Popular movements and the fragility of the Nordic democracies during the first half of the twentieth century
The Nordic countries Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden are among the few European countries where parliamentary democracy survived the challenges of the interwar period. The apparent resilience of Nordic democracy has sometimes been partly attributed to the strength of the popular movements, the i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of modern European history 2019-11, Vol.17 (4), p.469-485 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 485 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 469 |
container_title | Journal of modern European history |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Hilson, Mary |
description | The Nordic countries Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden are among the few European countries where parliamentary democracy survived the challenges of the interwar period. The apparent resilience of Nordic democracy has sometimes been partly attributed to the strength of the popular movements, the internal democratic structures, and culture of these organizations and not least their role in educating their members in democratic practices. Drawing primarily on examples from the co-operative movements in several Nordic countries, the article asks how democracy was understood in co-operative societies and how it functioned in practice. Co-operative societies were committed to the principle of ‘one member one vote’, but faced constant dilemmas over how to combine the possibility for grassroots influence with the need for central control, especially as the organizations grew in size. In some cases, this led to irreconcilable conflicts and splits in central organizations. The article argues that although the co-operatives and other popular movements later came to be seen as crucial elements in the survival of Nordic democracy, their role in this survival should not be taken for granted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1611894419880459 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1611894419880459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26832844</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_1611894419880459</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26832844</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-d4a26990f705c4862ff7420862ad9625e7a8cf952c714e9547760cf6107d2bc43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt7N0L-wGiSyXMpxRcUdaHrIebRpsxMSpJR-u-dOurChat7uOc7h8sF4ByjS4yFuMIcY6koxUpKRJk6ADPCa1wpwekhmO3tau8fg5OcNwhxhrmYgfY5bodWJ9jFd9e5vmSoewvL2kGf9Cq0oexg9F-Lx5hsMNC6LpqkTXAZ2iGFfjXhIeUC17r1P3z5GPuCK2toRjGk3Sk48rrN7ux7zsHr7c3L4r5aPt09LK6XlakpK5WlmnClkBeIGSo58V5QgkahreKEOaGl8YoRIzB1ilEhODKeYyQseTO0ngM09ZoUc07ON9sUOp12DUbN_lvN32-NkWqKZL1yzSYOqR8v_I-_mPhNLjH99hMuayIprT8BG4d0Rg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Popular movements and the fragility of the Nordic democracies during the first half of the twentieth century</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Hilson, Mary</creator><creatorcontrib>Hilson, Mary</creatorcontrib><description>The Nordic countries Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden are among the few European countries where parliamentary democracy survived the challenges of the interwar period. The apparent resilience of Nordic democracy has sometimes been partly attributed to the strength of the popular movements, the internal democratic structures, and culture of these organizations and not least their role in educating their members in democratic practices. Drawing primarily on examples from the co-operative movements in several Nordic countries, the article asks how democracy was understood in co-operative societies and how it functioned in practice. Co-operative societies were committed to the principle of ‘one member one vote’, but faced constant dilemmas over how to combine the possibility for grassroots influence with the need for central control, especially as the organizations grew in size. In some cases, this led to irreconcilable conflicts and splits in central organizations. The article argues that although the co-operatives and other popular movements later came to be seen as crucial elements in the survival of Nordic democracy, their role in this survival should not be taken for granted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1611-8944</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2631-9764</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1611894419880459</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Sage Publications, Ltd</publisher><subject>Special Issue: Fragile Democracy</subject><ispartof>Journal of modern European history, 2019-11, Vol.17 (4), p.469-485</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-d4a26990f705c4862ff7420862ad9625e7a8cf952c714e9547760cf6107d2bc43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26832844$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26832844$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hilson, Mary</creatorcontrib><title>Popular movements and the fragility of the Nordic democracies during the first half of the twentieth century</title><title>Journal of modern European history</title><addtitle>J Mod Eur Hist</addtitle><description>The