Failure of resistance spot welds: tensile shear versus coach peel loading conditions

This paper aims at investigating the failure behaviour of resistance spot welds under tensile shear (TS) and coach peel (CP) loading conditions. A failure mechanism was proposed to describe both interfacial and pullout failure modes in each loading condition. The mechanisms were confirmed by SEM inv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ironmaking & steelmaking 2012-02, Vol.39 (2), p.104-111
Hauptverfasser: Pouranvari, M, Marashi, S P H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 111
container_issue 2
container_start_page 104
container_title Ironmaking & steelmaking
container_volume 39
creator Pouranvari, M
Marashi, S P H
description This paper aims at investigating the failure behaviour of resistance spot welds under tensile shear (TS) and coach peel (CP) loading conditions. A failure mechanism was proposed to describe both interfacial and pullout failure modes in each loading condition. The mechanisms were confirmed by SEM investigations, examining the cross-sections of the fractured welds to detail the fracture path. The experimental results showed that in the pullout failure mode during TS testing, necking is initiated at the nugget circumference in the base metal, and then failure propagates along the nugget circumference in the sheet, leading to the final fracture, while pullout failure during the CP test occurred by crack initiation and propagation near the weld nugget/heat affected zone boundary. The interfacial failure to pullout failure mode transition in the TS and CP tests was also studied. The critical weld nugget size required to ensure the pullout failure mode was obtained for each loading condition. The critical fusion zone size to ensure pullout failure mode during the TS test was larger than that of the CP test. It was found that the load bearing capacity of the spot welds under CP is significantly lower than that of the TS test.
doi_str_mv 10.1179/1743281211Y.0000000066
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1179_1743281211Y_0000000066</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1179_1743281211Y.0000000066</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1010895832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-c8e375f10c48ecc771d2759511e4b7a95bca6cd0ec73ee254377794d83a345f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4MoOKf_guTopTNpmqb1NoZTQfAyD55Clr5uGVkz81rH_ns7OtDb3uXB-_6A9yHknrMJ56p85CoTacFTzr8m7DR5fkFGRyE5KpdkxATjSZkKcU1uEDe9RalUjchibpzvItBQ0wjosDWNBYq70NI9-AqfaAsNOt_f1mAi_YGIHVIbjF3THYCnPpjKNav-1FSudaHBW3JVG49wd9pj8jl_Xsxek_ePl7fZ9D2xmczbxBYglKw5s1kB1irFq1TJUnIO2VKZUi6tyW3FwCoBkMpMKKXKrCqEEZmspRiTh6F3F8N3B9jqrUML3psGQoeaM86KUhYi7a35YLUxIEao9S66rYmH3qSPGPU_jPoPYx8UQxDNCvQmdLHpXzqfmg4p19Qhbs0-RF_p1hx8iHXsETvU4kzHL1htiEs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1010895832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Failure of resistance spot welds: tensile shear versus coach peel loading conditions</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Pouranvari, M ; Marashi, S P H</creator><creatorcontrib>Pouranvari, M ; Marashi, S P H</creatorcontrib><description>This paper aims at investigating the failure behaviour of resistance spot welds under tensile shear (TS) and coach peel (CP) loading conditions. A failure mechanism was proposed to describe both interfacial and pullout failure modes in each loading condition. The mechanisms were confirmed by SEM investigations, examining the cross-sections of the fractured welds to detail the fracture path. The experimental results showed that in the pullout failure mode during TS testing, necking is initiated at the nugget circumference in the base metal, and then failure propagates along the nugget circumference in the sheet, leading to the final fracture, while pullout failure during the CP test occurred by crack initiation and propagation near the weld nugget/heat affected zone boundary. The interfacial failure to pullout failure mode transition in the TS and CP tests was also studied. The critical weld nugget size required to ensure the pullout failure mode was obtained for each loading condition. The critical fusion zone size to ensure pullout failure mode during the TS test was larger than that of the CP test. It was found that the load bearing capacity of the spot welds under CP is significantly lower than that of the TS test.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-9233</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-2812</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1179/1743281211Y.0000000066</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Circumferences ; Crack initiation ; Failure ; Failure modes ; Fracture mechanics ; Mechanical properties ; Resistance spot welding ; Shear ; Spot welds ; Welded joints</subject><ispartof>Ironmaking &amp; steelmaking, 2012-02, Vol.39 (2), p.104-111</ispartof><rights>2011 Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining Published by Maney on behalf of the Institute 2011</rights><rights>2011 Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining Published by Maney on behalf of the Institute</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-c8e375f10c48ecc771d2759511e4b7a95bca6cd0ec73ee254377794d83a345f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-c8e375f10c48ecc771d2759511e4b7a95bca6cd0ec73ee254377794d83a345f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1179/1743281211Y.0000000066$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1179/1743281211Y.0000000066$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pouranvari, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marashi, S P H</creatorcontrib><title>Failure of resistance spot welds: tensile shear versus coach peel loading conditions</title><title>Ironmaking &amp; steelmaking</title><description>This paper aims at investigating the failure behaviour of resistance spot