The future’s impossible disciplines
In this commentary, I want to stay with three questions: where exactly are we talking about when we are talking about the geographies of the impossible? Is speculative method necessarily transformative? What happens when we base our vision for future research on seeking new territory rather than exa...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Dialogues in human geography 2024-11, Vol.14 (3), p.513-516 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 516 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 513 |
| container_title | Dialogues in human geography |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Allahyari, Keyvan |
| description | In this commentary, I want to stay with three questions: where exactly are we talking about when we are talking about the geographies of the impossible? Is speculative method necessarily transformative? What happens when we base our vision for future research on seeking new territory rather than examining regimes of production of our own geographical knowledge? |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/20438206241242476 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_20438206241242476</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_20438206241242476</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_20438206241242476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-1c9dbb6e703e67a628b0bfce29b51b4ceeab8d79b6158ff9bace16452fd4195c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j81KAzEUhYMoWGofwN1sXE7NzeR3KcWfQsFNXYckc6Mp03ZIOgt3voav55M4peJG8Gzu4cB3OYeQa6BzAKVuGeWNZlQyDowzruQZmRyzWjPg57-eyksyK2VDRwkqQNIJuVm_YRWHw5Dx6-OzVGnb70tJvsOqTSWkvks7LFfkIrqu4OznTsnLw_168VSvnh-Xi7tVHZgyhxqCab2XqGiDUjnJtKc-BmTGC_A8IDqvW2W8BKFjNN4FBMkFiy0HI0IzJXD6G_LYImO0fU5bl98tUHucav9MHZn5iSnuFe1mP-TdWPEf4BuWH1Qb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The future’s impossible disciplines</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Allahyari, Keyvan</creator><creatorcontrib>Allahyari, Keyvan</creatorcontrib><description>In this commentary, I want to stay with three questions: where exactly are we talking about when we are talking about the geographies of the impossible? Is speculative method necessarily transformative? What happens when we base our vision for future research on seeking new territory rather than examining regimes of production of our own geographical knowledge?</description><identifier>ISSN: 2043-8206</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2043-8214</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/20438206241242476</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Dialogues in human geography, 2024-11, Vol.14 (3), p.513-516</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-1c9dbb6e703e67a628b0bfce29b51b4ceeab8d79b6158ff9bace16452fd4195c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8902-5172</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/20438206241242476$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20438206241242476$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allahyari, Keyvan</creatorcontrib><title>The future’s impossible disciplines</title><title>Dialogues in human geography</title><description>In this commentary, I want to stay with three questions: where exactly are we talking about when we are talking about the geographies of the impossible? Is speculative method necessarily transformative? What happens when we base our vision for future research on seeking new territory rather than examining regimes of production of our own geographical knowledge?</description><issn>2043-8206</issn><issn>2043-8214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp9j81KAzEUhYMoWGofwN1sXE7NzeR3KcWfQsFNXYckc6Mp03ZIOgt3voav55M4peJG8Gzu4cB3OYeQa6BzAKVuGeWNZlQyDowzruQZmRyzWjPg57-eyksyK2VDRwkqQNIJuVm_YRWHw5Dx6-OzVGnb70tJvsOqTSWkvks7LFfkIrqu4OznTsnLw_168VSvnh-Xi7tVHZgyhxqCab2XqGiDUjnJtKc-BmTGC_A8IDqvW2W8BKFjNN4FBMkFiy0HI0IzJXD6G_LYImO0fU5bl98tUHucav9MHZn5iSnuFe1mP-TdWPEf4BuWH1Qb</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Allahyari, Keyvan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8902-5172</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>The future’s impossible disciplines</title><author>Allahyari, Keyvan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-1c9dbb6e703e67a628b0bfce29b51b4ceeab8d79b6158ff9bace16452fd4195c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allahyari, Keyvan</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Dialogues in human geography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allahyari, Keyvan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The future’s impossible disciplines</atitle><jtitle>Dialogues in human geography</jtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>513</spage><epage>516</epage><pages>513-516</pages><issn>2043-8206</issn><eissn>2043-8214</eissn><abstract>In this commentary, I want to stay with three questions: where exactly are we talking about when we are talking about the geographies of the impossible? Is speculative method necessarily transformative? What happens when we base our vision for future research on seeking new territory rather than examining regimes of production of our own geographical knowledge?</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/20438206241242476</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8902-5172</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2043-8206 |
| ispartof | Dialogues in human geography, 2024-11, Vol.14 (3), p.513-516 |
| issn | 2043-8206 2043-8214 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_20438206241242476 |
| source | SAGE Complete A-Z List |
| title | The future’s impossible disciplines |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T03%3A23%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20future%E2%80%99s%20impossible%20disciplines&rft.jtitle=Dialogues%20in%20human%20geography&rft.au=Allahyari,%20Keyvan&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=513&rft.epage=516&rft.pages=513-516&rft.issn=2043-8206&rft.eissn=2043-8214&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/20438206241242476&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_20438206241242476%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_20438206241242476&rfr_iscdi=true |