Machine learning–based ground motion models for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions

Data-driven ground motion models (GMMs) for the average horizontal component from shallow crustal continental earthquakes in active tectonic regions are derived using a subset of the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA)-West2 data set, including 14,518 recordings out of 285 earthquakes recorded at 2347...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earthquake spectra 2023-11, Vol.39 (4), p.2406-2435
Hauptverfasser: Sedaghati, Farhad, Pezeshk, Shahram
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2435
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2406
container_title Earthquake spectra
container_volume 39
creator Sedaghati, Farhad
Pezeshk, Shahram
description Data-driven ground motion models (GMMs) for the average horizontal component from shallow crustal continental earthquakes in active tectonic regions are derived using a subset of the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA)-West2 data set, including 14,518 recordings out of 285 earthquakes recorded at 2347 different stations. We use four different nonparametric supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms including Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Kernel-Ridge Regressor (KRR), Random Forest Regressor (RFR), and Support Vector Regressor (SVR) to construct four individual models. Then, we use a weighted average ensemble approach to combine these four models into a robust model to predict various ground motion intensity measures such as peak ground displacement (PGD), peak ground velocity (PGV), peak ground acceleration (PGA), and 5%-damped pseudo-spectral acceleration (PSA). The model input parameters are moment magnitude, rupture distance, VS30, and ZTOR. The ensemble modeling attempts to remove the drawbacks or deficiencies of different ML algorithms while capturing their advantages and accounts for epistemic uncertainty. Although no functional form is provided, the model can capture salient features observed in ground motions such as saturation as well as geometrical spreading, anelastic attenuation, and nonlinear site amplification. The response spectra and the magnitude, distance, VS30, and ZTOR scaling trends are consistent and comparable with the NGA-West2 GMMs including several additional input parameters. We used a mixed-effects regression analysis to split the total aleatory uncertainty into between-event, within-station, and event-site–corrected components. The model is applicable to magnitudes from 3.0 to 8.0, rupture distances up to 300 km, and spectral periods of 0 to 10 s.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/87552930231191759
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_87552930231191759</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_87552930231191759</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_87552930231191759</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a307t-2b4637c99813c498609aae4e86be3ba81955e799880b1d201038b3574de50a5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1OxDAUhC0EEmHhAHS-QBY7jmO7RCv-pEU0UEcvzsvPkrXBTkB03IEbchKyWjokqinmfaN5Q8g5Z0vOlbrQSsrMCJYJzg1X0hyQhJs8T3XG-CFJdn66OzgmJzFuGONFzlhCunuwXe-QDgjB9a79_vyqIGJN2-AnV9OtH3vvZqlxiLTxgcYOhsG_UxumOMJAZ3DsXid4xkh7R8GO_RvSEe3oXW9pwHYOiKfkqIEh4tmvLsjT9dXj6jZdP9zcrS7XKQimxjSr8kIoa4zmwuZGF8wAYI66qFBUoLmREtVsa1bxev6NCV0JqfIaJQPZiAXh-1wbfIwBm_Il9FsIHyVn5W6q8s9UM7PcMxFaLDd-Cm6u-A_wA9_Ga1E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Machine learning–based ground motion models for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Sedaghati, Farhad ; Pezeshk, Shahram</creator><creatorcontrib>Sedaghati, Farhad ; Pezeshk, Shahram</creatorcontrib><description>Data-driven ground motion models (GMMs) for the average horizontal component from shallow crustal continental earthquakes in active tectonic regions are derived using a subset of the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA)-West2 data set, including 14,518 recordings out of 285 earthquakes recorded at 2347 different stations. We use four different nonparametric supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms including Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Kernel-Ridge Regressor (KRR), Random Forest Regressor (RFR), and Support Vector Regressor (SVR) to construct four individual models. Then, we use a weighted average ensemble approach to combine these four models into a robust model to predict various ground motion intensity measures such as peak ground displacement (PGD), peak ground velocity (PGV), peak ground acceleration (PGA), and 5%-damped pseudo-spectral acceleration (PSA). The model input parameters are moment magnitude, rupture distance, VS30, and ZTOR. The ensemble modeling attempts to remove the drawbacks or deficiencies of different ML algorithms while capturing their advantages and accounts for epistemic uncertainty. Although no functional form is provided, the model can capture salient features observed in ground motions such as saturation as well as geometrical spreading, anelastic attenuation, and nonlinear site amplification. The response spectra and the magnitude, distance, VS30, and ZTOR scaling trends are consistent and comparable with the NGA-West2 GMMs including several additional input parameters. We used a mixed-effects regression analysis to split the total aleatory uncertainty into between-event, within-station, and event-site–corrected components. The model is applicable to magnitudes from 3.0 to 8.0, rupture distances up to 300 km, and spectral periods of 0 to 10 s.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8755-2930</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8201</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/87552930231191759</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Earthquake spectra, 2023-11, Vol.39 (4), p.2406-2435</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a307t-2b4637c99813c498609aae4e86be3ba81955e799880b1d201038b3574de50a5f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a307t-2b4637c99813c498609aae4e86be3ba81955e799880b1d201038b3574de50a5f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4367-1184</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/87552930231191759$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/87552930231191759$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21824,27929,27930,43626,43627</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sedaghati, Farhad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pezeshk, Shahram</creatorcontrib><title>Machine learning–based ground motion