Are occupational therapists in hand therapy working in an occupation-centered way? A cross sectional survey

Introduction The dominance of the biomedical approach has previously caused a limited focus on occupation within hand therapy. This study aimed to investigate the rehabilitation offered to patients with a hand-related disorder (HRD) in Denmark including to determine the extent to which occupation-fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hand therapy 2024-09, Vol.29 (3), p.124-134
Hauptverfasser: Ransby, Thea Birch, Jacobsen, Nicolaj Schøler, Hansen, Alice Ørts
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 134
container_issue 3
container_start_page 124
container_title Hand therapy
container_volume 29
creator Ransby, Thea Birch
Jacobsen, Nicolaj Schøler
Hansen, Alice Ørts
description Introduction The dominance of the biomedical approach has previously caused a limited focus on occupation within hand therapy. This study aimed to investigate the rehabilitation offered to patients with a hand-related disorder (HRD) in Denmark including to determine the extent to which occupation-focused and/or occupation-based assessments and interventions are used and to identify barriers against their use. Methods A cross-sectional survey with 45 questions was conducted among members of the Danish Association for Hand Therapy. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics. Categorical variables were reported with frequency and percentage, and continuous variables with average and standard deviation. Results One hundred and six occupational therapists working as hand therapists (n = 106) completed the survey. They reported common use of assessments measuring range of motion, pain, edema, and occupational performance. Occupational performance was assessed by non-standardized occupation-focused assessments, such as informal conversations. Exercise, pain management, and occupation-focused informal conversations were reported as the most frequently used interventions. Out of 82 respondents, 74 (91.4%) reported that they used interventions focused on body function and structures to the extent they wanted. Only 41 (50.0%) used occupation-focused or occupation-based interventions to the extent they wanted. Discussion Assessments and interventions reporting body function and structure were used most frequently whereas assessments and interventions reporting activity and participation were used to a lesser extent. Occupation-focused assessments and interventions were used more commonly than occupation-based. Hand therapists considered occupation-based assessments and interventions to be important in rehabilitation after HRD, despite using them with few patients. Several barriers were reported regarding the implementation of an occupation-centered approach: habit, workload, time constraints, and setting.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/17589983241268188
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_17589983241268188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_17589983241268188</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_17589983241268188</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-f27638b1aaea9909ec44817240a70f7dbe0415238e4a6d0d3837186f3ad543be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1Kw0AQhRdRbNE-gDeyL5C6f8nuXkkp_kHBG70Ok-ykjW2TsJtY8vamthZB8GqGw_kOM4eQG86mnGt9x3VsrDVSKC4Sw405I-O9Fllr-flpN3JEJiGUGeOKqyRm8pKMpBXDmpgxWc880jrPuwbasq5gQ9sVemjK0AZaVnQFlTtKPd3Vfl1Wy70O1S8qyrFq0aOjO-jv6Yzmvg6BBsyPmaHzn9hfk4sCNgEnx3lF3h8f3ubP0eL16WU-W0S5EKKNCqETaTIOgGAts5grZbgWioFmhXYZMsVjIQ0qSBxz0kjNTVJIcLGSGcorwg-532d4LNLGl1vwfcpZuu8u_dPdwNwemKbLtuhOxE9Tg2F6MARYYvpRd354LPyT-AU7yXgj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are occupational therapists in hand therapy working in an occupation-centered way? A cross sectional survey</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ransby, Thea Birch ; Jacobsen, Nicolaj Schøler ; Hansen, Alice Ørts</creator><creatorcontrib>Ransby, Thea Birch ; Jacobsen, Nicolaj Schøler ; Hansen, Alice Ørts</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction The dominance of the biomedical approach has previously caused a limited focus on occupation within hand therapy. This study aimed to investigate the rehabilitation offered to patients with a hand-related disorder (HRD) in Denmark including to determine the extent to which occupation-focused and/or occupation-based assessments and interventions are used and to identify barriers against their use. Methods A cross-sectional survey with 45 questions was conducted among members of the Danish Association for Hand Therapy. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics. Categorical variables were reported with frequency and percentage, and continuous variables with average and standard deviation. Results One hundred and six occupational therapists working as hand therapists (n = 106) completed the survey. They reported common use of assessments measuring range of motion, pain, edema, and occupational performance. Occupational performance was assessed by non-standardized occupation-focused assessments, such as informal conversations. Exercise, pain management, and occupation-focused informal conversations were reported as the most frequently used interventions. Out of 82 respondents, 74 (91.4%) reported that they used interventions focused on body function and structures to the extent they wanted. Only 41 (50.0%) used occupation-focused or occupation-based interventions to the extent they wanted. Discussion Assessments and interventions reporting body function and structure were used most frequently whereas assessments and interventions reporting activity and participation were used to a lesser extent. Occupation-focused assessments and interventions were used more commonly than occupation-based. Hand therapists considered occupation-based assessments and interventions to be important in rehabilitation after HRD, despite using them with few patients. Several barriers were reported regarding the implementation of an occupation-centered approach: habit, workload, time constraints, and setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-9983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-9991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/17589983241268188</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39246568</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Hand therapy, 2024-09, Vol.29 (3), p.124-134</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-f27638b1aaea9909ec44817240a70f7dbe0415238e4a6d0d3837186f3ad543be3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7206-4933</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39246568$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ransby, Thea Birch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Nicolaj Schøler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Alice Ørts</creatorcontrib><title>Are occupational therapists in hand therapy working in an occupation-centered way? A cross sectional survey</title><title>Hand therapy</title><addtitle>Hand Ther</addtitle><description>Introduction The dominance of the biomedical approach has previously caused a limited focus on occupation within hand therapy. This study aimed to investigate the rehabilitation offered to patients with a hand-related disorder (HRD) in Denmark including to determine the extent to which occupation-focused and/or occupation-based assessments and interventions are used and to identify barriers against their use. Methods A cross-sectional survey with 45 questions was conducted among members of the Danish Association for Hand Therapy. