Contributions to Global Hematology from Low and Middle-Income Countries: Insights from ASH 2018

Background. Establishing research capacity in low and middle-income countries (LMIC) is key for improving health systems and implementing actionable programs through evidence-based assessments. Few studies have analyzed hematology research capacity in LMICs. The American Society of Hematology (ASH)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood 2019-11, Vol.134 (Supplement_1), p.2123-2123
Hauptverfasser: Gómez-De León, Andrés, Colunga Pedraza, Perla R., Tarín Arzaga, Luz del Carmen, Bugarin-Estrada, Emmanuel, Gómez-De León, David, Sung, Lillian, Gomez-Almaguer, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2123
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page 2123
container_title Blood
container_volume 134
creator Gómez-De León, Andrés
Colunga Pedraza, Perla R.
Tarín Arzaga, Luz del Carmen
Bugarin-Estrada, Emmanuel
Gómez-De León, David
Sung, Lillian
Gomez-Almaguer, David
description Background. Establishing research capacity in low and middle-income countries (LMIC) is key for improving health systems and implementing actionable programs through evidence-based assessments. Few studies have analyzed hematology research capacity in LMICs. The American Society of Hematology (ASH) annual meeting is the largest hematology event where peer-reviewed contributions from researchers worldwide are selected for presentation based on scientific merit. Therefore, it can provide a useful snapshot of the current status of hematology research in a single point in time. For this reason, we analyzed abstracts presented at the 2018 ASH annual meeting (ASH18) with a focus on those from authors working in a LMIC. Objective. To describe the proportion of abstracts presented at ASH18 from an LMIC and analyze their characteristics as a surrogate for academic contributions to global hematology. Methods. We reviewed all abstracts presented at ASH18 in an oral presentation or poster form published online in the supplemental edition of Blood 2018;132 (Suppl 1). LMICs were selected according to the World Bank classification including countries or territories with a gross national income
doi_str_mv 10.1182/blood-2019-130053
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1182_blood_2019_130053</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006497118600527</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0006497118600527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1423-43b49fae4d5c7dd5366b8d0bb7ac2ad418edfc5bdb1d75c55d3005205f3714c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAez8A4bxq0lhVUXQVCpiAawtv1KMkhjZKah_T0NYs7qbOaN7D0LXFG4oLdmtaWN0hAFdEsoBJD9BMypZSQAYnKIZACyIWBb0HF3k_AFABWdyhlQV-yEFsx9C7DMeIl630egW177TQ2zj7oCbFDu8jd9Y9w4_BedaTza9jZ3HVdyPuM93eNPnsHsf8nS-eqnxsU15ic4a3WZ_9Zdz9Pb48FrVZPu83lSrLbFUME4EN2LZaC-ctIVzki8WpnRgTKEt007Q0rvGSuMMdYW0UrpxJAPZ8IIKC3yO6PTXpphz8o36TKHT6aAoqNGQ-jWkRkNqMnRk7ifGH4t9BZ9UtsH31ruQvB2Ui-Ef-gcJvW5Z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contributions to Global Hematology from Low and Middle-Income Countries: Insights from ASH 2018</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gómez-De León, Andrés ; Colunga Pedraza, Perla R. ; Tarín Arzaga, Luz del Carmen ; Bugarin-Estrada, Emmanuel ; Gómez-De León, David ; Sung, Lillian ; Gomez-Almaguer, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Gómez-De León, Andrés ; Colunga Pedraza, Perla R. ; Tarín Arzaga, Luz del Carmen ; Bugarin-Estrada, Emmanuel ; Gómez-De León, David ; Sung, Lillian ; Gomez-Almaguer, David</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Establishing research capacity in low and middle-income countries (LMIC) is key for improving health systems and implementing actionable programs through evidence-based assessments. Few studies have analyzed hematology research capacity in LMICs. The American Society of Hematology (ASH) annual meeting is the largest hematology event where peer-reviewed contributions from researchers worldwide are selected for presentation based on scientific merit. Therefore, it can provide a useful snapshot of the current status of hematology research in a single point in time. For this reason, we analyzed abstracts presented at the 2018 ASH annual meeting (ASH18) with a focus on those from authors working in a LMIC. Objective. To describe the proportion of abstracts presented at ASH18 from an LMIC and analyze their characteristics