PTP) followed by D-dimer testing or CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) depending on risk. We aimed to develop an electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) to encourage broader use of a validated PTP scoring tool in emergency departments (EDs). The Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services require reporting of eCQMs which consist of value sets or lists of standardized codes linked to patient data within the electronic health record. We sought to identify a standardized way to identify CTPA and abnormal D-dimer tests using administrative codes (i.e. CPT, LOINC, SNOMEDCT codes) across three institutions. Methods: Value sets identifying CTPA and D-dimers were reviewed from existing eCQMs. Three institutions representing 38 EDs from across the country submitted data from all ED encounters between September 12, 2022 and January 11, 2023. Imaging types were reviewed from each of the CPT codes and LOINC (Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes). We determined the number of ED encounters, pre-test probability tool use, and diagnosis of PE using different codes. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV, respectively). Results: Over the 4-month study period, 270,214 encounters were identified across 38 EDs. Each institution identified CTPA with site-specific codes (Table 1). The Full CTPA Value Set identified 55% more encounters than the site-specific codes (Full set 15,054/9679 site-specific codes). LOINC code 88322-3 was only used at one site. CPT code 71275 had the best sensitivity and specificity, but still had false positives (PPV 82%) (Table 2). D-dimer values were identified as LOINC code 48065-7 and 91556-1 at Site 1 and 48067-3 at Site 2. SNOMEDCT codes were not used at any site despite being the way other eCQMs identify elevated D-dimer results. Different D-dimer tests with different normal ranges were used at each site. All sites did not have an electronically extractable positive indicator for D-dimer. Conclusion: Due to persistent false positives using CPT Code 71275 for identification of CTPA, using this code would lead to inclusion of patients for whom PTP was not required or recommended. Additionally, coding for an abnormal D-dimer test result are not standardized across institutions. Therefore, administrative codes cannot be used to develop eCQMs whose aim is to evaluate whether CTPA is ordered appropriately based on the PTP risk level and laboratory testing. Rosovsky:Pulmonary Embolism Response Team: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: President-Elect; BMS: Consultancy; Dova: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Research funding is to my institution, Research Funding; Abbott: Consultancy; Penumbra: Consultancy, Other: National Lead Investigator for STORM PE; Inari: Consultancy. [Display omitted]</description><issn>0006-4971</issn><issn>1528-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAez8A4Fx7CS2WFWhPKQiQMDacv2oDE6M7ASpfD0pZc3qbuZc3TkInRO4IISXl-sQoylKKGlBOPCaHaAZqUpeAJRwiGYAUBdMNOQYneT8DkAYLasZyiulP3B0-GVQvVHJ-G9rcBuN7zd45Ts_ZLzQekxKb3dny2D1kGLvNW6Dn0IF_Dyq4IctfrAqj8liFxN-GkMXe5W2eNmtY_C5w9debfqYfT5FR06FbM_-co7ebpav7V2xery9bxerQhPasEKAqYVzVDguKrfWhujGsEYzRpRWomFQ1bShwHlV6Zpq4mpRVgSa2nEwRtA5IvtenWLOyTr5mXw3bZIE5M6a_LUmd9bk3trEXO0ZOw378jbJrL3ttTU-TZ9LE_0_9A_D_3X9</recordid><startdate>20231102</startdate><enddate>20231102</enddate><creator>Baumann Kreuziger, Lisa</creator><creator>Keenan, Megan</creator><creator>Dykhoff, Hayley</creator><creator>Hall, Marie</creator><creator>Campbell, Kyle</creator><creator>Cahill, Emily</creator><creator>Hanson, Ryan</creator><creator>McEvoy, Dustin</creator><creator>He, Wei</creator><creator>Dutta, Sayon</creator><creator>Rosovsky, Rachel P.</creator><creator>Houghton, Damon E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231102</creationdate><title>Lack of Standardized Coding Limits Accuracy of Electronic Clinical Quality Measure for Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis</title><author>Baumann Kreuziger, Lisa ; Keenan, Megan ; Dykhoff, Hayley ; Hall, Marie ; Campbell, Kyle ; Cahill, Emily ; Hanson, Ryan ; McEvoy, Dustin ; He, Wei ; Dutta, Sayon ; Rosovsky, Rachel P. ; Houghton, Damon E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1374-90d69ff39f895fbcd1c7d47c441aca97405637308855c63c1f69251076f80dd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baumann Kreuziger, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keenan, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dykhoff, Hayley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cahill, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEvoy, Dustin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutta, Sayon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosovsky, Rachel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houghton, Damon E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Blood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baumann Kreuziger, Lisa</au><au>Keenan, Megan</au><au>Dykhoff, Hayley</au><au>Hall, Marie</au><au>Campbell, Kyle</au><au>Cahill, Emily</au><au>Hanson, Ryan</au><au>McEvoy, Dustin</au><au>He, Wei</au><au>Dutta, Sayon</au><au>Rosovsky, Rachel P.