Fortifying the algorithmic management provisions in the proposed Platform Work Directive

The European Commission proposed a Directive on Platform Work at the end of 2021. While much attention has been placed on its effort to address misclassification of the employed as self-employed, it also contains ambitious provisions for the regulation of the algorithmic management prevalent on thes...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European labour law journal 2023-06, Vol.14 (2), p.308-332
Hauptverfasser: Veale, Michael, Silberman, Michael ‘Six’, Binns, Reuben
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 332
container_issue 2
container_start_page 308
container_title European labour law journal
container_volume 14
creator Veale, Michael
Silberman, Michael ‘Six’
Binns, Reuben
description The European Commission proposed a Directive on Platform Work at the end of 2021. While much attention has been placed on its effort to address misclassification of the employed as self-employed, it also contains ambitious provisions for the regulation of the algorithmic management prevalent on these platforms. Overall, these provisions are well-drafted, yet they require extra scrutiny in light of the fierce lobbying and resistance they will likely encounter in the legislative process, in implementation and in enforcement. In this article, we place the proposal in its sociotechnical context, drawing upon wide cross-disciplinary scholarship to identify a range of tensions, potential misinterpretations, and perversions that should be pre-empted and guarded against at the earliest possible stage. These include improvements to ex ante and ex post algorithmic transparency; identifying and strengthening the standard against which human reviewers of algorithmic decisions review; anticipating challenges of representation and organising in complex platform contexts; creating realistic ambitions for digital worker communication channels; and accountably monitoring and evaluating impacts on workers while limiting data collection. We encourage legislators and regulators at both European and national levels to act to fortify these provisions in the negotiation of the Directive, its potential transposition, and in its enforcement.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/20319525231167983
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_20319525231167983</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_20319525231167983</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_20319525231167983</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-9e3b3adb971a3ab4d39f8e8c9a34e76f89d3221d9f1ebf55e346b3376095ac713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOwzAMhiMEEtPYA3DLC3TU8dI0RzQYTJoEBxDcqrR1tsDaTEmYtLenY9yQONmy_8_6_TN2DfkUQKkbkSNoKaRAgELpEs_YSKDWmZSyOB_6YZ8dBZdsEqOrc8y1KEsFI_a-8CE5e3D9mqcNcbNd--DSpnMN70xv1tRRn_gu-L2LzveRu_5HOEx2PlLLn7cmWR86_ubDJ79zgZrk9nTFLqzZRpr81jF7Xdy_zB-z1dPDcn67yhoUKmWasEbT1lqBQVPPWtS2pLLRBmekClvqFoWAVlug2kpJOCtqRFXkWppGAY4ZnO42wccYyFa74DoTDhXk1TGd6k86AzM9MXH4r_rwX6EfLP4DfAPKmWZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fortifying the algorithmic management provisions in the proposed Platform Work Directive</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Veale, Michael ; Silberman, Michael ‘Six’ ; Binns, Reuben</creator><creatorcontrib>Veale, Michael ; Silberman, Michael ‘Six’ ; Binns, Reuben</creatorcontrib><description>The European Commission proposed a Directive on Platform Work at the end of 2021. While much attention has been placed on its effort to address misclassification of the employed as self-employed, it also contains ambitious provisions for the regulation of the algorithmic management prevalent on these platforms. Overall, these provisions are well-drafted, yet they require extra scrutiny in light of the fierce lobbying and resistance they will likely encounter in the legislative process, in implementation and in enforcement. In this article, we place the proposal in its sociotechnical context, drawing upon wide cross-disciplinary scholarship to identify a range of tensions, potential misinterpretations, and perversions that should be pre-empted and guarded against at the earliest possible stage. These include improvements to ex ante and ex post algorithmic transparency; identifying and strengthening the standard against which human reviewers of algorithmic decisions review; anticipating challenges of representation and organising in complex platform contexts; creating realistic ambitions for digital worker communication channels; and accountably monitoring and evaluating impacts on workers while limiting data collection. We encourage legislators and regulators at both European and national levels to act to fortify these provisions in the negotiation of the Directive, its potential transposition, and in its enforcement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2031-9525</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2399-5556</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/20319525231167983</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>European labour law journal, 2023-06, Vol.14 (2), p.308-332</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-9e3b3adb971a3ab4d39f8e8c9a34e76f89d3221d9f1ebf55e346b3376095ac713</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/20319525231167983$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20319525231167983$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Veale, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silberman, Michael ‘Six’</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binns, Reuben</creatorcontrib><title>Fortifying the algorithmic management provisions in the proposed Platform Work Directive</title><title>European labour law journal</title><addtitle>European