Machine learning–based ground motion models for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions
Data-driven ground motion models (GMMs) for the average horizontal component from shallow crustal continental earthquakes in active tectonic regions are derived using a subset of the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA)-West2 data set, including 14,518 recordings out of 285 earthquakes recorded at 2347...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Earthquake spectra 2023-11, Vol.39 (4), p.2406-2435 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2435 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 2406 |
container_title | Earthquake spectra |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Sedaghati, Farhad Pezeshk, Shahram |
description | Data-driven ground motion models (GMMs) for the average horizontal component from shallow crustal continental earthquakes in active tectonic regions are derived using a subset of the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA)-West2 data set, including 14,518 recordings out of 285 earthquakes recorded at 2347 different stations. We use four different nonparametric supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms including Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Kernel-Ridge Regressor (KRR), Random Forest Regressor (RFR), and Support Vector Regressor (SVR) to construct four individual models. Then, we use a weighted average ensemble approach to combine these four models into a robust model to predict various ground motion intensity measures such as peak ground displacement (PGD), peak ground velocity (PGV), peak ground acceleration (PGA), and 5%-damped pseudo-spectral acceleration (PSA). The model input parameters are moment magnitude, rupture distance, VS30, and ZTOR. The ensemble modeling attempts to remove the drawbacks or deficiencies of different ML algorithms while capturing their advantages and accounts for epistemic uncertainty. Although no functional form is provided, the model can capture salient features observed in ground motions such as saturation as well as geometrical spreading, anelastic attenuation, and nonlinear site amplification. The response spectra and the magnitude, distance, VS30, and ZTOR scaling trends are consistent and comparable with the NGA-West2 GMMs including several additional input parameters. We used a mixed-effects regression analysis to split the total aleatory uncertainty into between-event, within-station, and event-site–corrected components. The model is applicable to magnitudes from 3.0 to 8.0, rupture distances up to 300 km, and spectral periods of 0 to 10 s. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/87552930231191759 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_87552930231191759</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_87552930231191759</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_87552930231191759</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a307t-2b4637c99813c498609aae4e86be3ba81955e799880b1d201038b3574de50a5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1OxDAUhC0EEmHhAHS-QBY7jmO7RCv-pEU0UEcvzsvPkrXBTkB03IEbchKyWjokqinmfaN5Q8g5Z0vOlbrQSsrMCJYJzg1X0hyQhJs8T3XG-CFJdn66OzgmJzFuGONFzlhCunuwXe-QDgjB9a79_vyqIGJN2-AnV9OtH3vvZqlxiLTxgcYOhsG_UxumOMJAZ3DsXid4xkh7R8GO_RvSEe3oXW9pwHYOiKfkqIEh4tmvLsjT9dXj6jZdP9zcrS7XKQimxjSr8kIoa4zmwuZGF8wAYI66qFBUoLmREtVsa1bxev6NCV0JqfIaJQPZiAXh-1wbfIwBm_Il9FsIHyVn5W6q8s9UM7PcMxFaLDd-Cm6u-A_wA9_Ga1E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Machine learning–based ground motion models for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Sedaghati, Farhad ; Pezeshk, Shahram</creator><creatorcontrib>Sedaghati, Farhad ; Pezeshk, Shahram</creatorcontrib><description>Data-driven ground motion models (GMMs) for the average horizontal component from shallow crustal continental earthquakes in active tectonic regions are derived using a subset of the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA)-West2 data set, including 14,518 recordings out of 285 earthquakes recorded at 2347 different stations. We use four different nonparametric supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms including Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Kernel-Ridge Regressor (KRR), Random Forest Regressor (RFR), and Support Vector Regressor (SVR) to construct four individual models. Then, we use a weighted average ensemble approach to combine these four models into a robust model to predict various ground motion intensity measures such as peak ground displacement (PGD), peak ground velocity (PGV), peak ground acceleration (PGA), and 5%-damped pseudo-spectral acceleration (PSA). The model input parameters are moment magnitude, rupture distance, VS30, and ZTOR. The ensemble modeling attempts to remove the drawbacks or deficiencies of different ML algorithms while capturing their advantages and accounts for epistemic uncertainty. Although no functional form is provided, the model can capture salient features observed in ground motions such as saturation as well as geometrical spreading, anelastic attenuation, and nonlinear site amplification. The response spectra and the magnitude, distance, VS30, and ZTOR scaling trends are consistent and comparable with the NGA-West2 GMMs including several additional input parameters. We used a mixed-effects regression analysis to split the total aleatory uncertainty into between-event, within-station, and event-site–corrected components. The model is applicable to magnitudes from 3.0 to 8.0, rupture distances up to 300 km, and spectral periods of 0 to 10 s.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8755-2930</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8201</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/87552930231191759</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Earthquake spectra, 2023-11, Vol.39 (4), p.2406-2435</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a307t-2b4637c99813c498609aae4e86be3ba81955e799880b1d201038b3574de50a5f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a307t-2b4637c99813c498609aae4e86be3ba81955e799880b1d201038b3574de50a5f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4367-1184</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/87552930231191759$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/87552930231191759$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21824,27929,27930,43626,43627</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sedaghati, Farhad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pezeshk, Shahram</creatorcontrib><title>Machine learning–based ground motion models