as a surrogate for academic contributions to global hematology. Methods. We reviewed all abstracts presented at ASH18 in an oral presentation or poster form published online in the supplemental edition of Blood 2018;132 (Suppl 1). LMICs were selected according to the World Bank classification including countries or territories with a gross national income &lt;$12,056 USD per capita. We described all abstracts that had a co-author with an affiliation from an institution in a LMIC, regardless of their position. We categorized studies as clinical vs. basic and single vs. multicenter nature. We also identified the presence of conflict-of interest statements (COI) and identifiable industry sponsors. We compared abstracts that had co-authors from high-income countries (HIC+LMIC) vs. those from LMIC countries alone. Comparison across groups was performed using chi-square and Fisher's exact test. Results. A total of 4,871 abstracts presented at ASH 2018, with 1,026 oral presentations and 3,845 posters were available online. Among them, 510 abstracts (10.5%) had a contributing author from an institution in an LMIC, corresponding to 92 (9%) of all oral presentations and 418 (10.9%) of all posters (Figure 1). LMIC-only contributions represented 4.7% of all abstracts (n=229). The most common LMIC of origin for LMIC-only contributions was China with 133 (58.1%) (Figure 1). Most abstracts were clinical and multicentric in nature (62 and 70.2%, respectively), and in 42.5% of them a COI was reported. Clinical trials reflected 19% of all LMIC contributions. In 31.9% of cases the first author was affiliated to an institution in a HIC. Mixed LMIC/HIC contributions had significantly more COIs and industry sponsors than those from LMIC-only institutions (Table 1). When comparing between oral vs poster LMIC presentations, works selected for an oral presentation were significantly more clinical and multicentric, had a higher proportion of clinical trials, more COIs and identified industry sponsors (Table 2). Conclusions. LMICs, where more than 80% of the world population resides, were responsible for only a small fraction of contributions to ASH18, half of them representing a form of international collaboration, with a high number of COI disclosures. [Display omitted] Gomez-Almaguer:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Teva: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-4971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-130053</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Blood, 2019-11, Vol.134 (Supplement_1), p.2123-2123</ispartof><rights>2019 American Society of Hematology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1423-43b49fae4d5c7dd5366b8d0bb7ac2ad418edfc5bdb1d75c55d3005205f3714c03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gómez-De León, Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colunga Pedraza, Perla R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarín Arzaga, Luz del Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugarin-Estrada, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-De León, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Lillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez-Almaguer, David</creatorcontrib><title>Contributions to Global Hematology from Low and Middle-Income Countries: Insights from ASH 2018</title><title>Blood</title><description>Background. Establishing research capacity in low and middle-income countries (LMIC) is key for improving health systems and implementing actionable programs through evidence-based assessments. Few studies have analyzed hematology research capacity in LMICs. The American Society of Hematology (ASH) annual meeting is the largest hematology event where peer-reviewed contributions from researchers worldwide are selected for presentation based on scientific merit. Therefore, it can provide a useful snapshot of the current status of hematology research in a single point in time. For this reason, we analyzed abstracts presented at the 2018 ASH annual meeting (ASH18) with a focus on those from authors working in a LMIC. Objective. To describe the proportion of abstracts presented at ASH18 from an LMIC and analyze their characteristics as a surrogate for academic contributions to global hematology. Methods. We reviewed all abstracts presented at ASH18 in an oral presentation or poster form published online in the supplemental edition of Blood 2018;132 (Suppl 1). LMICs