Factors Affecting Post-Transplant Relapse of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) in Children According on the Intensity of Conditioning
Background: Relapse of ALL remains the major cause of transplant failure. Relapse incidence after allo-HSCT is described in 30-40% of patients. Patients with ALL receive allo-HSCT with MAC more often because after RIC more relapses are expected. The aim: To compare the frequency of relapse after all...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Blood 2020-11, Vol.136 (Supplement 1), p.26-27 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 27 |
---|---|
container_issue | Supplement 1 |
container_start_page | 26 |
container_title | Blood |
container_volume | 136 |
creator | Semenova, Elena Vladimirovna Kozhokar, Polina Valerievna Paina, Olesia V Rakhmanova, Zhemal Zarifovna Frolova, Anastasia S Tsvetkova, Luibov Ekushov, Kirill Alexandrovich Bykova, Tatiana A Osipova, Anna A. Markova, Inna Bondarenko, Sergey N. Smirnov, Boris I Barkhatov, Ildar M Gindina, Tatyana L. Moiseev, Ivan S. Zander, Axel R. Zubarovskaya, Ludmila S |
description | Background:
Relapse of ALL remains the major cause of transplant failure. Relapse incidence after allo-HSCT is described in 30-40% of patients. Patients with ALL receive allo-HSCT with MAC more often because after RIC more relapses are expected.
The aim: To compare the frequency of relapse after allo-HSCT with RIC vs with MAC and to analyze the factors influencing the risk of relapse depending on the intensity of conditioning regimens.
Patients and methods:
Between 12/2000 and 09/2019 at RM Gorbacheva Research Institute a total of 235 children with ALL (median age of 10 years (0,5-18), underwent allo-HSCT. MAC (busulfan- or treosulfan-based) were used in 163 pts: 1st CR - 30 pts (MRD+ n=13), 2nd CR - 58 pts, 3rd or 4 CR - 27 pts, relapse - 48 pts. Allo-HSCT with RIC were performed in 72 pts: 1st CR - 12 pts (MRD+ n=9), 2nd CR - 29 pts, 3rd or 4 CR - 14 pts, relapse -17 pts. RIC consisted of fludarabine (30 mg/m2/d x 5 days) + melphalan (70 mg/m2/d x 2 days) or fludarabine (30 mg/m2/d x 5 days) + busulfan (4 mg/kg/d x 2 days). Matched related allo-HSCT was performed in 37 pts (16%), matched unrelated - in 128 pts (54%), haploidentical-in 70 pts (30%).
Cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate relapse incidence and NRM in a competing risk setting. Univariate analyses were performed using Grey test for cumulative incidences. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional-hazard model.
Results:
Median follow-up was 5,4 and 4,5 years for МАС and RIC, respectively. Relapses were diagnosed in 105 pts (44%) during 1-39 months after allo-HSCT (median 7.5 months) (90% relapses were during first 18 mo), 74 pts after MAC; 31 pts after RIC (p=0,549). Relapses occurred significantly less frequent (p=0,007) in patients who had CR at the moment of allo-HSCT - 61 pts (35%) (RIC -32%; MAC -37%) compared patients who had a relapse or primary resistance 44 pts (68%) (RIC-74%; MAC - 65%). The risk of relapse after MAC is influenced by the presence of acute GVHD (p=0,007), the source of HSCs (PBSC vs BM, p=0,032), and the status of the disease (CR vs relapse) at the moment of allo-HSCT (p=0,001). The risk of relapse after RIC is influenced by the presence of acute GVHD (p=0,042), age at the moment of allo-HSCT 1-10 years (p=0,032), and the status of the disease (CR vs relapse) at the moment of allo-HSCT (p=0,001).
