Conducting rapid qualitative research amongst people with experience of rough sleeping in London during the COVID-19 pandemic

In March 2020, the ‘Everyone In’ initiative was introduced by the UK government as a public health response to COVID-19. This initiative sought to temporarily accommodate people experiencing rough sleeping in hotels in all local authority areas throughout England. In London, ‘Everyone In’ involved t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research methods in medicine & health sciences 2021-09, Vol.2 (4), p.124-139
Hauptverfasser: Parkin, Stephen, Neale, Joanne, Roberts, Emmert, Brobbin, Eileen, Bowen, Alice, Hermann, Laura, Dwyer, Georges-Jacques, Turner, Richard, Henderson, Juliet, Kuester, Landon, McDonald, Rebecca, Radcliffe, Polly, Robson, Deborah, Craft, Sam, Strang, John, Metrebian, Nicola
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 139
container_issue 4
container_start_page 124
container_title Research methods in medicine & health sciences
container_volume 2
creator Parkin, Stephen
Neale, Joanne
Roberts, Emmert
Brobbin, Eileen
Bowen, Alice
Hermann, Laura
Dwyer, Georges-Jacques
Turner, Richard
Henderson, Juliet
Kuester, Landon
McDonald, Rebecca
Radcliffe, Polly
Robson, Deborah
Craft, Sam
Strang, John
Metrebian, Nicola
description In March 2020, the ‘Everyone In’ initiative was introduced by the UK government as a public health response to COVID-19. This initiative sought to temporarily accommodate people experiencing rough sleeping in hotels in all local authority areas throughout England. In London, ‘Everyone In’ involved the procurement of vacant accommodation in over 100 hotels and temporarily re-housed approximately 2000 individuals. A rapid qualitative study was undertaken within two hotels to explore experiences of the initiative from the perspective of people accommodated in the hotels. This article describes how standard qualitative methods were adapted and implemented to complete the study whilst meeting COVID-19 social distancing guidelines. The research involved a longitudinal design of a two-stage qualitative interview that sought to capture residents’ experience of ‘Everyone In’ at two points in time (while in the hotel and when residents had left the hotel). Adapted qualitative methods were employed by a team of 13 researchers. These adaptations included socially distanced leaflet dropping, telephone-based participant recruitment, a remote, multistage, longitudinal qualitative telephone interviewing and rapid framework analysis. 35 hotel residents were recruited into the study (two subsequently withdrew participation). A total of 299 (of a possible 330) short interviews were completed by 33 participants (26 male and 7 female) as part of the multi-stage, longitudinal design of the study. This study indicates that adapted qualitative research methods employed during a pandemic can be successfully applied to obtain insights and experiences (of individuals and groups) otherwise difficult to reach and/or complex to understand.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/26320843211061301
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_26320843211061301</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_26320843211061301</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_26320843211061301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1721-3926cada48b0e23ad19ac3b8db46e95293407eabff43bc0c83a832a5830bd5353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOIzzAO7yAh1z6XUp9TYw4EbdltPktM3QSWrSeln47k4ZF4Lg6vz88H0cfkIuOVtznmVXIpWC5bEUnLOUS8ZPyGLuork8_ZXPySqEHWNMFKmUIl-Qr9JZPanR2JZ6GIymrxP0ZoTRvCH1GBC86ijsnW3DSAd0Q4_03YwdxY8BvUGrkLqGeje1HQ094jC7jKXbg9lZqic_F2OHtHx82dxEvKADWI17oy7IWQN9wNXPXZLnu9un8iHaPt5vyuttpHgmeCQLkSrQEOc1QyFB8wKUrHNdxykWiShkzDKEumliWSumcgm5FJDkktU6kYlcEn70Ku9C8NhUgzd78J8VZ9U8YfVnwgOzPjIBWqx2bvL28OI_wDfVB3IB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conducting rapid qualitative research amongst people with experience of rough sleeping in London during the COVID-19 pandemic</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Parkin, Stephen ; Neale, Joanne ; Roberts, Emmert ; Brobbin, Eileen ; Bowen, Alice ; Hermann, Laura ; Dwyer, Georges-Jacques ; Turner, Richard ; Henderson, Juliet ; Kuester, Landon ; McDonald, Rebecca ; Radcliffe, Polly ; Robson, Deborah ; Craft, Sam ; Strang, John ; Metrebian, Nicola</creator><creatorcontrib>Parkin, Stephen ; Neale, Joanne ; Roberts, Emmert ; Brobbin, Eileen ; Bowen, Alice ; Hermann, Laura ; Dwyer, Georges-Jacques ; Turner, Richard ; Henderson, Juliet ; Kuester, Landon ; McDonald, Rebecca ; Radcliffe, Polly ; Robson, Deborah ; Craft, Sam ; Strang, John ; Metrebian, Nicola</creatorcontrib><description>In March 2020, the ‘Everyone In’ initiative was introduced by the UK government as a public health response to COVID-19. This initiative sought to temporarily accommodate people experiencing rough sleeping in hotels in all local authority areas throughout England. In London, ‘Everyone In’ involved the procurement of vacant accommodation in over 100 hotels and temporarily re-housed approximately 2000 individuals. A rapid qualitative study was undertaken within two hotels to explore experiences of the initiative from the perspective of people accommodated in the hotels. This article describes how standard qualitative methods were adapted and implemented to complete the study whilst meeting COVID-19 social distancing guidelines. The research involved a longitudinal design of a two-stage qualitative interview that sought to capture residents’ experience of ‘Everyone In’ at two points in time (while in the hotel and when residents had left the hotel). Adapted qualitative methods were employed by a team of 13 researchers. These adaptations included socially distanced leaflet dropping, telephone-based participant recruitment, a remote, multistage, longitudinal qualitative telephone interviewing and rapid framework analysis. 