Telemedicine in Hematology: Tool to Improve Access and Patient Satisfaction

Introduction: Telemedicine can transform the future of medicine, especially in rural settings by improving access to medical care. Here were present the patient satisfaction data from both telemedicine and regular visits in our Hematology & Oncology clinics. In Hematology, we have used tele medi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood 2021-11, Vol.138 (Supplement 1), p.4937-4937
Hauptverfasser: Master, Samip R, Ramadas, Poornima, Mansour, Richard Preston
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4937
container_issue Supplement 1
container_start_page 4937
container_title Blood
container_volume 138
creator Master, Samip R
Ramadas, Poornima
Mansour, Richard Preston
description Introduction: Telemedicine can transform the future of medicine, especially in rural settings by improving access to medical care. Here were present the patient satisfaction data from both telemedicine and regular visits in our Hematology & Oncology clinics. In Hematology, we have used tele medicine for sickle cell disease, benign hematology cases like iron deficiency, thrombocytopenia, leukocytosis etc., and in malignant hematology for new patient consults, toxicity checks, follow up of plasma cell disorders, chronic leukemias and low intensity chemotherapies. Methods: We retrospectively collected patient satisfaction survey data from March 2020 to April 2021 for both telemedicine and regular visits. The patients were allowed to give a score from 1 to 99 regarding their experience at visit. We collected data on the following: likelihood of recommending, care provider, access and overall assessment. Results: A total of 53 patient satisfaction survey were available for telemedicine and 462 for regular visits. Over 60 % of tele visits were non cancer related and 40% were cancer related. The average score for likelihood of recommending, care provider, access, and overall assessment for tele visit were 73.5, 41.5, 73.5 and 62 respectively. The average score for likelihood of recommending, care provider, access, and overall assessment for regular visit were 13.75, 7.5, 26.5, and 11 respectively. Conclusion: The patient satisfaction scores for likelihood of recommending, care provider, access and overall assessment were significantly better for tele visits compared to regular visits. Master: Blue Bird Bio: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company.
doi_str_mv 10.1182/blood-2021-152108
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1182_blood_2021_152108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006497121068300</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0006497121068300</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1858-46e80e7e3b5406c806c3b60718dc60007101dea92373225d62e5455e73076b223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLAzEUhIMoWKs_wFv-wOpLssmmeipFbbGgYD2HbPIqkd1NSZZC_72p9ezhMe8yw8xHyC2DO8Y0v2-7GH3FgbOKSc5An5FJeXQFwOGcTABAVfWsYZfkKudvAFYLLifkdYMd9uiDCwPSMNAl9naMXfw6PNBNjB0dI131uxT3SOfOYc7UDp6-2zHgMNKPonlr3RjicE0utrbLePOnU_L5_LRZLKv128tqMV9Xjmmpq1qhBmxQtLIG5XQ50SpomPZOlZ4NA-bRzrhoBOfSK46ylhIbAY1qORdTwk65LsWcE27NLoXepoNhYI40zC8Nc6RhTjSK5_HkwVJsHzCZ7MoAV5YndKPxMfzj_gHyUGX8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Telemedicine in Hematology: Tool to Improve Access and Patient Satisfaction</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Master, Samip R ; Ramadas, Poornima ; Mansour, Richard Preston</creator><creatorcontrib>Master, Samip R ; Ramadas, Poornima ; Mansour, Richard Preston</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Telemedicine can transform the future of medicine, especially in rural settings by improving access to medical care. Here were present the patient satisfaction data from both telemedicine and regular visits in our Hematology &amp; Oncology clinics. In Hematology, we have used tele medicine for sickle cell disease, benign hematology cases like iron deficiency, thrombocytopenia, leukocytosis etc., and in malignant hematology for new patient consults, toxicity checks, follow up of plasma cell disorders, chronic leukemias and low intensity chemotherapies. Methods: We retrospectively collected patient satisfaction survey data from March 2020 to April 2021 for both telemedicine and regular visits. The patients were allowed to give a score from 1 to 99 regarding their experience at visit. We collected data on the following: likelihood of recommending, care provider, access and overall assessment. Results: A total of 53 patient satisfaction survey were available for telemedicine and 462 for regular visits. Over 60 % of tele visits were non cancer related and 40% were cancer related. The average score for likelihood of recommending, care provider, access, and overall assessment for tele visit were 73.5, 41.5, 73.5 and 62 respectively. The average score for likelihood of recommending, care provider, access, and overall assessment for regular visit were 13.75, 7.5, 26.5, and 11 respectively. Conclusion: The patient satisfaction scores for likelihood of recommending, care provider, access and overall assessment were significantly better for tele visits compared to regular visits. Master: Blue Bird Bio: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-4971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1182/blood-2021-152108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Blood, 2021-11, Vol.138 (Supplement 1), p.4937-4937</ispartof><rights>2021 American Society of Hematology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1858-46e80e7e3b5406c806c3b60718dc60007101dea92373225d62e5455e73076b223</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Master, Samip R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramadas, Poornima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansour, Richard Preston</creatorcontrib><title>Telemedicine in Hematology: Tool to Improve Access and Patient Satisfaction</title><title>Blood</title><description>Introduction: Telemedicine can transform the future of medicine, especially in