Tactile Spatial Guidance for Collision Avoidance in NextGen Flight Operations
Future aviation operations will require pilots to assume new tasks, such as self-separation. Tactile displays are a promising means of supporting this task. They are well suited for presenting spatial information and offload the heavily taxed visual and auditory channels. This experiment assessed th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2016-09, Vol.60 (1), p.303-307 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 307 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 303 |
container_title | Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Prinet, Julie C. Wan, Yuzhi Sarter, Nadine |
description | Future aviation operations will require pilots to assume new tasks, such as self-separation. Tactile displays are a promising means of supporting this task. They are well suited for presenting spatial information and offload the heavily taxed visual and auditory channels. This experiment assessed the effectiveness of tactile spatial alerts for notifying pilots of an aircraft intruding on their flight path during Closely Spaced Parallel Approaches. Two alerting strategies (single-stage vs. graded) and two alert types (status vs. command) were compared. 19 pilots had to fly a series of approaches, detect tactile alerts and perform evasive maneuvers. The detection rate for tactile alerts was 100%. Graded and status alerts led to the highest response accuracy (100% and 98%, respectively). Response times were faster for command alerts and during manual flight. These results indicate that tactile displays are effective for conveying spatial information and can help prevent collisions in future aviation operations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1541931213601069 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1541931213601069</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1541931213601069</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1541931213601069</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-eea70293bd7e9fea02f7dc2c1ee9c9e34e8b6653bec9a8ffd578c6ea48efe7a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf3XuYPVPPRJs3lKK4K0104r0uansyMmpSkE_33dmwXInh1Xg7vczg8CN1SckeplPe0yKnilFEuCCVCnaEZo0JlBRHy_Fe-RFcp7QhhXPJ8hp432oyuB_w66NHpHtd712lvANsQcRX63iUXPF58htPeefwCX2MNHi97t30f8XqAOMHBp2t0YXWf4OY05-ht-bCpHrPVun6qFqvMsDwfMwAtCVO87SQoC5owKzvDDAVQRgHPoWyFKHgLRunS2q6QpRGg8xIsSE34HJHjXRNDShFsM0T3oeN3Q0lz0NH81TEh2RFJegvNLuyjnz78v_8D3r1g0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tactile Spatial Guidance for Collision Avoidance in NextGen Flight Operations</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Prinet, Julie C. ; Wan, Yuzhi ; Sarter, Nadine</creator><creatorcontrib>Prinet, Julie C. ; Wan, Yuzhi ; Sarter, Nadine</creatorcontrib><description>Future aviation operations will require pilots to assume new tasks, such as self-separation. Tactile displays are a promising means of supporting this task. They are well suited for presenting spatial information and offload the heavily taxed visual and auditory channels. This experiment assessed the effectiveness of tactile spatial alerts for notifying pilots of an aircraft intruding on their flight path during Closely Spaced Parallel Approaches. Two alerting strategies (single-stage vs. graded) and two alert types (status vs. command) were compared. 19 pilots had to fly a series of approaches, detect tactile alerts and perform evasive maneuvers. The detection rate for tactile alerts was 100%. Graded and status alerts led to the highest response accuracy (100% and 98%, respectively). Response times were faster for command alerts and during manual flight. These results indicate that tactile displays are effective for conveying spatial information and can help prevent collisions in future aviation operations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-5067</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1071-1813</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-5067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1541931213601069</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2016-09, Vol.60 (1), p.303-307</ispartof><rights>2016 by Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-eea70293bd7e9fea02f7dc2c1ee9c9e34e8b6653bec9a8ffd578c6ea48efe7a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-eea70293bd7e9fea02f7dc2c1ee9c9e34e8b6653bec9a8ffd578c6ea48efe7a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1541931213601069$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1541931213601069$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prinet, Julie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Yuzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarter, Nadine</creatorcontrib><title>Tactile Spatial Guidance for Collision Avoidance in NextGen Flight Operations</title><title>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</title><description>Future aviation operations will require pilots to assume new tasks, such as self-separation. Tactile displays are a promising means of supporting this task. They are well suited for presenting spatial information and offload the heavily taxed visual and auditory channels. This experiment assessed the effectiveness of tactile spatial alerts for notifying pilots of an aircraft intruding on their flight path during Closely Spaced Parallel Approaches. Two alerting strategies (single-stage vs. graded) and two alert types (status vs. command) were compared. 