High-resolution post-earthquake recovery simulation; impact of safety cordons
A framework is proposed to assess the impact of safety cordons on the recovery of community functions after an earthquake, using high-resolution geospatial information to simulate the damage, cordons, and recovery trajectories for buildings in the affected area. Ground motion maps are developed to c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Earthquake spectra 2022-08, Vol.38 (3), p.2061-2087 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2087 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 2061 |
container_title | Earthquake spectra |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Hulsey, Anne M Baker, Jack W Deierlein, Gregory G |
description | A framework is proposed to assess the impact of safety cordons on the recovery of community functions after an earthquake, using high-resolution geospatial information to simulate the damage, cordons, and recovery trajectories for buildings in the affected area. Ground motion maps are developed to characterize shaking intensities for regional building-level engineering assessments of damage, repair times, and recovery times to quantify the impact of access restrictions associated with cordons around tall buildings with impaired collapse safety. The results are presented as recovery curves that quantify the cumulative loss in building functionality across the community as a function of time following an earthquake. A case study considers recovery of office space in Downtown San Francisco, following a Mw7.2 event on the San Andreas Fault. For this scenario, an average of 219 community days of office functionality are lost in the first year, representing about 60% of the total office space capacity. About one-third of the loss is attributed to access restrictions associated with cordons around older tall buildings. The proposed framework can be used to investigate the efficacy of various mitigation strategies to expedite recovery. While the most effective strategy for mitigating the overall impact of cordon restrictions is to seismically retrofit older tall buildings that trigger cordons, other less expensive preparedness measures are shown to be effective, depending on the recovery time frame of interest. Specifically, recovery preparedness measures are generally more effective when evaluated for longer-term recovery targets (e.g. recovery of function after 12 months) compared with short-term targets (e.g. recovery after 4 months). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/87552930221075364 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_87552930221075364</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_87552930221075364</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_87552930221075364</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a343t-60f3091c8393430a81461c1a8185b6b80f8a4691791590f2a2e3c7dfe0e0c7fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKw0AQhhdRsFYfwFvukjqzu0l28SRFW6HiRc9hu51tU9Ns3U2Uvr0JFTwInn6G-b5h-Bm7RpggFsWtKrKMawGcIxSZyOUJG6GWMlUc8JSNhn06AOfsIsYtAOYSYMSe59V6kwaKvu7ayjfJ3sc2JRPazUdn3ikJZP0nhUMSq11Xm4G5S6rd3tg28S6JxlF7SKwPK9_ES3bmTB3p6ifH7O3x4XU6Txcvs6fp_SI1Qoo2zcEJ0GiV0P0MRqHM0WKfKlvmSwVOGZlrLDRmGhw3nIQtVo6AwBZuKcYMj3dt8DEGcuU-VDsTDiVCOfRR_umjdyZHJ5o1lVvfhaZ_8V_h5iisyUdbUWPpy4d69evyni5BauSZ-AaBr28c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>High-resolution post-earthquake recovery simulation; impact of safety cordons</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Hulsey, Anne M ; Baker, Jack W ; Deierlein, Gregory G</creator><creatorcontrib>Hulsey, Anne M ; Baker, Jack W ; Deierlein, Gregory G</creatorcontrib><description>A framework is proposed to assess the impact of safety cordons on the recovery of community functions after an earthquake, using high-resolution geospatial information to simulate the damage, cordons, and recovery trajectories for buildings in the affected area. Ground motion maps are developed to characterize shaking intensities for regional building-level engineering assessments of damage, repair times, and recovery times to quantify the impact of access restrictions associated with cordons around tall buildings with impaired collapse safety. The results are presented as recovery curves that quantify the cumulative loss in building functionality across the community as a function of time following an earthquake. A case study considers recovery of office space in Downtown San Francisco, following a Mw7.2 event on the San Andreas Fault. For this scenario, an average of 219 community days of office functionality are lost in the first year, representing about 60% of the total office space capacity. About one-third of the loss is attributed to access restrictions associated with cordons around older tall buildings. The proposed framework can be used to investigate the efficacy of various mitigation strategies to expedite recovery. While the most effective strategy for mitigating the overall impact of cordon restrictions is to seismically retrofit older tall buildings that trigger cordons, other less expensive preparedness measures are shown to be effective, depending on the recovery time frame of interest. Specifically, recovery preparedness measures are generally more effective when evaluated for longer-term recovery targets (e.g. recovery of function after 12 months) compared with short-term targets (e.g. recovery after 4 months).