Anticoagulation Challenges in Hematogeriatrics: Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Vs Vitamin k Antagonist in Elderly with Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are increasingly used in patients with Non Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) for stroke prevention. However, Follow-Up (FU) and dosing these agents in the elderly can be challenging due to different factors, such as chronic kidney disease, frailty, fall...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood 2019-11, Vol.134 (Supplement_1), p.1162-1162
Hauptverfasser: Campoy, Desirée, Artaza, Gonzalo, Velasquez, César A, Canals, Tania, Johansson, Erik A, Flores, Katia, Bastidas, Gabriela, Ruiz, Silvia, Ene, Gabriela S, Comai, Alessandra, Subira, Maricel, Salinas, Ramón, Sierra, Jorge, Olivera, Pável E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1162
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page 1162
container_title Blood
container_volume 134
creator Campoy, Desirée
Artaza, Gonzalo
Velasquez, César A
Canals, Tania
Johansson, Erik A
Flores, Katia
Bastidas, Gabriela
Ruiz, Silvia
Ene, Gabriela S
Comai, Alessandra
Subira, Maricel
Salinas, Ramón
Sierra, Jorge
Olivera, Pável E
description BACKGROUND Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are increasingly used in patients with Non Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) for stroke prevention. However, Follow-Up (FU) and dosing these agents in the elderly can be challenging due to different factors, such as chronic kidney disease, frailty, falls, multifactorial anemia and concomitant polypharmacy. These factors in elderly patients predisposes to both thromboembolic and bleeding events once atrial fibrillation occurs. Therefore, balancing risks and benefits of antithrombotic strategies in older populations is crucial. Despite recent increases in DOAC use in NVAF, there are still limited data regarding DOACs effectiveness and safety in frail elderly patients. AIM To assess the effectiveness and safety according to DOAC or Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA) in a cohort of elderly patients with NVAF. METHODS From April 2016 to April 2019, we consecutively included NVAF elderly patients (≥80 years-old) treated with DOAC or VKA in a prospective multicenter registry. Demographic, laboratory, frailty risk stratification and antithrombotic therapy data were collected. Patients had a minimum FU of 6 months. VKA patients had a standard FU through digital international normalized ratio (INR) control and the efficacy of therapy was determined by the time in therapeutic range (TTR) values from the preceding 6 months of treatment using Rosendaal's method. FU in DOAC patients was performed through structured and integral assessment following the Tromboc@t Working Group recommendations for management in patients receiving DOAC (Olivera et al, Med Clin 2018). Key practical management aspects are listed in the flow chart (Figure 1). Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS score) was assigned to each patient at the beginning and during the FU; patients were classified into three categories: non-frail (CFS 1-4), mild-to-moderately frail (CFS 5-6), and severely frail (CFS 7-9). RESULTS From a total of 1040 NVAF patients, 690 (63.5%) were treated with DOAC (61 dabigatran, 95 rivaroxaban, 254 edoxaban and 280 apixaban) and 350 with VKA. In the VKA group, the mean TTR was 52.8%. Demographic characteristics and CFS score are summarized in table 1. Kaplan-Meier analysis (median FU: 16.5 months) showed a significantly high incidence of stroke/systemic embolism among VKA patients vs DOAC patients (4.2 vs 0.5 events per 100 patient-years, p
doi_str_mv 10.1182/blood-2019-125150
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1182_blood_2019_125150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006497118590790</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0006497118590790</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1370-71feaf196186088e346da25c6ef7c7d999d5072af28219adab5e61b9142ab3533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOGzEUhi1UJNLQB-jOLzDUx5O5wSpKE0BCyoLLdnTGPg5uHRvZLiivw5MySbpghXSks_j1X_Qx9hPEBUArfw0uBF1IAV0BsoJKnLAJVLIthJDiG5sIIepi1jVwxr6n9EcImJWymrD3uc9WBdz8c5ht8HzxjM6R31Di1vMb2mIOG4oWc7QqXfKlMaSyfSVPKXH0mt-jobzjwfDfNo4aX0d0_FOuz4k_jWczbsfMv3sNN8HblPcdS6cpuh1_s_mZz8ea0b2yQ7TuOOmcnRp0iX78_1P2uFo-LG6Ku_X17WJ-VygoG1E0YAgNdDW0tWhbKme1RlmpmkyjGt11na5EI9HIVkKHGoeKahg6mEkcyqospwyOuSqGlCKZ_iXaLcZdD6LfQ-4PkPs95P4IefRcHT00Dnu1FPukLHlF-oCi18F-4f4AdHSISg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anticoagulation