Emotional Pursuits and the American Revolution

A major paradox of modern happiness gained wide public exposure in 1776 when Thomas Jefferson substituted the phrase “the pursuit of happiness” in place of Locke’s formulation: “life, liberty, and property.” In substituting happiness for property, Jefferson obscured the central hypocrisy of the Revo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Emotion Review 2020-07, Vol.12 (3), p.146-155
1. Verfasser: Eustace, Nicole
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 155
container_issue 3
container_start_page 146
container_title Emotion Review
container_volume 12
creator Eustace, Nicole
description A major paradox of modern happiness gained wide public exposure in 1776 when Thomas Jefferson substituted the phrase “the pursuit of happiness” in place of Locke’s formulation: “life, liberty, and property.” In substituting happiness for property, Jefferson obscured the central hypocrisy of the Revolution, that—as contemporaries complained—the “loudest yelps for liberty” were made by those practicing slavery. Jefferson elided the overlap between the pursuit of happiness and the protection of human property. And he blurred the connection between the assertion of slave power and the creation of a broad emotional hegemony in the service of multifaceted projects of political-economic mastery. Today, historians of emotion face an urgent need to explore the deep roots of this feeling in systems of unfreedom.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1754073920931566
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1754073920931566</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1754073920931566</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1754073920931566</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-7a6315a1293915f39ec19dda9221deb19345959fa707bcb10733ffe777585c9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j09LxDAQxYMouK7ePeYLdM0kTWfnuCzrH1hQRM8lTRPt0jaStILf3pYVD4KnNzzeG96PsWsQKwDEG0CdC1QkBSnQRXHCFrOVCczx9PdWdM4uUjoIUeRS0YKtdl0YmtCblj-NMY3NkLjpaz68O77pXGys6fmz-wztOMcu2Zk3bXJXP7pkr7e7l-19tn-8e9hu9pmVaxgyNMU0woAkRaC9ImeB6tqQlFC7CkjlmjR5gwIrW8E0THnvEFGvtaVaLZk4_rUxpBSdLz9i05n4VYIoZ97yL-9UyY6VZN5ceQhjnKDS__lv5j1Tvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Emotional Pursuits and the American Revolution</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Eustace, Nicole</creator><creatorcontrib>Eustace, Nicole</creatorcontrib><description>A major paradox of modern happiness gained wide public exposure in 1776 when Thomas Jefferson substituted the phrase “the pursuit of happiness” in place of Locke’s formulation: “life, liberty, and property.” In substituting happiness for property, Jefferson obscured the central hypocrisy of the Revolution, that—as contemporaries complained—the “loudest yelps for liberty” were made by those practicing slavery. Jefferson elided the overlap between the pursuit of happiness and the protection of human property. And he blurred the connection between the assertion of slave power and the creation of a broad emotional hegemony in the service of multifaceted projects of political-economic mastery. Today, historians of emotion face an urgent need to explore the deep roots of this feeling in systems of unfreedom.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1754-0739</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1754-0747</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1754073920931566</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Emotion Review, 2020-07, Vol.12 (3), p.146-155</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-7a6315a1293915f39ec19dda9221deb19345959fa707bcb10733ffe777585c9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-7a6315a1293915f39ec19dda9221deb19345959fa707bcb10733ffe777585c9d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5352-3126</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1754073920931566$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1754073920931566$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eustace, Nicole</creatorcontrib><title>Emotional Pursuits and the American Revolution</title><title>Emotion Review</title><description>A major paradox of modern happiness gained wide public exposure in 1776 when Thomas Jefferson substituted the phrase “the pursuit of happiness” in place of Locke’s formulation: “life, liberty, and property.” In substituting happiness for property, Jefferson obscured the central hypocrisy of the Revolution, that—as contemporaries complained—the “loudest yelps for liberty” were made by those practicing slavery. Jefferson elided the overlap between the pursuit of happiness and the protection of human property. And he blurred the connection between the assertion of slave power and the creation of a broad emotional hegemony in the service of multifaceted projects of political-economic mastery. Today, historians of emotion face an urgent need to explore the deep roots of this feeling in systems of unfreedom.</description><issn>1754-0739</issn><issn>1754-0747</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j09LxDAQxYMouK7ePeYLdM0kTWfnuCzrH1hQRM8lTRPt0jaStILf3pYVD4KnNzzeG96PsWsQKwDEG0CdC1QkBSnQRXHCFrOVCczx9PdWdM4uUjoIUeRS0YKtdl0YmtCblj-NMY3NkLjpaz68O77pXGys6fmz-wztOMcu2Zk3bXJXP7pkr7e7l-19tn-8e9hu9pmVaxgyNMU0woAkRaC9ImeB6tqQlFC7CkjlmjR5gwIrW8E0THnvEFGvtaVaLZk4_rUxpBSdLz9i05n4VYIoZ97yL-9UyY6VZN5ceQhjnKDS__lv5j1Tvg</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Eustace, Nicole</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5352-3126</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Emotional Pursuits and the American Revolution</title><author>Eustace, Nicole</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-7a6315a1293915f39ec19dda9221deb19345959fa707bcb10733ffe777585c9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eustace, Nicole</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Emotion Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eustace, Nicole</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Emotional Pursuits and the American Revolution</atitle><jtitle>Emotion Review</jtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>146</spage><epage>155</epage><pages>146-155</pages><issn>1754-0739</issn><eissn>1754-0747</eissn><abstract>A major paradox of modern happiness gained wide public exposure in 1776 when Thomas Jefferson substituted the phrase “the pursuit of happiness” in place of Locke’s formulation: “life, liberty, and property.” In substituting happiness for property, Jefferson obscured the central hypocrisy of the Revolution, that—as contemporaries complained—the “loudest yelps for liberty” were made by those practicing slavery. Jefferson elided the overlap between the pursuit of happiness and the protection of human property. And he blurred the connection between the assertion of slave power and the creation of a broad emotional hegemony in the service of multifaceted projects of political-economic mastery. Today, historians of emotion face an urgent need to explore the deep roots of this feeling in systems of unfreedom.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1754073920931566</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5352-3126</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1754-0739
ispartof Emotion Review, 2020-07, Vol.12 (3), p.146-155
issn 1754-0739
1754-0747
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1754073920931566
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Emotional Pursuits and the American Revolution
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T04%3A27%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Emotional%20Pursuits%20and%20the%20American%20Revolution&rft.jtitle=Emotion%20Review&rft.au=Eustace,%20Nicole&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=146&rft.epage=155&rft.pages=146-155&rft.issn=1754-0739&rft.eissn=1754-0747&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1754073920931566&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1754073920931566%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1754073920931566&rfr_iscdi=true