Risk-based blast-load modelling: Techniques, models and benefits

There are many deterministic blast-load methods currently in use, such as (1) those for the ready calculation of explosive pressure, impulse and duration; (2) the derivation of explosive safety distances; or (3) the determination of safety hazards (and other consequences) following an explosive’s de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of protective structures 2016-09, Vol.7 (3), p.430-451
Hauptverfasser: Netherton, Michael D, Stewart, Mark G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 451
container_issue 3
container_start_page 430
container_title International journal of protective structures
container_volume 7
creator Netherton, Michael D
Stewart, Mark G
description There are many deterministic blast-load methods currently in use, such as (1) those for the ready calculation of explosive pressure, impulse and duration; (2) the derivation of explosive safety distances; or (3) the determination of safety hazards (and other consequences) following an explosive’s detonation. In this article, we argue that deterministic blast-loading methods do not fully account for society’s usual acceptance (or rejection) of the risks associated with damage, safety and/or injury as a result of an explosive blast-load. This article details the state of the art of probabilistic blast-load modelling that supports a quantitative calculation of risk, with respect to damage, safety and injury. The probabilistic models draw data from the literature and from our own field trials. The article details the benefits that flow from this form of blast-load characterisation and concludes with a discussion on how probabilistic methods be used to derive cost–benefit advice with respect to any proposed risk mitigation solution.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/2041419616666455
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_2041419616666455</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2041419616666455</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_2041419616666455</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-45f12b1908c1fb08ef98be3fa9b7f4f3a33bb9d1d874226ea109df40da19e22b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1Lw0AQXUTBUnv3mB_g6s5m87GelKJVKAhSwVuYzc7W1DTRTHrw37ulehF8lxnevPcYnhDnoC4BiuJKKwMGbA55hMmyIzHZU9Jo9Xr8u8f7qZgxb1SEyTVk-UTcPDf8Lh0y-cS1yKNse_TJtvfUtk23vk5WVL91zeeO-OJAc4JdFFNHoRn5TJwEbJlmP3MqXu7vVvMHuXxaPM5vl7LWJYzSZAG0A6vKGoJTJQVbOkoDWlcEE1JMU-esB18WRuucEJT1wSiPYElrl06FOuTWQ888UKg-hmaLw1cFqtqXUP0tIVrkwcK4pmrT74Yufvi__htjZFuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk-based blast-load modelling: Techniques, models and benefits</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Netherton, Michael D ; Stewart, Mark G</creator><creatorcontrib>Netherton, Michael D ; Stewart, Mark G</creatorcontrib><description>There are many deterministic blast-load methods currently in use, such as (1) those for the ready calculation of explosive pressure, impulse and duration; (2) the derivation of explosive safety distances; or (3) the determination of safety hazards (and other consequences) following an explosive’s detonation. In this article, we argue that deterministic blast-loading methods do not fully account for society’s usual acceptance (or rejection) of the risks associated with damage, safety and/or injury as a result of an explosive blast-load. This article details the state of the art of probabilistic blast-load modelling that supports a quantitative calculation of risk, with respect to damage, safety and injury. The probabilistic models draw data from the literature and from our own field trials. The article details the benefits that flow from this form of blast-load characterisation and concludes with a discussion on how probabilistic methods be used to derive cost–benefit advice with respect to any proposed risk mitigation solution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2041-4196</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-420X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2041419616666455</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>International journal of protective structures, 2016-09, Vol.7 (3), p.430-451</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-45f12b1908c1fb08ef98be3fa9b7f4f3a33bb9d1d874226ea109df40da19e22b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-45f12b1908c1fb08ef98be3fa9b7f4f3a33bb9d1d874226ea109df40da19e22b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2041419616666455$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2041419616666455$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21821,27926,27927,43623,43624</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Netherton, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Mark G</creatorcontrib><title>Risk-based blast-load modelling: Techniques, models and benefits</title><title>International journal of protective structures</title><description>There are many deterministic blast-load methods currently in use, such as (1) those for the ready calculation of explosive pressure, impulse and duration; (2) the derivation of explosive safety distances; or (3) the determination of safety hazards (and other consequences) following an explosive’s detonation. In this article, we argue that deterministic blast-loading methods do not fully account for society’s usual acceptance (or rejection) of the risks associated with damage, safety and/or injury as a result of an explosive blast-load. This article details the state of the art of probabilistic blast-load modelling that supports a quantitative calculation of risk, with respect to damage, safety and injury. The probabilistic models draw data from the literature and from our own field trials. The article details the benefits that flow from this form of blast-load characterisation and concludes with a discussion on how probabilistic methods be used to derive cost–benefit advice with respect to any proposed risk mitigation solution.</description><issn>2041-4196</issn><issn>2041-420X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UE1Lw0AQXUTBUnv3mB_g6s5m87GelKJVKAhSwVuYzc7W1DTRTHrw37ulehF8lxnevPcYnhDnoC4BiuJKKwMGbA55hMmyIzHZU9Jo9Xr8u8f7qZgxb1SEyTVk-UTcPDf8Lh0y-cS1yKNse_TJtvfUtk23vk5WVL91zeeO-OJAc4JdFFNHoRn5TJwEbJlmP3MqXu7vVvMHuXxaPM5vl7LWJYzSZAG0A6vKGoJTJQVbOkoDWlcEE1JMU-esB18WRuucEJT1wSiPYElrl06FOuTWQ888UKg-hmaLw1cFqtqXUP0tIVrkwcK4pmrT74Yufvi__htjZFuQ</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Netherton, Michael D</creator><creator>Stewart, Mark G</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Risk-based blast-load modelling: Techniques, models and benefits</title><author>Netherton, Michael D ; Stewart, Mark G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-45f12b1908c1fb08ef98be3fa9b7f4f3a33bb9d1d874226ea109df40da19e22b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Netherton, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Mark G</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of protective structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Netherton, Michael D</au><au>Stewart, Mark G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk-based blast-load modelling: Techniques, models and benefits</atitle><jtitle>International journal of protective structures</jtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>430</spage><epage>451</epage><pages>430-451</pages><issn>2041-4196</issn><eissn>2041-420X</eissn><abstract>There are many deterministic blast-load methods currently in use, such as (1) those for the ready calculation of explosive pressure, impulse and duration; (2) the derivation of explosive safety distances; or (3) the determination of safety hazards (and other consequences) following an explosive’s detonation. In this article, we argue that deterministic blast-loading methods do not fully account for society’s usual acceptance (or rejection) of the risks associated with damage, safety and/or injury as a result of an explosive blast-load. This article details the state of the art of probabilistic blast-load modelling that supports a quantitative calculation of risk, with respect to damage, safety and injury. The probabilistic models draw data from the literature and from our own field trials. The article details the benefits that flow from this form of blast-load characterisation and concludes with a discussion on how probabilistic methods be used to derive cost–benefit advice with respect to any proposed risk mitigation solution.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/2041419616666455</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2041-4196
ispartof International journal of protective structures, 2016-09, Vol.7 (3), p.430-451
issn 2041-4196
2041-420X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_2041419616666455
source Access via SAGE
title Risk-based blast-load modelling: Techniques, models and benefits
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T09%3A41%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk-based%20blast-load%20modelling:%20Techniques,%20models%20and%20benefits&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20protective%20structures&rft.au=Netherton,%20Michael%20D&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=430&rft.epage=451&rft.pages=430-451&rft.issn=2041-4196&rft.eissn=2041-420X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2041419616666455&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_2041419616666455%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2041419616666455&rfr_iscdi=true