</description><identifier>ISSN: 8755-2930</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8201</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/87552930221075364</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute</publisher><subject>buildings ; California ; damage ; earthquakes ; Engineering geology ; FEMA P-58 ; geologic hazards ; ground motion ; high-resolution methods ; mitigation ; natural hazards ; REDi ; safety ; San Francisco California ; San Francisco County California ; seismic response ; seismic risk ; Seismology ; simulation ; structures ; United States</subject><ispartof>Earthquake spectra, 2022-08, Vol.38 (3), p.2061-2087</ispartof><rights>GeoRef, Copyright 2022, American Geosciences Institute. Reference includes data from GeoScienceWorld @Alexandria, VA @USA @United States</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a343t-60f3091c8393430a81461c1a8185b6b80f8a4691791590f2a2e3c7dfe0e0c7fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a343t-60f3091c8393430a81461c1a8185b6b80f8a4691791590f2a2e3c7dfe0e0c7fb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4265-055X ; 0000-0003-2744-9599</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/87552930221075364$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/87552930221075364$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hulsey, Anne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Jack W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deierlein, Gregory G</creatorcontrib><title>High-resolution post-earthquake recovery simulation; impact of safety cordons</title><title>Earthquake spectra</title><description>A framework is proposed to assess the impact of safety cordons on the recovery of community functions after an earthquake, using high-resolution geospatial information to simulate the damage, cordons, and recovery trajectories for buildings in the affected area. Ground motion maps are developed to characterize shaking intensities for regional building-level engineering assessments of damage, repair times, and recovery times to quantify the impact of access restrictions associated with cordons around tall buildings with impaired collapse safety. The results are presented as recovery curves that quantify the cumulative loss in building functionality across the community as a function of time following an earthquake. A case study considers recovery of office space in Downtown San Francisco, following a Mw7.2 event on the San Andreas Fault. For this scenario, an average of 219 community days of office functionality are lost in the first year, representing about 60% of the total office space capacity. About one-third of the loss is attributed to access restrictions associated with cordons around older tall buildings. The proposed framework can be used to investigate the efficacy of various mitigation strategies to expedite recovery. While the most effective strategy for mitigating the overall impact of cordon restrictions is to seismically retrofit older tall buildings that trigger cordons, other less expensive preparedness measures are shown to be effective, depending on the recovery time frame of interest. Specifically, recovery preparedness measures are generally more effective when evaluated for longer-term recovery targets (e.g. recovery of function after 12 months) compared with short-term targets (e.g. recovery after 4 months).</description><subject>buildings</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>damage</subject><subject>earthquakes</subject><subject>Engineering geology</subject><subject>FEMA P-58</subject><subject>geologic hazards</subject><subject>ground motion</subject><subject>high-resolution methods</subject><subject>mitigation</subject><subject>natural hazards</subject><subject>REDi</subject><subject>safety</subject><subject>San Francisco California</subject><subject>San Francisco County California</subject><subject>seismic response</subject><subject>seismic risk</subject><subject>Seismology</subject><subject>simulation</subject><subject>structures</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>8755-2930</issn><issn>1944-8201</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFKw0AQhhdRsFYfwFvukjqzu0l28SRFW6HiRc9hu51tU9Ns3U2Uvr0JFTwInn6G-b5h-Bm7RpggFsWtKrKMawGcIxSZyOUJG6GWMlUc8JSNhn06AOfsIsYtAOYSYMSe59V6kwaKvu7ayjfJ3sc2JRPazUdn3ikJZP0nhUMSq11Xm4G5S6rd3tg28S6JxlF7SKwPK9_ES3bmTB3p6ifH7O3x4XU6Txcvs6fp_SI1Qoo2zcEJ0GiV0P0MRqHM0WKfKlvmSwVOGZlrLDRmGhw3nIQtVo6AwBZuKcYMj3dt8DEGcuU-VDsTDiVCOfRR_umjdyZHJ5o1lVvfhaZ_8V_h5iisyUdbUWPpy4d69evyni5BauSZ-AaBr28c</recordid><startdate>202208</startdate><enddate>202208</enddate><creator>Hulsey, Anne M</creator><creator>Baker, Jack W</creator><creator>Deierlein, Gregory G</creator><general>Earthquake Engineering Research