The US Geological Survey ground failure product; near-real-time estimates of earthquake-triggered landslides and liquefaction

Since late 2018, the US Geological Survey (USGS) ground failure (GF) earthquake product has provided publicly available spatial estimates of earthquake-triggered landslide and liquefaction hazards, along with the qualitative hazard and population exposure-based alerts for M>6 earthquakes worldwid...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earthquake spectra 2022-02, Vol.38 (1), p.5-36
Hauptverfasser: Allstadt, Kate E, Thompson, Eric M, Jibson, Randall W, Wald, David J, Hearne, Michael, Hunter, Edward J, Fee, Jeremy, Schovanec, Heather, Slosky, Daniel, Haynie, Kirstie L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 36
container_issue 1
container_start_page 5
container_title Earthquake spectra
container_volume 38
creator Allstadt, Kate E
Thompson, Eric M
Jibson, Randall W
Wald, David J
Hearne, Michael
Hunter, Edward J
Fee, Jeremy
Schovanec, Heather
Slosky, Daniel
Haynie, Kirstie L
description Since late 2018, the US Geological Survey (USGS) ground failure (GF) earthquake product has provided publicly available spatial estimates of earthquake-triggered landslide and liquefaction hazards, along with the qualitative hazard and population exposure-based alerts for M>6 earthquakes worldwide and in near real time (within ∼30 min). Earthquake losses are oftentimes greatly aggravated by the impacts due to ground failure, yet those particular events with dramatic additional losses have not, heretofore, been rapidly identifiable. The GF product now provides situational awareness about the potential extent and severity of ground failure in the crucial time period before direct observations are available. We describe our implementation of the GF product and the lessons learned from the earthquakes that have occurred since the GF product was released. We describe the product design process, the underlying GF models, the methods we have developed for modeling uncertainty, and the development of the alert levels. The GF product has been produced in near real time for 320 events over the 2-year period since its public implementation in late 2018 through early 2021. The majority of these events yielded the lowest level (green) alerts for all ground-failure types, with 25 resulting in elevated hazard or exposure to landslides and 47 for liquefaction. In a qualitative comparison between the GF product alerts and GF occurrence information, we found that the product succeeds at assigning appropriate alert levels in the majority of cases. Based on our experience with the product, we have identified the following priorities for future improvements: (1) refinements of the underlying probabilistic models to incorporate severity and explicitly model the type of landslide/liquefaction; (2) development of models for fatalities and economic losses due to ground failure; and (3) estimation of the impacts of ground failure on infrastructure.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/87552930211032685
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_87552930211032685</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_87552930211032685</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_87552930211032685</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-af1bcb6f2107a58dee89cecb10b10448c49f6501055e5ed38fe15f04b4fea84c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_wFvuEk12k20WT1K0CgUPbc9LNplsU-OmTXaVHvzvbqngQRAG3sB73zA8hK4ZvWVsMrmTEyGyMqcZYzTPCilO0IiVnBOZUXaKRgefHALn6CKlDaWs4JSO0NdyDXi1wDMIPjROK48XffyAPW5i6FuDrXK-j4C3MZhed_e4BRVJBOVJ594BQxpEdZBwsHiwuvWuV29AuuiaBiIY7FVrkndmiAwb9m7Xg1W6c6G9RGdW-QRXPzpGq6fH5fSZzF9nL9OHOVG5LDqiLKt1XdiM0YkS0gDIUoOuGR2Gc6l5aQtBGRUCBJhcWmDCUl5zC0pynY8RO97VMaQUwVbbOHwd9xWj1aG_6k9_A3N7ZJJqoNqEPrbDi_8CN0eggZC0g1bDZ4je_LIZzbKKMpGXRf4N8VuCCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The US Geological Survey ground failure product; near-real-time estimates of earthquake-triggered landslides and liquefaction</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Allstadt, Kate E ; Thompson, Eric M ; Jibson, Randall W ; Wald, David J ; Hearne, Michael ; Hunter, Edward J ; Fee, Jeremy ; Schovanec, Heather ; Slosky, Daniel ; Haynie, Kirstie L</creator><creatorcontrib>Allstadt, Kate E ; Thompson, Eric M ; Jibson, Randall W ; Wald, David J ; Hearne, Michael ; Hunter, Edward J ; Fee, Jeremy ; Schovanec, Heather ; Slosky, Daniel ; Haynie, Kirstie L</creatorcontrib><description>Since late 2018, the US Geological Survey (USGS) ground failure (GF) earthquake product has provided publicly available spatial estimates of earthquake-triggered landslide and liquefaction hazards, along with the qualitative hazard and population exposure-based alerts for M&gt;6 earthquakes worldwide and in near real time (within ∼30 min). Earthquake losses are oftentimes greatly aggravated by the impacts due to ground failure, yet those particular events with dramatic additional losses have not, heretofore, been rapidly identifiable. The GF product now provides situational awareness about the potential extent and severity of ground failure in the crucial time period before direct observations are available. We describe our implementation of the GF product and the lessons learned from the earthquakes that have occurred since the GF product was released. We describe the product design process, the underlying GF models, the methods we have developed for modeling uncertainty, and the development of the alert levels. The GF product has been produced in near real time for 320 events over the 2-year period since its public implementation in late 2018 through early 2021. The majority of these events yielded the lowest level (green) alerts for all ground-failure types, with 25 resulting in elevated hazard or exposure to landslides and 47 for liquefaction. In a qualitative comparison between the GF product alerts and GF occurrence