for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions</title><title>Earthquake spectra</title><description>Data-driven ground motion models (GMMs) for the average horizontal component from shallow crustal continental earthquakes in active tectonic regions are derived using a subset of the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA)-West2 data set, including 14,518 recordings out of 285 earthquakes recorded at 2347 different stations. We use four different nonparametric supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms including Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Kernel-Ridge Regressor (KRR), Random Forest Regressor (RFR), and Support Vector Regressor (SVR) to construct four individual models. Then, we use a weighted average ensemble approach to combine these four models into a robust model to predict various ground motion intensity measures such as peak ground displacement (PGD), peak ground velocity (PGV), peak ground acceleration (PGA), and 5%-damped pseudo-spectral acceleration (PSA). The model input parameters are moment magnitude, rupture distance, VS30, and ZTOR. The ensemble modeling attempts to remove the drawbacks or deficiencies of different ML algorithms while capturing their advantages and accounts for epistemic uncertainty. Although no functional form is provided, the model can capture salient features observed in ground motions such as saturation as well as geometrical spreading, anelastic attenuation, and nonlinear site amplification. The response spectra and the magnitude, distance, VS30, and ZTOR scaling trends are consistent and comparable with the NGA-West2 GMMs including several additional input parameters. We used a mixed-effects regression analysis to split the total aleatory uncertainty into between-event, within-station, and event-site–corrected components. The model is applicable to magnitudes from 3.0 to 8.0, rupture distances up to 300 km, and spectral periods of 0 to 10 s.</description><issn>8755-2930</issn><issn>1944-8201</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1OxDAUhC0EEmHhAHS-QBY7jmO7RCv-pEU0UEcvzsvPkrXBTkB03IEbchKyWjokqinmfaN5Q8g5Z0vOlbrQSsrMCJYJzg1X0hyQhJs8T3XG-CFJdn66OzgmJzFuGONFzlhCunuwXe-QDgjB9a79_vyqIGJN2-AnV9OtH3vvZqlxiLTxgcYOhsG_UxumOMJAZ3DsXid4xkh7R8GO_RvSEe3oXW9pwHYOiKfkqIEh4tmvLsjT9dXj6jZdP9zcrS7XKQimxjSr8kIoa4zmwuZGF8wAYI66qFBUoLmREtVsa1bxev6NCV0JqfIaJQPZiAXh-1wbfIwBm_Il9FsIHyVn5W6q8s9UM7PcMxFaLDd-Cm6u-A_wA9_Ga1E</recordid><startdate>202311</startdate><enddate>202311</enddate><creator>Sedaghati, Farhad</creator><creator>Pezeshk, Shahram</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4367-1184</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202311</creationdate><title>Machine learning–based ground motion models for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions</title><author>Sedaghati, Farhad ; Pezeshk, Shahram</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a307t-2b4637c99813c498609aae4e86be3ba81955e799880b1d201038b3574de50a5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sedaghati, Farhad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pezeshk, Shahram</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Earthquake spectra</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sedaghati, Farhad</au><au>Pezeshk, Shahram</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Machine learning–based ground motion models for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions</atitle><jtitle>Earthquake spectra</jtitle><date>2023-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2406</spage><epage>2435</epage><pages>2406-2435</pages><issn>8755-2930</issn><eissn>1944-8201</eissn><abstract>Data-driven ground motion models (GMMs) for the average horizontal component from shallow crustal continental earthquakes in active tectonic regions are derived using a subset of the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA)-West2 data set, including 14,518 recordings out of 285 earthquakes recorded at 2347 different stations. We use four different nonparametric supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms including Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Kernel-Ridge Regressor (KRR), Random Forest Regressor (RFR), and Support Vector Regressor (SVR) to construct four individual models. Then, we use a weighted average ensemble approach to combine these four models into a robust model to predict various ground motion intensity measures such as peak ground displacement (PGD), peak ground velocity (PGV), peak ground acceleration (PGA), and 5%-damped pseudo-spectral acceleration (PSA). The model input parameters are moment magnitude, rupture distance, VS30, and ZTOR. The ensemble modeling attempts to remove the drawbacks or deficiencies of different ML algorithms while capturing their advantages and accounts for epistemic uncertainty. Although no functional form is provided, the model can capture salient features observed in ground motions such as saturation as well as geometrical spreading, anelastic attenuation, and nonlinear site amplification. The response spectra and the magnitude, distance, VS30, and ZTOR scaling trends are consistent and comparable with the NGA-West2 GMMs including several additional input parameters. We used a mixed-effects regression analysis to split the total aleatory uncertainty into between-event, within-station, and event-site–corrected components. The model is applicable to magnitudes from 3.0 to 8.0, rupture distances up to 300 km, and spectral periods of 0 to 10 s.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/87552930231191759</doi><tpages>30</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4367-1184</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 8755-2930 |
ispartof | Earthquake spectra, 2023-11, Vol.39 (4), p.2406-2435 |
issn | 8755-2930 1944-8201 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_87552930231191759 |
source | Access via SAGE |
title | Machine learning–based ground motion models for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T18%3A34%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Machine%20learning%E2%80%93based%20ground%20motion%20models%20for%20shallow%20crustal%20earthquakes%20in%20active%20tectonic%20regions&rft.jtitle=Earthquake%20spectra&rft.au=Sedaghati,%20Farhad&rft.date=2023-11&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2406&rft.epage=2435&rft.pages=2406-2435&rft.issn=8755-2930&rft.eissn=1944-8201&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/87552930231191759&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_87552930231191759%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_87552930231191759&rfr_iscdi=true |