Nordic countries Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden are among the few European countries where parliamentary democracy survived the challenges of the interwar period. The apparent resilience of Nordic democracy has sometimes been partly attributed to the strength of the popular movements, the internal democratic structures, and culture of these organizations and not least their role in educating their members in democratic practices. Drawing primarily on examples from the co-operative movements in several Nordic countries, the article asks how democracy was understood in co-operative societies and how it functioned in practice. Co-operative societies were committed to the principle of ‘one member one vote’, but faced constant dilemmas over how to combine the possibility for grassroots influence with the need for central control, especially as the organizations grew in size. In some cases, this led to irreconcilable conflicts and splits in central organizations. The article argues that although the co-operatives and other popular movements later came to be seen as crucial elements in the survival of Nordic democracy, their role in this survival should not be taken for granted.</description><subject>Special Issue: Fragile Democracy</subject><issn>1611-8944</issn><issn>2631-9764</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt7N0L-wGiSyXMpxRcUdaHrIebRpsxMSpJR-u-dOurChat7uOc7h8sF4ByjS4yFuMIcY6koxUpKRJk6ADPCa1wpwekhmO3tau8fg5OcNwhxhrmYgfY5bodWJ9jFd9e5vmSoewvL2kGf9Cq0oexg9F-Lx5hsMNC6LpqkTXAZ2iGFfjXhIeUC17r1P3z5GPuCK2toRjGk3Sk48rrN7ux7zsHr7c3L4r5aPt09LK6XlakpK5WlmnClkBeIGSo58V5QgkahreKEOaGl8YoRIzB1ilEhODKeYyQseTO0ngM09ZoUc07ON9sUOp12DUbN_lvN32-NkWqKZL1yzSYOqR8v_I-_mPhNLjH99hMuayIprT8BG4d0Rg</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Hilson, Mary</creator><general>Sage Publications, Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Popular movements and the fragility of the Nordic democracies during the first half of the twentieth century</title><author>Hilson, Mary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-d4a26990f705c4862ff7420862ad9625e7a8cf952c714e9547760cf6107d2bc43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Special Issue: Fragile Democracy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hilson, Mary</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of modern European history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hilson, Mary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Popular movements and the fragility of the Nordic democracies during the first half of the twentieth century</atitle><jtitle>Journal of modern European history</jtitle><addtitle>J Mod Eur Hist</addtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>469</spage><epage>485</epage><pages>469-485</pages><issn>1611-8944</issn><eissn>2631-9764</eissn><abstract>The Nordic countries Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden are among the few European countries where parliamentary democracy survived the challenges of the interwar period. The apparent resilience of Nordic democracy has sometimes been partly attributed to the strength of the popular movements, the internal democratic structures, and culture of these organizations and not least their role in educating their members in democratic practices. Drawing primarily on examples from the co-operative movements in several Nordic countries, the article asks how democracy was understood in co-operative societies and how it functioned in practice. Co-operative societies were committed to the principle of ‘one member one vote’, but faced constant dilemmas over how to combine the possibility for grassroots influence with the need for central control, especially as the organizations grew in size. In some cases, this led to irreconcilable conflicts and splits in central organizations. The article argues that although the co-operatives and other popular movements later came to be seen as crucial elements in the survival of Nordic democracy, their role in this survival should not be taken for granted.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1177/1611894419880459</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1611-8944 |
ispartof | Journal of modern European history, 2019-11, Vol.17 (4), p.469-485 |
issn | 1611-8944 2631-9764 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1611894419880459 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Special Issue: Fragile Democracy |
title | Popular movements and the fragility of the Nordic democracies during the first half of the twentieth century |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T08%3A20%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Popular%20movements%20and%20the%20fragility%20of%20the%20Nordic%20democracies%20during%20the%20first%20half%20of%20the%20twentieth%20century&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20modern%20European%20history&rft.au=Hilson,%20Mary&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=469&rft.epage=485&rft.pages=469-485&rft.issn=1611-8944&rft.eissn=2631-9764&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1611894419880459&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E26832844%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26832844&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1611894419880459&rfr_iscdi=true |