Localized- and advanced-stage follicular lymphomas differ in their gene expression profiles

The genetic background of follicular lymphomas (FLs) diagnosed in advanced clinical stages III/IV, and which are frequently characterized by t(14;18), has been substantially unraveled. Molecular features, as exemplified in the clinicogenetic risk model m7FLIPI, are important tools in risk stratifica...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood 2020-01, Vol.135 (3), p.181-190
Hauptverfasser: Staiger, Annette M., Hoster, Eva, Jurinovic, Vindi, Winter, Stefan, Leich, Ellen, Kalla, Claudia, Möller, Peter, Bernd, Heinz-Wolfram, Feller, Alfred C., Koch, Karoline, Klapper, Wolfram, Stein, Harald, Hansmann, Martin-Leo, Hartmann, Sylvia, Dreyling, Martin, Weigert, Oliver, Hiddemann, Wolfgang, Herfarth, Klaus, Rosenwald, Andreas, Engelhard, Marianne, Ott, German, Horn, Heike
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The genetic background of follicular lymphomas (FLs) diagnosed in advanced clinical stages III/IV, and which are frequently characterized by t(14;18), has been substantially unraveled. Molecular features, as exemplified in the clinicogenetic risk model m7FLIPI, are important tools in risk stratification. In contrast, little information is available concerning localized-stage FL (clinical stages I/II), which accounts for ∼20% of newly diagnosed FL in which the detection rate of t(14;18) is only ∼50%. To investigate the genetic background of localized-stage FL, patient cohorts with advanced-stage FL or localized-stage FL, uniformly treated within phase 3 trials of the German Low-Grade Lymphoma Study Group, were comparatively analyzed. Targeted gene expression (GE) profiling of 184 genes using nCounter technology was performed in 110 localized-stage and 556 advanced-stage FL patients. By penalized Cox regression, a prognostic GE signature could not be identified in patients with advanced-stage FL, consistent with results from global tests and univariate regression. In contrast, it was possible to define robust GE signatures discriminating localized-stage and advanced-stage FL (area under the curve, 0.98) by penalized logistic regression. Of note, 3% of samples harboring an “advanced-stage signature” in the localized-stage cohort exhibited inferior failure-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 7.1; P = .0003). Likewise, in the advanced-stage cohort, 7% of samples with a “localized-stage signature” had prolonged failure-free survival (HR, 2.3; P = .017) and overall survival (HR, 3.4; P = .072). These data support the concept of a biological difference between localized-stage and advanced-stage FL that might contribute to the superior outcome of localized FL. •Development of a robust GE signature discriminating localized-stage and advanced-stage FL.•The genetic signature may be responsible for the superior outcome of localized-stage FL. [Display omitted]
ISSN:0006-4971
1528-0020
DOI:10.1182/blood.2019000560