models for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions</title><title>Earthquake spectra</title><description>Data-driven ground motion models (GMMs) for the average horizontal component from shallow crustal continental earthquakes in active tectonic regions are derived using a subset of the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA)-West2 data set, including 14,518 recordings out of 285 earthquakes recorded at 2347 different stations. We use four different nonparametric supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms including Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Kernel-Ridge Regressor (KRR), Random Forest Regressor (RFR), and Support Vector Regressor (SVR) to construct four individual models. Then, we use a weighted average ensemble approach to combine these four models into a robust model to predict various ground motion intensity measures such as peak ground displacement (PGD), peak ground velocity (PGV), peak ground acceleration (PGA), and 5%-damped pseudo-spectral acceleration (PSA). The model input parameters are moment magnitude, rupture distance, VS30, and ZTOR. The ensemble modeling attempts to remove the drawbacks or deficiencies of different ML algorithms while capturing their advantages and accounts for epistemic uncertainty. Although no functional form is provided, the model can capture salient features observed in ground motions such as saturation as well as geometrical spreading, anelastic attenuation, and nonlinear site amplification. The response spectra and the magnitude, distance, VS30, and ZTOR scaling trends are consistent and comparable with the NGA-West2 GMMs including several additional input parameters. We used a mixed-effects regression analysis to split the total aleatory uncertainty into between-event, within-station, and event-site–corrected components. The model is applicable to magnitudes from 3.0 to 8.0, rupture distances up to 300 km, and spectral periods of 0 to 10 s.</description><issn>8755-2930</issn><issn>1944-8201</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1OxDAUhC0EEmHhAHS-QBY7jmO7RCv-pEU0UEcvzsvPkrXBTkB03IEbchKyWjokqinmfaN5Q8g5Z0vOlbrQSsrMCJYJzg1X0hyQhJs8T3XG-CFJdn66OzgmJzFuGONFzlhCunuwXe-QDgjB9a79_vyqIGJN2-AnV9OtH3vvZqlxiLTxgcYOhsG_UxumOMJAZ3DsXid4xkh7R8GO_RvSEe3oXW9pwHYOiKfkqIEh4tmvLsjT9dXj6jZdP9zcrS7XKQimxjSr8kIoa4zmwuZGF8wAYI66qFBUoLmREtVsa1bxev6NCV0JqfIaJQPZiAXh-1wbfIwBm_Il9FsIHyVn5W6q8s9UM7PcMxFaLDd-Cm6u-A_wA9_Ga1E</recordid><startdate>202311</startdate><enddate>202311</enddate><creator>Sedaghati, Farhad</creator><creator>Pezeshk, Shahram</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4367-1184</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202311</creationdate><title>Machine learning–based ground motion models for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions</title><author>Sedaghati, Farhad ; Pezeshk, Shahram</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a307t-2b4637c99813c498609aae4e86be3ba81955e799880b1d201038b3574de50a5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sedaghati, Farhad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pezeshk, Shahram</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Earthquake spectra</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sedaghati, Farhad</au><au>Pezeshk, Shahram</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Machine learning–based ground motion models for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions</atitle><jtitle>Earthquake spectra</jtitle><date>2023-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2406</spage><epage>2435</epage><pages>2406-2435</pages><issn>8755-2930</issn><eissn>1944-8201</eissn><abstract>Data-driven ground motion models (GMMs) for the average horizontal component from shallow crustal continental earthquakes in active tectonic regions are derived using a subset of the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA)-West2 data set, including 14,518 recordings out of 285 earthquakes recorded at 2347 different stations. We use four different nonparametric supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms including Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Kernel-Ridge Regressor (KRR), Random Forest Regressor (RFR), and Support Vector Regressor (SVR) to construct four individual models. Then, we use a weighted average ensemble approach to combine these four models into a robust model to predict various ground motion intensity measures such as peak ground displacement (PGD), peak ground velocity (PGV), peak ground acceleration (PGA), and 5%-damped pseudo-spectral acceleration (PSA). The model input parameters are moment magnitude, rupture distance, VS30, and ZTOR. The ensemble modeling attempts to remove the drawbacks or deficiencies of different ML algorithms while capturing their advantages and accounts for epistemic uncertainty. Although no functional form is provided, the model can capture salient features observed in ground motions such as saturation as well as geometrical spreading, anelastic attenuation, and nonlinear site amplification. The response spectra and the magnitude, distance, VS30, and ZTOR scaling trends are consistent and comparable with the NGA-West2 GMMs including several additional input parameters. We used a mixed-effects regression analysis to split the total aleatory uncertainty into between-event, within-station, and event-site–corrected components. The model is applicable to magnitudes from 3.0 to 8.0, rupture distances up to 300 km, and spectral periods of 0 to 10 s.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/87552930231191759</doi><tpages>30</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4367-1184</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 8755-2930
ispartof Earthquake spectra, 2023-11, Vol.39 (4), p.2406-2435
issn 8755-2930
1944-8201
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_87552930231191759
source Access via SAGE
title Machine learning–based ground motion models for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T18%3A34%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Machine%20learning%E2%80%93based%20ground%20motion%20models%20for%20shallow%20crustal%20earthquakes%20in%20active%20tectonic%20regions&rft.jtitle=Earthquake%20spectra&rft.au=Sedaghati,%20Farhad&rft.date=2023-11&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2406&rft.epage=2435&rft.pages=2406-2435&rft.issn=8755-2930&rft.eissn=1944-8201&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/87552930231191759&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_87552930231191759%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_87552930231191759&rfr_iscdi=true