35 hotel residents were recruited into the study (two subsequently withdrew participation). A total of 299 (of a possible 330) short interviews were completed by 33 participants (26 male and 7 female) as part of the multi-stage, longitudinal design of the study. This study indicates that adapted qualitative research methods employed during a pandemic can be successfully applied to obtain insights and experiences (of individuals and groups) otherwise difficult to reach and/or complex to understand.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2632-0843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2632-0843</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/26320843211061301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Research methods in medicine &amp; health sciences, 2021-09, Vol.2 (4), p.124-139</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1721-3926cada48b0e23ad19ac3b8db46e95293407eabff43bc0c83a832a5830bd5353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1721-3926cada48b0e23ad19ac3b8db46e95293407eabff43bc0c83a832a5830bd5353</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1621-0945</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/26320843211061301$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/26320843211061301$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,43619,43620</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parkin, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neale, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Emmert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brobbin, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowen, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwyer, Georges-Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Juliet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuester, Landon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radcliffe, Polly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robson, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craft, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strang, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metrebian, Nicola</creatorcontrib><title>Conducting rapid qualitative research amongst people with experience of rough sleeping in London during the COVID-19 pandemic</title><title>Research methods in medicine &amp; health sciences</title><description>In March 2020, the ‘Everyone In’ initiative was introduced by the UK government as a public health response to COVID-19. This initiative sought to temporarily accommodate people experiencing rough sleeping in hotels in all local authority areas throughout England. In London, ‘Everyone In’ involved the procurement of vacant accommodation in over 100 hotels and temporarily re-housed approximately 2000 individuals. A rapid qualitative study was undertaken within two hotels to explore experiences of the initiative from the perspective of people accommodated in the hotels. This article describes how standard qualitative methods were adapted and implemented to complete the study whilst meeting COVID-19 social distancing guidelines. The research involved a longitudinal design of a two-stage qualitative interview that sought to capture residents’ experience of ‘Everyone In’ at two points in time (while in the hotel and when residents had left the hotel). Adapted qualitative methods were employed by a team of 13 researchers. These adaptations included socially distanced leaflet dropping, telephone-based participant recruitment, a remote, multistage, longitudinal qualitative telephone interviewing and rapid framework analysis. 35 hotel residents were recruited into the study (two subsequently withdrew participation). A total of 299 (of a possible 330) short interviews were completed by 33 participants (26 male and 7 female) as part of the multi-stage, longitudinal design of the study. This study indicates that adapted qualitative research methods employed during a pandemic can be successfully applied to obtain insights and experiences (of individuals and groups) otherwise difficult to reach and/or complex to understand.</description><issn>2632-0843</issn><issn>2632-0843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOIzzAO7yAh1z6XUp9TYw4EbdltPktM3QSWrSeln47k4ZF4Lg6vz88H0cfkIuOVtznmVXIpWC5bEUnLOUS8ZPyGLuork8_ZXPySqEHWNMFKmUIl-Qr9JZPanR2JZ6GIymrxP0ZoTRvCH1GBC86ijsnW3DSAd0Q4_03YwdxY8BvUGrkLqGeje1HQ094jC7jKXbg9lZqic_F2OHtHx82dxEvKADWI17oy7IWQN9wNXPXZLnu9un8iHaPt5vyuttpHgmeCQLkSrQEOc1QyFB8wKUrHNdxykWiShkzDKEumliWSumcgm5FJDkktU6kYlcEn70Ku9C8NhUgzd78J8VZ9U8YfVnwgOzPjIBWqx2bvL28OI_wDfVB3IB</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Parkin, Stephen</creator><creator>Neale, Joanne</creator><creator>Roberts, Emmert</creator><creator>Brobbin, Eileen</creator><creator>Bowen, Alice</creator><creator>Hermann, Laura</creator><creator>Dwyer, Georges-Jacques</creator><creator>Turner, Richard</creator><creator>Henderson, Juliet</creator><creator>Kuester, Landon</creator><creator>McDonald, Rebecca</creator><creator>Radcliffe, Polly</creator><creator>Robson, Deborah</creator><creator>Craft, Sam</creator><creator>Strang, John</creator><creator>Metrebian, Nicola</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1621-0945</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Conducting