Are occupational therapists in hand therapy working in an occupation-centered way? A cross sectional survey
Introduction The dominance of the biomedical approach has previously caused a limited focus on occupation within hand therapy. This study aimed to investigate the rehabilitation offered to patients with a hand-related disorder (HRD) in Denmark including to determine the extent to which occupation-fo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hand therapy 2024-09, Vol.29 (3), p.124-134 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 134 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 124 |
container_title | Hand therapy |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Ransby, Thea Birch Jacobsen, Nicolaj Schøler Hansen, Alice Ørts |
description | Introduction
The dominance of the biomedical approach has previously caused a limited focus on occupation within hand therapy. This study aimed to investigate the rehabilitation offered to patients with a hand-related disorder (HRD) in Denmark including to determine the extent to which occupation-focused and/or occupation-based assessments and interventions are used and to identify barriers against their use.
Methods
A cross-sectional survey with 45 questions was conducted among members of the Danish Association for Hand Therapy. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics. Categorical variables were reported with frequency and percentage, and continuous variables with average and standard deviation.
Results
One hundred and six occupational therapists working as hand therapists (n = 106) completed the survey. They reported common use of assessments measuring range of motion, pain, edema, and occupational performance. Occupational performance was assessed by non-standardized occupation-focused assessments, such as informal conversations. Exercise, pain management, and occupation-focused informal conversations were reported as the most frequently used interventions. Out of 82 respondents, 74 (91.4%) reported that they used interventions focused on body function and structures to the extent they wanted. Only 41 (50.0%) used occupation-focused or occupation-based interventions to the extent they wanted.
Discussion
Assessments and interventions reporting body function and structure were used most frequently whereas assessments and interventions reporting activity and participation were used to a lesser extent. Occupation-focused assessments and interventions were used more commonly than occupation-based. Hand therapists considered occupation-based assessments and interventions to be important in rehabilitation after HRD, despite using them with few patients. Several barriers were reported regarding the implementation of an occupation-centered approach: habit, workload, time constraints, and setting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/17589983241268188 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_17589983241268188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_17589983241268188</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_17589983241268188</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-f27638b1aaea9909ec44817240a70f7dbe0415238e4a6d0d3837186f3ad543be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1Kw0AQhRdRbNE-gDeyL5C6f8nuXkkp_kHBG70Ok-ykjW2TsJtY8vamthZB8GqGw_kOM4eQG86mnGt9x3VsrDVSKC4Sw405I-O9Fllr-flpN3JEJiGUGeOKqyRm8pKMpBXDmpgxWc880jrPuwbasq5gQ9sVemjK0AZaVnQFlTtKPd3Vfl1Wy70O1S8qyrFq0aOjO-jv6Yzmvg6BBsyPmaHzn9hfk4sCNgEnx3lF3h8f3ubP0eL16WU-W0S5EKKNCqETaTIOgGAts5grZbgWioFmhXYZMsVjIQ0qSBxz0kjNTVJIcLGSGcorwg-532d4LNLGl1vwfcpZuu8u_dPdwNwemKbLtuhOxE9Tg2F6MARYYvpRd354LPyT-AU7yXgj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are occupational therapists in hand therapy working in an occupation-centered way? A cross sectional survey</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ransby, Thea Birch ; Jacobsen, Nicolaj Schøler ; Hansen, Alice Ørts</creator><creatorcontrib>Ransby, Thea Birch ; Jacobsen, Nicolaj Schøler ; Hansen, Alice Ørts</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
The dominance of the biomedical approach has previously caused a limited focus on occupation within hand therapy. This study aimed to investigate the rehabilitation offered to patients with a hand-related disorder (HRD) in Denmark including to determine the extent to which occupation-focused and/or occupation-based assessments and interventions are used and to identify barriers against their use.
Methods
A cross-sectional survey with 45 questions was conducted among members of the Danish Association for Hand Therapy. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics. Categorical variables were reported with frequency and percentage, and continuous variables with average and standard deviation.
Results
One hundred and six occupational therapists working as hand therapists (n = 106) completed the survey. They reported common use of assessments measuring range of motion, pain, edema, and occupational performance. Occupational performance was assessed by non-standardized occupation-focused assessments, such as informal conversations. Exercise, pain management, and occupation-focused informal conversations were reported as the most frequently used interventions. Out of 82 respondents, 74 (91.4%) reported that they used interventions focused on body function and structures to the extent they wanted. Only 41 (50.0%) used occupation-focused or occupation-based interventions to the extent they wanted.
Discussion
Assessments and interventions reporting body function and structure were used most frequently whereas assessments and interventions reporting activity and participation were used to a lesser extent. Occupation-focused assessments and interventions were used more commonly than occupation-based. Hand therapists considered occupation-based assessments and interventions to be important in rehabilitation after HRD, despite using them with few patients. Several barriers were reported regarding the implementation of an occupation-centered approach: habit, workload, time constraints, and setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-9983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-9991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/17589983241268188</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39246568</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Hand therapy, 2024-09, Vol.29 (3), p.124-134</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-f27638b1aaea9909ec44817240a70f7dbe0415238e4a6d0d3837186f3ad543be3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7206-4933</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39246568$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ransby, Thea Birch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Nicolaj Schøler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Alice Ørts</creatorcontrib><title>Are occupational therapists in hand therapy working in an occupation-centered way? A cross sectional survey</title><title>Hand therapy</title><addtitle>Hand Ther</addtitle><description>Introduction
The dominance of the biomedical approach has previously caused a limited focus on occupation within hand therapy. This study aimed to investigate the rehabilitation offered to patients with a hand-related disorder (HRD) in Denmark including to determine the extent to which occupation-focused and/or occupation-based assessments and interventions are used and to identify barriers against their use.