Labour Law Journal</addtitle><description>The European Commission proposed a Directive on Platform Work at the end of 2021. While much attention has been placed on its effort to address misclassification of the employed as self-employed, it also contains ambitious provisions for the regulation of the algorithmic management prevalent on these platforms. Overall, these provisions are well-drafted, yet they require extra scrutiny in light of the fierce lobbying and resistance they will likely encounter in the legislative process, in implementation and in enforcement. In this article, we place the proposal in its sociotechnical context, drawing upon wide cross-disciplinary scholarship to identify a range of tensions, potential misinterpretations, and perversions that should be pre-empted and guarded against at the earliest possible stage. These include improvements to ex ante and ex post algorithmic transparency; identifying and strengthening the standard against which human reviewers of algorithmic decisions review; anticipating challenges of representation and organising in complex platform contexts; creating realistic ambitions for digital worker communication channels; and accountably monitoring and evaluating impacts on workers while limiting data collection. We encourage legislators and regulators at both European and national levels to act to fortify these provisions in the negotiation of the Directive, its potential transposition, and in its enforcement.</description><issn>2031-9525</issn><issn>2399-5556</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFOwzAMhiMEEtPYA3DLC3TU8dI0RzQYTJoEBxDcqrR1tsDaTEmYtLenY9yQONmy_8_6_TN2DfkUQKkbkSNoKaRAgELpEs_YSKDWmZSyOB_6YZ8dBZdsEqOrc8y1KEsFI_a-8CE5e3D9mqcNcbNd--DSpnMN70xv1tRRn_gu-L2LzveRu_5HOEx2PlLLn7cmWR86_ubDJ79zgZrk9nTFLqzZRpr81jF7Xdy_zB-z1dPDcn67yhoUKmWasEbT1lqBQVPPWtS2pLLRBmekClvqFoWAVlug2kpJOCtqRFXkWppGAY4ZnO42wccYyFa74DoTDhXk1TGd6k86AzM9MXH4r_rwX6EfLP4DfAPKmWZA</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Veale, Michael</creator><creator>Silberman, Michael ‘Six’</creator><creator>Binns, Reuben</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Fortifying the algorithmic management provisions in the proposed Platform Work Directive</title><author>Veale, Michael ; Silberman, Michael ‘Six’ ; Binns, Reuben</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-9e3b3adb971a3ab4d39f8e8c9a34e76f89d3221d9f1ebf55e346b3376095ac713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Veale, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silberman, Michael ‘Six’</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binns, Reuben</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European labour law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Veale, Michael</au><au>Silberman, Michael ‘Six’</au><au>Binns, Reuben</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fortifying the algorithmic management provisions in the proposed Platform Work Directive</atitle><jtitle>European labour law journal</jtitle><addtitle>European Labour Law Journal</addtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>308</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>308-332</pages><issn>2031-9525</issn><eissn>2399-5556</eissn><abstract>The European Commission proposed a Directive on Platform Work at the end of 2021. While much attention has been placed on its effort to address misclassification of the employed as self-employed, it also contains ambitious provisions for the regulation of the algorithmic management prevalent on these platforms. Overall, these provisions are well-drafted, yet they require extra scrutiny in light of the fierce lobbying and resistance they will likely encounter in the legislative process, in implementation and in enforcement. In this article, we place the proposal in its sociotechnical context, drawing upon wide cross-disciplinary scholarship to identify a range of tensions, potential misinterpretations, and perversions that should be pre-empted and guarded against at the earliest possible stage. These include improvements to ex ante and ex post algorithmic transparency; identifying and strengthening the standard against which human reviewers of algorithmic decisions review; anticipating challenges of representation and organising in complex platform contexts; creating realistic ambitions for digital worker communication channels; and accountably monitoring and evaluating impacts on workers while limiting data collection. We encourage legislators and regulators at both European and national levels to act to fortify these provisions in the negotiation of the Directive, its potential transposition, and in its enforcement.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/20319525231167983</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2031-9525
ispartof European labour law journal, 2023-06, Vol.14 (2), p.308-332
issn 2031-9525
2399-5556
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_20319525231167983
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Fortifying the algorithmic management provisions in the proposed Platform Work Directive
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T08%3A58%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fortifying%20the%20algorithmic%20management%20provisions%20in%20the%20proposed%20Platform%20Work%20Directive&rft.jtitle=European%20labour%20law%20journal&rft.au=Veale,%20Michael&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=308&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=308-332&rft.issn=2031-9525&rft.eissn=2399-5556&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/20319525231167983&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_20319525231167983%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_20319525231167983&rfr_iscdi=true