information, we found that the product succeeds at assigning appropriate alert levels in the majority of cases. Based on our experience with the product, we have identified the following priorities for future improvements: (1) refinements of the underlying probabilistic models to incorporate severity and explicitly model the type of landslide/liquefaction; (2) development of models for fatalities and economic losses due to ground failure; and (3) estimation of the impacts of ground failure on infrastructure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8755-2930</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8201</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/87552930211032685</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute</publisher><subject>data bases ; data processing ; earthquakes ; failures ; geologic hazards ; global ; infrastructure ; landslides ; liquefaction ; mass movements ; natural hazards ; near-real-time methods ; real-time methods ; Seismology ; ShakeMap ; statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>Earthquake spectra, 2022-02, Vol.38 (1), p.5-36</ispartof><rights>GeoRef, Copyright 2023, American Geosciences Institute. Reference includes data from GeoScienceWorld @Alexandria, VA @USA @United States</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-af1bcb6f2107a58dee89cecb10b10448c49f6501055e5ed38fe15f04b4fea84c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-af1bcb6f2107a58dee89cecb10b10448c49f6501055e5ed38fe15f04b4fea84c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6943-4806 ; 0000-0003-4977-5248</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/87552930211032685$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/87552930211032685$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allstadt, Kate E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Eric M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jibson, Randall W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wald, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hearne, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Edward J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fee, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schovanec, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slosky, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haynie, Kirstie L</creatorcontrib><title>The US Geological Survey ground failure product; near-real-time estimates of earthquake-triggered landslides and liquefaction</title><title>Earthquake spectra</title><description>Since late 2018, the US Geological Survey (USGS) ground failure (GF) earthquake product has provided publicly available spatial estimates of earthquake-triggered landslide and liquefaction hazards, along with the qualitative hazard and population exposure-based alerts for M&gt;6 earthquakes worldwide and in near real time (within ∼30 min). Earthquake losses are oftentimes greatly aggravated by the impacts due to ground failure, yet those particular events with dramatic additional losses have not, heretofore, been rapidly identifiable. The GF product now provides situational awareness about the potential extent and severity of ground failure in the crucial time period before direct observations are available. We describe our implementation of the GF product and the lessons learned from the earthquakes that have occurred since the GF product was released. We describe the product design process, the underlying GF models, the methods we have developed for modeling uncertainty, and the development of the alert levels. The GF product has been produced in near real time for 320 events over the 2-year period since its public implementation in late 2018 through early 2021. The majority of these events yielded the lowest level (green) alerts for all ground-failure types, with 25 resulting in elevated hazard or exposure to landslides and 47 for liquefaction. In a qualitative comparison between the GF product alerts and GF occurrence information, we found that the product succeeds at assigning appropriate alert levels in the majority of cases. Based on our experience with the product, we have identified the following priorities for future improvements: (1) refinements of the underlying probabilistic models to incorporate severity and explicitly model the type of landslide/liquefaction; (2) development of models for fatalities and economic losses due to ground failure; and (3) estimation of the impacts of ground failure on infrastructure.</description><subject>data bases</subject><subject>data processing</subject><subject>earthquakes</subject><subject>failures</subject><subject>geologic hazards</subject><subject>global</subject><subject>infrastructure</subject><subject>landslides</subject><subject>liquefaction</subject><subject>mass movements</subject><subject>natural hazards</subject><subject>near-real-time methods</subject><subject>real-time methods</subject><subject>Seismology</subject><subject>ShakeMap</subject><subject>statistical analysis</subject><issn>8755-2930</issn><issn>1944-8201</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_wFvuEk12k20WT1K0CgUPbc9LNplsU-OmTXaVHvzvbqngQRAG3sB73zA8hK4ZvWVsMrmTEyGyMqcZYzTPCilO0IiVnBOZUXaKRgefHALn6CKlDaWs4JSO0NdyDXi1wDMIPjROK48XffyAPW5i6FuDrXK-j4C3MZhed_e4BRVJBOVJ594BQxpEdZBwsHiwuvWuV29AuuiaBiIY7FVrkndmiAwb9m7Xg1W6c6G9RGdW-QRXPzpGq6fH5fSZzF9nL9OHOVG5LDqiLKt1XdiM0YkS0gDIUoOuGR2Gc6l5aQtBGRUCBJhcWmDCUl5zC0pynY8RO97VMaQUwVbbOHwd9xWj1aG_6k9_A3N7ZJJqoNqEPrbDi_8CN0eggZC0g1bDZ4je_LIZzbKKMpGXRf4N8VuCCQ</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Allstadt, Kate E</creator><creator>Thompson, Eric M</creator><creator>Jibson, Randall W</creator><creator>Wald, David J</creator><creator>Hearne, Michael</creator><creator>Hunter, Edward J</creator><creator>Fee, Jeremy</creator><creator>Schovanec, Heather</creator><creator>Slosky, Daniel</creator><creator>Haynie, Kirstie L</creator><general>Earthquake