The influence of design variations in footwear medial-lateral support on the running biomechanics of older female runners

The influence of design variations in footwear medial-lateral support on the running biomechanics of older female runners

Reports of greater incidence of knee pain and injury in older female runners compared with their younger counterparts may be associated with differences in lower limb biomechanics that influence knee joint loading. The aim of this study was to investigate footwear interventions aimed at influencing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology Journal of sports engineering and technology, 2022-03, Vol.236 (1), p.53-59
Hauptverfasser: Lilley, Kim, Stiles, Victoria, Dixon, Sharon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 59
container_issue 1
container_start_page 53
container_title Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology
container_volume 236
creator Lilley, Kim
Stiles, Victoria
Dixon, Sharon
description Reports of greater incidence of knee pain and injury in older female runners compared with their younger counterparts may be associated with differences in lower limb biomechanics that influence knee joint loading. The aim of this study was to investigate footwear interventions aimed at influencing lower limb biomechanics in older female runners (>45 years). Strategies for reducing peak rearfoot eversion and the external knee adductor moment were investigated, since both measures have been associated with knee joint injury. Twenty female runners (mean age 50.7 ± 5.6 years) performed 10 running trials in four footwear conditions: neutral running shoe (Control); neutral shoe with 4° medial heel wedge insole (Medial Wedge); neutral shoe with 4° lateral heel wedge insole (Lateral Wedge); and neutral shoe with combined insole with 5° lateral wedge and medial arch support (Combined Insole). Peak rearfoot eversion and knee external adductor moment were compared for the four conditions using RMANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1754337120984619
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1754337120984619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1754337120984619</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1754337120984619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-4111a27c6459da511154df85d1431c8e186da24d4dc68f310033c6e074e7f7403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt7l_kDo7mTTJIupfgCwU0Fd0NMbtqUmaQkM0r_vVMqLgRX93XOx-UQcg3sBkCpW1CN4FxBzRZaSFickNlhVXGu309_ewXn5KKULWOy1sBmZL_aIA3RdyNGizR56rCEdaSfJgczhBTLdKY-peELTaY9umC6qjMDZtPRMu52KQ80RTpMoDzGGOKafoTUo92YGGw5MFPnMFOPvemOIszlkpx50xW8-qlz8vZwv1o-VS-vj8_Lu5fK1koOlQAAUysrRbNwppmmRjivGweCg9UIWjpTCyecldpzYIxzK5EpgcorwficsCPX5lRKRt_ucuhN3rfA2kN07d_oJkt1tBSzxnabxhynD__XfwMjGm_J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of design variations in footwear medial-lateral support on the running biomechanics of older female runners</title><source>SAGE Journals Online</source><creator>Lilley, Kim ; Stiles, Victoria ; Dixon, Sharon</creator><creatorcontrib>Lilley, Kim ; Stiles, Victoria ; Dixon, Sharon</creatorcontrib><description>Reports of greater incidence of knee pain and injury in older female runners compared with their younger counterparts may be associated with differences in lower limb biomechanics that influence knee joint loading. The aim of this study was to investigate footwear interventions aimed at influencing lower limb biomechanics in older female runners (&gt;45 years). Strategies for reducing peak rearfoot eversion and the external knee adductor moment were investigated, since both measures have been associated with knee joint injury. Twenty female runners (mean age 50.7 ± 5.6 years) performed 10 running trials in four footwear conditions: neutral running shoe (Control); neutral shoe with 4° medial heel wedge insole (Medial Wedge); neutral shoe with 4° lateral heel wedge insole (Lateral Wedge); and neutral shoe with combined insole with 5° lateral wedge and medial arch support (Combined Insole). Peak rearfoot eversion and knee external adductor moment were compared for the four conditions using RMANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests (p &lt; 0.05). Compared with the Control, peak rearfoot eversion was lower for the Combined Insole condition, with this value being lower than for all other insole conditions (p &lt; 0.05). Compared with the Control, the peak knee external adductor moment was lower for the Lateral Wedge and the Combined Insole conditions (p &lt; 0.05). These results support the use of a combined insole with lateral wedge and medial arch support for the reduction of peak rearfoot eversion and peak knee external adductor moment, variables that have been associated with increased risk of knee injury. If aiming to reduce knee external adductor moment alone, then the lateral wedge technology employed in this study provides an effective method for older female runners.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1754-3371</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1754-338X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1754337120984619</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology, 2022-03, Vol.236 (1), p.53-59</ispartof><rights>IMechE 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-4111a27c6459da511154df85d1431c8e186da24d4dc68f310033c6e074e7f7403</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3127-566X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1754337120984619$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1754337120984619$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lilley, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiles, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Sharon</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of design variations in footwear medial-lateral support on the running biomechanics of older female runners</title><title>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology</title><description>Reports of greater incidence of knee pain and injury in older female runners compared with their younger counterparts may be associated with differences in lower limb biomechanics that influence knee joint loading. The aim of this study was to investigate footwear interventions aimed at influencing lower limb biomechanics in older female