Malignant features of a benign waiting list
Objective: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) operations are frequently deferred. Consequently, patients awaiting TURP have multiple urology-related admissions for problems such as urinary retention. This audit aims to determine the effect of TURP deferments on the frequency and duration...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical urology 2017-03, Vol.10 (2), p.105-109 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 109 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 105 |
container_title | Journal of clinical urology |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Ally, Munira Lee, Tiffany Ecclestone, Hazel Teo, Luke Kavia, Rajesh |
description | Objective:
Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) operations are frequently deferred. Consequently, patients awaiting TURP have multiple urology-related admissions for problems such as urinary retention. This audit aims to determine the effect of TURP deferments on the frequency and duration of urology-related admissions, as well as the financial implication in our institution over a three-month period.
Patients and methods:
A retrospective, electronic database review of patients who received a TURP at Northwick Park Hospital, between 1 January 2014–31 March 2014, was carried out.
The following data were extracted: (a) date the patient was listed for TURP; (b) date patient underwent TURP; (c) number of deferments between a patient being listed for surgery and receiving their operation; (d) reason(s) for deferment; and (e) number, duration and indication of urology-related inpatient admissions whilst awaiting TURP. Using this data, we calculated the cost of urology-related admissions whilst awaiting surgery.
Results:
In total, 44 patients underwent a TURP operation. Of these, 21 patients had their TURP deferred. There were 23 urology-related admissions whilst patients awaited a TURP. Fifteen of these admissions were attributed to eight patients with deferments to surgery. They spent a total of 45 days/30 nights in hospital. The remaining eight urology-related admissions were accounted for by six patients with no deferments to surgery. They spent 12 days/3 nights in hospital. We approximate a daily cost of £250 for an NHS bed. This equates to a total cost of £11,250 (£1406 per patient) for the eight patients who had TURPs deferred versus £3000 (£500 per patient) for those six patients without deferments.
Conclusion:
Patients who have their TURP operations deferred have an increased frequency and duration of urology-related admissions, associated with an additional cost of at least £900 per patient. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/2051415816671041 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_2051415816671041</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2051415816671041</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_2051415816671041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-40d081a2b6466a72a862575b964b1a56e209dae69a32159933bc7b3c2016742a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j81Lw0AQxRdRsNTePe5dojP7mT1K8aNQ8dKew2y6CSsxkd0U8b83oR5E8DSPH-895jF2jXCLaO2dAI0KdYnGWASFZ2wxo2Jm57_0JVvlHD1oKR2KEhbs5oW62PbUj7wJNB5TyHxoOHEf-onzT4pj7FvexTxesYuGuhxWP3fJ9o8Pu_VzsX192qzvt0UtShwLBQcokYQ3yhiygkojtNXeGeWRtAkC3IGCcSQFauek9LX1shaAxipBcsng1FunIecUmuojxXdKXxVCNe-t_u6dIsUpkqkN1dtwTP304f_-b82NUhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Malignant features of a benign waiting list</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ally, Munira ; Lee, Tiffany ; Ecclestone, Hazel ; Teo, Luke ; Kavia, Rajesh</creator><creatorcontrib>Ally, Munira ; Lee, Tiffany ; Ecclestone, Hazel ; Teo, Luke ; Kavia, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><description>Objective:
Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) operations are frequently deferred. Consequently, patients awaiting TURP have multiple urology-related admissions for problems such as urinary retention. This audit aims to determine the effect of TURP deferments on the frequency and duration of urology-related admissions, as well as the financial implication in our institution over a three-month period.
Patients and methods:
A retrospective, electronic database review of patients who received a TURP at Northwick Park Hospital, between 1 January 2014–31 March 2014, was carried out.
The following data were extracted: (a) date the patient was listed for TURP; (b) date patient underwent TURP; (c) number of deferments between a patient being listed for surgery and receiving their operation; (d) reason(s) for deferment; and (e) number, duration and indication of urology-related inpatient admissions whilst awaiting TURP. Using this data, we calculated the cost of urology-related admissions whilst awaiting surgery.
Results:
In total, 44 patients underwent a TURP operation. Of these, 21 patients had their TURP deferred. There were 23 urology-related admissions whilst patients awaited a TURP. Fifteen of these admissions were attributed to eight patients with deferments to surgery. They spent a total of 45 days/30 nights in hospital. The remaining eight urology-related admissions were accounted for by six patients with no deferments to surgery. They spent 12 days/3 nights in hospital. We approximate a daily cost of £250 for an NHS bed. This equates to a total cost of £11,250 (£1406 per patient) for the eight patients who had TURPs deferred versus £3000 (£500 per patient) for those six patients without deferments.
Conclusion:
Patients who have their TURP operations deferred have an increased frequency and duration of urology-related admissions, associated with an additional cost of at least £900 per patient.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2051-4158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2051-4158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2051-4166</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2051415816671041</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Journal of clinical urology, 2017-03, Vol.10 (2), p.105-109</ispartof><rights>British Association of Urological Surgeons 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-40d081a2b6466a72a862575b964b1a56e209dae69a32159933bc7b3c2016742a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-40d081a2b6466a72a862575b964b1a56e209dae69a32159933bc7b3c2016742a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2051415816671041$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2051415816671041$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ally, Munira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Tiffany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ecclestone, Hazel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teo, Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavia, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><title>Malignant features of a benign waiting list</title><title>Journal of clinical urology</title><description>Objective:
Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) operations are frequently deferred. Consequently, patients awaiting TURP have multiple urology-related admissions for problems such as urinary retention. This audit aims to determine the effect of TURP deferments on the frequency and duration of urology-related admissions, as well as the financial implication in our institution over a three-month period.