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics. Categorical variables were reported with frequency and percentage, and continuous variables with average and standard deviation. Results One hundred and six occupational therapists working as hand therapists (n = 106) completed the survey. They reported common use of assessments measuring range of motion, pain, edema, and occupational performance. Occupational performance was assessed by non-standardized occupation-focused assessments, such as informal conversations. Exercise, pain management, and occupation-focused informal conversations were reported as the most frequently used interventions. Out of 82 respondents, 74 (91.4%) reported that they used interventions focused on body function and structures to the extent they wanted. Only 41 (50.0%) used occupation-focused or occupation-based interventions to the extent they wanted. Discussion Assessments and interventions reporting body function and structure were used most frequently whereas assessments and interventions reporting activity and participation were used to a lesser extent. Occupation-focused assessments and interventions were used more commonly than occupation-based. Hand therapists considered occupation-based assessments and interventions to be important in rehabilitation after HRD, despite using them with few patients. Several barriers were reported regarding the implementation of an occupation-centered approach: habit, workload, time constraints, and setting.</description><issn>1758-9983</issn><issn>1758-9991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kN1Kw0AQhRdRbNE-gDeyL5C6f8nuXkkp_kHBG70Ok-ykjW2TsJtY8vamthZB8GqGw_kOM4eQG86mnGt9x3VsrDVSKC4Sw405I-O9Fllr-flpN3JEJiGUGeOKqyRm8pKMpBXDmpgxWc880jrPuwbasq5gQ9sVemjK0AZaVnQFlTtKPd3Vfl1Wy70O1S8qyrFq0aOjO-jv6Yzmvg6BBsyPmaHzn9hfk4sCNgEnx3lF3h8f3ubP0eL16WU-W0S5EKKNCqETaTIOgGAts5grZbgWioFmhXYZMsVjIQ0qSBxz0kjNTVJIcLGSGcorwg-532d4LNLGl1vwfcpZuu8u_dPdwNwemKbLtuhOxE9Tg2F6MARYYvpRd354LPyT-AU7yXgj</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Ransby, Thea Birch</creator><creator>Jacobsen, Nicolaj Schøler</creator><creator>Hansen, Alice Ørts</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7206-4933</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Are occupational therapists in hand therapy working in an occupation-centered way? A cross sectional survey</title><author>Ransby, Thea Birch ; Jacobsen, Nicolaj Schøler ; Hansen, Alice Ørts</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-f27638b1aaea9909ec44817240a70f7dbe0415238e4a6d0d3837186f3ad543be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ransby, Thea Birch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Nicolaj Schøler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Alice Ørts</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Hand therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ransby, Thea Birch</au><au>Jacobsen, Nicolaj Schøler</au><au>Hansen, Alice Ørts</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are occupational therapists in hand therapy working in an occupation-centered way? A cross sectional survey</atitle><jtitle>Hand therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Hand Ther</addtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>124</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>124-134</pages><issn>1758-9983</issn><eissn>1758-9991</eissn><abstract>Introduction The dominance of the biomedical approach has previously caused a limited focus on occupation within hand therapy. This study aimed to investigate the rehabilitation offered to patients with a hand-related disorder (HRD) in Denmark including to determine the extent to which occupation-focused and/or occupation-based assessments and interventions are used and to identify barriers against their use. Methods A cross-sectional survey with 45 questions was conducted among members of the Danish Association for Hand Therapy. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics. Categorical variables were reported with frequency and percentage, and continuous variables with average and standard deviation. Results One hundred and six occupational therapists working as hand therapists (n = 106) completed the survey. They reported common use of assessments measuring range of motion, pain, edema, and occupational performance. Occupational performance was assessed by non-standardized occupation-focused assessments, such as informal conversations. Exercise, pain management, and occupation-focused informal conversations were reported as the most frequently used interventions. Out of 82 respondents, 74 (91.4%) reported that they used interventions focused on body function and structures to the extent they wanted. Only 41 (50.0%) used occupation-focused or occupation-based interventions to the extent they wanted. Discussion Assessments and interventions reporting body function and structure were used most frequently whereas assessments and interventions reporting activity and participation were used to a lesser extent. Occupation-focused assessments and interventions were used more commonly than occupation-based. Hand therapists considered occupation-based assessments and interventions to be important in rehabilitation after HRD, despite using them with few patients. Several barriers were reported regarding the implementation of an occupation-centered approach: habit, workload, time constraints, and setting.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>39246568</pmid><doi>10.1177/17589983241268188</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7206-4933</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1758-9983
ispartof Hand therapy, 2024-09, Vol.29 (3), p.124-134
issn 1758-9983
1758-9991
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_17589983241268188
source PubMed Central
title Are occupational therapists in hand therapy working in an occupation-centered way? A cross sectional survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T08%3A07%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20occupational%20therapists%20in%20hand%20therapy%20working%20in%20an%20occupation-centered%20way?%20A%20cross%20sectional%20survey&rft.jtitle=Hand%20therapy&rft.au=Ransby,%20Thea%20Birch&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=124&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=124-134&rft.issn=1758-9983&rft.eissn=1758-9991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/17589983241268188&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_17589983241268188%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/39246568&rft_sage_id=10.1177_17589983241268188&rfr_iscdi=true