Modern Democracy as the Cult of the Individual: Durkheim on religious coexistence and conflict
After the demise of Christianity, Western society did not become secular, according to Emile Durkheim, but located foundations in a new religion he calls the “cult of the individual.” This religion holds the rational individual person as sacred, and corresponds to a multi-faceted, complex, and diver...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Critical research on religion 2019-12, Vol.7 (3), p.292-311 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 311 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 292 |
container_title | Critical research on religion |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Carls, Paul |
description | After the demise of Christianity, Western society did not become secular, according to Emile Durkheim, but located foundations in a new religion he calls the “cult of the individual.” This religion holds the rational individual person as sacred, and corresponds to a multi-faceted, complex, and diverse society united around individual democratic rights and modern science. Different traditional religions can co-exist in the cult of the individual, but only if they accept a subordinate status in relation to it. Durkheim maintains, however, that all religions construct authoritative regimes of truth and moral obligations, setting the stage for conflict. How then should modern democracies respond to challenges to their authority from traditional religions? This article argues that a Durkheimian response would be to assert the values of the cult of the individual, as this is the only way to maintain the integrity and viability of Western democratic society. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/2050303218823069 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_2050303218823069</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2050303218823069</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_2050303218823069</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-b653cda11a481e69005f67df345a0a7e64736392849c945c0611b48afbf6186f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWGrvHvMFVid_Nsl6k1ZtoeJFry7ZbNKmbhNJdsV-e1srHgRP85vHe8PwELokcEWIlNcUSmDAKFGKMhDVCRodpIIBh9NfZvQcTXLeAABhDCSVI_T6GFubAp7ZbTRJmx3WGfdri6dD1-PovnkRWv_h20F3N3g2pLe19VscA0628ysfh4xNtJ8-9zYYi3Vo93twnTf9BTpzust28jPH6OX-7nk6L5ZPD4vp7bIwVJG-aETJTKsJ0VwRKyqA0gnZOsZLDVpawSUTrKKKV6bipQFBSMOVdo0TRAnHxgiOd02KOSfr6vfktzrtagL1oaL6b0X7SHGMZL2y9SYOKew__N__BQq3ZRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modern Democracy as the Cult of the Individual: Durkheim on religious coexistence and conflict</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Carls, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Carls, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>After the demise of Christianity, Western society did not become secular, according to Emile Durkheim, but located foundations in a new religion he calls the “cult of the individual.” This religion holds the rational individual person as sacred, and corresponds to a multi-faceted, complex, and diverse society united around individual democratic rights and modern science. Different traditional religions can co-exist in the cult of the individual, but only if they accept a subordinate status in relation to it. Durkheim maintains, however, that all religions construct authoritative regimes of truth and moral obligations, setting the stage for conflict. How then should modern democracies respond to challenges to their authority from traditional religions? This article argues that a Durkheimian response would be to assert the values of the cult of the individual, as this is the only way to maintain the integrity and viability of Western democratic society.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2050-3032</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2050-3040</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2050303218823069</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Critical research on religion, 2019-12, Vol.7 (3), p.292-311</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-b653cda11a481e69005f67df345a0a7e64736392849c945c0611b48afbf6186f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-b653cda11a481e69005f67df345a0a7e64736392849c945c0611b48afbf6186f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2050303218823069$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2050303218823069$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carls, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Modern Democracy as the Cult of the Individual: Durkheim on religious coexistence and conflict</title><title>Critical research on religion</title><description>After the demise of Christianity, Western society did not become secular, according to Emile Durkheim, but located foundations in a new religion he calls the “cult of the individual.” This religion holds the rational individual person as sacred, and corresponds to a multi-faceted, complex, and diverse society united around individual democratic rights and modern science. Different traditional religions can co-exist in the cult of the individual, but only if they accept a subordinate status in relation to it. Durkheim maintains, however, that all religions construct authoritative regimes of truth and moral obligations, setting the stage for conflict. How then should modern democracies respond to challenges to their authority from traditional religions? This article argues that a Durkheimian response would be to assert the values of the cult of the individual, as this is the only way to maintain the integrity and viability of Western democratic society.</description><issn>2050-3032</issn><issn>2050-3040</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWGrvHvMFVid_Nsl6k1ZtoeJFry7ZbNKmbhNJdsV-e1srHgRP85vHe8PwELokcEWIlNcUSmDAKFGKMhDVCRodpIIBh9NfZvQcTXLeAABhDCSVI_T6GFubAp7ZbTRJmx3WGfdri6dD1-PovnkRWv_h20F3N3g2pLe19VscA0628ysfh4xNtJ8-9zYYi3Vo93twnTf9BTpzust28jPH6OX-7nk6L5ZPD4vp7bIwVJG-aETJTKsJ0VwRKyqA0gnZOsZLDVpawSUTrKKKV6bipQFBSMOVdo0TRAnHxgiOd02KOSfr6vfktzrtagL1oaL6b0X7SHGMZL2y9SYOKew__N__BQq3ZRA</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Carls, Paul</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Modern Democracy as the Cult of the Individual: Durkheim on religious coexistence and conflict</title><author>Carls, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-b653cda11a481e69005f67df345a0a7e64736392849c945c0611b48afbf6186f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carls, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Critical research on religion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carls, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modern Democracy as the Cult of the Individual: Durkheim on religious coexistence and conflict</atitle><jtitle>Critical research on religion</jtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>292</spage><epage>311</epage><pages>292-311</pages><issn>2050-3032</issn><eissn>2050-3040</eissn><abstract>After the demise of Christianity, Western society did not become secular, according to Emile Durkheim, but located foundations in a new religion he calls the “cult of the individual.” This religion holds the rational individual person as sacred, and corresponds to a multi-faceted, complex, and diverse society united around individual democratic rights and modern science. Different traditional religions can co-exist in the cult of the individual, but only if they accept a subordinate status in relation to it. Durkheim maintains, however, that all religions construct authoritative regimes of truth and moral obligations, setting the stage for conflict. How then should modern democracies respond to challenges to their authority from traditional religions? This article argues that a Durkheimian response would be to assert the values of the cult of the individual, as this is the only way to maintain the integrity and viability of Western democratic society.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/2050303218823069</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2050-3032 |
ispartof | Critical research on religion, 2019-12, Vol.7 (3), p.292-311 |
issn | 2050-3032 2050-3040 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_2050303218823069 |
source | Access via SAGE |
title | Modern Democracy as the Cult of the Individual: Durkheim on religious coexistence and conflict |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T02%3A10%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modern%20Democracy%20as%20the%20Cult%20of%20the%20Individual:%20Durkheim%20on%20religious%20coexistence%20and%20conflict&rft.jtitle=Critical%20research%20on%20religion&rft.au=Carls,%20Paul&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=292&rft.epage=311&rft.pages=292-311&rft.issn=2050-3032&rft.eissn=2050-3040&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2050303218823069&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_2050303218823069%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2050303218823069&rfr_iscdi=true |