Institute</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4265-055X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2744-9599</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202208</creationdate><title>High-resolution post-earthquake recovery simulation; impact of safety cordons</title><author>Hulsey, Anne M ; Baker, Jack W ; Deierlein, Gregory G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a343t-60f3091c8393430a81461c1a8185b6b80f8a4691791590f2a2e3c7dfe0e0c7fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>buildings</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>damage</topic><topic>earthquakes</topic><topic>Engineering geology</topic><topic>FEMA P-58</topic><topic>geologic hazards</topic><topic>ground motion</topic><topic>high-resolution methods</topic><topic>mitigation</topic><topic>natural hazards</topic><topic>REDi</topic><topic>safety</topic><topic>San Francisco California</topic><topic>San Francisco County California</topic><topic>seismic response</topic><topic>seismic risk</topic><topic>Seismology</topic><topic>simulation</topic><topic>structures</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hulsey, Anne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Jack W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deierlein, Gregory G</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Earthquake spectra</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hulsey, Anne M</au><au>Baker, Jack W</au><au>Deierlein, Gregory G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High-resolution post-earthquake recovery simulation; impact of safety cordons</atitle><jtitle>Earthquake spectra</jtitle><date>2022-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2061</spage><epage>2087</epage><pages>2061-2087</pages><issn>8755-2930</issn><eissn>1944-8201</eissn><abstract>A framework is proposed to assess the impact of safety cordons on the recovery of community functions after an earthquake, using high-resolution geospatial information to simulate the damage, cordons, and recovery trajectories for buildings in the affected area. Ground motion maps are developed to characterize shaking intensities for regional building-level engineering assessments of damage, repair times, and recovery times to quantify the impact of access restrictions associated with cordons around tall buildings with impaired collapse safety. The results are presented as recovery curves that quantify the cumulative loss in building functionality across the community as a function of time following an earthquake. A case study considers recovery of office space in Downtown San Francisco, following a Mw7.2 event on the San Andreas Fault. For this scenario, an average of 219 community days of office functionality are lost in the first year, representing about 60% of the total office space capacity. About one-third of the loss is attributed to access restrictions associated with cordons around older tall buildings. The proposed framework can be used to investigate the efficacy of various mitigation strategies to expedite recovery. While the most effective strategy for mitigating the overall impact of cordon restrictions is to seismically retrofit older tall buildings that trigger cordons, other less expensive preparedness measures are shown to be effective, depending on the recovery time frame of interest. Specifically, recovery preparedness measures are generally more effective when evaluated for longer-term recovery targets (e.g. recovery of function after 12 months) compared with short-term targets (e.g. recovery after 4 months).</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Earthquake Engineering Research Institute</pub><doi>10.1177/87552930221075364</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4265-055X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2744-9599</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 8755-2930 |
ispartof | Earthquake spectra, 2022-08, Vol.38 (3), p.2061-2087 |
issn | 8755-2930 1944-8201 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_87552930221075364 |
source | Access via SAGE |
subjects | buildings California damage earthquakes Engineering geology FEMA P-58 geologic hazards ground motion high-resolution methods mitigation natural hazards REDi safety San Francisco California San Francisco County California seismic response seismic risk Seismology simulation structures United States |
title | High-resolution post-earthquake recovery simulation; impact of safety cordons |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T14%3A53%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High-resolution%20post-earthquake%20recovery%20simulation;%20impact%20of%20safety%20cordons&rft.jtitle=Earthquake%20spectra&rft.au=Hulsey,%20Anne%20M&rft.date=2022-08&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2061&rft.epage=2087&rft.pages=2061-2087&rft.issn=8755-2930&rft.eissn=1944-8201&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/87552930221075364&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_87552930221075364%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_87552930221075364&rfr_iscdi=true |