Cognitive Task Analysis Using Complementary Elicitation Methods

Cognitive task analysis is accomplished using a wide variety of methodologies, and we have previously argued that different methods will tend to elicit qualitatively different types of knowledge and skills. Because of this, many practitioners use complementary methods for a given project. We have de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 1995-10, Vol.39 (9), p.525-529
1. Verfasser: Gordon, Sallie E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 529
container_issue 9
container_start_page 525
container_title Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
container_volume 39
creator Gordon, Sallie E.
description Cognitive task analysis is accomplished using a wide variety of methodologies, and we have previously argued that different methods will tend to elicit qualitatively different types of knowledge and skills. Because of this, many practitioners use complementary methods for a given project. We have developed such a complementary package of knowledge elicitation techniques, along with a specific representational method, which together are termed conceptual graph analysis. Conceptual graph analysis is domain-independent and can be used to evaluate complex cognitive tasks or subtasks. It relies on the successive use of document analysis, interviews, task observation, and induction based on review of task performance. The information from these elicitation techniques is represented as a set of interrelated conceptual graphs, but can be represented in other formats also. There are several issues relevant to cognitive task analysis that are currently being faced, including when to perform this type of analysis, and what methods to use. One answer is to perform cognitive task analysis when the task has an inherently high degree of cognitive complexity.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/154193129503900919
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_154193129503900919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_154193129503900919</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_154193129503900919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c217t-6ef15c9c71f11b1969ad8947687ad15814ae19ad06e14aa8133c845e5681d4bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwApz8AqHe-P-Eqqj8SEVc2nPkOE5wSeIqNkh9exKVGxKnXa3mG80OQvdAHgCkXAFnoCnkmhOqCdGgL9AiB6EzToS8RItZkM2Ka3QT44GQnErKFuixCO3gk_92eGfiJ14PpjtFH_E--qHFReiPnevdkMx4wpvOW59M8mHAby59hDreoqvGdNHd_c4l2j9tdsVLtn1_fi3W28zmIFMmXAPcaiuhAahAC21qpZkUSpoauAJmHEw3Ity0GgWUWsW440JBzaqKLlF-9rVjiHF0TXkcfT-FKoGUcwXl3womaHWGomldeQhf4_Rd_I_4AShSW34</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cognitive Task Analysis Using Complementary Elicitation Methods</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Gordon, Sallie E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Sallie E.</creatorcontrib><description>Cognitive task analysis is accomplished using a wide variety of methodologies, and we have previously argued that different methods will tend to elicit qualitatively different types of knowledge and skills. Because of this, many practitioners use complementary methods for a given project. We have developed such a complementary package of knowledge elicitation techniques, along with a specific representational method, which together are termed conceptual graph analysis. Conceptual graph analysis is domain-independent and can be used to evaluate complex cognitive tasks or subtasks. It relies on the successive use of document analysis, interviews, task observation, and induction based on review of task performance. The information from these elicitation techniques is represented as a set of interrelated conceptual graphs, but can be represented in other formats also. There are several issues relevant to cognitive task analysis that are currently being faced, including when to perform this type of analysis, and what methods to use. One answer is to perform cognitive task analysis when the task has an inherently high degree of cognitive complexity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-9312</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1071-1813</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-5067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/154193129503900919</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 1995-10, Vol.39 (9), p.525-529</ispartof><rights>1995 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c217t-6ef15c9c71f11b1969ad8947687ad15814ae19ad06e14aa8133c845e5681d4bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c217t-6ef15c9c71f11b1969ad8947687ad15814ae19ad06e14aa8133c845e5681d4bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/154193129503900919$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/154193129503900919$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21806,27911,27912,43608,43609</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Sallie E.</creatorcontrib><title>Cognitive Task Analysis Using Complementary Elicitation Methods</title><title>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</title><description>Cognitive task analysis is accomplished using a wide variety of methodologies, and we have previously argued that different methods will tend to elicit qualitatively different types of knowledge and skills. Because of this, many practitioners use complementary methods for a given project. We have developed such a complementary package of knowledge elicitation techniques, along with a specific representational method, which together are termed conceptual graph analysis. Conceptual graph analysis is domain-independent and can be used to evaluate complex cognitive tasks or subtasks. It relies on the successive use of document analysis, interviews, task observation, and induction based on review of task performance. The information from these elicitation techniques is represented as a set of interrelated conceptual graphs, but can be represented in other formats also. There are several issues relevant to cognitive task analysis that are currently being faced, including when to perform this type of analysis, and what methods to use. One answer is to perform cognitive task analysis when the task has an inherently high degree of cognitive complexity.</description><issn>1541-9312</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><issn>2169-5067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwApz8AqHe-P-Eqqj8SEVc2nPkOE5wSeIqNkh9exKVGxKnXa3mG80OQvdAHgCkXAFnoCnkmhOqCdGgL9AiB6EzToS8RItZkM2Ka3QT44GQnErKFuixCO3gk_92eGfiJ14PpjtFH_E--qHFReiPnevdkMx4wpvOW59M8mHAby59hDreoqvGdNHd_c4l2j9tdsVLtn1_fi3W28zmIFMmXAPcaiuhAahAC21qpZkUSpoauAJmHEw3Ity0GgWUWsW440JBzaqKLlF-9rVjiHF0TXkcfT-FKoGUcwXl3womaHWGomldeQhf4_Rd_I_4AShSW34</recordid><startdate>199510</startdate><enddate>199510</enddate><creator>Gordon, Sallie E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199510</creationdate><title>Cognitive Task Analysis Using Complementary Elicitation Methods</title><author>Gordon, Sallie E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c217t-6ef15c9c71f11b1969ad8947687ad15814ae19ad06e14aa8133c845e5681d4bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Sallie E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gordon, Sallie E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cognitive Task Analysis Using Complementary Elicitation Methods</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle><date>1995-10</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>525</spage><epage>529</epage><pages>525-529</pages><issn>1541-9312</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><eissn>2169-5067</eissn><abstract>Cognitive task analysis is accomplished using a wide variety of methodologies, and we have previously argued that different methods will tend to elicit qualitatively different types of knowledge and skills. Because of this, many practitioners use complementary methods for a given project. We have developed such a complementary package of knowledge elicitation techniques, along with a specific representational method, which together are termed conceptual graph analysis. Conceptual graph analysis is domain-independent and can be used to evaluate complex cognitive tasks or subtasks. It relies on the successive use of document analysis, interviews, task observation, and induction based on review of task performance. The information from these elicitation techniques is represented as a set of interrelated conceptual graphs, but can be represented in other formats also. There are several issues relevant to cognitive task analysis that are currently being faced, including when to perform this type of analysis, and what methods to use. One answer is to perform cognitive task analysis when the task has an inherently high degree of cognitive complexity.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/154193129503900919</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1541-9312
ispartof Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 1995-10, Vol.39 (9), p.525-529
issn 1541-9312
1071-1813
2169-5067
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_154193129503900919
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Cognitive Task Analysis Using Complementary Elicitation Methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T22%3A08%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cognitive%20Task%20Analysis%20Using%20Complementary%20Elicitation%20Methods&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Human%20Factors%20and%20Ergonomics%20Society%20Annual%20Meeting&rft.au=Gordon,%20Sallie%20E.&rft.date=1995-10&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=525&rft.epage=529&rft.pages=525-529&rft.issn=1541-9312&rft.eissn=2169-5067&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/154193129503900919&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_154193129503900919%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_154193129503900919&rfr_iscdi=true