The national shaping of Europe’s emerging hydrogen strategies: Cooperative or competitive hydrogen Politics?

In recent years, many European states have begun heavily investing in hydrogen (H2) technologies and as of July 2021, several have published detailed national hydrogen strategies. Nonetheless, it is evident there are emerging differences between these states regarding the scale, ambition and sophist...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Competition and regulation in network industries 2022-03, Vol.23 (1), p.77-96
Hauptverfasser: Machado, Júlia T. M., Flynn, Brendan, Williamson, Ian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 96
container_issue 1
container_start_page 77
container_title Competition and regulation in network industries
container_volume 23
creator Machado, Júlia T. M.
Flynn, Brendan
Williamson, Ian
description In recent years, many European states have begun heavily investing in hydrogen (H2) technologies and as of July 2021, several have published detailed national hydrogen strategies. Nonetheless, it is evident there are emerging differences between these states regarding the scale, ambition and sophistication of their H2 plans. Such strategies also have implications for existing energy regimes that remain strongly dependent on fossil fuels alongside greater integration of renewables. Emerging H2 firms and technologies further disturb energy policies by either requiring a partly new, or at least modified, European energy infrastructure. Will such changes produce commercially dominant H2 businesses that could distort the broader energy market and confer a leading position upon a few countries and firms? There is also uncertainty over whether H2 technologies will support renewables by providing a ready means of energy storage, or whether investment in hydrogen could, paradoxically, displace some of the commercial interest in renewables. Finally, questions have been posed about the green credentials of H2 technologies. There are significant differences in how hydrogen is generated and much debate about the hydrogen colours. This paper employs a comparative analysis of three European national hydrogen strategies, offering a contrast between Germany, the UK and Portugal. The interaction between these and the EU level is mapped. Also explored is whether the various national styles favour more cooperative or competitive policy-making. The comparison with the UK allows us to explore some impacts Brexit may have on British H2 ambitions. To interpret these strategies, we employ the Multi-Level Perspective on energy transitions, which focuses on how different actors have a variable influence at mutually reinforcing levels of policymaking (niches, regime and landscape). These include EU institutions, national governments and agencies. Energy and technology firms and research networks are also crucial. We draw attention to several fundamental regulatory challenges that H2 strategies raise. Also highlighted are differences and similarities between countries and the wider possible trajectories for future hydrogen development.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/17835917221082935
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_17835917221082935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_17835917221082935</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_17835917221082935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2275-5dd115ebda63d0e057557aef851271d10f4c0ebb91f1145a85e0aaf75285573d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAUhC0EElXpAdj5Ail-dl3HbBCqyo9UCRZlHTnxc2rUxpGdInXHNbgeJyGhiA0Sq6eZ-eYthpBLYFMApa5A5UJqUJwDy7kW8oSMuNA641rOT8loyLMBOCeTlHzJQIkZ5FKPSLPeIG1M50NjtjRtTOubmgZHl_sYWvx8_0gUdxjrwd4cbAw1NjR10XRYe0zXdBF6rpf-DWmItAq7Fjv_LX_557DtnSrdXJAzZ7YJJz93TF7uluvFQ7Z6un9c3K6yinMlM2ktgMTSmrmwDJlUUiqDLpfAFVhgblYxLEsNDmAmTS6RGeOU5HkPCivGBI5_qxhSiuiKNvqdiYcCWDFsVvzZrO9Mj51kaixewz72k6R_Cl9C5m7P</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The national shaping of Europe’s emerging hydrogen strategies: Cooperative or competitive hydrogen Politics?</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Machado, Júlia T. M. ; Flynn, Brendan ; Williamson, Ian</creator><creatorcontrib>Machado, Júlia T. M. ; Flynn, Brendan ; Williamson, Ian</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, many European states have begun heavily investing in hydrogen (H2) technologies and as of July 2021, several have published detailed national hydrogen strategies. Nonetheless, it is evident there are emerging differences between these states regarding the scale, ambition and sophistication of their H2 plans. Such strategies also have implications for existing energy regimes that remain strongly dependent on fossil fuels alongside greater integration of renewables. Emerging H2 firms and technologies further disturb energy policies by either requiring a partly new, or at least modified, European energy infrastructure. Will such changes produce commercially dominant H2 businesses that could distort the broader energy