Driver Responses to Incongruent V2V and V2I Safety Critical Information in Left-Turn Across Path Scenarios

The present work aims to help guide the development of safer systems and interfaces by investigating how drivers handle safety messages from in-vehicle and in-roadway infrastructure sources with incongruent onset timing. Two part-task driving simulator experiments were used to examine concurrent Dri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2017-09, Vol.61 (1), p.1904-1908
Hauptverfasser: Richard, Christian, Hoekstra-Atwood, Liberty, Philips, Brian H., Jerome, Christian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1908
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1904
container_title Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
container_volume 61
creator Richard, Christian
Hoekstra-Atwood, Liberty
Philips, Brian H.
Jerome, Christian
description The present work aims to help guide the development of safer systems and interfaces by investigating how drivers handle safety messages from in-vehicle and in-roadway infrastructure sources with incongruent onset timing. Two part-task driving simulator experiments were used to examine concurrent Driver-Infrastructure Interface (DII) and Driver-Vehicle Interface (DVI) displays for a gap-assist system while making a Left-Turn Across Path (LTAP) movement at a signalized intersection. Participants encountered repeated LTAP scenarios and indicated whether they would make a left turn through varying gaps in traffic. The key factors examined were: gap size, age, display type, and the visibility of oncoming traffic. Drivers primarily used the displays when they had an obstructed view of oncoming traffic. They preferred the DII, but some participants would rely on the DVI if the DII had conservative timing. Participants showed inconsistent performance when the DII and DVI displayed conflicting information.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1541931213601957
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1541931213601957</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1541931213601957</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1541931213601957</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-f376f51d422cc928a4eadd7c0ec813c3ea742a04f79fb21860920be0c1f90dcb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtPAyEYJEYTa_XukT-A8gG7lGNTX5s00dja64ayUGlaaICa9N-7tZ5MPM1hHpkZhG6B3gFIeQ-VAMWBAa8pqEqeoQGDWpGK1vIcDY40OfKX6CrnNaWMSy4GaP2Q_JdN-N3mXQzZZlwiboKJYZX2NhS8YAusQ9djg2fa2XLAk-SLN3rT61xMW118DNgHPLWukPk-BTw2KeaM33T5xDNjg04-5mt04fQm25tfHKKPp8f55IVMX5-byXhKDBOiEMdl7SroBGPGKDbSwuquk4ZaMwJuuNVSME2Fk8otGYxqqhhdWmrAKdqZJR8iesr9KZGsa3fJb3U6tEDb41ft3696CzlZsl7Zdh37DX3D__XfFy1pdg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Driver Responses to Incongruent V2V and V2I Safety Critical Information in Left-Turn Across Path Scenarios</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Richard, Christian ; Hoekstra-Atwood, Liberty ; Philips, Brian H. ; Jerome, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Richard, Christian ; Hoekstra-Atwood, Liberty ; Philips, Brian H. ; Jerome, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>The present work aims to help guide the development of safer systems and interfaces by investigating how drivers handle safety messages from in-vehicle and in-roadway infrastructure sources with incongruent onset timing. Two part-task driving simulator experiments were used to examine concurrent Driver-Infrastructure Interface (DII) and Driver-Vehicle Interface (DVI) displays for a gap-assist system while making a Left-Turn Across Path (LTAP) movement at a signalized intersection. Participants encountered repeated LTAP scenarios and indicated whether they would make a left turn through varying gaps in traffic. The key factors examined were: gap size, age, display type, and the visibility of oncoming traffic. Drivers primarily used the displays when they had an obstructed view of oncoming traffic. They preferred the DII, but some participants would rely on the DVI if the DII had conservative timing. Participants showed inconsistent performance when the DII and DVI displayed conflicting information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-9312</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1071-1813</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-5067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1541931213601957</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2017-09, Vol.61 (1), p.1904-1908</ispartof><rights>2017 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-f376f51d422cc928a4eadd7c0ec813c3ea742a04f79fb21860920be0c1f90dcb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-f376f51d422cc928a4eadd7c0ec813c3ea742a04f79fb21860920be0c1f90dcb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1541931213601957$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1541931213601957$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21810,27915,27916,43612,43613</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richard, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoekstra-Atwood, Liberty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philips, Brian H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jerome, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Driver