Theory and explanation in geography revisited: Mid-range causal theories and explanatory conjuncturalism
This commentary takes on Jamie Peck’s conjunctural methodologies and reflects on the epistemological matter of theory and explanation in geography. Mapping onto several key elements of conjunctural analysis, I reframe its methodological examination in relation to mid-level concepts and theories (i.e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dialogues in human geography 2024-11, Vol.14 (3), p.483-487 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 487 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 483 |
container_title | Dialogues in human geography |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Yeung, Henry Wai-chung |
description | This commentary takes on
Jamie Peck’s conjunctural methodologies and reflects on the epistemological matter of theory and explanation in geography. Mapping onto several key elements of conjunctural analysis, I reframe its methodological examination in relation to mid-level concepts and theories (i.e. mid-range theory), the articulation of causality and causal co-determination (i.e. causal mechanisms), and situational analysis, historicisation, and thick theorisation as context-rich explanation (i.e. context-specificity). By way of a sympathetic critique, I focus on two potential ‘blind spots’ that might require further rethinking and perhaps remedies: the underdevelopment of practical adequacy and the role of normative theorising in conjunctural methodologies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/20438206231177074 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_20438206231177074</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_20438206231177074</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_20438206231177074</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-ea95798045e8d54cee8ea99cb58adc1de9dd2d53c6979e0e4a17c391790576753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOOY-gG_5Ap1JmzSJbzL8BxNf5nO5JnddRpeOpBX77W2ZCCJ4X-69B36HwyHkmrMl50rd5EwUOmdlXkwvU-KMzCYt0zkX5z83Ky_JIqU9G0cyyUs2I7vNDts4UAiO4uexgQCdbwP1gdbY1hGOu4FG_PDJd-hu6Yt3WYRQI7XQJ2hoN_Ee0y-HydG2Yd8H2_URGp8OV-RiC03Cxfeek7eH-83qKVu_Pj6v7taZzbXoMgQjldFMSNROCouoR8nYd6nBWe7QOJc7WdjSKIMMBXBlC8OVYVKVShZzwk--NrYpRdxWx-gPEIeKs2qqp_rT1sgsT0yCGqt928cwRvwH-AIoHGve</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Theory and explanation in geography revisited: Mid-range causal theories and explanatory conjuncturalism</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Yeung, Henry Wai-chung</creator><creatorcontrib>Yeung, Henry Wai-chung</creatorcontrib><description>This commentary takes on
Jamie Peck’s conjunctural methodologies and reflects on the epistemological matter of theory and explanation in geography. Mapping onto several key elements of conjunctural analysis, I reframe its methodological examination in relation to mid-level concepts and theories (i.e. mid-range theory), the articulation of causality and causal co-determination (i.e. causal mechanisms), and situational analysis, historicisation, and thick theorisation as context-rich explanation (i.e. context-specificity). By way of a sympathetic critique, I focus on two potential ‘blind spots’ that might require further rethinking and perhaps remedies: the underdevelopment of practical adequacy and the role of normative theorising in conjunctural methodologies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2043-8206</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2043-8214</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/20438206231177074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Dialogues in human geography, 2024-11, Vol.14 (3), p.483-487</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-ea95798045e8d54cee8ea99cb58adc1de9dd2d53c6979e0e4a17c391790576753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-ea95798045e8d54cee8ea99cb58adc1de9dd2d53c6979e0e4a17c391790576753</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0647-0658</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/20438206231177074$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20438206231177074$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yeung, Henry Wai-chung</creatorcontrib><title>Theory and explanation in geography revisited: Mid-range causal theories and explanatory conjuncturalism</title><title>Dialogues in human geography</title><description>This commentary takes on
Jamie Peck’s conjunctural methodologies and reflects on the epistemological matter of theory and explanation in geography. Mapping onto several key elements of conjunctural analysis, I reframe its methodological examination in relation to mid-level concepts and theories (i.e. mid-range theory), the articulation of causality and causal co-determination (i.e. causal mechanisms), and situational analysis, historicisation, and thick theorisation as context-rich explanation (i.e. context-specificity). By way of a sympathetic critique, I focus on two potential ‘blind spots’ that might require further rethinking and perhaps remedies: the underdevelopment of practical adequacy and the role of normative theorising in conjunctural methodologies.</description><issn>2043-8206</issn><issn>2043-8214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOOY-gG_5Ap1JmzSJbzL8BxNf5nO5JnddRpeOpBX77W2ZCCJ4X-69B36HwyHkmrMl50rd5EwUOmdlXkwvU-KMzCYt0zkX5z83Ky_JIqU9G0cyyUs2I7vNDts4UAiO4uexgQCdbwP1gdbY1hGOu4FG_PDJd-hu6Yt3WYRQI7XQJ2hoN_Ee0y-HydG2Yd8H2_URGp8OV-RiC03Cxfeek7eH-83qKVu_Pj6v7taZzbXoMgQjldFMSNROCouoR8nYd6nBWe7QOJc7WdjSKIMMBXBlC8OVYVKVShZzwk--NrYpRdxWx-gPEIeKs2qqp_rT1sgsT0yCGqt928cwRvwH-AIoHGve</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Yeung, Henry Wai-chung</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0647-0658</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Theory and explanation in geography revisited: Mid-range causal theories and explanatory conjuncturalism</title><author>Yeung, Henry Wai-chung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-ea95798045e8d54cee8ea99cb58adc1de9dd2d53c6979e0e4a17c391790576753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yeung, Henry Wai-chung</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Dialogues in human geography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yeung, Henry Wai-chung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Theory and explanation in geography revisited: Mid-range causal theories and explanatory conjuncturalism</atitle><jtitle>Dialogues in human geography</jtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>483</spage><epage>487</epage><pages>483-487</pages><issn>2043-8206</issn><eissn>2043-8214</eissn><abstract>This commentary takes on
Jamie Peck’s conjunctural methodologies and reflects on the epistemological matter of theory and explanation in geography. Mapping onto several key elements of conjunctural analysis, I reframe its methodological examination in relation to mid-level concepts and theories (i.e. mid-range theory), the articulation of causality and causal co-determination (i.e. causal mechanisms), and situational analysis, historicisation, and thick theorisation as context-rich explanation (i.e. context-specificity). By way of a sympathetic critique, I focus on two potential ‘blind spots’ that might require further rethinking and perhaps remedies: the underdevelopment of practical adequacy and the role of normative theorising in conjunctural methodologies.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/20438206231177074</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0647-0658</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2043-8206 |
ispartof | Dialogues in human geography, 2024-11, Vol.14 (3), p.483-487 |
issn | 2043-8206 2043-8214 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_20438206231177074 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List |
title | Theory and explanation in geography revisited: Mid-range causal theories and explanatory conjuncturalism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T23%3A43%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Theory%20and%20explanation%20in%20geography%20revisited:%20Mid-range%20causal%20theories%20and%20explanatory%20conjuncturalism&rft.jtitle=Dialogues%20in%20human%20geography&rft.au=Yeung,%20Henry%20Wai-chung&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=483&rft.epage=487&rft.pages=483-487&rft.issn=2043-8206&rft.eissn=2043-8214&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/20438206231177074&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_20438206231177074%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_20438206231177074&rfr_iscdi=true |