The effects of measurement error and testing frequency on the fitness-fatigue model applied to resistance training: A simulation approach

This study investigated the effects of measurement error and testing frequency on prediction accuracy of the standard fitness-fatigue model. A simulation-based approach was used to systematically assess measurement error and frequency inputs commonly used when monitoring the training of athletes. Tw...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of sports science & coaching 2020-02, Vol.15 (1), p.60-71
Hauptverfasser: Stephens Hemingway, Benedict H, Burgess, Katherine E, Elyan, Eyad, Swinton, Paul A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 71
container_issue 1
container_start_page 60
container_title International journal of sports science & coaching
container_volume 15
creator Stephens Hemingway, Benedict H
Burgess, Katherine E
Elyan, Eyad
Swinton, Paul A
description This study investigated the effects of measurement error and testing frequency on prediction accuracy of the standard fitness-fatigue model. A simulation-based approach was used to systematically assess measurement error and frequency inputs commonly used when monitoring the training of athletes. Two hypothetical athletes (intermediate and advanced) were developed and realistic training loads and daily ‘true’ power values were generated using the fitness-fatigue model across 16 weeks. Simulations were then completed by adding Gaussian measurement errors to true values with mean 0 and set standard deviations to recreate more and less reliable measurement practices used in real-world settings. Errors were added to the model training phase (weeks 1–8) and sampling of data was used to recreate different testing frequencies (every day to once per week) when obtaining parameter estimates. In total, 210 sets of simulations (N = 104 iterations) were completed using an iterative hill-climbing optimisation technique. Parameter estimates were then combined with training loads in the model testing phase (weeks 9–16) to quantify prediction errors. Regression analyses identified positive associations between prediction errors and the linear combination of measurement error and testing frequency ( R adj 2 =0.87–0.94). Significant model improvements (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1747954119887721
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1747954119887721</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1747954119887721</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1747954119887721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-c7f4a817909944da1e4beb2a6cfca72c624dc9242fdb3d7323547b847a485c273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1qwzAQhEVpoSHNvUe9gFtLVrJWbyH0JxDoJYXejCyvEgVbSiX5kEfoW1chPRW6lznMfMMyhNyz8oExgEcGAuRcMCbrGoCzKzLhpaiLSsLnNZmc7eLs35JZjIcyX8UBQE7I93aPFI1BnSL1hg6o4hhwQJcohuADVa6jCWOybkdNwK8RnT5R72jKpLHJYYyFUcnuRqSD77Cn6njsLWbM04DRxqScRpqCsi63PNEljXYY-8zkmhwOXun9Hbkxqo84-9Up-Xh53q7eis3763q13BS64lUqNBihagaylFKITjEULbZcLbTRCrhecNFpyQU3XVt1kJm5gLYWoEQ91xyqKSkvvTr4GAOa5hjsoMKpYWVzXrP5u2ZGigsS1Q6bgx-Dyx_-n_8BWbx3hA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of measurement error and testing frequency on the fitness-fatigue model applied to resistance training: A simulation approach</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Stephens Hemingway, Benedict H ; Burgess, Katherine E ; Elyan, Eyad ; Swinton, Paul A</creator><creatorcontrib>Stephens Hemingway, Benedict H ; Burgess, Katherine E ; Elyan, Eyad ; Swinton, Paul A</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated the effects of measurement error and testing frequency on prediction accuracy of the standard fitness-fatigue model. A simulation-based approach was used to systematically assess measurement error and frequency inputs commonly used when monitoring the training of athletes. Two hypothetical athletes (intermediate and advanced) were developed and realistic training loads and daily ‘true’ power values were generated using the fitness-fatigue model across 16 weeks. Simulations were then completed by adding Gaussian measurement errors to true values with mean 0 and set standard deviations to recreate more and less reliable measurement practices used in real-world settings. Errors were added to the model training phase (weeks 1–8) and sampling of data was used to recreate different testing frequencies (every day to once per week) when obtaining parameter estimates. In total, 210 sets of simulations (N = 104 iterations) were completed using an iterative hill-climbing optimisation technique. Parameter estimates were then combined with training loads in the model testing phase (weeks 9–16) to quantify prediction errors. Regression analyses identified positive associations between prediction errors and the linear combination of measurement error and testing frequency ( R adj 2 =0.87–0.94). Significant model improvements (P &lt; 0.001) were obtained across all scenarios by including an interaction term demonstrating greater deleterious effects of measurement error at low testing frequencies.The findings of this simulation study represent a lower-bound case and indicate that in real-world settings, where a fitness-fatigue model is used to predict training response, measurement practices that generate coefficients of variation greater than ≈ 4% will not provide satisfactory results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-9541</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2048-397X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1747954119887721</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>International journal of sports science &amp; coaching, 2020-02, Vol.15 (1), p.60-71</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-c7f4a817909944da1e4beb2a6cfca72c624dc9242fdb3d7323547b847a485c273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-c7f4a817909944da1e4beb2a6cfca72c624dc9242fdb3d7323547b847a485c273</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9663-0696</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1747954119887721$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1747954119887721$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stephens Hemingway, Benedict H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Katherine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elyan, Eyad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swinton, Paul A</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of measurement error and testing frequency on the fitness-fatigue model applied to resistance training: A simulation approach</title><title>International journal of sports science &amp; coaching</title><description>This study investigated the effects of measurement error and testing frequency on prediction accuracy of the