The US Geological Survey ground failure product; near-real-time estimates of earthquake-triggered landslides and liquefaction
Since late 2018, the US Geological Survey (USGS) ground failure (GF) earthquake product has provided publicly available spatial estimates of earthquake-triggered landslide and liquefaction hazards, along with the qualitative hazard and population exposure-based alerts for M>6 earthquakes worldwid...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Earthquake spectra 2022-02, Vol.38 (1), p.5-36 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 36 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 5 |
container_title | Earthquake spectra |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Allstadt, Kate E Thompson, Eric M Jibson, Randall W Wald, David J Hearne, Michael Hunter, Edward J Fee, Jeremy Schovanec, Heather Slosky, Daniel Haynie, Kirstie L |
description | Since late 2018, the US Geological Survey (USGS) ground failure (GF) earthquake product has provided publicly available spatial estimates of earthquake-triggered landslide and liquefaction hazards, along with the qualitative hazard and population exposure-based alerts for M>6 earthquakes worldwide and in near real time (within ∼30 min). Earthquake losses are oftentimes greatly aggravated by the impacts due to ground failure, yet those particular events with dramatic additional losses have not, heretofore, been rapidly identifiable. The GF product now provides situational awareness about the potential extent and severity of ground failure in the crucial time period before direct observations are available. We describe our implementation of the GF product and the lessons learned from the earthquakes that have occurred since the GF product was released. We describe the product design process, the underlying GF models, the methods we have developed for modeling uncertainty, and the development of the alert levels. The GF product has been produced in near real time for 320 events over the 2-year period since its public implementation in late 2018 through early 2021. The majority of these events yielded the lowest level (green) alerts for all ground-failure types, with 25 resulting in elevated hazard or exposure to landslides and 47 for liquefaction. In a qualitative comparison between the GF product alerts and GF occurrence information, we found that the product succeeds at assigning appropriate alert levels in the majority of cases. Based on our experience with the product, we have identified the following priorities for future improvements: (1) refinements of the underlying probabilistic models to incorporate severity and explicitly model the type of landslide/liquefaction; (2) development of models for fatalities and economic losses due to ground failure; and (3) estimation of the impacts of ground failure on infrastructure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/87552930211032685 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_87552930211032685</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_87552930211032685</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_87552930211032685</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-af1bcb6f2107a58dee89cecb10b10448c49f6501055e5ed38fe15f04b4fea84c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_wFvuEk12k20WT1K0CgUPbc9LNplsU-OmTXaVHvzvbqngQRAG3sB73zA8hK4ZvWVsMrmTEyGyMqcZYzTPCilO0IiVnBOZUXaKRgefHALn6CKlDaWs4JSO0NdyDXi1wDMIPjROK48XffyAPW5i6FuDrXK-j4C3MZhed_e4BRVJBOVJ594BQxpEdZBwsHiwuvWuV29AuuiaBiIY7FVrkndmiAwb9m7Xg1W6c6G9RGdW-QRXPzpGq6fH5fSZzF9nL9OHOVG5LDqiLKt1XdiM0YkS0gDIUoOuGR2Gc6l5aQtBGRUCBJhcWmDCUl5zC0pynY8RO97VMaQUwVbbOHwd9xWj1aG_6k9_A3N7ZJJqoNqEPrbDi_8CN0eggZC0g1bDZ4je_LIZzbKKMpGXRf4N8VuCCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The US Geological Survey ground failure product; near-real-time estimates of earthquake-triggered landslides and liquefaction</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Allstadt, Kate E ; Thompson, Eric M ; Jibson, Randall W ; Wald, David J ; Hearne, Michael ; Hunter, Edward J ; Fee, Jeremy ; Schovanec, Heather ; Slosky, Daniel ; Haynie, Kirstie L</creator><creatorcontrib>Allstadt, Kate E ; Thompson, Eric M ; Jibson, Randall W ; Wald, David J ; Hearne, Michael ; Hunter, Edward J ; Fee, Jeremy ; Schovanec, Heather ; Slosky, Daniel ; Haynie, Kirstie L</creatorcontrib><description>Since late 2018, the US Geological Survey (USGS) ground failure (GF) earthquake product has provided publicly available spatial estimates of earthquake-triggered landslide and liquefaction hazards, along with the qualitative hazard and population exposure-based alerts for M>6 earthquakes worldwide and in near real time (within ∼30 min). Earthquake losses are oftentimes greatly aggravated by the impacts due to ground failure, yet those particular events with dramatic additional losses have not, heretofore, been rapidly identifiable. The GF product now provides situational awareness about the potential extent and severity of ground failure in the crucial time period before direct observations are available. We describe our implementation of the GF product and the lessons learned from the earthquakes that have occurred since the GF product was released. We describe the product design process, the underlying GF models, the methods we have developed for modeling uncertainty, and the development of the alert levels. The GF product has been produced in near real time for 320 events over the 2-year period since its public implementation in late 2018 through early 2021. The majority of these events yielded the lowest level (green) alerts for all ground-failure types, with 25 resulting in elevated hazard or exposure to landslides and 47 for liquefaction. In a qualitative comparison between the GF product alerts and GF occurrence information, we found that the product succeeds at assigning appropriate alert levels in the