market and confer a leading position upon a few countries and firms? There is also uncertainty over whether H2 technologies will support renewables by providing a ready means of energy storage, or whether investment in hydrogen could, paradoxically, displace some of the commercial interest in renewables. Finally, questions have been posed about the green credentials of H2 technologies. There are significant differences in how hydrogen is generated and much debate about the hydrogen colours. This paper employs a comparative analysis of three European national hydrogen strategies, offering a contrast between Germany, the UK and Portugal. The interaction between these and the EU level is mapped. Also explored is whether the various national styles favour more cooperative or competitive policy-making. The comparison with the UK allows us to explore some impacts Brexit may have on British H2 ambitions. To interpret these strategies, we employ the Multi-Level Perspective on energy transitions, which focuses on how different actors have a variable influence at mutually reinforcing levels of policymaking (niches, regime and landscape). These include EU institutions, national governments and agencies. Energy and technology firms and research networks are also crucial. We draw attention to several fundamental regulatory challenges that H2 strategies raise. Also highlighted are differences and similarities between countries and the wider possible trajectories for future hydrogen development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1783-5917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2399-2956</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/17835917221082935</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Competition and regulation in network industries, 2022-03, Vol.23 (1), p.77-96</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2275-5dd115ebda63d0e057557aef851271d10f4c0ebb91f1145a85e0aaf75285573d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1508-1726</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/17835917221082935$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17835917221082935$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Machado, Júlia T. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Brendan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Ian</creatorcontrib><title>The national shaping of Europe’s emerging hydrogen strategies: Cooperative or competitive hydrogen Politics?</title><title>Competition and regulation in network industries</title><description>In recent years, many European states have begun heavily investing in hydrogen (H2) technologies and as of July 2021, several have published detailed national hydrogen strategies. Nonetheless, it is evident there are emerging differences between these states regarding the scale, ambition and sophistication of their H2 plans. Such strategies also have implications for existing energy regimes that remain strongly dependent on fossil fuels alongside greater integration of renewables. Emerging H2 firms and technologies further disturb energy policies by either requiring a partly new, or at least modified, European energy infrastructure. Will such changes produce commercially dominant H2 businesses that could distort the broader energy market and confer a leading position upon a few countries and firms? There is also uncertainty over whether H2 technologies will support renewables by providing a ready means of energy storage, or whether investment in hydrogen could, paradoxically, displace some of the commercial interest in renewables. Finally, questions have been posed about the green credentials of H2 technologies. There are significant differences in how hydrogen is generated and much debate about the hydrogen colours. This paper employs a comparative analysis of three European national hydrogen strategies, offering a contrast between Germany, the UK and Portugal. The interaction between these and the EU level is mapped. Also explored is whether the various national styles favour more cooperative or competitive policy-making. The comparison with the UK allows us to explore some impacts Brexit may have on British H2 ambitions. To interpret these strategies, we employ the Multi-Level Perspective on energy transitions, which focuses on how different actors have a variable influence at mutually reinforcing levels of policymaking (niches, regime and landscape). These include EU institutions, national governments and agencies. Energy and technology firms and research networks are also crucial. We draw attention to several fundamental regulatory challenges that H2 strategies raise. Also highlighted are differences and similarities between countries and the wider possible trajectories for future hydrogen development.