Challenges in Hematogeriatrics: Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Vs Vitamin k Antagonist in Elderly with Atrial Fibrillation</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Campoy, Desirée ; Artaza, Gonzalo ; Velasquez, César A ; Canals, Tania ; Johansson, Erik A ; Flores, Katia ; Bastidas, Gabriela ; Ruiz, Silvia ; Ene, Gabriela S ; Comai, Alessandra ; Subira, Maricel ; Salinas, Ramón ; Sierra, Jorge ; Olivera, Pável E</creator><creatorcontrib>Campoy, Desirée ; Artaza, Gonzalo ; Velasquez, César A ; Canals, Tania ; Johansson, Erik A ; Flores, Katia ; Bastidas, Gabriela ; Ruiz, Silvia ; Ene, Gabriela S ; Comai, Alessandra ; Subira, Maricel ; Salinas, Ramón ; Sierra, Jorge ; Olivera, Pável E</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are increasingly used in patients with Non Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) for stroke prevention. However, Follow-Up (FU) and dosing these agents in the elderly can be challenging due to different factors, such as chronic kidney disease, frailty, falls, multifactorial anemia and concomitant polypharmacy. These factors in elderly patients predisposes to both thromboembolic and bleeding events once atrial fibrillation occurs. Therefore, balancing risks and benefits of antithrombotic strategies in older populations is crucial. Despite recent increases in DOAC use in NVAF, there are still limited data regarding DOACs effectiveness and safety in frail elderly patients. AIM To assess the effectiveness and safety according to DOAC or Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA) in a cohort of elderly patients with NVAF. METHODS From April 2016 to April 2019, we consecutively included NVAF elderly patients (≥80 years-old) treated with DOAC or VKA in a prospective multicenter registry. Demographic, laboratory, frailty risk stratification and antithrombotic therapy data were collected. Patients had a minimum FU of 6 months. VKA patients had a standard FU through digital international normalized ratio (INR) control and the efficacy of therapy was determined by the time in therapeutic range (TTR) values from the preceding 6 months of treatment using Rosendaal's method. FU in DOAC patients was performed through structured and integral assessment following the Tromboc@t Working Group recommendations for management in patients receiving DOAC (Olivera et al, Med Clin 2018). Key practical management aspects are listed in the flow chart (Figure 1). Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS score) was assigned to each patient at the beginning and during the FU; patients were classified into three categories: non-frail (CFS 1-4), mild-to-moderately frail (CFS 5-6), and severely frail (CFS 7-9). RESULTS From a total of 1040 NVAF patients, 690 (63.5%) were treated with DOAC (61 dabigatran, 95 rivaroxaban, 254 edoxaban and 280 apixaban) and 350 with VKA. In the VKA group, the mean TTR was 52.8%. Demographic characteristics and CFS score are summarized in table 1. Kaplan-Meier analysis (median FU: 16.5 months) showed a significantly high incidence of stroke/systemic embolism among VKA patients vs DOAC patients (4.2 vs 0.5 events per 100 patient-years, p&lt;0.001). Major bleeding in the DOAC group was significantly infrequent compared with VKA group (2.2 vs 8.9 events, p=0.001). In the DOAC group, 90% (n=20/22) of the major bleedings were gastrointestinal [16 rivaroxaban and 4 edoxaban]. However, in the VKA group 64% (n = 20/31) were gastrointestinal, 25.8% (n= 8/31) intracranial and 9.7% (n = 3/31) urogenital bleedings. We identified 365 very elderly patients (aged ≥ 90 years) of which 270 (39.1%) were DOAC patients and 95 (27.1%) VKA patients. In this subgroup of patients, after a multivariate regression analysis, the stroke/systemic embolism incidence was similar in both treatment groups regardless of the age, but major bleeding decreased significantly in DOAC group (adjusted HR 0.247, 95% CI 0.091-0.664). CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that DOACs can be a good therapeutic option for stroke/systemic embolism prevention in frail elderly patients, showing low rates of stroke as well as bleeding events when a structured and integral FU is applied to anticoagulated patients. Further investigations are necessary to analyze the impact in the quality of life and net clinical benefit of anticoagulant therapy when a FU program is applied in elderly