standard fitness-fatigue model. A simulation-based approach was used to systematically assess measurement error and frequency inputs commonly used when monitoring the training of athletes. Two hypothetical athletes (intermediate and advanced) were developed and realistic training loads and daily ‘true’ power values were generated using the fitness-fatigue model across 16 weeks. Simulations were then completed by adding Gaussian measurement errors to true values with mean 0 and set standard deviations to recreate more and less reliable measurement practices used in real-world settings. Errors were added to the model training phase (weeks 1–8) and sampling of data was used to recreate different testing frequencies (every day to once per week) when obtaining parameter estimates. In total, 210 sets of simulations (N = 104 iterations) were completed using an iterative hill-climbing optimisation technique. Parameter estimates were then combined with training loads in the model testing phase (weeks 9–16) to quantify prediction errors. Regression analyses identified positive associations between prediction errors and the linear combination of measurement error and testing frequency ( R adj 2 =0.87–0.94). Significant model improvements (P &lt; 0.001) were obtained across all scenarios by including an interaction term demonstrating greater deleterious effects of measurement error at low testing frequencies.The findings of this simulation study represent a lower-bound case and indicate that in real-world settings, where a fitness-fatigue model is used to predict training response, measurement practices that generate coefficients of variation greater than ≈ 4% will not provide satisfactory results.</description><issn>1747-9541</issn><issn>2048-397X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1qwzAQhEVpoSHNvUe9gFtLVrJWbyH0JxDoJYXejCyvEgVbSiX5kEfoW1chPRW6lznMfMMyhNyz8oExgEcGAuRcMCbrGoCzKzLhpaiLSsLnNZmc7eLs35JZjIcyX8UBQE7I93aPFI1BnSL1hg6o4hhwQJcohuADVa6jCWOybkdNwK8RnT5R72jKpLHJYYyFUcnuRqSD77Cn6njsLWbM04DRxqScRpqCsi63PNEljXYY-8zkmhwOXun9Hbkxqo84-9Up-Xh53q7eis3763q13BS64lUqNBihagaylFKITjEULbZcLbTRCrhecNFpyQU3XVt1kJm5gLYWoEQ91xyqKSkvvTr4GAOa5hjsoMKpYWVzXrP5u2ZGigsS1Q6bgx-Dyx_-n_8BWbx3hA</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Stephens Hemingway, Benedict H</creator><creator>Burgess, Katherine E</creator><creator>Elyan, Eyad</creator><creator>Swinton, Paul A</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9663-0696</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>The effects of measurement error and testing frequency on the fitness-fatigue model applied to resistance training: A simulation approach</title><author>Stephens Hemingway, Benedict H ; Burgess, Katherine E ; Elyan, Eyad ; Swinton, Paul A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-c7f4a817909944da1e4beb2a6cfca72c624dc9242fdb3d7323547b847a485c273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stephens Hemingway, Benedict H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Katherine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elyan, Eyad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swinton, Paul A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of sports science &amp; coaching</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stephens Hemingway, Benedict H</au><au>Burgess, Katherine E</au><au>Elyan, Eyad</au><au>Swinton, Paul A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of measurement error and testing frequency on the fitness-fatigue model applied to resistance training: A simulation approach</atitle><jtitle>International journal of sports science &amp; coaching</jtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>60-71</pages><issn>1747-9541</issn><eissn>2048-397X</eissn><abstract>This study investigated the effects of measurement error and testing frequency on prediction accuracy of the standard fitness-fatigue model. A simulation-based approach was used to systematically assess measurement error and frequency inputs commonly used when monitoring the training of athletes. Two hypothetical athletes (intermediate and advanced) were developed and realistic training loads and daily ‘true’ power values were generated using the fitness-fatigue model across 16 weeks. Simulations were then completed by adding Gaussian measurement errors to true values with mean 0 and set standard deviations to recreate more and less reliable measurement practices used in real-world settings. Errors were added to the model training phase (weeks 1–8) and sampling of data was used to recreate different testing frequencies (every day to once per week) when obtaining parameter estimates. In total, 210 sets of simulations (N = 104 iterations) were completed using an iterative hill-climbing optimisation technique. Parameter estimates were then combined with training loads in the model testing phase (weeks 9–16) to quantify prediction errors. Regression analyses identified positive associations between prediction errors and the linear combination of measurement error and testing frequency ( R adj 2 =0.87–0.94). Significant model improvements (P &lt; 0.001) were obtained across all scenarios by including an interaction term demonstrating greater deleterious effects of measurement error at low testing frequencies.The findings of this simulation study represent a lower-bound case and indicate that in real-world settings, where a fitness-fatigue model is used to predict training response, measurement practices that generate coefficients of variation greater than ≈ 4% will not provide satisfactory results.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1747954119887721</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9663-0696</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1747-9541
ispartof International journal of sports science & coaching, 2020-02, Vol.15 (1), p.60-71
issn 1747-9541
2048-397X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1747954119887721
source SAGE Complete
title The effects of measurement error and testing frequency on the fitness-fatigue model applied to resistance training: A simulation approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A11%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20measurement%20error%20and%20testing%20frequency%20on%20the%20fitness-fatigue%20model%20applied%20to%20resistance%20training:%20A%20simulation%20approach&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20sports%20science%20&%20coaching&rft.au=Stephens%20Hemingway,%20Benedict%20H&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=60-71&rft.issn=1747-9541&rft.eissn=2048-397X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1747954119887721&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1747954119887721%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1747954119887721&rfr_iscdi=true