Propulsive efficiency of alternative underwater flykick techniques for swimmers

Analysis of video and speed data is used to evaluate the efficiency of human underwater flykick. The authors show that by coupling Lighthill’s theory of fish locomotion with human musculoskeletal modelling, it is possible to evaluate the effectiveness of the mechanical and hydrodynamic propulsive co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology Journal of sports engineering and technology, 2021-12, Vol.235 (4), p.354-364
Hauptverfasser: Phillips, Christopher WG, Forrester, Alexander IJ, Hudson, Dominic A, Turnock, Stephen R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 364
container_issue 4
container_start_page 354
container_title Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology
container_volume 235
creator Phillips, Christopher WG
Forrester, Alexander IJ
Hudson, Dominic A
Turnock, Stephen R
description Analysis of video and speed data is used to evaluate the efficiency of human underwater flykick. The authors show that by coupling Lighthill’s theory of fish locomotion with human musculoskeletal modelling, it is possible to evaluate the effectiveness of the mechanical and hydrodynamic propulsive components of human underwater flykick. This allows the effect of subtle variances in technique to be assessed by measurement of athlete motion alone. This is demonstrated in an experimental case study of an elite athlete performing two different techniques; one more knee-based or thunniform, and the second more undulatory or carangiform/anguilliform. In finding the mean kinematics of each technique, it is first shown that maintaining stroke-by-stroke consistency of technique leads to an increase in propulsive efficiency. It is further demonstrated that in changing technique, an athlete may swim at the same kick rate but have different propulsive efficiency. This demonstrates the need to determine the energy cost in order to evaluate differing techniques. For the sprint athlete in this case study, it was shown to be more effective to swim with a thunniform technique when at higher velocities and a more anguilliform at lower velocities.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1754337120912610
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1754337120912610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1754337120912610</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1754337120912610</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-611ca7f1ed5b4f91b15f302a480817373455b5321042624d430b1552a3e4e40d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1Lw0AUXETBWr173D8QfW8_sulRil9QqAcFb2G7eavbpkndTSz9902peBA8zWPezMAMY9cIN4jG3KLRSkqDAiYocoQTNjpQmZTF--nvbfCcXaS0BMhFgTBi85fYbvo6hW_i5H1wgRq3463ntu4oNrY7fPqmori1A8F9vVsFt-Iduc8mfPWUuG8jT9uwXlNMl-zM2zrR1Q-O2dvD_ev0KZvNH5-nd7PMSSG7LEd01nikSi-Un-ACtZcgrCqgQCONVFovtBQISuRCVUrCINHCSlKkoJJjBsdcF9uUIvlyE8Paxl2JUB4GKf8OMliyoyXZDyqXbT-0q9P_-j35BmAq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Propulsive efficiency of alternative underwater flykick techniques for swimmers</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Phillips, Christopher WG ; Forrester, Alexander IJ ; Hudson, Dominic A ; Turnock, Stephen R</creator><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Christopher WG ; Forrester, Alexander IJ ; Hudson, Dominic A ; Turnock, Stephen R</creatorcontrib><description>Analysis of video and speed data is used to evaluate the efficiency of human underwater flykick. The authors show that by coupling Lighthill’s theory of fish locomotion with human musculoskeletal modelling, it is possible to evaluate the effectiveness of the mechanical and hydrodynamic propulsive components of human underwater flykick. This allows the effect of subtle variances in technique to be assessed by measurement of athlete motion alone. This is demonstrated in an experimental case study of an elite athlete performing two different techniques; one more knee-based or thunniform, and the second more undulatory or carangiform/anguilliform. In finding the mean kinematics of each technique, it is first shown that maintaining stroke-by-stroke consistency of technique leads to an increase in propulsive efficiency. It is further demonstrated that in changing technique, an athlete may swim at the same kick rate but have different propulsive efficiency. This demonstrates the need to determine the energy cost in order to evaluate differing techniques. For the sprint athlete in this case study, it was shown to be more effective to swim with a thunniform technique when at higher velocities and a more anguilliform at lower velocities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1754-3371</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1754-338X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1754337120912610</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology, 2021-12, Vol.235 (4), p.354-364</ispartof><rights>IMechE 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-611ca7f1ed5b4f91b15f302a480817373455b5321042624d430b1552a3e4e40d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-611ca7f1ed5b4f91b15f302a480817373455b5321042624d430b1552a3e4e40d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6315-474X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1754337120912610$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1754337120912610$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21800,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Christopher WG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrester, Alexander IJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, Dominic A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turnock, Stephen R</creatorcontrib><title>Propulsive efficiency of alternative underwater flykick techniques for