Emotional Pursuits and the American Revolution
A major paradox of modern happiness gained wide public exposure in 1776 when Thomas Jefferson substituted the phrase “the pursuit of happiness” in place of Locke’s formulation: “life, liberty, and property.” In substituting happiness for property, Jefferson obscured the central hypocrisy of the Revo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Emotion Review 2020-07, Vol.12 (3), p.146-155 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 155 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 146 |
container_title | Emotion Review |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Eustace, Nicole |
description | A major paradox of modern happiness gained wide public exposure in 1776 when Thomas Jefferson substituted the phrase “the pursuit of happiness” in place of Locke’s formulation: “life, liberty, and property.” In substituting happiness for property, Jefferson obscured the central hypocrisy of the Revolution, that—as contemporaries complained—the “loudest yelps for liberty” were made by those practicing slavery. Jefferson elided the overlap between the pursuit of happiness and the protection of human property. And he blurred the connection between the assertion of slave power and the creation of a broad emotional hegemony in the service of multifaceted projects of political-economic mastery. Today, historians of emotion face an urgent need to explore the deep roots of this feeling in systems of unfreedom. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1754073920931566 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1754073920931566</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1754073920931566</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1754073920931566</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-7a6315a1293915f39ec19dda9221deb19345959fa707bcb10733ffe777585c9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j09LxDAQxYMouK7ePeYLdM0kTWfnuCzrH1hQRM8lTRPt0jaStILf3pYVD4KnNzzeG96PsWsQKwDEG0CdC1QkBSnQRXHCFrOVCczx9PdWdM4uUjoIUeRS0YKtdl0YmtCblj-NMY3NkLjpaz68O77pXGys6fmz-wztOMcu2Zk3bXJXP7pkr7e7l-19tn-8e9hu9pmVaxgyNMU0woAkRaC9ImeB6tqQlFC7CkjlmjR5gwIrW8E0THnvEFGvtaVaLZk4_rUxpBSdLz9i05n4VYIoZ97yL-9UyY6VZN5ceQhjnKDS__lv5j1Tvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Emotional Pursuits and the American Revolution</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Eustace, Nicole</creator><creatorcontrib>Eustace, Nicole</creatorcontrib><description>A major paradox of modern happiness gained wide public exposure in 1776 when Thomas Jefferson substituted the phrase “the pursuit of happiness” in place of Locke’s formulation: “life, liberty, and property.” In substituting happiness for property, Jefferson obscured the central hypocrisy of the Revolution, that—as contemporaries complained—the “loudest yelps for liberty” were made by those practicing slavery. Jefferson elided the overlap between the pursuit of happiness and the protection of human property. And he blurred the connection between the assertion of slave power and the creation of a broad emotional hegemony in the service of multifaceted projects of political-economic mastery. Today, historians of emotion face an urgent need to explore the deep roots of this feeling in systems of unfreedom.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1754-0739</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1754-0747</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1754073920931566</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Emotion Review, 2020-07, Vol.12 (3), p.146-155</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-7a6315a1293915f39ec19dda9221deb19345959fa707bcb10733ffe777585c9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-7a6315a1293915f39ec19dda9221deb19345959fa707bcb10733ffe777585c9d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5352-3126</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1754073920931566$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1754073920931566$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eustace, Nicole</creatorcontrib><title>Emotional Pursuits and the American Revolution</title><title>Emotion Review</title><description>A major paradox of modern happiness gained wide public exposure in 1776 when Thomas Jefferson substituted the phrase “the pursuit of happiness” in place of Locke’s formulation: “life, liberty, and property.” In substituting happiness for property, Jefferson obscured the central hypocrisy of the Revolution, that—as contemporaries complained—the “loudest yelps for liberty” were made by those practicing slavery. Jefferson elided the overlap between the pursuit of happiness and the protection of human property. And he blurred the connection between the assertion of slave power and the creation of a broad emotional hegemony in the service of multifaceted projects of political-economic mastery. Today, historians of emotion face an urgent need to explore the deep roots of this feeling in systems of unfreedom.</description><issn>1754-0739</issn><issn>1754-0747</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j09LxDAQxYMouK7ePeYLdM0kTWfnuCzrH1hQRM8lTRPt0jaStILf3pYVD4KnNzzeG96PsWsQKwDEG0CdC1QkBSnQRXHCFrOVCczx9PdWdM4uUjoIUeRS0YKtdl0YmtCblj-NMY3NkLjpaz68O77pXGys6fmz-wztOMcu2Zk3bXJXP7pkr7e7l-19tn-8e9hu9pmVaxgyNMU0woAkRaC9ImeB6tqQlFC7CkjlmjR5gwIrW8E0THnvEFGvtaVaLZk4_rUxpBSdLz9i05n4VYIoZ97yL-9UyY6VZN5ceQhjnKDS__lv5j1Tvg</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Eustace, Nicole</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5352-3126</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Emotional Pursuits and the American Revolution</title><author>Eustace, Nicole</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-7a6315a1293915f39ec19dda9221deb19345959fa707bcb10733ffe777585c9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eustace, Nicole</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Emotion Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eustace, Nicole</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Emotional Pursuits and the American Revolution</atitle><jtitle>Emotion Review</jtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>146</spage><epage>155</epage><pages>146-155</pages><issn>1754-0739</issn><eissn>1754-0747</eissn><abstract>A major paradox of modern happiness gained wide public exposure in 1776 when Thomas Jefferson substituted the phrase “the pursuit of happiness” in place of Locke’s formulation: “life, liberty, and property.” In substituting happiness for property, Jefferson obscured the central hypocrisy of the Revolution, that—as contemporaries complained—the “loudest yelps for liberty” were made by those practicing slavery. Jefferson elided the overlap between the pursuit of happiness and the protection of human property. And he blurred the connection between the assertion of slave power and the creation of a broad emotional hegemony in the service of multifaceted projects of political-economic mastery. Today, historians of emotion face an urgent need to explore the deep roots of this feeling in systems of unfreedom.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1754073920931566</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5352-3126</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1754-0739 |
ispartof | Emotion Review, 2020-07, Vol.12 (3), p.146-155 |
issn | 1754-0739 1754-0747 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1754073920931566 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List |
title | Emotional Pursuits and the American Revolution |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T04%3A27%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Emotional%20Pursuits%20and%20the%20American%20Revolution&rft.jtitle=Emotion%20Review&rft.au=Eustace,%20Nicole&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=146&rft.epage=155&rft.pages=146-155&rft.issn=1754-0739&rft.eissn=1754-0747&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1754073920931566&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1754073920931566%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1754073920931566&rfr_iscdi=true |