rapid qualitative research amongst people with experience of rough sleeping in London during the COVID-19 pandemic</title><author>Parkin, Stephen ; Neale, Joanne ; Roberts, Emmert ; Brobbin, Eileen ; Bowen, Alice ; Hermann, Laura ; Dwyer, Georges-Jacques ; Turner, Richard ; Henderson, Juliet ; Kuester, Landon ; McDonald, Rebecca ; Radcliffe, Polly ; Robson, Deborah ; Craft, Sam ; Strang, John ; Metrebian, Nicola</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1721-3926cada48b0e23ad19ac3b8db46e95293407eabff43bc0c83a832a5830bd5353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parkin, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neale, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Emmert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brobbin, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowen, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwyer, Georges-Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Juliet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuester, Landon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radcliffe, Polly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robson, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craft, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strang, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metrebian, Nicola</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Research methods in medicine &amp; health sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parkin, Stephen</au><au>Neale, Joanne</au><au>Roberts, Emmert</au><au>Brobbin, Eileen</au><au>Bowen, Alice</au><au>Hermann, Laura</au><au>Dwyer, Georges-Jacques</au><au>Turner, Richard</au><au>Henderson, Juliet</au><au>Kuester, Landon</au><au>McDonald, Rebecca</au><au>Radcliffe, Polly</au><au>Robson, Deborah</au><au>Craft, Sam</au><au>Strang, John</au><au>Metrebian, Nicola</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conducting rapid qualitative research amongst people with experience of rough sleeping in London during the COVID-19 pandemic</atitle><jtitle>Research methods in medicine &amp; health sciences</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>124</spage><epage>139</epage><pages>124-139</pages><issn>2632-0843</issn><eissn>2632-0843</eissn><abstract>In March 2020, the ‘Everyone In’ initiative was introduced by the UK government as a public health response to COVID-19. This initiative sought to temporarily accommodate people experiencing rough sleeping in hotels in all local authority areas throughout England. In London, ‘Everyone In’ involved the procurement of vacant accommodation in over 100 hotels and temporarily re-housed approximately 2000 individuals. A rapid qualitative study was undertaken within two hotels to explore experiences of the initiative from the perspective of people accommodated in the hotels. This article describes how standard qualitative methods were adapted and implemented to complete the study whilst meeting COVID-19 social distancing guidelines. The research involved a longitudinal design of a two-stage qualitative interview that sought to capture residents’ experience of ‘Everyone In’ at two points in time (while in the hotel and when residents had left the hotel). Adapted qualitative methods were employed by a team of 13 researchers. These adaptations included socially distanced leaflet dropping, telephone-based participant recruitment, a remote, multistage, longitudinal qualitative telephone interviewing and rapid framework analysis. 35 hotel residents were recruited into the study (two subsequently withdrew participation). A total of 299 (of a possible 330) short interviews were completed by 33 participants (26 male and 7 female) as part of the multi-stage, longitudinal design of the study. This study indicates that adapted qualitative research methods employed during a pandemic can be successfully applied to obtain insights and experiences (of individuals and groups) otherwise difficult to reach and/or complex to understand.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/26320843211061301</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1621-0945</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2632-0843
ispartof Research methods in medicine & health sciences, 2021-09, Vol.2 (4), p.124-139
issn 2632-0843
2632-0843
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_26320843211061301
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Conducting rapid qualitative research amongst people with experience of rough sleeping in London during the COVID-19 pandemic
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T09%3A42%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conducting%20rapid%20qualitative%20research%20amongst%20people%20with%20experience%20of%20rough%20sleeping%20in%20London%20during%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic&rft.jtitle=Research%20methods%20in%20medicine%20&%20health%20sciences&rft.au=Parkin,%20Stephen&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=124&rft.epage=139&rft.pages=124-139&rft.issn=2632-0843&rft.eissn=2632-0843&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/26320843211061301&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_26320843211061301%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_26320843211061301&rfr_iscdi=true