Treatment Outcome and a Practical 10-Point Prognostic Index in Adult Patients with Non-M3 Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study in Malaysia

▪ Background: Literature on Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) survival and prognostic factors were often derived from strict trial studies from developed country. A simple yet practical prognosis index has not been developed and tested in resource limited setting such as Malaysia. We described the treatment outcome and designed a 10 point prognostic index to predict survival of adult AML (non-M3) in real clinical practice in Malaysia. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected and analyzed from all adults with AML diagnosed and treated from 2007 to 2017 in three main hematology centers in Malaysia, Ampang Hospital, Sarawak General Hospital and Miri General Hospital. Treatment pattern and survival outcome were described. Multivariable analysis using Cox regression statistics were performed to identify significant prognostic variables affecting overall survival. Each variable were assigned points based on hazard ratios. A sum of the points led to a maximum score of 10. Patients were then categorized into low (0 point), intermediate (1 to 3 points) or high-risk group (4 points or above). Results: Demographics and treatment outcome of patients are shown in Table 1 & 2. There were 1277 adult patients, diagnosed with AML where 86.5% (n= 1106) of them were non M3 AML. Out of these, 908 patients (82.2%) received intensive chemotherapy treatment. Median age of diagnosis was 45 years. The remission post induction rate was 64.3% with induction death, refractory and relapse rate of 8.8%, 20.0% and 27.7% respectively. Median overall survival (OS) and Event Free Survival (EFS) time was 15 months and 12 months. The 3-year OS and EFS was 32.9% and 28.5% respectively. At the time of analysis, 66.1% of patients were dead (n=600) with disease progression being the main cause of death (n=416, 45.8%). Three year overall OS for patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant (n=301, 33.1%) versus patients without transplantation were 53.7 % versus 22.0 % (HR 2.597, p