Anthropology, theology, critique

This article reflects on one potential relationship the anthropological study of religion might enjoy with a critical orientation to religion. To do so, I highlight a burgeoning (but tenuous) dialog between anthropology and theology. Ultimately, I propose that a focus on religion and human flourishi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical research on religion 2018-04, Vol.6 (1), p.28-34
1. Verfasser: Bielo, James S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 34
container_issue 1
container_start_page 28
container_title Critical research on religion
container_volume 6
creator Bielo, James S
description This article reflects on one potential relationship the anthropological study of religion might enjoy with a critical orientation to religion. To do so, I highlight a burgeoning (but tenuous) dialog between anthropology and theology. Ultimately, I propose that a focus on religion and human flourishing provides one wavelength on which an anthropology–theology collaboration can thrive. I follow the observation that anthropologists and theologians are united by concern with shared problems. If human and social flourishing is one such problem, then what might a collaborative configuration look like? The example I consider is how ethnographic evidence of religion in public life can be mobilized to advance prophetic theological critiques of injustice.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/2050303218757323
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_2050303218757323</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2050303218757323</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_2050303218757323</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-e3fa679e34fb66972d090b9e1c9f3ede877dcef657e2e9392f312f2d2c54285b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j09rwkAQxZfSQsV679EP0G1nZ5JM9ijSP4LQS3sOyWZWI9a1u_Hgt29E6aHQ0zyG95t5T6l7A4_GMD8h5EBAaErOmZCu1Oi00gQZXP9qwls1SWkDAIYIGHmkprNdv45hH7ZhdXyY9mu5KBe7vvs-yJ268fU2yeQyx-rz5flj_qaX76-L-Wyp3fCv10K-LtgKZb4pCsvYgoXGinHWk7RSMrdOfJGzoFiy6MmgxxZdnmGZNzRWcL7rYkgpiq_2sfuq47EyUJ1KVn9LDog-I6leSbUJh7gbEv7v_wFKPU-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anthropology, theology, critique</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Bielo, James S</creator><creatorcontrib>Bielo, James S</creatorcontrib><description>This article reflects on one potential relationship the anthropological study of religion might enjoy with a critical orientation to religion. To do so, I highlight a burgeoning (but tenuous) dialog between anthropology and theology. Ultimately, I propose that a focus on religion and human flourishing provides one wavelength on which an anthropology–theology collaboration can thrive. I follow the observation that anthropologists and theologians are united by concern with shared problems. If human and social flourishing is one such problem, then what might a collaborative configuration look like? The example I consider is how ethnographic evidence of religion in public life can be mobilized to advance prophetic theological critiques of injustice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2050-3032</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2050-3040</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2050303218757323</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Critical research on religion, 2018-04, Vol.6 (1), p.28-34</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-e3fa679e34fb66972d090b9e1c9f3ede877dcef657e2e9392f312f2d2c54285b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-e3fa679e34fb66972d090b9e1c9f3ede877dcef657e2e9392f312f2d2c54285b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2050303218757323$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2050303218757323$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bielo, James S</creatorcontrib><title>Anthropology, theology, critique</title><title>Critical research on religion</title><description>This article reflects on one potential relationship the anthropological study of religion might enjoy with a critical orientation to religion. To do so, I highlight a burgeoning (but tenuous) dialog between anthropology and theology. Ultimately, I propose that a focus on religion and human flourishing provides one wavelength on which an anthropology–theology collaboration can thrive. I follow the observation that anthropologists and theologians are united by concern with shared problems. If human and social flourishing is one such problem, then what might a collaborative configuration look like? The example I consider is how ethnographic evidence of religion in public life can be mobilized to advance prophetic theological critiques of injustice.</description><issn>2050-3032</issn><issn>2050-3040</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j09rwkAQxZfSQsV679EP0G1nZ5JM9ijSP4LQS3sOyWZWI9a1u_Hgt29E6aHQ0zyG95t5T6l7A4_GMD8h5EBAaErOmZCu1Oi00gQZXP9qwls1SWkDAIYIGHmkprNdv45hH7ZhdXyY9mu5KBe7vvs-yJ268fU2yeQyx-rz5flj_qaX76-L-Wyp3fCv10K-LtgKZb4pCsvYgoXGinHWk7RSMrdOfJGzoFiy6MmgxxZdnmGZNzRWcL7rYkgpiq_2sfuq47EyUJ1KVn9LDog-I6leSbUJh7gbEv7v_wFKPU-g</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Bielo, James S</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Anthropology, theology, critique</title><author>Bielo, James S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-e3fa679e34fb66972d090b9e1c9f3ede877dcef657e2e9392f312f2d2c54285b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bielo, James S</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Critical research on religion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bielo, James S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anthropology, theology, critique</atitle><jtitle>Critical research on religion</jtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>28</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>28-34</pages><issn>2050-3032</issn><eissn>2050-3040</eissn><abstract>This article reflects on one potential relationship the anthropological study of religion might enjoy with a critical orientation to religion. To do so, I highlight a burgeoning (but tenuous) dialog between anthropology and theology. Ultimately, I propose that a focus on religion and human flourishing provides one wavelength on which an anthropology–theology collaboration can thrive. I follow the observation that anthropologists and theologians are united by concern with shared problems. If human and social flourishing is one such problem, then what might a collaborative configuration look like? The example I consider is how ethnographic evidence of religion in public life can be mobilized to advance prophetic theological critiques of injustice.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/2050303218757323</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2050-3032
ispartof Critical research on religion, 2018-04, Vol.6 (1), p.28-34
issn 2050-3032
2050-3040
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_2050303218757323
source Access via SAGE
title Anthropology, theology, critique
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A54%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anthropology,%20theology,%20critique&rft.jtitle=Critical%20research%20on%20religion&rft.au=Bielo,%20James%20S&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=28&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=28-34&rft.issn=2050-3032&rft.eissn=2050-3040&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2050303218757323&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_2050303218757323%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2050303218757323&rfr_iscdi=true