Illuminating Activities at Paleo Crossing (33ME274) Through Microwear Analysis

Microwear analysis provides a means to extract important information on the activities conducted at Paleoindian sites from meager assemblages. Microwear analysis was conducted on a sample of 10 tools from the Paleo Crossing site in Medina County, Ohio. Tools analyzed included fluted points, end scra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lithic technology 2013-07, Vol.38 (2), p.108-97
1. Verfasser: Miller, G. Logan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 97
container_issue 2
container_start_page 108
container_title Lithic technology
container_volume 38
creator Miller, G. Logan
description Microwear analysis provides a means to extract important information on the activities conducted at Paleoindian sites from meager assemblages. Microwear analysis was conducted on a sample of 10 tools from the Paleo Crossing site in Medina County, Ohio. Tools analyzed included fluted points, end scrapers, blades, gravers, and unifacial knives. Wear patterns indicated that the tools were used to cut, scrape, engrave, and penetrate (i.e., via a projectile) such materials as soft plant, meat, hide, and bone/antler. Several of the tools were hafted and wear patterns were well developed overall. Based on this pilot study, comparison with microwear studies conducted on sites in the Great Lakes region and beyond suggests that Paleo Crossing provides new information on the number, as well as the types, of Paleoindian tools used to cut soft plant.
doi_str_mv 10.1179/0197726113Z.00000000012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1179_0197726113Z_00000000012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43287195</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43287195</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-9d0cece0dc5f0ddb0ef3b7f7dfbea27da96ce7077ee20cc1621230ad93b04ec83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPAjEUhRujiQT5DXZjoovBPmamdIkElUTUBW7cNJ0-oKRMTVsk_HuZoAk77-Yu7nfuOTkAXGM0xJjxe4Q5Y6TGmH4O0d9gcgZ6BFW4qPGoOge9jio67BIMUlp3TMlxhUgPvM68325cK7Nrl3Cssvt22ZkEZYbv0psAJzGk1B1vKZ1PCSvv4GIVw3a5gnOnYtgZGeG4lX6fXLoCF1b6ZAa_uw8-HqeLyXPx8vY0m4xfCkXLOhdcI2WUQVpVFmndIGNpwyzTtjGSMC15rQxDjBlDkFK4JphQJDWnDSqNGtE-YMe_qksXjRVf0W1k3AuMRNeMOGlGnDRzUN4cleuUQzyVHRyYKCkZMcyrA_dw5FxrQ9zIXYheiyz3PkQbZatcEvQ_sx9Yz3aX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Illuminating Activities at Paleo Crossing (33ME274) Through Microwear Analysis</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Miller, G. Logan</creator><creatorcontrib>Miller, G. Logan</creatorcontrib><description>Microwear analysis provides a means to extract important information on the activities conducted at Paleoindian sites from meager assemblages. Microwear analysis was conducted on a sample of 10 tools from the Paleo Crossing site in Medina County, Ohio. Tools analyzed included fluted points, end scrapers, blades, gravers, and unifacial knives. Wear patterns indicated that the tools were used to cut, scrape, engrave, and penetrate (i.e., via a projectile) such materials as soft plant, meat, hide, and bone/antler. Several of the tools were hafted and wear patterns were well developed overall. Based on this pilot study, comparison with microwear studies conducted on sites in the Great Lakes region and beyond suggests that Paleo Crossing provides new information on the number, as well as the types, of Paleoindian tools used to cut soft plant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-7261</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2051-6185</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1179/0197726113Z.00000000012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>Clovis ; microwear ; Paleoindian</subject><ispartof>Lithic technology, 2013-07, Vol.38 (2), p.108-97</ispartof><rights>W. S. Maney &amp; Son Ltd 2013 2013</rights><rights>W. S. Maney &amp; Son Ltd 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-9d0cece0dc5f0ddb0ef3b7f7dfbea27da96ce7077ee20cc1621230ad93b04ec83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-9d0cece0dc5f0ddb0ef3b7f7dfbea27da96ce7077ee20cc1621230ad93b04ec83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43287195$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43287195$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miller, G. Logan</creatorcontrib><title>Illuminating Activities at Paleo Crossing (33ME274) Through Microwear Analysis</title><title>Lithic technology</title><description>Microwear analysis provides a means