Responses to Incongruent V2V and V2I Safety Critical Information in Left-Turn Across Path Scenarios</title><title>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</title><description>The present work aims to help guide the development of safer systems and interfaces by investigating how drivers handle safety messages from in-vehicle and in-roadway infrastructure sources with incongruent onset timing. Two part-task driving simulator experiments were used to examine concurrent Driver-Infrastructure Interface (DII) and Driver-Vehicle Interface (DVI) displays for a gap-assist system while making a Left-Turn Across Path (LTAP) movement at a signalized intersection. Participants encountered repeated LTAP scenarios and indicated whether they would make a left turn through varying gaps in traffic. The key factors examined were: gap size, age, display type, and the visibility of oncoming traffic. Drivers primarily used the displays when they had an obstructed view of oncoming traffic. They preferred the DII, but some participants would rely on the DVI if the DII had conservative timing. Participants showed inconsistent performance when the DII and DVI displayed conflicting information.</description><issn>1541-9312</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><issn>2169-5067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UEtPAyEYJEYTa_XukT-A8gG7lGNTX5s00dja64ayUGlaaICa9N-7tZ5MPM1hHpkZhG6B3gFIeQ-VAMWBAa8pqEqeoQGDWpGK1vIcDY40OfKX6CrnNaWMSy4GaP2Q_JdN-N3mXQzZZlwiboKJYZX2NhS8YAusQ9djg2fa2XLAk-SLN3rT61xMW118DNgHPLWukPk-BTw2KeaM33T5xDNjg04-5mt04fQm25tfHKKPp8f55IVMX5-byXhKDBOiEMdl7SroBGPGKDbSwuquk4ZaMwJuuNVSME2Fk8otGYxqqhhdWmrAKdqZJR8iesr9KZGsa3fJb3U6tEDb41ft3696CzlZsl7Zdh37DX3D__XfFy1pdg</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Richard, Christian</creator><creator>Hoekstra-Atwood, Liberty</creator><creator>Philips, Brian H.</creator><creator>Jerome, Christian</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>Driver Responses to Incongruent V2V and V2I Safety Critical Information in Left-Turn Across Path Scenarios</title><author>Richard, Christian ; Hoekstra-Atwood, Liberty ; Philips, Brian H. ; Jerome, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-f376f51d422cc928a4eadd7c0ec813c3ea742a04f79fb21860920be0c1f90dcb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richard, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoekstra-Atwood, Liberty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philips, Brian H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jerome, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richard, Christian</au><au>Hoekstra-Atwood, Liberty</au><au>Philips, Brian H.</au><au>Jerome, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Driver Responses to Incongruent V2V and V2I Safety Critical Information in Left-Turn Across Path Scenarios</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1904</spage><epage>1908</epage><pages>1904-1908</pages><issn>1541-9312</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><eissn>2169-5067</eissn><abstract>The present work aims to help guide the development of safer systems and interfaces by investigating how drivers handle safety messages from in-vehicle and in-roadway infrastructure sources with incongruent onset timing. Two part-task driving simulator experiments were used to examine concurrent Driver-Infrastructure Interface (DII) and Driver-Vehicle Interface (DVI) displays for a gap-assist system while making a Left-Turn Across Path (LTAP) movement at a signalized intersection. Participants encountered repeated LTAP scenarios and indicated whether they would make a left turn through varying gaps in traffic. The key factors examined were: gap size, age, display type, and the visibility of oncoming traffic. Drivers primarily used the displays when they had an obstructed view of oncoming traffic. They preferred the DII, but some participants would rely on the DVI if the DII had conservative timing. Participants showed inconsistent performance when the DII and DVI displayed conflicting information.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1541931213601957</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1541-9312
ispartof Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2017-09, Vol.61 (1), p.1904-1908
issn 1541-9312
1071-1813
2169-5067
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1541931213601957
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Driver Responses to Incongruent V2V and V2I Safety Critical Information in Left-Turn Across Path Scenarios
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T02%3A30%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Driver%20Responses%20to%20Incongruent%20V2V%20and%20V2I%20Safety%20Critical%20Information%20in%20Left-Turn%20Across%20Path%20Scenarios&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Human%20Factors%20and%20Ergonomics%20Society%20Annual%20Meeting&rft.au=Richard,%20Christian&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1904&rft.epage=1908&rft.pages=1904-1908&rft.issn=1541-9312&rft.eissn=2169-5067&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1541931213601957&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1541931213601957%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1541931213601957&rfr_iscdi=true