Multivariable analysis confirmed a significant impact of disease status at the moment of allo-HSCT whit MAC (p=0,001) and with RIC (p=0,00 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1182/blood-2020-139466 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1182_blood_2020_139466</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006497118733338</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0006497118733338</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1376-83aee9b12d34ac98d186a8fb75be544db5d9e5ad8fbc1d5381cee49bff685b843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKxDAURYMoOI5-gLssdRFN2rST4qoURwcKiozrkCavTrSTDEkU5gf8blvHtasHl3suj4PQJaM3jInsthu8NySjGSUsr3hZHqEZKzJB6BgdoxmltCS8WrBTdBbjO6WM51kxQ99LpZMPEdd9DzpZ94affUxkHZSLu0G5hF9gULsI2Pe41p8JcLvf7ja-G1RMVuMWPj9gaxW-qtv2GluHm40dTAA31rUPZtr0DqcN4JVL4KJN-2ms8c7YZL0bC-fopFdDhIu_O0evy_t180jap4dVU7dEs3xREpErgKpjmcm50pUwTJRK9N2i6KDg3HSFqaBQZow0M0UumAbgVdf3pSg6wfM5YoddHXyMAXq5C3arwl4yKieR8leknETKg8iRuTswMD72ZSHIqC04DcaGUZk03v5D_wCF134s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors Affecting Post-Transplant Relapse of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) in Children According on the Intensity of Conditioning</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Semenova, Elena Vladimirovna ; Kozhokar, Polina Valerievna ; Paina, Olesia V ; Rakhmanova, Zhemal Zarifovna ; Frolova, Anastasia S ; Tsvetkova, Luibov ; Ekushov, Kirill Alexandrovich ; Bykova, Tatiana A ; Osipova, Anna A. ; Markova, Inna ; Bondarenko, Sergey N. ; Smirnov, Boris I ; Barkhatov, Ildar M ; Gindina, Tatyana L. ; Moiseev, Ivan S. ; Zander, Axel R. ; Zubarovskaya, Ludmila S</creator><creatorcontrib>Semenova, Elena Vladimirovna ; Kozhokar, Polina Valerievna ; Paina, Olesia V ; Rakhmanova, Zhemal Zarifovna ; Frolova, Anastasia S ; Tsvetkova, Luibov ; Ekushov, Kirill Alexandrovich ; Bykova, Tatiana A ; Osipova, Anna A. ; Markova, Inna ; Bondarenko, Sergey N. ; Smirnov, Boris I ; Barkhatov, Ildar M ; Gindina, Tatyana L. ; Moiseev, Ivan S. ; Zander, Axel R. ; Zubarovskaya, Ludmila S</creatorcontrib><description>Background:
Relapse of ALL remains the major cause of transplant failure. Relapse incidence after allo-HSCT is described in 30-40% of patients. Patients with ALL receive allo-HSCT with MAC more often because after RIC more relapses are expected.
The aim: To compare the frequency of relapse after allo-HSCT with RIC vs with MAC and to analyze the factors influencing the risk of relapse depending on the intensity of conditioning regimens.
Patients and methods:
Between 12/2000 and 09/2019 at RM Gorbacheva Research Institute a total of 235 children with ALL (median age of 10 years (0,5-18), underwent allo-HSCT. MAC (busulfan- or treosulfan-based) were used in 163 pts: 1st CR - 30 pts (MRD+ n=13), 2nd CR - 58 pts, 3rd or 4 CR - 27 pts, relapse - 48 pts. Allo-HSCT with RIC were performed in 72 pts: 1st CR - 12 pts (MRD+ n=9), 2nd CR - 29 pts, 3rd or 4 CR - 14 pts, relapse -17 pts. RIC consisted of fludarabine (30 mg/m2/d x 5 days) + melphalan (70 mg/m2/d x 2 days) or fludarabine (30 mg/m2/d x 5 days) + busulfan (4 mg/kg/d x 2 days). Matched related allo-HSCT was performed in 37 pts (16%), matched unrelated - in 128 pts (54%), haploidentical-in 70 pts (30%).
Cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate relapse incidence and NRM in a competing risk setting. Univariate analyses were performed using Grey test for cumulative incidences. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional-hazard model.
Results:
Median follow-up was 5,4 and 4,5 years for МАС and RIC, respectively. Relapses were diagnosed in 105 pts (44%) during 1-39 months after allo-HSCT (median 7.5 months) (90% relapses were during first 18 mo), 74 pts after MAC; 31 pts after RIC (p=0,549). Relapses occurred significantly less frequent (p=0,007) in patients who had CR at the moment of allo-HSCT - 61 pts (35%) (RIC -32%; MAC -37%) compared patients who had a relapse or primary resistance 44 pts (68%) (RIC-74%; MAC - 65%). The risk of relapse after MAC is influenced by the presence of acute GVHD (p=0,007), the source of HSCs (PBSC vs BM, p=0,032), and the status of the disease (CR vs relapse) at the moment of allo-HSCT (p=0,001). The risk of relapse after RIC is influenced by the presence of acute GVHD (p=0,042), age at the moment of allo-HSCT 1-10 years (p=0,032), and the status of the disease (CR vs relapse) at the moment of allo-HSCT (p=0,001).
