Contested Convergence and the Politics of Play on GameTrailers.com
As a hobby and as an industry, gaming is growing. The impetus for this growth is convergence, specifically technological, content, and market convergence. But gamers might contest this convergence, insofar as it blends “genres of participation.” Gaming has long been dominated by the “hardcore” who “...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Games and culture 2013-01, Vol.8 (1), p.3-25 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 25 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | Games and culture |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Milner, Ryan M. |
description | As a hobby and as an industry, gaming is growing. The impetus for this growth is convergence, specifically technological, content, and market convergence. But gamers might contest this convergence, insofar as it blends “genres of participation.” Gaming has long been dominated by the “hardcore” who “geek out” over their favorite titles. However, a recent influx of “casual” games, which encourage “hanging out” means a split in resources. In order to investigate the contestation this might inspire, I analyzed discussions on the site GameTrailers.com. The site features both producer and fan discourse on the state of the videogame industry. On GameTrailers, the debate over convergence comes down to its driving focus: audience convergence. The industry’s goal is to create products that bring together a wider range of consumers. Differing perspectives on the worth and outcome of this audience convergence lead to political contestation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1555412013478684 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1555412013478684</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1555412013478684</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1555412013478684</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-33a629f1294ccf07aa5334d101e1634464676c66632256a932d27486e7e6b7d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMFKw0AUXETBWr173B9I3bf78jY5atFWKNhDPYd181JT0qzsRqF_b0rFg-BphmFmGEaIW1AzAGvvIM9zBK3AoC2owDMxOUoZginPf7lWl-IqpZ1SiKbUE_EwD_3AaeBajuyL45Z7z9L1tRzeWa5D1w6tTzI0ct25gwy9XLg9b6JrO45p5sP-Wlw0rkt884NT8fr0uJkvs9XL4nl-v8q8LmDIjHGkywZ0id43yjqXG4M1KGAgg0hIljwRGa1zcqXRtbZYEFumN1tbMxXq1OtjSClyU33Edu_ioQJVHT-o_n4wRrJTJLktV7vwGftx4f_-b0i9WXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contested Convergence and the Politics of Play on GameTrailers.com</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Milner, Ryan M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Milner, Ryan M.</creatorcontrib><description>As a hobby and as an industry, gaming is growing. The impetus for this growth is convergence, specifically technological, content, and market convergence. But gamers might contest this convergence, insofar as it blends “genres of participation.” Gaming has long been dominated by the “hardcore” who “geek out” over their favorite titles. However, a recent influx of “casual” games, which encourage “hanging out” means a split in resources. In order to investigate the contestation this might inspire, I analyzed discussions on the site GameTrailers.com. The site features both producer and fan discourse on the state of the videogame industry. On GameTrailers, the debate over convergence comes down to its driving focus: audience convergence. The industry’s goal is to create products that bring together a wider range of consumers. Differing perspectives on the worth and outcome of this audience convergence lead to political contestation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1555-4120</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-4139</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1555412013478684</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Games and culture, 2013-01, Vol.8 (1), p.3-25</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-33a629f1294ccf07aa5334d101e1634464676c66632256a932d27486e7e6b7d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-33a629f1294ccf07aa5334d101e1634464676c66632256a932d27486e7e6b7d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1555412013478684$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1555412013478684$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Milner, Ryan M.</creatorcontrib><title>Contested Convergence and the Politics of Play on GameTrailers.com</title><title>Games and culture</title><description>As a hobby and as an industry, gaming is growing. The impetus for this growth is convergence, specifically technological, content, and market convergence. But gamers might contest this convergence, insofar as it blends “genres of participation.” Gaming has long been dominated by the “hardcore” who “geek out” over their favorite titles. However, a recent influx of “casual” games, which encourage “hanging out” means a split in resources. In order to investigate the contestation this might inspire, I analyzed discussions on the site GameTrailers.com. The site features both producer and fan discourse on the state of the videogame industry. On GameTrailers, the debate over convergence comes down to its driving focus: audience convergence. The industry’s goal is to create products that bring together a wider range of consumers. Differing perspectives on the worth and outcome of this audience convergence lead to political contestation.</description><issn>1555-4120</issn><issn>1555-4139</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UMFKw0AUXETBWr173B9I3bf78jY5atFWKNhDPYd181JT0qzsRqF_b0rFg-BphmFmGEaIW1AzAGvvIM9zBK3AoC2owDMxOUoZginPf7lWl-IqpZ1SiKbUE_EwD_3AaeBajuyL45Z7z9L1tRzeWa5D1w6tTzI0ct25gwy9XLg9b6JrO45p5sP-Wlw0rkt884NT8fr0uJkvs9XL4nl-v8q8LmDIjHGkywZ0id43yjqXG4M1KGAgg0hIljwRGa1zcqXRtbZYEFumN1tbMxXq1OtjSClyU33Edu_ioQJVHT-o_n4wRrJTJLktV7vwGftx4f_-b0i9WXw</recordid><startdate>201301</startdate><enddate>201301</enddate><creator>Milner, Ryan M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201301</creationdate><title>Contested Convergence and the Politics of Play on GameTrailers.com</title><author>Milner, Ryan M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-33a629f1294ccf07aa5334d101e1634464676c66632256a932d27486e7e6b7d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Milner, Ryan M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Games and culture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Milner, Ryan M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contested Convergence and the Politics of Play on GameTrailers.com</atitle><jtitle>Games and culture</jtitle><date>2013-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>3-25</pages><issn>1555-4120</issn><eissn>1555-4139</eissn><abstract>As a hobby and as an industry, gaming is growing. The impetus for this growth is convergence, specifically technological, content, and market convergence. But gamers might contest this convergence, insofar as it blends “genres of participation.” Gaming has long been dominated by the “hardcore” who “geek out” over their favorite titles. However, a recent influx of “casual” games, which encourage “hanging out” means a split in resources. In order to investigate the contestation this might inspire, I analyzed discussions on the site GameTrailers.com. The site features both producer and fan discourse on the state of the videogame industry. On GameTrailers, the debate over convergence comes down to its driving focus: audience convergence. The industry’s goal is to create products that bring together a wider range of consumers. Differing perspectives on the worth and outcome of this audience convergence lead to political contestation.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1555412013478684</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1555-4120 |
ispartof | Games and culture, 2013-01, Vol.8 (1), p.3-25 |
issn | 1555-4120 1555-4139 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1555412013478684 |
source | Access via SAGE |
title | Contested Convergence and the Politics of Play on GameTrailers.com |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T13%3A24%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contested%20Convergence%20and%20the%20Politics%20of%20Play%20on%20GameTrailers.com&rft.jtitle=Games%20and%20culture&rft.au=Milner,%20Ryan%20M.&rft.date=2013-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=3-25&rft.issn=1555-4120&rft.eissn=1555-4139&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1555412013478684&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1555412013478684%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1555412013478684&rfr_iscdi=true |