majority of cases. Based on our experience with the product, we have identified the following priorities for future improvements: (1) refinements of the underlying probabilistic models to incorporate severity and explicitly model the type of landslide/liquefaction; (2) development of models for fatalities and economic losses due to ground failure; and (3) estimation of the impacts of ground failure on infrastructure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8755-2930</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8201</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/87552930211032685</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute</publisher><subject>data bases ; data processing ; earthquakes ; failures ; geologic hazards ; global ; infrastructure ; landslides ; liquefaction ; mass movements ; natural hazards ; near-real-time methods ; real-time methods ; Seismology ; ShakeMap ; statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>Earthquake spectra, 2022-02, Vol.38 (1), p.5-36</ispartof><rights>GeoRef, Copyright 2023, American Geosciences Institute. Reference includes data from GeoScienceWorld @Alexandria, VA @USA @United States</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-af1bcb6f2107a58dee89cecb10b10448c49f6501055e5ed38fe15f04b4fea84c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-af1bcb6f2107a58dee89cecb10b10448c49f6501055e5ed38fe15f04b4fea84c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6943-4806 ; 0000-0003-4977-5248</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/87552930211032685$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/87552930211032685$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allstadt, Kate E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Eric M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jibson, Randall W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wald, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hearne, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Edward J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fee, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schovanec, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slosky, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haynie, Kirstie L</creatorcontrib><title>The US Geological Survey ground failure product; near-real-time estimates of earthquake-triggered landslides and liquefaction</title><title>Earthquake spectra</title><description>Since late 2018, the US Geological Survey (USGS) ground failure (GF) earthquake product has provided publicly available spatial estimates of earthquake-triggered landslide and liquefaction hazards, along with the qualitative hazard and population exposure-based alerts for M>6 earthquakes worldwide and in near real time (within ∼30 min). Earthquake losses are oftentimes greatly aggravated by the impacts due to ground failure, yet those particular events with dramatic additional losses have not, heretofore, been rapidly identifiable. The GF product now provides situational awareness about the potential extent and severity of ground failure in the crucial time period before direct observations are available. We describe our implementation of the GF product and the lessons learned from the earthquakes that have occurred since the GF product was released. We describe the product design process, the underlying GF models, the methods we have developed for modeling uncertainty, and the development of the alert levels. The GF product has been produced in near real time for 320 events over the 2-year period since its public implementation in late 2018 through early 2021. The majority of these events yielded the lowest level (green) alerts for all ground-failure types, with 25 resulting in elevated hazard or exposure to landslides and 47 for liquefaction. In a qualitative comparison between the GF product alerts and GF occurrence information, we found that the product succeeds at assigning appropriate alert levels in the majority of cases. Based on our experience with the product, we have identified the following priorities for future improvements: (1) refinements of the underlying probabilistic models to incorporate severity and explicitly model the type of landslide/liquefaction; (2) development of models for fatalities and economic losses due to ground failure; and (3) estimation of the impacts of ground failure on infrastructure.</description><subject>data bases</subject><subject>data processing</subject><subject>earthquakes</subject><subject>failures</subject><subject>geologic hazards</subject><subject>global</subject><subject>infrastructure</subject><subject>landslides</subject><subject>liquefaction</subject><subject>mass movements</subject><subject>natural hazards</subject><subject>near-real-time methods</subject><subject>real-time methods</subject><subject>Seismology</subject><subject>ShakeMap</subject><subject>statistical analysis</subject><issn>8755-2930</issn><issn>1944-8201</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_wFvuEk12k20WT1K0CgUPbc9LNplsU-OmTXaVHvzvbqngQRAG3sB73zA8hK4ZvWVsMrmTEyGyMqcZYzTPCilO0IiVnBOZUXaKRgefHALn6CKlDaWs4JSO0NdyDXi1wDMIPjROK48XffyAPW5i6FuDrXK-j4C3MZhed_e4BRVJBOVJ594BQxpEdZBwsHiwuvWuV29AuuiaBiIY7FVrkndmiAwb9m7Xg1W6c6G9RGdW-QRXPzpGq6fH5fSZzF9nL9OHOVG5LDqiLKt1XdiM0YkS0gDIUoOuGR2Gc6l5aQtBGRUCBJhcWmDCUl5zC0pynY8RO97VMaQUwVbbOHwd9xWj1aG_6k9_A3N7ZJJqoNqEPrbDi_8CN0eggZC0g1bDZ4je_LIZzbKKMpGXRf4N8VuCCQ</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Allstadt, Kate E</creator><creator>Thompson, Eric M</creator><creator>Jibson, Randall W</creator><creator>Wald, David J</creator><creator>Hearne, Michael</creator><creator>Hunter, Edward J</creator><creator>Fee, Jeremy</creator><creator>Schovanec, Heather</creator><creator>Slosky, Daniel</creator><creator>Haynie, Kirstie L</creator><general>Earthquake Engineering Research