runners (&gt;45 years). Strategies for reducing peak rearfoot eversion and the external knee adductor moment were investigated, since both measures have been associated with knee joint injury. Twenty female runners (mean age 50.7 ± 5.6 years) performed 10 running trials in four footwear conditions: neutral running shoe (Control); neutral shoe with 4° medial heel wedge insole (Medial Wedge); neutral shoe with 4° lateral heel wedge insole (Lateral Wedge); and neutral shoe with combined insole with 5° lateral wedge and medial arch support (Combined Insole). Peak rearfoot eversion and knee external adductor moment were compared for the four conditions using RMANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests (p &lt; 0.05). Compared with the Control, peak rearfoot eversion was lower for the Combined Insole condition, with this value being lower than for all other insole conditions (p &lt; 0.05). Compared with the Control, the peak knee external adductor moment was lower for the Lateral Wedge and the Combined Insole conditions (p &lt; 0.05). These results support the use of a combined insole with lateral wedge and medial arch support for the reduction of peak rearfoot eversion and peak knee external adductor moment, variables that have been associated with increased risk of knee injury. If aiming to reduce knee external adductor moment alone, then the lateral wedge technology employed in this study provides an effective method for older female runners.</description><issn>1754-3371</issn><issn>1754-338X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt7l_kDo7mTTJIupfgCwU0Fd0NMbtqUmaQkM0r_vVMqLgRX93XOx-UQcg3sBkCpW1CN4FxBzRZaSFickNlhVXGu309_ewXn5KKULWOy1sBmZL_aIA3RdyNGizR56rCEdaSfJgczhBTLdKY-peELTaY9umC6qjMDZtPRMu52KQ80RTpMoDzGGOKafoTUo92YGGw5MFPnMFOPvemOIszlkpx50xW8-qlz8vZwv1o-VS-vj8_Lu5fK1koOlQAAUysrRbNwppmmRjivGweCg9UIWjpTCyecldpzYIxzK5EpgcorwficsCPX5lRKRt_ucuhN3rfA2kN07d_oJkt1tBSzxnabxhynD__XfwMjGm_J</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Lilley, Kim</creator><creator>Stiles, Victoria</creator><creator>Dixon, Sharon</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3127-566X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>The influence of design variations in footwear medial-lateral support on the running biomechanics of older female runners</title><author>Lilley, Kim ; Stiles, Victoria ; Dixon, Sharon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-4111a27c6459da511154df85d1431c8e186da24d4dc68f310033c6e074e7f7403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lilley, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiles, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Sharon</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lilley, Kim</au><au>Stiles, Victoria</au><au>Dixon, Sharon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of design variations in footwear medial-lateral support on the running biomechanics of older female runners</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology</jtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>236</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>59</epage><pages>53-59</pages><issn>1754-3371</issn><eissn>1754-338X</eissn><abstract>Reports of greater incidence of knee pain and injury in older female runners compared with their younger counterparts may be associated with differences in lower limb biomechanics that influence knee joint loading. The aim of this study was to investigate footwear interventions aimed at influencing lower limb biomechanics in older female runners (&gt;45 years). Strategies for reducing peak rearfoot eversion and the external knee adductor moment were investigated, since both measures have been associated with knee joint injury. Twenty female runners (mean age 50.7 ± 5.6 years) performed 10 running trials in four footwear conditions: neutral running shoe (Control); neutral shoe with 4° medial heel wedge insole (Medial Wedge); neutral shoe with 4° lateral heel wedge insole (Lateral Wedge); and neutral shoe with combined insole with 5° lateral wedge and medial arch support (Combined Insole). Peak rearfoot eversion and knee external adductor moment were compared for the four conditions using RMANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests (p &lt; 0.05). Compared with the Control, peak rearfoot eversion was lower for the Combined Insole condition, with this value being lower than for all other insole conditions (p &lt; 0.05). Compared with the Control, the peak knee external adductor moment was lower for the Lateral Wedge and the Combined Insole conditions (p &lt; 0.05). These results support the use of a combined insole with lateral wedge and medial arch support for the reduction of peak rearfoot eversion and peak knee external adductor moment, variables that have been associated with increased risk of knee injury. If aiming to reduce knee external adductor moment alone, then the lateral wedge technology employed in this study provides an effective method for older female runners.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1754337120984619</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3127-566X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1754-3371
ispartof Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology, 2022-03, Vol.236 (1), p.53-59
issn 1754-3371
1754-338X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1754337120984619
source SAGE Journals Online
title The influence of design variations in footwear medial-lateral support on the running biomechanics of older female runners
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T22%3A16%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20design%20variations%20in%20footwear%20medial-lateral%20support%20on%20the%20running%20biomechanics%20of%20older%20female%20runners&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Institution%20of%20Mechanical%20Engineers.%20Part%20P,%20Journal%20of%20sports%20engineering%20and%20technology&rft.au=Lilley,%20Kim&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=236&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=59&rft.pages=53-59&rft.issn=1754-3371&rft.eissn=1754-338X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1754337120984619&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1754337120984619%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1754337120984619&rfr_iscdi=true