Patients and methods:
A retrospective, electronic database review of patients who received a TURP at Northwick Park Hospital, between 1 January 2014–31 March 2014, was carried out.
The following data were extracted: (a) date the patient was listed for TURP; (b) date patient underwent TURP; (c) number of deferments between a patient being listed for surgery and receiving their operation; (d) reason(s) for deferment; and (e) number, duration and indication of urology-related inpatient admissions whilst awaiting TURP. Using this data, we calculated the cost of urology-related admissions whilst awaiting surgery.
Results:
In total, 44 patients underwent a TURP operation. Of these, 21 patients had their TURP deferred. There were 23 urology-related admissions whilst patients awaited a TURP. Fifteen of these admissions were attributed to eight patients with deferments to surgery. They spent a total of 45 days/30 nights in hospital. The remaining eight urology-related admissions were accounted for by six patients with no deferments to surgery. They spent 12 days/3 nights in hospital. We approximate a daily cost of £250 for an NHS bed. This equates to a total cost of £11,250 (£1406 per patient) for the eight patients who had TURPs deferred versus £3000 (£500 per patient) for those six patients without deferments.
Conclusion:
Patients who have their TURP operations deferred have an increased frequency and duration of urology-related admissions, associated with an additional cost of at least £900 per patient.</description><issn>2051-4158</issn><issn>2051-4158</issn><issn>2051-4166</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j81Lw0AQxRdRsNTePe5dojP7mT1K8aNQ8dKew2y6CSsxkd0U8b83oR5E8DSPH-895jF2jXCLaO2dAI0KdYnGWASFZ2wxo2Jm57_0JVvlHD1oKR2KEhbs5oW62PbUj7wJNB5TyHxoOHEf-onzT4pj7FvexTxesYuGuhxWP3fJ9o8Pu_VzsX192qzvt0UtShwLBQcokYQ3yhiygkojtNXeGeWRtAkC3IGCcSQFauek9LX1shaAxipBcsng1FunIecUmuojxXdKXxVCNe-t_u6dIsUpkqkN1dtwTP304f_-b82NUhw</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>Ally, Munira</creator><creator>Lee, Tiffany</creator><creator>Ecclestone, Hazel</creator><creator>Teo, Luke</creator><creator>Kavia, Rajesh</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>Malignant features of a benign waiting list</title><author>Ally, Munira ; Lee, Tiffany ; Ecclestone, Hazel ; Teo, Luke ; Kavia, Rajesh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-40d081a2b6466a72a862575b964b1a56e209dae69a32159933bc7b3c2016742a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ally, Munira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Tiffany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ecclestone, Hazel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teo, Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavia, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ally, Munira</au><au>Lee, Tiffany</au><au>Ecclestone, Hazel</au><au>Teo, Luke</au><au>Kavia, Rajesh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Malignant features of a benign waiting list</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical urology</jtitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>105-109</pages><issn>2051-4158</issn><eissn>2051-4158</eissn><eissn>2051-4166</eissn><abstract>Objective:
Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) operations are frequently deferred. Consequently, patients awaiting TURP have multiple urology-related admissions for problems such as urinary retention. This audit aims to determine the effect of TURP deferments on the frequency and duration of urology-related admissions, as well as the financial implication in our institution over a three-month period.
Patients and methods:
A retrospective, electronic database review of patients who received a TURP at Northwick Park Hospital, between 1 January 2014–31 March 2014, was carried out.
The following data were extracted: (a) date the patient was listed for TURP; (b) date patient underwent TURP; (c) number of deferments between a patient being listed for surgery and receiving their operation; (d) reason(s) for deferment; and (e) number, duration and indication of urology-related inpatient admissions whilst awaiting TURP. Using this data, we calculated the cost of urology-related admissions whilst awaiting surgery.
Results:
In total, 44 patients underwent a TURP operation. Of these, 21 patients had their TURP deferred. There were 23 urology-related admissions whilst patients awaited a TURP. Fifteen of these admissions were attributed to eight patients with deferments to surgery. They spent a total of 45 days/30 nights in hospital. The remaining eight urology-related admissions were accounted for by six patients with no deferments to surgery. They spent 12 days/3 nights in hospital. We approximate a daily cost of £250 for an NHS bed. This equates to a total cost of £11,250 (£1406 per patient) for the eight patients who had TURPs deferred versus £3000 (£500 per patient) for those six patients without deferments.
Conclusion:
Patients who have their TURP operations deferred have an increased frequency and duration of urology-related admissions, associated with an additional cost of at least £900 per patient.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/2051415816671041</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2051-4158 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical urology, 2017-03, Vol.10 (2), p.105-109 |
issn | 2051-4158 2051-4158 2051-4166 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_2051415816671041 |
source | Access via SAGE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Malignant features of a benign waiting list |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T12%3A28%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Malignant%20features%20of%20a%20benign%20waiting%20list&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20urology&rft.au=Ally,%20Munira&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=105-109&rft.issn=2051-4158&rft.eissn=2051-4158&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2051415816671041&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_2051415816671041%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2051415816671041&rfr_iscdi=true |