19 pilots had to fly a series of approaches, detect tactile alerts and perform evasive maneuvers. The detection rate for tactile alerts was 100%. Graded and status alerts led to the highest response accuracy (100% and 98%, respectively). Response times were faster for command alerts and during manual flight. These results indicate that tactile displays are effective for conveying spatial information and can help prevent collisions in future aviation operations.</description><issn>2169-5067</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><issn>2169-5067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf3XuYPVPPRJs3lKK4K0104r0uansyMmpSkE_33dmwXInh1Xg7vczg8CN1SckeplPe0yKnilFEuCCVCnaEZo0JlBRHy_Fe-RFcp7QhhXPJ8hp432oyuB_w66NHpHtd712lvANsQcRX63iUXPF58htPeefwCX2MNHi97t30f8XqAOMHBp2t0YXWf4OY05-ht-bCpHrPVun6qFqvMsDwfMwAtCVO87SQoC5owKzvDDAVQRgHPoWyFKHgLRunS2q6QpRGg8xIsSE34HJHjXRNDShFsM0T3oeN3Q0lz0NH81TEh2RFJegvNLuyjnz78v_8D3r1g0g</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Prinet, Julie C.</creator><creator>Wan, Yuzhi</creator><creator>Sarter, Nadine</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Tactile Spatial Guidance for Collision Avoidance in NextGen Flight Operations</title><author>Prinet, Julie C. ; Wan, Yuzhi ; Sarter, Nadine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-eea70293bd7e9fea02f7dc2c1ee9c9e34e8b6653bec9a8ffd578c6ea48efe7a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prinet, Julie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Yuzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarter, Nadine</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prinet, Julie C.</au><au>Wan, Yuzhi</au><au>Sarter, Nadine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tactile Spatial Guidance for Collision Avoidance in NextGen Flight Operations</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>303</spage><epage>307</epage><pages>303-307</pages><issn>2169-5067</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><eissn>2169-5067</eissn><abstract>Future aviation operations will require pilots to assume new tasks, such as self-separation. Tactile displays are a promising means of supporting this task. They are well suited for presenting spatial information and offload the heavily taxed visual and auditory channels. This experiment assessed the effectiveness of tactile spatial alerts for notifying pilots of an aircraft intruding on their flight path during Closely Spaced Parallel Approaches. Two alerting strategies (single-stage vs. graded) and two alert types (status vs. command) were compared. 19 pilots had to fly a series of approaches, detect tactile alerts and perform evasive maneuvers. The detection rate for tactile alerts was 100%. Graded and status alerts led to the highest response accuracy (100% and 98%, respectively). Response times were faster for command alerts and during manual flight. These results indicate that tactile displays are effective for conveying spatial information and can help prevent collisions in future aviation operations.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1541931213601069</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-5067 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2016-09, Vol.60 (1), p.303-307 |
issn | 2169-5067 1071-1813 2169-5067 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1541931213601069 |
source | Access via SAGE |
title | Tactile Spatial Guidance for Collision Avoidance in NextGen Flight Operations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A56%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tactile%20Spatial%20Guidance%20for%20Collision%20Avoidance%20in%20NextGen%20Flight%20Operations&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Human%20Factors%20and%20Ergonomics%20Society%20Annual%20Meeting&rft.au=Prinet,%20Julie%20C.&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=303&rft.epage=307&rft.pages=303-307&rft.issn=2169-5067&rft.eissn=2169-5067&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1541931213601069&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1541931213601069%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1541931213601069&rfr_iscdi=true |