swimmers</title><title>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology</title><description>Analysis of video and speed data is used to evaluate the efficiency of human underwater flykick. The authors show that by coupling Lighthill’s theory of fish locomotion with human musculoskeletal modelling, it is possible to evaluate the effectiveness of the mechanical and hydrodynamic propulsive components of human underwater flykick. This allows the effect of subtle variances in technique to be assessed by measurement of athlete motion alone. This is demonstrated in an experimental case study of an elite athlete performing two different techniques; one more knee-based or thunniform, and the second more undulatory or carangiform/anguilliform. In finding the mean kinematics of each technique, it is first shown that maintaining stroke-by-stroke consistency of technique leads to an increase in propulsive efficiency. It is further demonstrated that in changing technique, an athlete may swim at the same kick rate but have different propulsive efficiency. This demonstrates the need to determine the energy cost in order to evaluate differing techniques. For the sprint athlete in this case study, it was shown to be more effective to swim with a thunniform technique when at higher velocities and a more anguilliform at lower velocities.</description><issn>1754-3371</issn><issn>1754-338X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1Lw0AUXETBWr173D8QfW8_sulRil9QqAcFb2G7eavbpkndTSz9902peBA8zWPezMAMY9cIN4jG3KLRSkqDAiYocoQTNjpQmZTF--nvbfCcXaS0BMhFgTBi85fYbvo6hW_i5H1wgRq3463ntu4oNrY7fPqmori1A8F9vVsFt-Iduc8mfPWUuG8jT9uwXlNMl-zM2zrR1Q-O2dvD_ev0KZvNH5-nd7PMSSG7LEd01nikSi-Un-ACtZcgrCqgQCONVFovtBQISuRCVUrCINHCSlKkoJJjBsdcF9uUIvlyE8Paxl2JUB4GKf8OMliyoyXZDyqXbT-0q9P_-j35BmAq</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Phillips, Christopher WG</creator><creator>Forrester, Alexander IJ</creator><creator>Hudson, Dominic A</creator><creator>Turnock, Stephen R</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6315-474X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Propulsive efficiency of alternative underwater flykick techniques for swimmers</title><author>Phillips, Christopher WG ; Forrester, Alexander IJ ; Hudson, Dominic A ; Turnock, Stephen R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-611ca7f1ed5b4f91b15f302a480817373455b5321042624d430b1552a3e4e40d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Christopher WG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrester, Alexander IJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, Dominic A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turnock, Stephen R</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phillips, Christopher WG</au><au>Forrester, Alexander IJ</au><au>Hudson, Dominic A</au><au>Turnock, Stephen R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Propulsive efficiency of alternative underwater flykick techniques for swimmers</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology</jtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>235</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>354</spage><epage>364</epage><pages>354-364</pages><issn>1754-3371</issn><eissn>1754-338X</eissn><abstract>Analysis of video and speed data is used to evaluate the efficiency of human underwater flykick. The authors show that by coupling Lighthill’s theory of fish locomotion with human musculoskeletal modelling, it is possible to evaluate the effectiveness of the mechanical and hydrodynamic propulsive components of human underwater flykick. This allows the effect of subtle variances in technique to be assessed by measurement of athlete motion alone. This is demonstrated in an experimental case study of an elite athlete performing two different techniques; one more knee-based or thunniform, and the second more undulatory or carangiform/anguilliform. In finding the mean kinematics of each technique, it is first shown that maintaining stroke-by-stroke consistency of technique leads to an increase in propulsive efficiency. It is further demonstrated that in changing technique, an athlete may swim at the same kick rate but have different propulsive efficiency. This demonstrates the need to determine the energy cost in order to evaluate differing techniques. For the sprint athlete in this case study, it was shown to be more effective to swim with a thunniform technique when at higher velocities and a more anguilliform at lower velocities.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1754337120912610</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6315-474X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1754-3371
ispartof Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology, 2021-12, Vol.235 (4), p.354-364
issn 1754-3371
1754-338X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1754337120912610
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Propulsive efficiency of alternative underwater flykick techniques for swimmers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T04%3A28%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Propulsive%20efficiency%20of%20alternative%20underwater%20flykick%20techniques%20for%20swimmers&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Institution%20of%20Mechanical%20Engineers.%20Part%20P,%20Journal%20of%20sports%20engineering%20and%20technology&rft.au=Phillips,%20Christopher%20WG&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=235&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=354&rft.epage=364&rft.pages=354-364&rft.issn=1754-3371&rft.eissn=1754-338X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1754337120912610&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1754337120912610%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1754337120912610&rfr_iscdi=true