Exploring the Differences in Macrocognition Between Experts and Non-CHD Experts Managing Congenital Heart Disease (CHD)

Background and aims: Children with congenital heart disease (CHD) are at risk of deterioration in the face of common childhood illnesses, and their resuscitation and acute management is often best achieved with the guidance of CHD experts. Access to such expertise may be limited outside specialty he...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare 2021-06, Vol.10 (1), p.335-339
Hauptverfasser: Assadi, Azadeh, Laussen, Peter C., Trbovich, Patricia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 339
container_issue 1
container_start_page 335
container_title Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare
container_volume 10
creator Assadi, Azadeh
Laussen, Peter C.
Trbovich, Patricia
description Background and aims: Children with congenital heart disease (CHD) are at risk of deterioration in the face of common childhood illnesses, and their resuscitation and acute management is often best achieved with the guidance of CHD experts. Access to such expertise may be limited outside specialty heart centers and the fragility of these patients is cause for discomfort among many emergency medicine physicians. An understanding of the differences in macrocognition of these clinicians could shed light on some of the causes of discomfort and facilitate the development of a sociotechnological solution to this problem. Methods: Cardiac intensivists (CHD experts) and pediatric emergency medicine physicians (non-CHD experts) in a major academic cardiac center were interviewed using the critical decision method. Interview transcripts were coded deductively based on Klein’s macrocognitive framework and inductively to allow for new or modified characterization of dimensions. Results: While both CHD-experts and non-CHD experts relied on the macrocognitive functions of sensemaking, naturalistic decision making and detecting problems, the specific data and mental models used to understand the patients and course of therapy differed between CHD-experts and non-CHD experts. Conclusion: Characterization of differences between the macrocognitive processes of CHD experts and non-CHD experts can inform development of sociotechnological solutions to augment decision making pertaining to the acute management of pediatric CHD patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/2327857921101238
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_2327857921101238</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2327857921101238</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_2327857921101238</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1218-fd3d79916a2eed8f85c9861324cb959879462e9b083da634b0189e382e9cc2b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWGrvHnPUw2om2Y_kqNtqhVYvel6y2dl1S01KslL9781SERGcywyP93vMDCHnwK4AiuKaC17IrFAcgAEX8ohMRimRmcqOf82nZBbChsVSKWeZnJD94mO3db63HR1ekc77tkWP1mCgvaVrbbwzrrP90DtLb3HYI1oaGfRDoNo29NHZpFzOf7S1trob40pnO4yg3tIlaj_E7IA6IL2I9sszctLqbcDZd5-Sl7vFc7lMVk_3D-XNKjHAQSZtI5pCKcg1R2xkKzOjZA6Cp6ZWmZKFSnOOqmZSNDoXac1AKhQyasbwGsSUsENuPCQEj2218_2b9p8VsGr8XfX3dxFJDkjQHVYb9-5t3PB__xf_j219</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring the Differences in Macrocognition Between Experts and Non-CHD Experts Managing Congenital Heart Disease (CHD)</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Assadi, Azadeh ; Laussen, Peter C. ; Trbovich, Patricia</creator><creatorcontrib>Assadi, Azadeh ; Laussen, Peter C. ; Trbovich, Patricia</creatorcontrib><description>Background and aims: Children with congenital heart disease (CHD) are at risk of deterioration in the face of common childhood illnesses, and their resuscitation and acute management is often best achieved with the guidance of CHD experts. Access to such expertise may be limited outside specialty heart centers and the fragility of these patients is cause for discomfort among many emergency medicine physicians. An understanding of the differences in macrocognition of these clinicians could shed light on some of the causes of discomfort and facilitate the development of a sociotechnological solution to this problem. Methods: Cardiac intensivists (CHD experts) and pediatric emergency medicine physicians (non-CHD experts) in a major academic cardiac center were interviewed using the critical decision method. Interview transcripts were coded deductively based on Klein’s macrocognitive framework and inductively to allow for new or modified characterization of dimensions. Results: While both CHD-experts and non-CHD experts relied on the macrocognitive functions of sensemaking, naturalistic decision making and detecting problems, the specific data and mental models used to understand the patients and course of therapy differed between CHD-experts and non-CHD experts. Conclusion: Characterization of differences between the macrocognitive processes of CHD experts and non-CHD experts can inform development of sociotechnological solutions to augment decision making pertaining to the acute management of pediatric CHD patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2327-8595</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-8595</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2327857921101238</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare, 2021-06, Vol.10 (1), p.335-339</ispartof><rights>2021 by Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1218-fd3d79916a2eed8f85c9861324cb959879462e9b083da634b0189e382e9cc2b13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2327857921101238$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2327857921101238$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,21826,27931,27932,43628,43629</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Assadi, Azadeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laussen, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trbovich, Patricia</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring the Differences in Macrocognition Between Experts and Non-CHD Experts Managing Congenital