patients. [Display omitted] Sierra:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-4971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-125150</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Blood, 2019-11, Vol.134 (Supplement_1), p.1162-1162</ispartof><rights>2019 American Society of Hematology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Campoy, Desirée</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Artaza, Gonzalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velasquez, César A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canals, Tania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansson, Erik A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores, Katia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastidas, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ene, Gabriela S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comai, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subira, Maricel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salinas, Ramón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sierra, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivera, Pável E</creatorcontrib><title>Anticoagulation Challenges in Hematogeriatrics: Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Vs Vitamin k Antagonist in Elderly with Atrial Fibrillation</title><title>Blood</title><description>BACKGROUND Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are increasingly used in patients with Non Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) for stroke prevention. However, Follow-Up (FU) and dosing these agents in the elderly can be challenging due to different factors, such as chronic kidney disease, frailty, falls, multifactorial anemia and concomitant polypharmacy. These factors in elderly patients predisposes to both thromboembolic and bleeding events once atrial fibrillation occurs. Therefore, balancing risks and benefits of antithrombotic strategies in older populations is crucial. Despite recent increases in DOAC use in NVAF, there are still limited data regarding DOACs effectiveness and safety in frail elderly patients. AIM To assess the effectiveness and safety according to DOAC or Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA) in a cohort of elderly patients with NVAF. METHODS From April 2016 to April 2019, we consecutively included NVAF elderly patients (≥80 years-old) treated with DOAC or VKA in a prospective multicenter registry. Demographic, laboratory, frailty risk stratification and antithrombotic therapy data were collected. Patients had a minimum FU of 6 months. VKA patients had a standard FU through digital international normalized ratio (INR) control and the efficacy of therapy was determined by the time in therapeutic range (TTR) values from the preceding 6 months of treatment using Rosendaal's method. FU in DOAC patients was performed through structured and integral assessment following the Tromboc@t Working Group recommendations for management in patients receiving DOAC (Olivera et al, Med Clin 2018). Key practical management aspects are listed in the flow chart (Figure 1). Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS score) was assigned to each patient at the beginning and during the FU; patients were classified into three categories: non-frail (CFS 1-4), mild-to-moderately frail (CFS 5-6), and severely frail (CFS 7-9). RESULTS From a total of 1040 NVAF patients, 690 (63.5%) were treated with DOAC (61 dabigatran, 95 rivaroxaban, 254 edoxaban and 280 apixaban) and 350 with VKA. In the VKA group, the mean TTR was 52.8%. Demographic characteristics and CFS score are summarized in table 1. Kaplan-Meier analysis (median FU: 16.5 months) showed a significantly high incidence of stroke/systemic embolism among VKA patients vs DOAC patients (4.2 vs 0.5 events per 100 patient-years, p&lt;0.001). Major bleeding in the DOAC group was significantly infrequent compared with VKA group (2.2 vs 8.9 events, p=0.001). In the DOAC group, 90% (n=20/22) of the major bleedings were gastrointestinal [16 rivaroxaban and 4 edoxaban]. However, in the VKA group 64% (n = 20/31) were gastrointestinal, 25.8% (n= 8/31) intracranial and 9.7% (n = 3/31) urogenital bleedings. We identified 365 very elderly patients (aged ≥ 90 years) of which 270 (39.1%) were DOAC patients and 95 (27.1%) VKA patients. In this subgroup of patients, after a multivariate regression analysis, the stroke/systemic embolism incidence was similar in both treatment groups regardless of the age, but major bleeding decreased significantly in DOAC group (adjusted HR 0.247, 95% CI 0.091-0.664). CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that DOACs can be a good therapeutic option for stroke/systemic embolism prevention in frail elderly patients, showing low rates of stroke as well as bleeding events when a structured and integral FU is applied to anticoagulated patients. Further investigations are necessary to analyze the impact in the quality of life and net clinical benefit of anticoagulant therapy when a FU program is applied in elderly patients. [Display omitted] Sierra:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria.</description><issn>0006-4971</issn><issn>1528-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOGzEUhi1UJNLQB-jOLzDUx5O5wSpKE0BCyoLLdnTGPg5uHRvZLiivw5MySbpghXSks_j1X_Qx9hPEBUArfw0uBF1IAV0BsoJKnLAJVLIthJDiG5sIIepi1jVwxr6n9EcImJWymrD3uc9WBdz8c5ht8HzxjM6R31Di1vMb2mIOG4oWc7QqXfKlMaSyfSVPKXH0mt-jobzjwfDfNo4aX0d0_FOuz4k_jWczbsfMv3sNN8HblPcdS6cpuh1_s_mZz8ea0b2yQ7TuOOmcnRp0iX78_1P2uFo-LG6Ku_X17WJ-VygoG1E0YAgNdDW0tWhbKme1RlmpmkyjGt11na5EI9HIVkKHGoeKahg6mEkcyqospwyOuSqGlCKZ_iXaLcZdD6LfQ-4PkPs95P4IefRcHT00Dnu1FPukLHlF-oCi18F-4f4AdHSISg</recordid><startdate>20191113</startdate><enddate>20191113</enddate><creator>Campoy, Desirée</creator><creator>Artaza, Gonzalo</creator><creator>Velasquez, César A</creator><creator>Canals, Tania</creator><creator>Johansson, Erik A</creator><creator>Flores, Katia</creator><creator>Bastidas, Gabriela</creator><creator>Ruiz, Silvia</creator><creator>Ene, Gabriela S</creator><creator>Comai, Alessandra</creator><creator>Subira, Maricel</creator><creator>Salinas, Ramón</creator><creator>Sierra, Jorge</creator><creator>Olivera, Pável E</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191113</creationdate><title>Anticoagulation Challenges in Hematogeriatrics: Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Vs Vitamin k Antagonist in Elderly with Atrial Fibrillation</title><author>Campoy, Desirée ; Artaza, Gonzalo ; Velasquez, César A ; Canals, Tania ; Johansson, Erik A ; Flores, Katia ; Bastidas, Gabriela ; Ruiz, Silvia ; Ene, Gabriela S ; Comai, Alessandra ; Subira, Maricel ; Salinas, Ramón ; Sierra, Jorge ; Olivera, Pável E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1370-71feaf196186088e346da25c6ef7c7d999d5072af28219adab5e61b9142ab3533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Campoy, Desirée</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Artaza, Gonzalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velasquez, César A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canals, Tania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansson, Erik A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores, Katia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastidas, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ene, Gabriela S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comai, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subira, Maricel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salinas, Ramón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sierra, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivera, Pável E</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Blood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Campoy, Desirée</au><au>Artaza, Gonzalo</au><au>Velasquez, César A</au><au>Canals, Tania</au><au>Johansson, Erik A</au><au>Flores, Katia</au><au>Bastidas, Gabriela</au><au>Ruiz, Silvia</au><au>Ene, Gabriela S</au><au>Comai, Alessandra</au><au>Subira, Maricel</au><au>Salinas, Ramón</au><au>Sierra, Jorge</au><au>Olivera, Pável E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anticoagulation Challenges in Hematogeriatrics: Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Vs Vitamin k Antagonist in Elderly with Atrial Fibrillation</atitle><jtitle>Blood</jtitle><date>2019-11-13</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><spage>1162</spage><epage>1162</epage><pages>1162-1162</pages><issn>0006-4971</issn><eissn>1528-0020</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are increasingly used in patients with Non Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) for stroke prevention. However, Follow-Up (FU) and dosing these agents in the elderly can be challenging due to different factors, such as chronic kidney disease, frailty, falls, multifactorial anemia and concomitant polypharmacy. These factors in elderly patients predisposes to both thromboembolic and bleeding