rural settings by improving access to medical care. Here were present the patient satisfaction data from both telemedicine and regular visits in our Hematology &amp; Oncology clinics. In Hematology, we have used tele medicine for sickle cell disease, benign hematology cases like iron deficiency, thrombocytopenia, leukocytosis etc., and in malignant hematology for new patient consults, toxicity checks, follow up of plasma cell disorders, chronic leukemias and low intensity chemotherapies. Methods: We retrospectively collected patient satisfaction survey data from March 2020 to April 2021 for both telemedicine and regular visits. The patients were allowed to give a score from 1 to 99 regarding their experience at visit. We collected data on the following: likelihood of recommending, care provider, access and overall assessment. Results: A total of 53 patient satisfaction survey were available for telemedicine and 462 for regular visits. Over 60 % of tele visits were non cancer related and 40% were cancer related. The average score for likelihood of recommending, care provider, access, and overall assessment for tele visit were 73.5, 41.5, 73.5 and 62 respectively. The average score for likelihood of recommending, care provider, access, and overall assessment for regular visit were 13.75, 7.5, 26.5, and 11 respectively. Conclusion: The patient satisfaction scores for likelihood of recommending, care provider, access and overall assessment were significantly better for tele visits compared to regular visits. Master: Blue Bird Bio: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company.</description><issn>0006-4971</issn><issn>1528-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFLAzEUhIMoWKs_wFv-wOpLssmmeipFbbGgYD2HbPIqkd1NSZZC_72p9ezhMe8yw8xHyC2DO8Y0v2-7GH3FgbOKSc5An5FJeXQFwOGcTABAVfWsYZfkKudvAFYLLifkdYMd9uiDCwPSMNAl9naMXfw6PNBNjB0dI131uxT3SOfOYc7UDp6-2zHgMNKPonlr3RjicE0utrbLePOnU_L5_LRZLKv128tqMV9Xjmmpq1qhBmxQtLIG5XQ50SpomPZOlZ4NA-bRzrhoBOfSK46ylhIbAY1qORdTwk65LsWcE27NLoXepoNhYI40zC8Nc6RhTjSK5_HkwVJsHzCZ7MoAV5YndKPxMfzj_gHyUGX8</recordid><startdate>20211123</startdate><enddate>20211123</enddate><creator>Master, Samip R</creator><creator>Ramadas, Poornima</creator><creator>Mansour, Richard Preston</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211123</creationdate><title>Telemedicine in Hematology: Tool to Improve Access and Patient Satisfaction</title><author>Master, Samip R ; Ramadas, Poornima ; Mansour, Richard Preston</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1858-46e80e7e3b5406c806c3b60718dc60007101dea92373225d62e5455e73076b223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Master, Samip R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramadas, Poornima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansour, Richard Preston</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Blood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Master, Samip R</au><au>Ramadas, Poornima</au><au>Mansour, Richard Preston</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Telemedicine in Hematology: Tool to Improve Access and Patient Satisfaction</atitle><jtitle>Blood</jtitle><date>2021-11-23</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>Supplement 1</issue><spage>4937</spage><epage>4937</epage><pages>4937-4937</pages><issn>0006-4971</issn><eissn>1528-0020</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Telemedicine can transform the future of medicine, especially in rural settings by improving access to medical care. Here were present the patient satisfaction data from both telemedicine and regular visits in our Hematology &amp; Oncology clinics. In Hematology, we have used tele medicine for sickle cell disease, benign hematology cases like iron deficiency, thrombocytopenia, leukocytosis etc., and in malignant hematology for new patient consults, toxicity checks, follow up of plasma cell disorders, chronic leukemias and low intensity chemotherapies. Methods: We retrospectively collected patient satisfaction survey data from March 2020 to April 2021 for both telemedicine and regular visits. The patients were allowed to give a score from 1 to 99 regarding their experience at visit. We collected data on the following: likelihood of recommending, care provider, access and overall assessment. Results: A total of 53 patient satisfaction survey were available for telemedicine and 462 for regular visits. Over 60 % of tele visits were non cancer related and 40% were cancer related. The average score for likelihood of recommending, care provider, access, and overall assessment for tele visit were 73.5, 41.5, 73.5 and 62 respectively. The average score for likelihood of recommending, care provider, access, and overall assessment for regular visit were 13.75, 7.5, 26.5, and 11 respectively. Conclusion: The patient satisfaction scores for likelihood of recommending, care provider, access and overall assessment were significantly better for tele visits compared to regular visits. Master: Blue Bird Bio: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1182/blood-2021-152108</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-4971
ispartof Blood, 2021-11, Vol.138 (Supplement 1), p.4937-4937
issn 0006-4971
1528-0020
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1182_blood_2021_152108
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Telemedicine in Hematology: Tool to Improve Access and Patient Satisfaction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T14%3A32%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Telemedicine%20in%20Hematology:%20Tool%20to%20Improve%20Access%20and%20Patient%20Satisfaction&rft.jtitle=Blood&rft.au=Master,%20Samip%20R&rft.date=2021-11-23&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=Supplement%201&rft.spage=4937&rft.epage=4937&rft.pages=4937-4937&rft.issn=0006-4971&rft.eissn=1528-0020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1182/blood-2021-152108&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0006497121068300%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0006497121068300&rfr_iscdi=true