</description><issn>1783-5917</issn><issn>2399-2956</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAUhC0EElXpAdj5Ail-dl3HbBCqyo9UCRZlHTnxc2rUxpGdInXHNbgeJyGhiA0Sq6eZ-eYthpBLYFMApa5A5UJqUJwDy7kW8oSMuNA641rOT8loyLMBOCeTlHzJQIkZ5FKPSLPeIG1M50NjtjRtTOubmgZHl_sYWvx8_0gUdxjrwd4cbAw1NjR10XRYe0zXdBF6rpf-DWmItAq7Fjv_LX_557DtnSrdXJAzZ7YJJz93TF7uluvFQ7Z6un9c3K6yinMlM2ktgMTSmrmwDJlUUiqDLpfAFVhgblYxLEsNDmAmTS6RGeOU5HkPCivGBI5_qxhSiuiKNvqdiYcCWDFsVvzZrO9Mj51kaixewz72k6R_Cl9C5m7P</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Machado, Júlia T. M.</creator><creator>Flynn, Brendan</creator><creator>Williamson, Ian</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1508-1726</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>The national shaping of Europe’s emerging hydrogen strategies: Cooperative or competitive hydrogen Politics?</title><author>Machado, Júlia T. M. ; Flynn, Brendan ; Williamson, Ian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2275-5dd115ebda63d0e057557aef851271d10f4c0ebb91f1145a85e0aaf75285573d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Machado, Júlia T. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Brendan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Ian</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Competition and regulation in network industries</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Machado, Júlia T. M.</au><au>Flynn, Brendan</au><au>Williamson, Ian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The national shaping of Europe’s emerging hydrogen strategies: Cooperative or competitive hydrogen Politics?</atitle><jtitle>Competition and regulation in network industries</jtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>77</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>77-96</pages><issn>1783-5917</issn><eissn>2399-2956</eissn><abstract>In recent years, many European states have begun heavily investing in hydrogen (H2) technologies and as of July 2021, several have published detailed national hydrogen strategies. Nonetheless, it is evident there are emerging differences between these states regarding the scale, ambition and sophistication of their H2 plans. Such strategies also have implications for existing energy regimes that remain strongly dependent on fossil fuels alongside greater integration of renewables. Emerging H2 firms and technologies further disturb energy policies by either requiring a partly new, or at least modified, European energy infrastructure. Will such changes produce commercially dominant H2 businesses that could distort the broader energy market and confer a leading position upon a few countries and firms? There is also uncertainty over whether H2 technologies will support renewables by providing a ready means of energy storage, or whether investment in hydrogen could, paradoxically, displace some of the commercial interest in renewables. Finally, questions have been posed about the green credentials of H2 technologies. There are significant differences in how hydrogen is generated and much debate about the hydrogen colours. This paper employs a comparative analysis of three European national hydrogen strategies, offering a contrast between Germany, the UK and Portugal. The interaction between these and the EU level is mapped. Also explored is whether the various national styles favour more cooperative or competitive policy-making. The comparison with the UK allows us to explore some impacts Brexit may have on British H2 ambitions. To interpret these strategies, we employ the Multi-Level Perspective on energy transitions, which focuses on how different actors have a variable influence at mutually reinforcing levels of policymaking (niches, regime and landscape). These include EU institutions, national governments and agencies. Energy and technology firms and research networks are also crucial. We draw attention to several fundamental regulatory challenges that H2 strategies raise. Also highlighted are differences and similarities between countries and the wider possible trajectories for future hydrogen development.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/17835917221082935</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1508-1726</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1783-5917
ispartof Competition and regulation in network industries, 2022-03, Vol.23 (1), p.77-96
issn 1783-5917
2399-2956
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_17835917221082935
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title The national shaping of Europe’s emerging hydrogen strategies: Cooperative or competitive hydrogen Politics?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A20%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20national%20shaping%20of%20Europe%E2%80%99s%20emerging%20hydrogen%20strategies:%20Cooperative%20or%20competitive%20hydrogen%20Politics?&rft.jtitle=Competition%20and%20regulation%20in%20network%20industries&rft.au=Machado,%20J%C3%BAlia%20T.%20M.&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=77-96&rft.issn=1783-5917&rft.eissn=2399-2956&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/17835917221082935&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_17835917221082935%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_17835917221082935&rfr_iscdi=true