welds under tensile shear (TS) and coach peel (CP) loading conditions. A failure mechanism was proposed to describe both interfacial and pullout failure modes in each loading condition. The mechanisms were confirmed by SEM investigations, examining the cross-sections of the fractured welds to detail the fracture path. The experimental results showed that in the pullout failure mode during TS testing, necking is initiated at the nugget circumference in the base metal, and then failure propagates along the nugget circumference in the sheet, leading to the final fracture, while pullout failure during the CP test occurred by crack initiation and propagation near the weld nugget/heat affected zone boundary. The interfacial failure to pullout failure mode transition in the TS and CP tests was also studied. The critical weld nugget size required to ensure the pullout failure mode was obtained for each loading condition. The critical fusion zone size to ensure pullout failure mode during the TS test was larger than that of the CP test. It was found that the load bearing capacity of the spot welds under CP is significantly lower than that of the TS test.</description><subject>Circumferences</subject><subject>Crack initiation</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Failure modes</subject><subject>Fracture mechanics</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Resistance spot welding</subject><subject>Shear</subject><subject>Spot welds</subject><subject>Welded joints</subject><issn>0301-9233</issn><issn>1743-2812</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4MoOKf_guTopTNpmqb1NoZTQfAyD55Clr5uGVkz81rH_ns7OtDb3uXB-_6A9yHknrMJ56p85CoTacFTzr8m7DR5fkFGRyE5KpdkxATjSZkKcU1uEDe9RalUjchibpzvItBQ0wjosDWNBYq70NI9-AqfaAsNOt_f1mAi_YGIHVIbjF3THYCnPpjKNav-1FSudaHBW3JVG49wd9pj8jl_Xsxek_ePl7fZ9D2xmczbxBYglKw5s1kB1irFq1TJUnIO2VKZUi6tyW3FwCoBkMpMKKXKrCqEEZmspRiTh6F3F8N3B9jqrUML3psGQoeaM86KUhYi7a35YLUxIEao9S66rYmH3qSPGPU_jPoPYx8UQxDNCvQmdLHpXzqfmg4p19Qhbs0-RF_p1hx8iHXsETvU4kzHL1htiEs</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Pouranvari, M</creator><creator>Marashi, S P H</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Failure of resistance spot welds: tensile shear versus coach peel loading conditions</title><author>Pouranvari, M ; Marashi, S P H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-c8e375f10c48ecc771d2759511e4b7a95bca6cd0ec73ee254377794d83a345f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Circumferences</topic><topic>Crack initiation</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Failure modes</topic><topic>Fracture mechanics</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Resistance spot welding</topic><topic>Shear</topic><topic>Spot welds</topic><topic>Welded joints</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pouranvari, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marashi, S P H</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Ironmaking &amp; steelmaking</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pouranvari, M</au><au>Marashi, S P H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Failure of resistance spot welds: tensile shear versus coach peel loading conditions</atitle><jtitle>Ironmaking &amp; steelmaking</jtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>104</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>104-111</pages><issn>0301-9233</issn><eissn>1743-2812</eissn><abstract>This paper aims at investigating the failure behaviour of resistance spot welds under tensile shear (TS) and coach peel (CP) loading conditions. A failure mechanism was proposed to describe both interfacial and pullout failure modes in each loading condition. The mechanisms were confirmed by SEM investigations, examining the cross-sections of the fractured welds to detail the fracture path. The experimental results showed that in the pullout failure mode during TS testing, necking is initiated at the nugget circumference in the base metal, and then failure propagates along the nugget circumference in the sheet, leading to the final fracture, while pullout failure during the CP test occurred by crack initiation and propagation near the weld nugget/heat affected zone boundary. The interfacial failure to pullout failure mode transition in the TS and CP tests was also studied. The critical weld nugget size required to ensure the pullout failure mode was obtained for each loading condition. The critical fusion zone size to ensure pullout failure mode during the TS test was larger than that of the CP test. It was found that the load bearing capacity of the spot welds under CP is significantly lower than that of the TS test.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1179/1743281211Y.0000000066</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-9233
ispartof Ironmaking & steelmaking, 2012-02, Vol.39 (2), p.104-111
issn 0301-9233
1743-2812
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1179_1743281211Y_0000000066
source SAGE Complete
subjects Circumferences
Crack initiation
Failure
Failure modes
Fracture mechanics
Mechanical properties
Resistance spot welding
Shear
Spot welds
Welded joints
title Failure of resistance spot welds: tensile shear versus coach peel loading conditions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T03%3A58%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Failure%20of%20resistance%20spot%20welds:%20tensile%20shear%20versus%20coach%20peel%20loading%20conditions&rft.jtitle=Ironmaking%20&%20steelmaking&rft.au=Pouranvari,%20M&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=104&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=104-111&rft.issn=0301-9233&rft.eissn=1743-2812&rft_id=info:doi/10.1179/1743281211Y.0000000066&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1010895832%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1010895832&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1179_1743281211Y.0000000066&rfr_iscdi=true