to extract important information on the activities conducted at Paleoindian sites from meager assemblages. Microwear analysis was conducted on a sample of 10 tools from the Paleo Crossing site in Medina County, Ohio. Tools analyzed included fluted points, end scrapers, blades, gravers, and unifacial knives. Wear patterns indicated that the tools were used to cut, scrape, engrave, and penetrate (i.e., via a projectile) such materials as soft plant, meat, hide, and bone/antler. Several of the tools were hafted and wear patterns were well developed overall. Based on this pilot study, comparison with microwear studies conducted on sites in the Great Lakes region and beyond suggests that Paleo Crossing provides new information on the number, as well as the types, of Paleoindian tools used to cut soft plant.</description><subject>Clovis</subject><subject>microwear</subject><subject>Paleoindian</subject><issn>0197-7261</issn><issn>2051-6185</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtPAjEUhRujiQT5DXZjoovBPmamdIkElUTUBW7cNJ0-oKRMTVsk_HuZoAk77-Yu7nfuOTkAXGM0xJjxe4Q5Y6TGmH4O0d9gcgZ6BFW4qPGoOge9jio67BIMUlp3TMlxhUgPvM68325cK7Nrl3Cssvt22ZkEZYbv0psAJzGk1B1vKZ1PCSvv4GIVw3a5gnOnYtgZGeG4lX6fXLoCF1b6ZAa_uw8-HqeLyXPx8vY0m4xfCkXLOhdcI2WUQVpVFmndIGNpwyzTtjGSMC15rQxDjBlDkFK4JphQJDWnDSqNGtE-YMe_qksXjRVf0W1k3AuMRNeMOGlGnDRzUN4cleuUQzyVHRyYKCkZMcyrA_dw5FxrQ9zIXYheiyz3PkQbZatcEvQ_sx9Yz3aX</recordid><startdate>201307</startdate><enddate>201307</enddate><creator>Miller, G. Logan</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Left Coast Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201307</creationdate><title>Illuminating Activities at Paleo Crossing (33ME274) Through Microwear Analysis</title><author>Miller, G. Logan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-9d0cece0dc5f0ddb0ef3b7f7dfbea27da96ce7077ee20cc1621230ad93b04ec83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Clovis</topic><topic>microwear</topic><topic>Paleoindian</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller, G. Logan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Lithic technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller, G. Logan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Illuminating Activities at Paleo Crossing (33ME274) Through Microwear Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Lithic technology</jtitle><date>2013-07</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>108</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>108-97</pages><issn>0197-7261</issn><eissn>2051-6185</eissn><abstract>Microwear analysis provides a means to extract important information on the activities conducted at Paleoindian sites from meager assemblages. Microwear analysis was conducted on a sample of 10 tools from the Paleo Crossing site in Medina County, Ohio. Tools analyzed included fluted points, end scrapers, blades, gravers, and unifacial knives. Wear patterns indicated that the tools were used to cut, scrape, engrave, and penetrate (i.e., via a projectile) such materials as soft plant, meat, hide, and bone/antler. Several of the tools were hafted and wear patterns were well developed overall. Based on this pilot study, comparison with microwear studies conducted on sites in the Great Lakes region and beyond suggests that Paleo Crossing provides new information on the number, as well as the types, of Paleoindian tools used to cut soft plant.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1179/0197726113Z.00000000012</doi><tpages>-10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0197-7261
ispartof Lithic technology, 2013-07, Vol.38 (2), p.108-97
issn 0197-7261
2051-6185
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1179_0197726113Z_00000000012
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Clovis
microwear
Paleoindian
title Illuminating Activities at Paleo Crossing (33ME274) Through Microwear Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T14%3A54%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Illuminating%20Activities%20at%20Paleo%20Crossing%20(33ME274)%20Through%20Microwear%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Lithic%20technology&rft.au=Miller,%20G.%20Logan&rft.date=2013-07&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=108&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=108-97&rft.issn=0197-7261&rft.eissn=2051-6185&rft_id=info:doi/10.1179/0197726113Z.00000000012&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E43287195%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43287195&rfr_iscdi=true