Methods
A cross-sectional survey with 45 questions was conducted among members of the Danish Association for Hand Therapy. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics. Categorical variables were reported with frequency and percentage, and continuous variables with average and standard deviation.
Results
One hundred and six occupational therapists working as hand therapists (n = 106) completed the survey. They reported common use of assessments measuring range of motion, pain, edema, and occupational performance. Occupational performance was assessed by non-standardized occupation-focused assessments, such as informal conversations. Exercise, pain management, and occupation-focused informal conversations were reported as the most frequently used interventions. Out of 82 respondents, 74 (91.4%) reported that they used interventions focused on body function and structures to the extent they wanted. Only 41 (50.0%) used occupation-focused or occupation-based interventions to the extent they wanted.
Discussion
Assessments and interventions reporting body function and structure were used most frequently whereas assessments and interventions reporting activity and participation were used to a lesser extent. Occupation-focused assessments and interventions were used more commonly than occupation-based. Hand therapists considered occupation-based assessments and interventions to be important in rehabilitation after HRD, despite using them with few patients. Several barriers were reported regarding the implementation of an occupation-centered approach: habit, workload, time constraints, and setting.</description><issn>1758-9983</issn><issn>1758-9991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kN1Kw0AQhRdRbNE-gDeyL5C6f8nuXkkp_kHBG70Ok-ykjW2TsJtY8vamthZB8GqGw_kOM4eQG86mnGt9x3VsrDVSKC4Sw405I-O9Fllr-flpN3JEJiGUGeOKqyRm8pKMpBXDmpgxWc880jrPuwbasq5gQ9sVemjK0AZaVnQFlTtKPd3Vfl1Wy70O1S8qyrFq0aOjO-jv6Yzmvg6BBsyPmaHzn9hfk4sCNgEnx3lF3h8f3ubP0eL16WU-W0S5EKKNCqETaTIOgGAts5grZbgWioFmhXYZMsVjIQ0qSBxz0kjNTVJIcLGSGcorwg-532d4LNLGl1vwfcpZuu8u_dPdwNwemKbLtuhOxE9Tg2F6MARYYvpRd354LPyT-AU7yXgj</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Ransby, Thea Birch</creator><creator>Jacobsen, Nicolaj Schøler</creator><creator>Hansen, Alice Ørts</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7206-4933</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Are occupational therapists in hand therapy working in an occupation-centered way? A cross sectional survey</title><author>Ransby, Thea Birch ; Jacobsen, Nicolaj Schøler ; Hansen, Alice Ørts</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-f27638b1aaea9909ec44817240a70f7dbe0415238e4a6d0d3837186f3ad543be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ransby, Thea Birch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Nicolaj Schøler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Alice Ørts</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Hand therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ransby, Thea Birch</au><au>Jacobsen, Nicolaj Schøler</au><au>Hansen, Alice Ørts</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are occupational therapists in hand therapy working in an occupation-centered way? A cross sectional survey</atitle><jtitle>Hand therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Hand Ther</addtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>124</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>124-134</pages><issn>1758-9983</issn><eissn>1758-9991</eissn><abstract>Introduction
The dominance of the biomedical approach has previously caused a limited focus on occupation within hand therapy. This study aimed to investigate the rehabilitation offered to patients with a hand-related disorder (HRD) in Denmark including to determine the extent to which occupation-focused and/or occupation-based assessments and interventions are used and to identify barriers against their use.
Methods
A cross-sectional survey with 45 questions was conducted among members of the Danish Association for Hand Therapy. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics. Categorical variables were reported with frequency and percentage, and continuous variables with average and standard deviation.
Results
One hundred and six occupational therapists working as hand therapists (n = 106) completed the survey. They reported common use of assessments measuring range of motion, pain, edema, and occupational performance. Occupational performance was assessed by non-standardized occupation-focused assessments, such as informal conversations. Exercise, pain management, and occupation-focused informal conversations were reported as the most frequently used interventions. Out of 82 respondents, 74 (91.4%) reported that they used interventions focused on body function and structures to the extent they wanted. Only 41 (50.0%) used occupation-focused or occupation-based interventions to the extent they wanted.
Discussion
Assessments and interventions reporting body function and structure were used most frequently whereas assessments and interventions reporting activity and participation were used to a lesser extent. Occupation-focused assessments and interventions were used more commonly than occupation-based. Hand therapists considered occupation-based assessments and interventions to be important in rehabilitation after HRD, despite using them with few patients. Several barriers were reported regarding the implementation of an occupation-centered approach: habit, workload, time constraints, and setting.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>39246568</pmid><doi>10.1177/17589983241268188</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7206-4933</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1758-9983 |
ispartof | Hand therapy, 2024-09, Vol.29 (3), p.124-134 |
issn | 1758-9983 1758-9991 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_17589983241268188 |
source | PubMed Central |
title | Are occupational therapists in hand therapy working in an occupation-centered way? A cross sectional survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T08%3A07%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20occupational%20therapists%20in%20hand%20therapy%20working%20in%20an%20occupation-centered%20way?%20A%20cross%20sectional%20survey&rft.jtitle=Hand%20therapy&rft.au=Ransby,%20Thea%20Birch&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=124&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=124-134&rft.issn=1758-9983&rft.eissn=1758-9991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/17589983241268188&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_17589983241268188%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/39246568&rft_sage_id=10.1177_17589983241268188&rfr_iscdi=true |