were selected according to the World Bank classification including countries or territories with a gross national income &lt;$12,056 USD per capita. We described all abstracts that had a co-author with an affiliation from an institution in a LMIC, regardless of their position. We categorized studies as clinical vs. basic and single vs. multicenter nature. We also identified the presence of conflict-of interest statements (COI) and identifiable industry sponsors. We compared abstracts that had co-authors from high-income countries (HIC+LMIC) vs. those from LMIC countries alone. Comparison across groups was performed using chi-square and Fisher's exact test. Results. A total of 4,871 abstracts presented at ASH 2018, with 1,026 oral presentations and 3,845 posters were available online. Among them, 510 abstracts (10.5%) had a contributing author from an institution in an LMIC, corresponding to 92 (9%) of all oral presentations and 418 (10.9%) of all posters (Figure 1). LMIC-only contributions represented 4.7% of all abstracts (n=229). The most common LMIC of origin for LMIC-only contributions was China with 133 (58.1%) (Figure 1). Most abstracts were clinical and multicentric in nature (62 and 70.2%, respectively), and in 42.5% of them a COI was reported. Clinical trials reflected 19% of all LMIC contributions. In 31.9% of cases the first author was affiliated to an institution in a HIC. Mixed LMIC/HIC contributions had significantly more COIs and industry sponsors than those from LMIC-only institutions (Table 1). When comparing between oral vs poster LMIC presentations, works selected for an oral presentation were significantly more clinical and multicentric, had a higher proportion of clinical trials, more COIs and identified industry sponsors (Table 2). Conclusions. LMICs, where more than 80% of the world population resides, were responsible for only a small fraction of contributions to ASH18, half of them representing a form of international collaboration, with a high number of COI disclosures. [Display omitted] Gomez-Almaguer:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Teva: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.</description><issn>0006-4971</issn><issn>1528-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAez8A4bxq0lhVUXQVCpiAawtv1KMkhjZKah_T0NYs7qbOaN7D0LXFG4oLdmtaWN0hAFdEsoBJD9BMypZSQAYnKIZACyIWBb0HF3k_AFABWdyhlQV-yEFsx9C7DMeIl630egW177TQ2zj7oCbFDu8jd9Y9w4_BedaTza9jZ3HVdyPuM93eNPnsHsf8nS-eqnxsU15ic4a3WZ_9Zdz9Pb48FrVZPu83lSrLbFUME4EN2LZaC-ctIVzki8WpnRgTKEt007Q0rvGSuMMdYW0UrpxJAPZ8IIKC3yO6PTXpphz8o36TKHT6aAoqNGQ-jWkRkNqMnRk7ifGH4t9BZ9UtsH31ruQvB2Ui-Ef-gcJvW5Z</recordid><startdate>20191113</startdate><enddate>20191113</enddate><creator>Gómez-De León, Andrés</creator><creator>Colunga Pedraza, Perla R.</creator><creator>Tarín Arzaga, Luz del Carmen</creator><creator>Bugarin-Estrada, Emmanuel</creator><creator>Gómez-De León, David</creator><creator>Sung, Lillian</creator><creator>Gomez-Almaguer, David</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191113</creationdate><title>Contributions to Global Hematology from Low and Middle-Income Countries: Insights from ASH 2018</title><author>Gómez-De León, Andrés ; Colunga Pedraza, Perla R. ; Tarín Arzaga, Luz del Carmen ; Bugarin-Estrada, Emmanuel ; Gómez-De León, David ; Sung, Lillian ; Gomez-Almaguer, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1423-43b49fae4d5c7dd5366b8d0bb7ac2ad418edfc5bdb1d75c55d3005205f3714c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gómez-De León, Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colunga Pedraza, Perla R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarín Arzaga, Luz del Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugarin-Estrada, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-De León, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Lillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez-Almaguer, David</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Blood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gómez-De León, Andrés</au><au>Colunga Pedraza, Perla R.