events once atrial fibrillation occurs. Therefore, balancing risks and benefits of antithrombotic strategies in older populations is crucial. Despite recent increases in DOAC use in NVAF, there are still limited data regarding DOACs effectiveness and safety in frail elderly patients. AIM To assess the effectiveness and safety according to DOAC or Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA) in a cohort of elderly patients with NVAF. METHODS From April 2016 to April 2019, we consecutively included NVAF elderly patients (≥80 years-old) treated with DOAC or VKA in a prospective multicenter registry. Demographic, laboratory, frailty risk stratification and antithrombotic therapy data were collected. Patients had a minimum FU of 6 months. VKA patients had a standard FU through digital international normalized ratio (INR) control and the efficacy of therapy was determined by the time in therapeutic range (TTR) values from the preceding 6 months of treatment using Rosendaal's method. FU in DOAC patients was performed through structured and integral assessment following the Tromboc@t Working Group recommendations for management in patients receiving DOAC (Olivera et al, Med Clin 2018). Key practical management aspects are listed in the flow chart (Figure 1). Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS score) was assigned to each patient at the beginning and during the FU; patients were classified into three categories: non-frail (CFS 1-4), mild-to-moderately frail (CFS 5-6), and severely frail (CFS 7-9). RESULTS From a total of 1040 NVAF patients, 690 (63.5%) were treated with DOAC (61 dabigatran, 95 rivaroxaban, 254 edoxaban and 280 apixaban) and 350 with VKA. In the VKA group, the mean TTR was 52.8%. Demographic characteristics and CFS score are summarized in table 1. Kaplan-Meier analysis (median FU: 16.5 months) showed a significantly high incidence of stroke/systemic embolism among VKA patients vs DOAC patients (4.2 vs 0.5 events per 100 patient-years, p&lt;0.001). Major bleeding in the DOAC group was significantly infrequent compared with VKA group (2.2 vs 8.9 events, p=0.001). In the DOAC group, 90% (n=20/22) of the major bleedings were gastrointestinal [16 rivaroxaban and 4 edoxaban]. However, in the VKA group 64% (n = 20/31) were gastrointestinal, 25.8% (n= 8/31) intracranial and 9.7% (n = 3/31) urogenital bleedings. We identified 365 very elderly patients (aged ≥ 90 years) of which 270 (39.1%) were DOAC patients and 95 (27.1%) VKA patients. In this subgroup of patients, after a multivariate regression analysis, the stroke/systemic embolism incidence was similar in both treatment groups regardless of the age, but major bleeding decreased significantly in DOAC group (adjusted HR 0.247, 95% CI 0.091-0.664). CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that DOACs can be a good therapeutic option for stroke/systemic embolism prevention in frail elderly patients, showing low rates of stroke as well as bleeding events when a structured and integral FU is applied to anticoagulated patients. Further investigations are necessary to analyze the impact in the quality of life and net clinical benefit of anticoagulant therapy when a FU program is applied in elderly patients. [Display omitted] Sierra:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1182/blood-2019-125150</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-4971
ispartof Blood, 2019-11, Vol.134 (Supplement_1), p.1162-1162
issn 0006-4971
1528-0020
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1182_blood_2019_125150
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Anticoagulation Challenges in Hematogeriatrics: Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Vs Vitamin k Antagonist in Elderly with Atrial Fibrillation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T22%3A23%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anticoagulation%20Challenges%20in%20Hematogeriatrics:%20Effectiveness%20and%20Safety%20of%20Direct%20Oral%20Anticoagulants%20Vs%20Vitamin%20k%20Antagonist%20in%20Elderly%20with%20Atrial%20Fibrillation&rft.jtitle=Blood&rft.au=Campoy,%20Desir%C3%A9e&rft.date=2019-11-13&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.spage=1162&rft.epage=1162&rft.pages=1162-1162&rft.issn=0006-4971&rft.eissn=1528-0020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1182/blood-2019-125150&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0006497118590790%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0006497118590790&rfr_iscdi=true