Building Empirical Typologies with QCA: Toward a Classification of Media Systems

Typologies are omnipresent both in everyday life as well as in the sciences. Epistemologically, there are several systematic ways to build typologies, such as qualitative, theory-based descriptions on one end and quantitative, exploratory statistical means on the other end of the spectrum. Both have...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The international journal of press/politics 2016-04, Vol.21 (2), p.209-232
Hauptverfasser: Büchel, Florin, Humprecht, Edda, Castro-Herrero, Laia, Engesser, Sven, Brüggemann, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 232
container_issue 2
container_start_page 209
container_title The international journal of press/politics
container_volume 21
creator Büchel, Florin
Humprecht, Edda
Castro-Herrero, Laia
Engesser, Sven
Brüggemann, Michael
description Typologies are omnipresent both in everyday life as well as in the sciences. Epistemologically, there are several systematic ways to build typologies, such as qualitative, theory-based descriptions on one end and quantitative, exploratory statistical means on the other end of the spectrum. Both have their specific advantages and disadvantages, which can be bridged by applying set-theoretic methods, such as Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). The contribution of this paper is substantial and methodological: First, we show how QCA can enhance our understanding of media systems by building a typology that draws on Hallin and Mancini’s framework. The main improvement of QCA is the ability to identify ideal types as well as border cases. In our analysis, we move beyond the widely discussed case of Great Britain and take a closer look at further border cases such as Austria, Belgium, France, the Netherlands, and Portugal. Second, QCA has been scarcely applied to build typologies and if so, only in neighboring disciplines. Thus, we aim at familiarizing comparative political communication scholars with this method.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1940161215626567
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1940161215626567</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1940161215626567</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1940161215626567</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-3b5bf3b227e492f09df1b9f8f50e8b08204c774bb98d3d244c90c092823a38363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1T0tLAzEYDKJgrd497snb6pcv2TyOdakPKIhQz2GTTdaUbXdJWqT_3paKB8HTDMPMMEPILYV7SqV8oJoDFRRpJVBUQp6RyVEqqUA4_-UUL8lVzisAAYKxCbl73MW-jZuumK_HmKJr-mK5H4d-6KLPxVfcfhbv9eyaXISmz_7mB6fk42m-rF_Kxdvzaz1blA4Z35bMVjYwiyg91xhAt4FaHVSowCsLCoE7Kbm1WrWsRc6dBgcaFbKGKSbYlMCp16Uh5-SDGVNcN2lvKJjjT_P35yFSniK56bxZDbu0OSz83_8NKQZP9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Building Empirical Typologies with QCA: Toward a Classification of Media Systems</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Büchel, Florin ; Humprecht, Edda ; Castro-Herrero, Laia ; Engesser, Sven ; Brüggemann, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Büchel, Florin ; Humprecht, Edda ; Castro-Herrero, Laia ; Engesser, Sven ; Brüggemann, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Typologies are omnipresent both in everyday life as well as in the sciences. Epistemologically, there are several systematic ways to build typologies, such as qualitative, theory-based descriptions on one end and quantitative, exploratory statistical means on the other end of the spectrum. Both have their specific advantages and disadvantages, which can be bridged by applying set-theoretic methods, such as Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). The contribution of this paper is substantial and methodological: First, we show how QCA can enhance our understanding of media systems by building a typology that draws on Hallin and Mancini’s framework. The main improvement of QCA is the ability to identify ideal types as well as border cases. In our analysis, we move beyond the widely discussed case of Great Britain and take a closer look at further border cases such as Austria, Belgium, France, the Netherlands, and Portugal. Second, QCA has been scarcely applied to build typologies and if so, only in neighboring disciplines. Thus, we aim at familiarizing comparative political communication scholars with this method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1940-1612</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-1620</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1940161215626567</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>The international journal of press/politics, 2016-04, Vol.21 (2), p.209-232</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-3b5bf3b227e492f09df1b9f8f50e8b08204c774bb98d3d244c90c092823a38363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1940161215626567$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1940161215626567$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,43619,43620</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Büchel, Florin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humprecht, Edda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro-Herrero, Laia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engesser, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brüggemann, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Building