</au><au>Tarín Arzaga, Luz del Carmen</au><au>Bugarin-Estrada, Emmanuel</au><au>Gómez-De León, David</au><au>Sung, Lillian</au><au>Gomez-Almaguer, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contributions to Global Hematology from Low and Middle-Income Countries: Insights from ASH 2018</atitle><jtitle>Blood</jtitle><date>2019-11-13</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><spage>2123</spage><epage>2123</epage><pages>2123-2123</pages><issn>0006-4971</issn><eissn>1528-0020</eissn><abstract>Background. Establishing research capacity in low and middle-income countries (LMIC) is key for improving health systems and implementing actionable programs through evidence-based assessments. Few studies have analyzed hematology research capacity in LMICs. The American Society of Hematology (ASH) annual meeting is the largest hematology event where peer-reviewed contributions from researchers worldwide are selected for presentation based on scientific merit. Therefore, it can provide a useful snapshot of the current status of hematology research in a single point in time. For this reason, we analyzed abstracts presented at the 2018 ASH annual meeting (ASH18) with a focus on those from authors working in a LMIC. Objective. To describe the proportion of abstracts presented at ASH18 from an LMIC and analyze their characteristics as a surrogate for academic contributions to global hematology. Methods. We reviewed all abstracts presented at ASH18 in an oral presentation or poster form published online in the supplemental edition of Blood 2018;132 (Suppl 1). LMICs were selected according to the World Bank classification including countries or territories with a gross national income &lt;$12,056 USD per capita. We described all abstracts that had a co-author with an affiliation from an institution in a LMIC, regardless of their position. We categorized studies as clinical vs. basic and single vs. multicenter nature. We also identified the presence of conflict-of interest statements (COI) and identifiable industry sponsors. We compared abstracts that had co-authors from high-income countries (HIC+LMIC) vs. those from LMIC countries alone. Comparison across groups was performed using chi-square and Fisher's exact test. Results. A total of 4,871 abstracts presented at ASH 2018, with 1,026 oral presentations and 3,845 posters were available online. Among them, 510 abstracts (10.5%) had a contributing author from an institution in an LMIC, corresponding to 92 (9%) of all oral presentations and 418 (10.9%) of all posters (Figure 1). LMIC-only contributions represented 4.7% of all abstracts (n=229). The most common LMIC of origin for LMIC-only contributions was China with 133 (58.1%) (Figure 1). Most abstracts were clinical and multicentric in nature (62 and 70.2%, respectively), and in 42.5% of them a COI was reported. Clinical trials reflected 19% of all LMIC contributions. In 31.9% of cases the first author was affiliated to an institution in a HIC. Mixed LMIC/HIC contributions had significantly more COIs and industry sponsors than those from LMIC-only institutions (Table 1). When comparing between oral vs poster LMIC presentations, works selected for an oral presentation were significantly more clinical and multicentric, had a higher proportion of clinical trials, more COIs and identified industry sponsors (Table 2). Conclusions. LMICs, where more than 80% of the world population resides, were responsible for only a small fraction of contributions to ASH18, half of them representing a form of international collaboration, with a high number of COI disclosures. [Display omitted] Gomez-Almaguer:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Teva: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1182/blood-2019-130053</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-4971
ispartof Blood, 2019-11, Vol.134 (Supplement_1), p.2123-2123
issn 0006-4971
1528-0020
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1182_blood_2019_130053
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Contributions to Global Hematology from Low and Middle-Income Countries: Insights from ASH 2018
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T21%3A30%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contributions%20to%20Global%20Hematology%20from%20Low%20and%20Middle-Income%20Countries:%20Insights%20from%20ASH%202018&rft.jtitle=Blood&rft.au=G%C3%B3mez-De%20Le%C3%B3n,%20Andr%C3%A9s&rft.date=2019-11-13&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.spage=2123&rft.epage=2123&rft.pages=2123-2123&rft.issn=0006-4971&rft.eissn=1528-0020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1182/blood-2019-130053&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0006497118600527%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0006497118600527&rfr_iscdi=true