Multivariable analysis confirmed a significant impact of disease status at the moment of allo-HSCT whit MAC (p=0,001) and with RIC (p=0,002).
Presence of aGVHD was additional factor associated with lower relapse risk in multivariate analysis in pts after MAC (p=0,005).
Patients with active disease at the moment of HSCT had higher relapse-free survival after RIC (RIC-23% vs MAC- 12%, p=0,012). Salvage patients in whom the relapse was documented after HSCT had 28% and 38% probability of long-term OS after RIC and MAC, respectively (p=0,572).
Conclusion:
Relapse incidence after allo-HSCT with MAC and with RIC is comparable. The most significant factor affecting the risk of relapse is the status of the disease at the moment of allo-HSCT.
No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-4971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1182/blood-2020-139466</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Blood, 2020-11, Vol.136 (Supplement 1), p.26-27</ispartof><rights>2020 American Society of Hematology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Semenova, Elena Vladimirovna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozhokar, Polina Valerievna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paina, Olesia V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakhmanova, Zhemal Zarifovna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frolova, Anastasia S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsvetkova, Luibov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekushov, Kirill Alexandrovich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bykova, Tatiana A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osipova, Anna A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markova, Inna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bondarenko, Sergey N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smirnov, Boris I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barkhatov, Ildar M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gindina, Tatyana L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moiseev, Ivan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zander, Axel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zubarovskaya, Ludmila S</creatorcontrib><title>Factors Affecting Post-Transplant Relapse of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) in Children According on the Intensity of Conditioning</title><title>Blood</title><description>Background:
Relapse of ALL remains the major cause of transplant failure. Relapse incidence after allo-HSCT is described in 30-40% of patients. Patients with ALL receive allo-HSCT with MAC more often because after RIC more relapses are expected.
The aim: To compare the frequency of relapse after allo-HSCT with RIC vs with MAC and to analyze the factors influencing the risk of relapse depending on the intensity of conditioning regimens.
Patients and methods:
Between 12/2000 and 09/2019 at RM Gorbacheva Research Institute a total of 235 children with ALL (median age of 10 years (0,5-18), underwent allo-HSCT. MAC (busulfan- or treosulfan-based) were used in 163 pts: 1st CR - 30 pts (MRD+ n=13), 2nd CR - 58 pts, 3rd or 4 CR - 27 pts, relapse - 48 pts. Allo-HSCT with RIC were performed in 72 pts: 1st CR - 12 pts (MRD+ n=9), 2nd CR - 29 pts, 3rd or 4 CR - 14 pts, relapse -17 pts. RIC consisted of fludarabine (30 mg/m2/d x 5 days) + melphalan (70 mg/m2/d x 2 days) or fludarabine (30 mg/m2/d x 5 days) + busulfan (4 mg/kg/d x 2 days). Matched related allo-HSCT was performed in 37 pts (16%), matched unrelated - in 128 pts (54%), haploidentical-in 70 pts (30%).
Cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate relapse incidence and NRM in a competing risk setting. Univariate analyses were performed using Grey test for cumulative incidences. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional-hazard model.
Results:
Median follow-up was 5,4 and 4,5 years for МАС and RIC, respectively. Relapses were diagnosed in 105 pts (44%) during 1-39 months after allo-HSCT (median 7.5 months) (90% relapses were during first 18 mo), 74 pts after MAC; 31 pts after RIC (p=0,549). Relapses occurred significantly less frequent (p=0,007) in patients who had CR at the moment of allo-HSCT - 61 pts (35%) (RIC -32%; MAC -37%) compared patients who had a relapse or primary resistance 44 pts (68%) (RIC-74%; MAC - 65%). The risk of relapse after MAC is influenced by the presence of acute GVHD (p=0,007), the source of HSCs (PBSC vs BM, p=0,032), and the status of the disease (CR vs relapse) at the moment of allo-HSCT (p=0,001). The risk of relapse after RIC is influenced by the presence of acute GVHD (p=0,042), age at the moment of allo-HSCT 1-10 years (p=0,032), and the status of the disease (CR vs relapse) at the moment of allo-HSCT (p=0,001).
Multivariable analysis confirmed a significant impact of disease status at the moment of allo-HSCT whit MAC (p=0,001) and with RIC (p=0,002).
Presence of aGVHD was additional factor associated with lower relapse risk in multivariate analysis in pts after MAC (p=0,005).
