Improvising against the racial state in Atlanta: Reimagining agency in environmental justice

Recent scholarship on environmental justice highlights a concern about the relationship between the racial state and social movement strategy. This paper addresses the ingenuity of environmental justice organizing in the Proctor Creek and South River watersheds of Atlanta, Georgia, each home to pred...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environment and planning. C, Politics and space Politics and space, 2021-11, Vol.39 (7), p.1586-1605
Hauptverfasser: Milligan, Richard, McCreary, Tyler, Jelks, Na’Taki Osborne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1605
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1586
container_title Environment and planning. C, Politics and space
container_volume 39
creator Milligan, Richard
McCreary, Tyler
Jelks, Na’Taki Osborne
description Recent scholarship on environmental justice highlights a concern about the relationship between the racial state and social movement strategy. This paper addresses the ingenuity of environmental justice organizing in the Proctor Creek and South River watersheds of Atlanta, Georgia, each home to predominantly Black communities and unjust flows of toxicants and sewage through urban creeks, streams, and rivers. We begin from critiques of the failure of institutionalized environmental justice and the state’s role in maintaining environmental racisms. To examine organizing responses to these circumstances, we analyze the improvisational politics of social movements in the context of the racial state, theoretically drawing from Charles Lee’s Ingenious Citizenship (2016). Empirically investigating the work of Atlanta community organizers, we emphasize pathways of strategic innovation among environmental justice organizers that improvise against the racial state even while negotiating with it. The article presents evidence of organizers challenging dominant modes of quantifying environmental injustice, appropriating and repurposing the language of environmental restoration, and improvising in the spaces of environmental governance. While state recognition has sought to contain or co-opt movements, we demonstrate the continuing vitality of mobilizations that simultaneously make demands of the state and rupture the governing forms of knowledge and practice that reinforce environmental racisms.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/23996544211038944
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_23996544211038944</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_23996544211038944</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_23996544211038944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-6501fa6ff7d6f827558f665fffe8ad1c0d852f4457c7b3b07f4b1fa99a7f5a263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1KAzEQhYMoWGofwLu8QGuy-V3vSvGnUBBE74QlTTM1y262JGmhb29KizeCVzPMmW84cxC6p2RGqVIPFatrKTivKCVM15xfodFpNpVCVNe_Pee3aJJSSwihmjPNxAh9LftdHA4--bDFZmt8SBnnb4ejsd50OGWTHfYBz3NnQjaP-N353mx9OAMu2ONJduHg4xB6V3Y63O5T9tbdoRswXXKTSx2jz-enj8XrdPX2slzMV1PLqMrFGaFgJIDaSNCVEkKDlAIAnDYbaslGiwo4F8qqNVsTBXxdgLo2CoSpJBsjer5r45BSdNDsYjEZjw0lzSmh5k9ChZmdmVSeaNphH0Ox-A_wAw1hZ2M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improvising against the racial state in Atlanta: Reimagining agency in environmental justice</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Milligan, Richard ; McCreary, Tyler ; Jelks, Na’Taki Osborne</creator><creatorcontrib>Milligan, Richard ; McCreary, Tyler ; Jelks, Na’Taki Osborne</creatorcontrib><description>Recent scholarship on environmental justice highlights a concern about the relationship between the racial state and social movement strategy. This paper addresses the ingenuity of environmental justice organizing in the Proctor Creek and South River watersheds of Atlanta, Georgia, each home to predominantly Black communities and unjust flows of toxicants and sewage through urban creeks, streams, and rivers. We begin from critiques of the failure of institutionalized environmental justice and the state’s role in maintaining environmental racisms. To examine organizing responses to these circumstances, we analyze the improvisational politics of social movements in the context of the racial state, theoretically drawing from Charles Lee’s Ingenious Citizenship (2016). Empirically investigating the work of Atlanta community organizers, we emphasize pathways of strategic innovation among environmental justice organizers that improvise against the racial state even while negotiating with it. The article presents evidence of organizers challenging dominant modes of quantifying environmental injustice, appropriating and repurposing the language of environmental restoration, and improvising in the spaces of environmental governance. While state recognition has sought to contain or co-opt movements, we demonstrate the continuing vitality of mobilizations that simultaneously make demands of the state and rupture the governing forms of knowledge and practice that reinforce environmental racisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2399-6544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2399-6552</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/23996544211038944</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Environment and planning. C, Politics and space, 2021-11, Vol.39 (7), p.1586-1605</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-6501fa6ff7d6f827558f665fffe8ad1c0d852f4457c7b3b07f4b1fa99a7f5a263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-6501fa6ff7d6f827558f665fffe8ad1c0d852f4457c7b3b07f4b1fa99a7f5a263</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9161-7801</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/23996544211038944$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544211038944$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Milligan, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCreary, Tyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jelks, Na’Taki Osborne</creatorcontrib><title>Improvising against the racial state in Atlanta: Reimagining agency in environmental justice</title><title>Environment and planning. C, Politics and space</title><description>Recent scholarship on environmental justice highlights a concern about the relationship between the racial state and social movement strategy. This paper addresses the ingenuity of environmental justice organizing in the Proctor Creek and South River watersheds of Atlanta, Georgia, each home to predominantly Black communities and unjust flows of toxicants and sewage through urban creeks, streams, and rivers. We begin from critiques of the failure of institutionalized environmental justice and the state’s role in maintaining environmental racisms. To examine organizing responses to these circumstances, we analyze the improvisational politics of social movements in the context of the racial state, theoretically drawing from Charles Lee’s Ingenious Citizenship (2016). Empirically investigating the work of Atlanta community organizers, we emphasize pathways of strategic innovation among environmental justice organizers that improvise against the racial state even while negotiating with it. The article presents evidence of organizers challenging dominant modes of quantifying environmental injustice, appropriating and repurposing the language of environmental restoration, and improvising in the spaces of environmental governance. While state recognition has sought to contain or co-opt movements, we demonstrate the continuing vitality of mobilizations that simultaneously make demands of the state and rupture the governing forms of knowledge and practice that reinforce environmental racisms.</description><issn>2399-6544</issn><issn>2399-6552</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kN1KAzEQhYMoWGofwLu8QGuy-V3vSvGnUBBE74QlTTM1y262JGmhb29KizeCVzPMmW84cxC6p2RGqVIPFatrKTivKCVM15xfodFpNpVCVNe_Pee3aJJSSwihmjPNxAh9LftdHA4--bDFZmt8SBnnb4ejsd50OGWTHfYBz3NnQjaP-N353mx9OAMu2ONJduHg4xB6V3Y63O5T9tbdoRswXXKTSx2jz-enj8XrdPX2slzMV1PLqMrFGaFgJIDaSNCVEkKDlAIAnDYbaslGiwo4F8qqNVsTBXxdgLo2CoSpJBsjer5r45BSdNDsYjEZjw0lzSmh5k9ChZmdmVSeaNphH0Ox-A_wAw1hZ2M</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Milligan, Richard</creator><creator>McCreary, Tyler</creator><creator>Jelks, Na’Taki Osborne</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9161-7801</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Improvising against the racial state in Atlanta: Reimagining agency in environmental justice</title><author>Milligan, Richard ; McCreary, Tyler ; Jelks, Na’Taki Osborne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-6501fa6ff7d6f827558f665fffe8ad1c0d852f4457c7b3b07f4b1fa99a7f5a263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Milligan, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCreary, Tyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jelks, Na’Taki Osborne</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Environment and planning. C, Politics and space</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Milligan, Richard</au><au>McCreary, Tyler</au><au>Jelks, Na’Taki Osborne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improvising against the racial state in Atlanta: Reimagining agency in environmental justice</atitle><jtitle>Environment and planning. C, Politics and space</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1586</spage><epage>1605</epage><pages>1586-1605</pages><issn>2399-6544</issn><eissn>2399-6552</eissn><abstract>Recent scholarship on environmental justice highlights a concern about the relationship between the racial state and social movement strategy. This paper addresses the ingenuity of environmental justice organizing in the Proctor Creek and South River watersheds of Atlanta, Georgia, each home to predominantly Black communities and unjust flows of toxicants and sewage through urban creeks, streams, and rivers. We begin from critiques of the failure of institutionalized environmental justice and the state’s role in maintaining environmental racisms. To examine organizing responses to these circumstances, we analyze the improvisational politics of social movements in the context of the racial state, theoretically drawing from Charles Lee’s Ingenious Citizenship (2016). Empirically investigating the work of Atlanta community organizers, we emphasize pathways of strategic innovation among environmental justice organizers that improvise against the racial state even while negotiating with it. The article presents evidence of organizers challenging dominant modes of quantifying environmental injustice, appropriating and repurposing the language of environmental restoration, and improvising in the spaces of environmental governance. While state recognition has sought to contain or co-opt movements, we demonstrate the continuing vitality of mobilizations that simultaneously make demands of the state and rupture the governing forms of knowledge and practice that reinforce environmental racisms.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/23996544211038944</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9161-7801</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2399-6544
ispartof Environment and planning. C, Politics and space, 2021-11, Vol.39 (7), p.1586-1605
issn 2399-6544
2399-6552
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_23996544211038944
source Access via SAGE
title Improvising against the racial state in Atlanta: Reimagining agency in environmental justice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A22%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improvising%20against%20the%20racial%20state%20in%20Atlanta:%20Reimagining%20agency%20in%20environmental%20justice&rft.jtitle=Environment%20and%20planning.%20C,%20Politics%20and%20space&rft.au=Milligan,%20Richard&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1586&rft.epage=1605&rft.pages=1586-1605&rft.issn=2399-6544&rft.eissn=2399-6552&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/23996544211038944&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_23996544211038944%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_23996544211038944&rfr_iscdi=true