Institute</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6943-4806</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4977-5248</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>The US Geological Survey ground failure product; near-real-time estimates of earthquake-triggered landslides and liquefaction</title><author>Allstadt, Kate E ; Thompson, Eric M ; Jibson, Randall W ; Wald, David J ; Hearne, Michael ; Hunter, Edward J ; Fee, Jeremy ; Schovanec, Heather ; Slosky, Daniel ; Haynie, Kirstie L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-af1bcb6f2107a58dee89cecb10b10448c49f6501055e5ed38fe15f04b4fea84c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>data bases</topic><topic>data processing</topic><topic>earthquakes</topic><topic>failures</topic><topic>geologic hazards</topic><topic>global</topic><topic>infrastructure</topic><topic>landslides</topic><topic>liquefaction</topic><topic>mass movements</topic><topic>natural hazards</topic><topic>near-real-time methods</topic><topic>real-time methods</topic><topic>Seismology</topic><topic>ShakeMap</topic><topic>statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allstadt, Kate E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Eric M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jibson, Randall W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wald, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hearne, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Edward J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fee, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schovanec, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slosky, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haynie, Kirstie L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Earthquake spectra</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allstadt, Kate E</au><au>Thompson, Eric M</au><au>Jibson, Randall W</au><au>Wald, David J</au><au>Hearne, Michael</au><au>Hunter, Edward J</au><au>Fee, Jeremy</au><au>Schovanec, Heather</au><au>Slosky, Daniel</au><au>Haynie, Kirstie L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The US Geological Survey ground failure product; near-real-time estimates of earthquake-triggered landslides and liquefaction</atitle><jtitle>Earthquake spectra</jtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>5-36</pages><issn>8755-2930</issn><eissn>1944-8201</eissn><abstract>Since late 2018, the US Geological Survey (USGS) ground failure (GF) earthquake product has provided publicly available spatial estimates of earthquake-triggered landslide and liquefaction hazards, along with the qualitative hazard and population exposure-based alerts for M>6 earthquakes worldwide and in near real time (within ∼30 min). Earthquake losses are oftentimes greatly aggravated by the impacts due to ground failure, yet those particular events with dramatic additional losses have not, heretofore, been rapidly identifiable. The GF product now provides situational awareness about the potential extent and severity of ground failure in the crucial time period before direct observations are available. We describe our implementation of the GF product and the lessons learned from the earthquakes that have occurred since the GF product was released. We describe the product design process, the underlying GF models, the methods we have developed for modeling uncertainty, and the development of the alert levels. The GF product has been produced in near real time for 320 events over the 2-year period since its public implementation in late 2018 through early 2021. The majority of these events yielded the lowest level (green) alerts for all ground-failure types, with 25 resulting in elevated hazard or exposure to landslides and 47 for liquefaction. In a qualitative comparison between the GF product alerts and GF occurrence information, we found that the product succeeds at assigning appropriate alert levels in the majority of cases. Based on our experience with the product, we have identified the following priorities for future improvements: (1) refinements of the underlying probabilistic models to incorporate severity and explicitly model the type of landslide/liquefaction; (2) development of models for fatalities and economic losses due to ground failure; and (3) estimation of the impacts of ground failure on infrastructure.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Earthquake Engineering Research Institute</pub><doi>10.1177/87552930211032685</doi><tpages>32</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6943-4806</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4977-5248</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 8755-2930 |
ispartof | Earthquake spectra, 2022-02, Vol.38 (1), p.5-36 |
issn | 8755-2930 1944-8201 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_87552930211032685 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | data bases data processing earthquakes failures geologic hazards global infrastructure landslides liquefaction mass movements natural hazards near-real-time methods real-time methods Seismology ShakeMap statistical analysis |
title | The US Geological Survey ground failure product; near-real-time estimates of earthquake-triggered landslides and liquefaction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T23%3A32%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20US%20Geological%20Survey%20ground%20failure%20product;%20near-real-time%20estimates%20of%20earthquake-triggered%20landslides%20and%20liquefaction&rft.jtitle=Earthquake%20spectra&rft.au=Allstadt,%20Kate%20E&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=5-36&rft.issn=8755-2930&rft.eissn=1944-8201&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/87552930211032685&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_87552930211032685%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_87552930211032685&rfr_iscdi=true |