Empirical Typologies with QCA: Toward a Classification of Media Systems</title><title>The international journal of press/politics</title><description>Typologies are omnipresent both in everyday life as well as in the sciences. Epistemologically, there are several systematic ways to build typologies, such as qualitative, theory-based descriptions on one end and quantitative, exploratory statistical means on the other end of the spectrum. Both have their specific advantages and disadvantages, which can be bridged by applying set-theoretic methods, such as Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). The contribution of this paper is substantial and methodological: First, we show how QCA can enhance our understanding of media systems by building a typology that draws on Hallin and Mancini’s framework. The main improvement of QCA is the ability to identify ideal types as well as border cases. In our analysis, we move beyond the widely discussed case of Great Britain and take a closer look at further border cases such as Austria, Belgium, France, the Netherlands, and Portugal. Second, QCA has been scarcely applied to build typologies and if so, only in neighboring disciplines. Thus, we aim at familiarizing comparative political communication scholars with this method.</description><issn>1940-1612</issn><issn>1940-1620</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1T0tLAzEYDKJgrd497snb6pcv2TyOdakPKIhQz2GTTdaUbXdJWqT_3paKB8HTDMPMMEPILYV7SqV8oJoDFRRpJVBUQp6RyVEqqUA4_-UUL8lVzisAAYKxCbl73MW-jZuumK_HmKJr-mK5H4d-6KLPxVfcfhbv9eyaXISmz_7mB6fk42m-rF_Kxdvzaz1blA4Z35bMVjYwiyg91xhAt4FaHVSowCsLCoE7Kbm1WrWsRc6dBgcaFbKGKSbYlMCp16Uh5-SDGVNcN2lvKJjjT_P35yFSniK56bxZDbu0OSz83_8NKQZP9w</recordid><startdate>201604</startdate><enddate>201604</enddate><creator>Büchel, Florin</creator><creator>Humprecht, Edda</creator><creator>Castro-Herrero, Laia</creator><creator>Engesser, Sven</creator><creator>Brüggemann, Michael</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201604</creationdate><title>Building Empirical Typologies with QCA</title><author>Büchel, Florin ; Humprecht, Edda ; Castro-Herrero, Laia ; Engesser, Sven ; Brüggemann, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-3b5bf3b227e492f09df1b9f8f50e8b08204c774bb98d3d244c90c092823a38363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Büchel, Florin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humprecht, Edda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro-Herrero, Laia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engesser, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brüggemann, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The international journal of press/politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Büchel, Florin</au><au>Humprecht, Edda</au><au>Castro-Herrero, Laia</au><au>Engesser, Sven</au><au>Brüggemann, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Building Empirical Typologies with QCA: Toward a Classification of Media Systems</atitle><jtitle>The international journal of press/politics</jtitle><date>2016-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>209-232</pages><issn>1940-1612</issn><eissn>1940-1620</eissn><abstract>Typologies are omnipresent both in everyday life as well as in the sciences. Epistemologically, there are several systematic ways to build typologies, such as qualitative, theory-based descriptions on one end and quantitative, exploratory statistical means on the other end of the spectrum. Both have their specific advantages and disadvantages, which can be bridged by applying set-theoretic methods, such as Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). The contribution of this paper is substantial and methodological: First, we show how QCA can enhance our understanding of media systems by building a typology that draws on Hallin and Mancini’s framework. The main improvement of QCA is the ability to identify ideal types as well as border cases. In our analysis, we move beyond the widely discussed case of Great Britain and take a closer look at further border cases such as Austria, Belgium, France, the Netherlands, and Portugal. Second, QCA has been scarcely applied to build typologies and if so, only in neighboring disciplines. Thus, we aim at familiarizing comparative political communication scholars with this method.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1940161215626567</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1940-1612
ispartof The international journal of press/politics, 2016-04, Vol.21 (2), p.209-232
issn 1940-1612
1940-1620
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1940161215626567
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Building Empirical Typologies with QCA: Toward a Classification of Media Systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T19%3A41%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Building%20Empirical%20Typologies%20with%20QCA:%20Toward%20a%20Classification%20of%20Media%20Systems&rft.jtitle=The%20international%20journal%20of%20press/politics&rft.au=B%C3%BCchel,%20Florin&rft.date=2016-04&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=209-232&rft.issn=1940-1612&rft.eissn=1940-1620&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1940161215626567&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1940161215626567%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1940161215626567&rfr_iscdi=true