Patients with active disease at the moment of HSCT had higher relapse-free survival after RIC (RIC-23% vs MAC- 12%, p=0,012). Salvage patients in whom the relapse was documented after HSCT had 28% and 38% probability of long-term OS after RIC and MAC, respectively (p=0,572).
Conclusion:
Relapse incidence after allo-HSCT with MAC and with RIC is comparable. The most significant factor affecting the risk of relapse is the status of the disease at the moment of allo-HSCT.
No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.</description><issn>0006-4971</issn><issn>1528-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFKxDAURYMoOI5-gLssdRFN2rST4qoURwcKiozrkCavTrSTDEkU5gf8blvHtasHl3suj4PQJaM3jInsthu8NySjGSUsr3hZHqEZKzJB6BgdoxmltCS8WrBTdBbjO6WM51kxQ99LpZMPEdd9DzpZ94affUxkHZSLu0G5hF9gULsI2Pe41p8JcLvf7ja-G1RMVuMWPj9gaxW-qtv2GluHm40dTAA31rUPZtr0DqcN4JVL4KJN-2ms8c7YZL0bC-fopFdDhIu_O0evy_t180jap4dVU7dEs3xREpErgKpjmcm50pUwTJRK9N2i6KDg3HSFqaBQZow0M0UumAbgVdf3pSg6wfM5YoddHXyMAXq5C3arwl4yKieR8leknETKg8iRuTswMD72ZSHIqC04DcaGUZk03v5D_wCF134s</recordid><startdate>20201105</startdate><enddate>20201105</enddate><creator>Semenova, Elena Vladimirovna</creator><creator>Kozhokar, Polina Valerievna</creator><creator>Paina, Olesia V</creator><creator>Rakhmanova, Zhemal Zarifovna</creator><creator>Frolova, Anastasia S</creator><creator>Tsvetkova, Luibov</creator><creator>Ekushov, Kirill Alexandrovich</creator><creator>Bykova, Tatiana A</creator><creator>Osipova, Anna A.</creator><creator>Markova, Inna</creator><creator>Bondarenko, Sergey N.</creator><creator>Smirnov, Boris I</creator><creator>Barkhatov, Ildar M</creator><creator>Gindina, Tatyana L.</creator><creator>Moiseev, Ivan S.</creator><creator>Zander, Axel R.</creator><creator>Zubarovskaya, Ludmila S</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201105</creationdate><title>Factors Affecting Post-Transplant Relapse of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) in Children According on the Intensity of Conditioning</title><author>Semenova, Elena Vladimirovna ; Kozhokar, Polina Valerievna ; Paina, Olesia V ; Rakhmanova, Zhemal Zarifovna ; Frolova, Anastasia S ; Tsvetkova, Luibov ; Ekushov, Kirill Alexandrovich ; Bykova, Tatiana A ; Osipova, Anna A. ; Markova, Inna ; Bondarenko, Sergey N. ; Smirnov, Boris I ; Barkhatov, Ildar M ; Gindina, Tatyana L. ; Moiseev, Ivan S. ; Zander, Axel R. ; Zubarovskaya, Ludmila S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1376-83aee9b12d34ac98d186a8fb75be544db5d9e5ad8fbc1d5381cee49bff685b843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Semenova, Elena Vladimirovna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozhokar, Polina Valerievna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paina, Olesia V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakhmanova, Zhemal Zarifovna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frolova, Anastasia S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsvetkova, Luibov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekushov, Kirill Alexandrovich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bykova, Tatiana A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osipova, Anna A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markova, Inna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bondarenko, Sergey N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smirnov, Boris I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barkhatov, Ildar M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gindina, Tatyana L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moiseev, Ivan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zander, Axel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zubarovskaya, Ludmila S</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Blood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Semenova, Elena Vladimirovna</au><au>Kozhokar, Polina Valerievna</au><au>Paina, Olesia V</au><au>Rakhmanova, Zhemal Zarifovna</au><au>Frolova, Anastasia S</au><au>Tsvetkova, Luibov</au><au>Ekushov, Kirill Alexandrovich</au><au>Bykova, Tatiana A</au><au>Osipova, Anna A.</au><au>Markova, Inna</au><au>Bondarenko, Sergey N.</au><au>Smirnov, Boris I</au><au>Barkhatov, Ildar M</au><au>Gindina, Tatyana L.</au><au>Moiseev, Ivan S.</au><au>Zander, Axel R.</au><au>Zubarovskaya, Ludmila S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors Affecting Post-Transplant Relapse of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) in Children According on the Intensity of Conditioning</atitle><jtitle>Blood</jtitle><date>2020-11-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>136</volume><issue>Supplement 1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>26-27</pages><issn>0006-4971</issn><eissn>1528-0020</eissn><abstract>Background:
Relapse of ALL remains the major cause of transplant failure. Relapse incidence after allo-HSCT is described in 30-40% of patients. Patients with ALL receive allo-HSCT with MAC more often because after RIC more relapses are expected.