Engineering Research Institute</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6943-4806</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4977-5248</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>The US Geological Survey ground failure product; near-real-time estimates of earthquake-triggered landslides and liquefaction</title><author>Allstadt, Kate E ; Thompson, Eric M ; Jibson, Randall W ; Wald, David J ; Hearne, Michael ; Hunter, Edward J ; Fee, Jeremy ; Schovanec, Heather ; Slosky, Daniel ; Haynie, Kirstie L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-af1bcb6f2107a58dee89cecb10b10448c49f6501055e5ed38fe15f04b4fea84c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>data bases</topic><topic>data processing</topic><topic>earthquakes</topic><topic>failures</topic><topic>geologic hazards</topic><topic>global</topic><topic>infrastructure</topic><topic>landslides</topic><topic>liquefaction</topic><topic>mass movements</topic><topic>natural hazards</topic><topic>near-real-time methods</topic><topic>real-time methods</topic><topic>Seismology</topic><topic>ShakeMap</topic><topic>statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allstadt, Kate E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Eric M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jibson, Randall W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wald, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hearne, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Edward J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fee, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schovanec, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slosky, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haynie, Kirstie L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Earthquake spectra</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allstadt, Kate E</au><au>Thompson, Eric M</au><au>Jibson, Randall W</au><au>Wald, David J</au><au>Hearne, Michael</au><au>Hunter, Edward J</au><au>Fee, Jeremy</au><au>Schovanec, Heather</au><au>Slosky, Daniel</au><au>Haynie, Kirstie L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The US Geological Survey ground failure product; near-real-time estimates of earthquake-triggered landslides and liquefaction</atitle><jtitle>Earthquake spectra</jtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>5-36</pages><issn>8755-2930</issn><eissn>1944-8201</eissn><abstract>Since late 2018, the US Geological Survey (USGS) ground failure (GF) earthquake product has provided publicly available spatial estimates of earthquake-triggered landslide and liquefaction hazards, along with the qualitative hazard and population exposure-based alerts for M&gt;6 earthquakes worldwide and in near real time (within ∼30 min). Earthquake losses are oftentimes greatly aggravated by the impacts due to ground failure, yet those particular events with dramatic additional losses have not, heretofore, been rapidly identifiable. The GF product now provides situational awareness about the potential extent and severity of ground failure in the crucial time period before direct observations are available. We describe our implementation of the GF product and the lessons learned from the earthquakes that have occurred since the GF product was released. We describe the product design process, the underlying GF models, the methods we have developed for modeling uncertainty, and the development of the alert levels. The GF product has been produced in near real time for 320 events over the 2-year period since its public implementation in late 2018 through early 2021. The majority of these events yielded the lowest level (green) alerts for all ground-failure types, with 25 resulting in elevated hazard or exposure to landslides and 47 for liquefaction. In a qualitative comparison between the GF product alerts and GF occurrence information, we found that the product succeeds at assigning appropriate alert levels in the majority of cases. Based on our experience with the product, we have identified the following priorities for future improvements: (1) refinements of the underlying probabilistic models to incorporate severity and explicitly model the type of landslide/liquefaction; (2) development of models for fatalities and economic losses due to ground failure; and (3) estimation of the impacts of ground failure on infrastructure.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Earthquake Engineering Research Institute</pub><doi>10.1177/87552930211032685</doi><tpages>32</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6943-4806</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4977-5248</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 8755-2930
ispartof Earthquake spectra, 2022-02, Vol.38 (1), p.5-36
issn 8755-2930
1944-8201
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_87552930211032685
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects data bases
data processing
earthquakes
failures
geologic hazards
global
infrastructure
landslides
liquefaction
mass movements
natural hazards
near-real-time methods
real-time methods
Seismology
ShakeMap
statistical analysis
title The US Geological Survey ground failure product; near-real-time estimates of earthquake-triggered landslides and liquefaction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T23%3A32%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20US%20Geological%20Survey%20ground%20failure%20product;%20near-real-time%20estimates%20of%20earthquake-triggered%20landslides%20and%20liquefaction&rft.jtitle=Earthquake%20spectra&rft.au=Allstadt,%20Kate%20E&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=5-36&rft.issn=8755-2930&rft.eissn=1944-8201&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/87552930211032685&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_87552930211032685%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_87552930211032685&rfr_iscdi=true