Heart Disease (CHD)</title><title>Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare</title><description>Background and aims: Children with congenital heart disease (CHD) are at risk of deterioration in the face of common childhood illnesses, and their resuscitation and acute management is often best achieved with the guidance of CHD experts. Access to such expertise may be limited outside specialty heart centers and the fragility of these patients is cause for discomfort among many emergency medicine physicians. An understanding of the differences in macrocognition of these clinicians could shed light on some of the causes of discomfort and facilitate the development of a sociotechnological solution to this problem. Methods: Cardiac intensivists (CHD experts) and pediatric emergency medicine physicians (non-CHD experts) in a major academic cardiac center were interviewed using the critical decision method. Interview transcripts were coded deductively based on Klein’s macrocognitive framework and inductively to allow for new or modified characterization of dimensions. Results: While both CHD-experts and non-CHD experts relied on the macrocognitive functions of sensemaking, naturalistic decision making and detecting problems, the specific data and mental models used to understand the patients and course of therapy differed between CHD-experts and non-CHD experts. Conclusion: Characterization of differences between the macrocognitive processes of CHD experts and non-CHD experts can inform development of sociotechnological solutions to augment decision making pertaining to the acute management of pediatric CHD patients.</description><issn>2327-8595</issn><issn>2327-8595</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWGrvHnPUw2om2Y_kqNtqhVYvel6y2dl1S01KslL9781SERGcywyP93vMDCHnwK4AiuKaC17IrFAcgAEX8ohMRimRmcqOf82nZBbChsVSKWeZnJD94mO3db63HR1ekc77tkWP1mCgvaVrbbwzrrP90DtLb3HYI1oaGfRDoNo29NHZpFzOf7S1trob40pnO4yg3tIlaj_E7IA6IL2I9sszctLqbcDZd5-Sl7vFc7lMVk_3D-XNKjHAQSZtI5pCKcg1R2xkKzOjZA6Cp6ZWmZKFSnOOqmZSNDoXac1AKhQyasbwGsSUsENuPCQEj2218_2b9p8VsGr8XfX3dxFJDkjQHVYb9-5t3PB__xf_j219</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Assadi, Azadeh</creator><creator>Laussen, Peter C.</creator><creator>Trbovich, Patricia</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Exploring the Differences in Macrocognition Between Experts and Non-CHD Experts Managing Congenital Heart Disease (CHD)</title><author>Assadi, Azadeh ; Laussen, Peter C. ; Trbovich, Patricia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1218-fd3d79916a2eed8f85c9861324cb959879462e9b083da634b0189e382e9cc2b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Assadi, Azadeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laussen, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trbovich, Patricia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Assadi, Azadeh</au><au>Laussen, Peter C.</au><au>Trbovich, Patricia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring the Differences in Macrocognition Between Experts and Non-CHD Experts Managing Congenital Heart Disease (CHD)</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare</jtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>335</spage><epage>339</epage><pages>335-339</pages><issn>2327-8595</issn><eissn>2327-8595</eissn><abstract>Background and aims: Children with congenital heart disease (CHD) are at risk of deterioration in the face of common childhood illnesses, and their resuscitation and acute management is often best achieved with the guidance of CHD experts. Access to such expertise may be limited outside specialty heart centers and the fragility of these patients is cause for discomfort among many emergency medicine physicians. An understanding of the differences in macrocognition of these clinicians could shed light on some of the causes of discomfort and facilitate the development of a sociotechnological solution to this problem. Methods: Cardiac intensivists (CHD experts) and pediatric emergency medicine physicians (non-CHD experts) in a major academic cardiac center were interviewed using the critical decision method. Interview transcripts were coded deductively based on Klein’s macrocognitive framework and inductively to allow for new or modified characterization of dimensions. Results: While both CHD-experts and non-CHD experts relied on the macrocognitive functions of sensemaking, naturalistic decision making and detecting problems, the specific data and mental models used to understand the patients and course of therapy differed between CHD-experts and non-CHD experts. Conclusion: Characterization of differences between the macrocognitive processes of CHD experts and non-CHD experts can inform development of sociotechnological solutions to augment decision making pertaining to the acute management of pediatric CHD patients.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/2327857921101238</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2327-8595
ispartof Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare, 2021-06, Vol.10 (1), p.335-339
issn 2327-8595
2327-8595
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_2327857921101238
source Access via SAGE
title Exploring the Differences in Macrocognition Between Experts and Non-CHD Experts Managing Congenital Heart Disease (CHD)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T11%3A18%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20the%20Differences%20in%20Macrocognition%20Between%20Experts%20and%20Non-CHD%20Experts%20Managing%20Congenital%20Heart%20Disease%20(CHD)&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20International%20Symposium%20of%20Human%20Factors%20and%20Ergonomics%20in%20Healthcare&rft.au=Assadi,%20Azadeh&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=335&rft.epage=339&rft.pages=335-339&rft.issn=2327-8595&rft.eissn=2327-8595&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2327857921101238&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_2327857921101238%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2327857921101238&rfr_iscdi=true