The aim: To compare the frequency of relapse after allo-HSCT with RIC vs with MAC and to analyze the factors influencing the risk of relapse depending on the intensity of conditioning regimens.
Patients and methods:
Between 12/2000 and 09/2019 at RM Gorbacheva Research Institute a total of 235 children with ALL (median age of 10 years (0,5-18), underwent allo-HSCT. MAC (busulfan- or treosulfan-based) were used in 163 pts: 1st CR - 30 pts (MRD+ n=13), 2nd CR - 58 pts, 3rd or 4 CR - 27 pts, relapse - 48 pts. Allo-HSCT with RIC were performed in 72 pts: 1st CR - 12 pts (MRD+ n=9), 2nd CR - 29 pts, 3rd or 4 CR - 14 pts, relapse -17 pts. RIC consisted of fludarabine (30 mg/m2/d x 5 days) + melphalan (70 mg/m2/d x 2 days) or fludarabine (30 mg/m2/d x 5 days) + busulfan (4 mg/kg/d x 2 days). Matched related allo-HSCT was performed in 37 pts (16%), matched unrelated - in 128 pts (54%), haploidentical-in 70 pts (30%).
Cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate relapse incidence and NRM in a competing risk setting. Univariate analyses were performed using Grey test for cumulative incidences. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional-hazard model.
Results:
Median follow-up was 5,4 and 4,5 years for МАС and RIC, respectively. Relapses were diagnosed in 105 pts (44%) during 1-39 months after allo-HSCT (median 7.5 months) (90% relapses were during first 18 mo), 74 pts after MAC; 31 pts after RIC (p=0,549). Relapses occurred significantly less frequent (p=0,007) in patients who had CR at the moment of allo-HSCT - 61 pts (35%) (RIC -32%; MAC -37%) compared patients who had a relapse or primary resistance 44 pts (68%) (RIC-74%; MAC - 65%). The risk of relapse after MAC is influenced by the presence of acute GVHD (p=0,007), the source of HSCs (PBSC vs BM, p=0,032), and the status of the disease (CR vs relapse) at the moment of allo-HSCT (p=0,001). The risk of relapse after RIC is influenced by the presence of acute GVHD (p=0,042), age at the moment of allo-HSCT 1-10 years (p=0,032), and the status of the disease (CR vs relapse) at the moment of allo-HSCT (p=0,001).
Multivariable analysis confirmed a significant impact of disease status at the moment of allo-HSCT whit MAC (p=0,001) and with RIC (p=0,002).
Presence of aGVHD was additional factor associated with lower relapse risk in multivariate analysis in pts after MAC (p=0,005).
Patients with active disease at the moment of HSCT had higher relapse-free survival after RIC (RIC-23% vs MAC- 12%, p=0,012). Salvage patients in whom the relapse was documented after HSCT had 28% and 38% probability of long-term OS after RIC and MAC, respectively (p=0,572).
Conclusion:
Relapse incidence after allo-HSCT with MAC and with RIC is comparable. The most significant factor affecting the risk of relapse is the status of the disease at the moment of allo-HSCT.
No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1182/blood-2020-139466</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-4971 |
ispartof | Blood, 2020-11, Vol.136 (Supplement 1), p.26-27 |
issn | 0006-4971 1528-0020 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1182_blood_2020_139466 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Factors Affecting Post-Transplant Relapse of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) in Children According on the Intensity of Conditioning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T21%3A54%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20Affecting%20Post-Transplant%20Relapse%20of%20Acute%20Lymphoblastic%20Leukemia%20(ALL)%20in%20Children%20According%20on%20the%20Intensity%20of%20Conditioning&rft.jtitle=Blood&rft.au=Semenova,%20Elena%20Vladimirovna&rft.date=2020-11-05&rft.volume=136&rft.issue=Supplement%201&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=26-27&rft.issn=0006-4971&rft.eissn=1528-0020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1182/blood-2020-139466&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0006497118733338%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0006497118733338&rfr_iscdi=true |