Theory and explanation in geography revisited: Mid-range causal theories and explanatory conjuncturalism

This commentary takes on Jamie Peck’s conjunctural methodologies and reflects on the epistemological matter of theory and explanation in geography. Mapping onto several key elements of conjunctural analysis, I reframe its methodological examination in relation to mid-level concepts and theories (i.e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dialogues in human geography 2024-11, Vol.14 (3), p.483-487
1. Verfasser: Yeung, Henry Wai-chung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 487
container_issue 3
container_start_page 483
container_title Dialogues in human geography
container_volume 14
creator Yeung, Henry Wai-chung
description This commentary takes on Jamie Peck’s conjunctural methodologies and reflects on the epistemological matter of theory and explanation in geography. Mapping onto several key elements of conjunctural analysis, I reframe its methodological examination in relation to mid-level concepts and theories (i.e. mid-range theory), the articulation of causality and causal co-determination (i.e. causal mechanisms), and situational analysis, historicisation, and thick theorisation as context-rich explanation (i.e. context-specificity). By way of a sympathetic critique, I focus on two potential ‘blind spots’ that might require further rethinking and perhaps remedies: the underdevelopment of practical adequacy and the role of normative theorising in conjunctural methodologies.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/20438206231177074
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_20438206231177074</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_20438206231177074</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_20438206231177074</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-ea95798045e8d54cee8ea99cb58adc1de9dd2d53c6979e0e4a17c391790576753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOOY-gG_5Ap1JmzSJbzL8BxNf5nO5JnddRpeOpBX77W2ZCCJ4X-69B36HwyHkmrMl50rd5EwUOmdlXkwvU-KMzCYt0zkX5z83Ky_JIqU9G0cyyUs2I7vNDts4UAiO4uexgQCdbwP1gdbY1hGOu4FG_PDJd-hu6Yt3WYRQI7XQJ2hoN_Ee0y-HydG2Yd8H2_URGp8OV-RiC03Cxfeek7eH-83qKVu_Pj6v7taZzbXoMgQjldFMSNROCouoR8nYd6nBWe7QOJc7WdjSKIMMBXBlC8OVYVKVShZzwk--NrYpRdxWx-gPEIeKs2qqp_rT1sgsT0yCGqt928cwRvwH-AIoHGve</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Theory and explanation in geography revisited: Mid-range causal theories and explanatory conjuncturalism</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Yeung, Henry Wai-chung</creator><creatorcontrib>Yeung, Henry Wai-chung</creatorcontrib><description>This commentary takes on Jamie Peck’s conjunctural methodologies and reflects on the epistemological matter of theory and explanation in geography. Mapping onto several key elements of conjunctural analysis, I reframe its methodological examination in relation to mid-level concepts and theories (i.e. mid-range theory), the articulation of causality and causal co-determination (i.e. causal mechanisms), and situational analysis, historicisation, and thick theorisation as context-rich explanation (i.e. context-specificity). By way of a sympathetic critique, I focus on two potential ‘blind spots’ that might require further rethinking and perhaps remedies: the underdevelopment of practical adequacy and the role of normative theorising in conjunctural methodologies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2043-8206</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2043-8214</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/20438206231177074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Dialogues in human geography, 2024-11, Vol.14 (3), p.483-487</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-ea95798045e8d54cee8ea99cb58adc1de9dd2d53c6979e0e4a17c391790576753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-ea95798045e8d54cee8ea99cb58adc1de9dd2d53c6979e0e4a17c391790576753</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0647-0658</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/20438206231177074$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20438206231177074$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yeung, Henry Wai-chung</creatorcontrib><title>Theory and explanation in geography revisited: Mid-range causal theories and explanatory conjuncturalism</title><title>Dialogues in human geography</title><description>This commentary takes on Jamie Peck’s conjunctural methodologies and reflects on the epistemological matter of theory and explanation in geography. Mapping onto several key elements of conjunctural analysis, I reframe its methodological examination in relation to mid-level concepts and theories (i.e. mid-range theory), the articulation of causality and causal co-determination (i.e. causal mechanisms), and situational analysis, historicisation, and thick theorisation as context-rich explanation (i.e. context-specificity). By way of a sympathetic critique, I focus on two potential ‘blind spots’ that might require further rethinking and perhaps remedies: the underdevelopment of practical adequacy and the role of normative theorising in conjunctural methodologies.</description><issn>2043-8206</issn><issn>2043-8214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOOY-gG_5Ap1JmzSJbzL8BxNf5nO5JnddRpeOpBX77W2ZCCJ4X-69B36HwyHkmrMl50rd5EwUOmdlXkwvU-KMzCYt0zkX5z83Ky_JIqU9G0cyyUs2I7vNDts4UAiO4uexgQCdbwP1gdbY1hGOu4FG_PDJd-hu6Yt3WYRQI7XQJ2hoN_Ee0y-HydG2Yd8H2_URGp8OV-RiC03Cxfeek7eH-83qKVu_Pj6v7taZzbXoMgQjldFMSNROCouoR8nYd6nBWe7QOJc7WdjSKIMMBXBlC8OVYVKVShZzwk--NrYpRdxWx-gPEIeKs2qqp_rT1sgsT0yCGqt928cwRvwH-AIoHGve</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Yeung, Henry Wai-chung</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0647-0658</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Theory and explanation in geography revisited: Mid-range causal theories and explanatory conjuncturalism</title><author>Yeung, Henry Wai-chung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-ea95798045e8d54cee8ea99cb58adc1de9dd2d53c6979e0e4a17c391790576753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yeung, Henry Wai-chung</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Dialogues in human geography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yeung, Henry Wai-chung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Theory and explanation in geography revisited: Mid-range causal theories and explanatory conjuncturalism</atitle><jtitle>Dialogues in human geography</jtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>483</spage><epage>487</epage><pages>483-487</pages><issn>2043-8206</issn><eissn>2043-8214</eissn><abstract>This commentary takes on Jamie Peck’s conjunctural methodologies and reflects on the epistemological matter of theory and explanation in geography. Mapping onto several key elements of conjunctural analysis, I reframe its methodological examination in relation to mid-level concepts and theories (i.e. mid-range theory), the articulation of causality and causal co-determination (i.e. causal mechanisms), and situational analysis, historicisation, and thick theorisation as context-rich explanation (i.e. context-specificity). By way of a sympathetic critique, I focus on two potential ‘blind spots’ that might require further rethinking and perhaps remedies: the underdevelopment of practical adequacy and the role of normative theorising in conjunctural methodologies.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/20438206231177074</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0647-0658</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2043-8206
ispartof Dialogues in human geography, 2024-11, Vol.14 (3), p.483-487
issn 2043-8206
2043-8214
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_20438206231177074
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Theory and explanation in geography revisited: Mid-range causal theories and explanatory conjuncturalism
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T23%3A43%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Theory%20and%20explanation%20in%20geography%20revisited:%20Mid-range%20causal%20theories%20and%20explanatory%20conjuncturalism&rft.jtitle=Dialogues%20in%20human%20geography&rft.au=Yeung,%20Henry%20Wai-chung&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=483&rft.epage=487&rft.pages=483-487&rft.issn=2043-8206&rft.eissn=2043-8214&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/20438206231177074&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_20438206231177074%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_20438206231177074&rfr_iscdi=true