</au><au>Houghton, Damon E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lack of Standardized Coding Limits Accuracy of Electronic Clinical Quality Measure for Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis</atitle><jtitle>Blood</jtitle><date>2023-11-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>Supplement 1</issue><spage>3687</spage><epage>3687</epage><pages>3687-3687</pages><issn>0006-4971</issn><eissn>1528-0020</eissn><abstract>Introduction: ASH Guidelines for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) start with risk assessment using a pretest probability tool (PTP) followed by D-dimer testing or CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) depending on risk. We aimed to develop an electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) to encourage broader use of a validated PTP scoring tool in emergency departments (EDs). The Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services require reporting of eCQMs which consist of value sets or lists of standardized codes linked to patient data within the electronic health record. We sought to identify a standardized way to identify CTPA and abnormal D-dimer tests using administrative codes (i.e. CPT, LOINC, SNOMEDCT codes) across three institutions. Methods: Value sets identifying CTPA and D-dimers were reviewed from existing eCQMs. Three institutions representing 38 EDs from across the country submitted data from all ED encounters between September 12, 2022 and January 11, 2023. Imaging types were reviewed from each of the CPT codes and LOINC (Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes). We determined the number of ED encounters, pre-test probability tool use, and diagnosis of PE using different codes. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV, respectively). Results: Over the 4-month study period, 270,214 encounters were identified across 38 EDs. Each institution identified CTPA with site-specific codes (Table 1). The Full CTPA Value Set identified 55% more encounters than the site-specific codes (Full set 15,054/9679 site-specific codes). LOINC code 88322-3 was only used at one site. CPT code 71275 had the best sensitivity and specificity, but still had false positives (PPV 82%) (Table 2). D-dimer values were identified as LOINC code 48065-7 and 91556-1 at Site 1 and 48067-3 at Site 2. SNOMEDCT codes were not used at any site despite being the way other eCQMs identify elevated D-dimer results. Different D-dimer tests with different normal ranges were used at each site. All sites did not have an electronically extractable positive indicator for D-dimer. Conclusion: Due to persistent false positives using CPT Code 71275 for identification of CTPA, using this code would lead to inclusion of patients for whom PTP was not required or recommended. Additionally, coding for an abnormal D-dimer test result are not standardized across institutions. Therefore, administrative codes cannot be used to develop eCQMs whose aim is to evaluate whether CTPA is ordered appropriately based on the PTP risk level and laboratory testing. Rosovsky:Pulmonary Embolism Response Team: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: President-Elect; BMS: Consultancy; Dova: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Research funding is to my institution, Research Funding; Abbott: Consultancy; Penumbra: Consultancy, Other: National Lead Investigator for STORM PE; Inari: Consultancy. [Display omitted]</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1182/blood-2023-180864</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-4971
ispartof Blood, 2023-11, Vol.142 (Supplement 1), p.3687-3687
issn 0006-4971
1528-0020
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1182_blood_2023_180864
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Lack of Standardized Coding Limits Accuracy of Electronic Clinical Quality Measure for Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A25%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lack%20of%20Standardized%20Coding%20Limits%20Accuracy%20of%20Electronic%20Clinical%20Quality%20Measure%20for%20Pulmonary%20Embolism%20Diagnosis&rft.jtitle=Blood&rft.au=Baumann%20Kreuziger,%20Lisa&rft.date=2023-11-02&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=Supplement%201&rft.spage=3687&rft.epage=3687&rft.pages=3687-3687&rft.issn=0006-4971&rft.eissn=1528-0020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1182/blood-2023-180864&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0006497123102898%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0006497123102898&rfr_iscdi=true