Verbal Time Production as a Secondary Task: Which Metrics and Target Intervals are Most Sensitive to Workload for Fine Motor Laparoscopic Training Tasks?
Although time production is frequently used as a secondary task, research has not thoroughly investigated whether the length of the to-be-produced interval or the metric used to summarize productions affects sensitivity to mental workload. Fourteen participants produced four target intervals (6, 11,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2009-10, Vol.53 (18), p.1191-1195 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1195 |
---|---|
container_issue | 18 |
container_start_page | 1191 |
container_title | Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Grant, Russell C. Carswell, C. Melody Lio, Cindy H. Seales, Brent Clarke, Duncan |
description | Although time production is frequently used as a secondary task, research has not thoroughly investigated whether the length of the to-be-produced interval or the metric used to summarize productions affects sensitivity to mental workload. Fourteen participants produced four target intervals (6, 11, 16, or 21 s) while performing a surgical training task that required putting small beads into a cup (easy) or onto a peg (difficult). Intervals were summarized into two metrics of central tendency and four metrics of dispersion previously used in the literature. Results indicate that metrics of central tendency and shorter target intervals are more sensitive to mental workload. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/154193120905301806 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_154193120905301806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_154193120905301806</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_154193120905301806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1326-ae0d2737495a609aedb2d9a54d3c8abcc10d2a4835214f4ea158efabd6af62113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UNlKAzEUDaJgrf6AT_mBsVlm9UWkWC20KDjax-FOkmnTJSlJWvBT_Fsz6pvg072c7S4IXVNyQ2lRjGiW0opTRiqScUJLkp-gAaN5lWQkL07RoBckveIcXXi_JoTxgqcD9PmuXAtbXOudwi_OyoMI2hoMHgN-VcIaCe4D1-A3t3ix0mKF5yo4LSJvZMTdUgU8NUG5I2wj6BSeWx-i13gd9FHhYPHCus3WgsSddXiiTa8JsZ3BHpz1wu61wLUDbbRZfg_zd5forIuJ6uq3DtHb5KEePyWz58fp-H6WCMpZnoAikhW8SKsMclKBki2TFWSp5KKEVggaeUhLnjGadqkCmpWqg1bm0OWMUj5E7CdXxE28U12zd3oXj24oafrnNn-fG02jH5OHpWrW9uBM3PE_xxdZxHwK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Verbal Time Production as a Secondary Task: Which Metrics and Target Intervals are Most Sensitive to Workload for Fine Motor Laparoscopic Training Tasks?</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Grant, Russell C. ; Carswell, C. Melody ; Lio, Cindy H. ; Seales, Brent ; Clarke, Duncan</creator><creatorcontrib>Grant, Russell C. ; Carswell, C. Melody ; Lio, Cindy H. ; Seales, Brent ; Clarke, Duncan</creatorcontrib><description>Although time production is frequently used as a secondary task, research has not thoroughly investigated whether the length of the to-be-produced interval or the metric used to summarize productions affects sensitivity to mental workload. Fourteen participants produced four target intervals (6, 11, 16, or 21 s) while performing a surgical training task that required putting small beads into a cup (easy) or onto a peg (difficult). Intervals were summarized into two metrics of central tendency and four metrics of dispersion previously used in the literature. Results indicate that metrics of central tendency and shorter target intervals are more sensitive to mental workload.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-9312</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1071-1813</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-5067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/154193120905301806</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2009-10, Vol.53 (18), p.1191-1195</ispartof><rights>2009 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1326-ae0d2737495a609aedb2d9a54d3c8abcc10d2a4835214f4ea158efabd6af62113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1326-ae0d2737495a609aedb2d9a54d3c8abcc10d2a4835214f4ea158efabd6af62113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/154193120905301806$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/154193120905301806$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21824,27929,27930,43626,43627</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grant, Russell C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carswell, C. Melody</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lio, Cindy H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seales, Brent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Duncan</creatorcontrib><title>Verbal Time Production as a Secondary Task: Which Metrics and Target Intervals are Most Sensitive to Workload for Fine Motor Laparoscopic Training Tasks?</title><title>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</title><description>Although time production is frequently used as a secondary task, research has not thoroughly investigated whether the length of the to-be-produced interval or the metric used to summarize productions affects sensitivity to mental workload. Fourteen participants produced four target intervals (6, 11, 16, or 21 s) while performing a surgical training task that required putting small beads into a cup (easy) or onto a peg (difficult). Intervals were summarized into two metrics of central tendency and four metrics of dispersion previously used in the literature. Results indicate that metrics of central tendency and shorter target intervals are more sensitive to mental workload.</description><issn>1541-9312</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><issn>2169-5067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UNlKAzEUDaJgrf6AT_mBsVlm9UWkWC20KDjax-FOkmnTJSlJWvBT_Fsz6pvg072c7S4IXVNyQ2lRjGiW0opTRiqScUJLkp-gAaN5lWQkL07RoBckveIcXXi_JoTxgqcD9PmuXAtbXOudwi_OyoMI2hoMHgN-VcIaCe4D1-A3t3ix0mKF5yo4LSJvZMTdUgU8NUG5I2wj6BSeWx-i13gd9FHhYPHCus3WgsSddXiiTa8JsZ3BHpz1wu61wLUDbbRZfg_zd5forIuJ6uq3DtHb5KEePyWz58fp-H6WCMpZnoAikhW8SKsMclKBki2TFWSp5KKEVggaeUhLnjGadqkCmpWqg1bm0OWMUj5E7CdXxE28U12zd3oXj24oafrnNn-fG02jH5OHpWrW9uBM3PE_xxdZxHwK</recordid><startdate>200910</startdate><enddate>200910</enddate><creator>Grant, Russell C.</creator><creator>Carswell, C. Melody</creator><creator>Lio, Cindy H.</creator><creator>Seales, Brent</creator><creator>Clarke, Duncan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200910</creationdate><title>Verbal Time Production as a Secondary Task: Which Metrics and Target Intervals are Most Sensitive to Workload for Fine Motor Laparoscopic Training Tasks?</title><author>Grant, Russell C. ; Carswell, C. Melody ; Lio, Cindy H. ; Seales, Brent ; Clarke, Duncan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1326-ae0d2737495a609aedb2d9a54d3c8abcc10d2a4835214f4ea158efabd6af62113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grant, Russell C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carswell, C. Melody</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lio, Cindy H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seales, Brent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Duncan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grant, Russell C.</au><au>Carswell, C. Melody</au><au>Lio, Cindy H.</au><au>Seales, Brent</au><au>Clarke, Duncan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Verbal Time Production as a Secondary Task: Which Metrics and Target Intervals are Most Sensitive to Workload for Fine Motor Laparoscopic Training Tasks?</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle><date>2009-10</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>1191</spage><epage>1195</epage><pages>1191-1195</pages><issn>1541-9312</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><eissn>2169-5067</eissn><abstract>Although time production is frequently used as a secondary task, research has not thoroughly investigated whether the length of the to-be-produced interval or the metric used to summarize productions affects sensitivity to mental workload. Fourteen participants produced four target intervals (6, 11, 16, or 21 s) while performing a surgical training task that required putting small beads into a cup (easy) or onto a peg (difficult). Intervals were summarized into two metrics of central tendency and four metrics of dispersion previously used in the literature. Results indicate that metrics of central tendency and shorter target intervals are more sensitive to mental workload.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/154193120905301806</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1541-9312 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2009-10, Vol.53 (18), p.1191-1195 |
issn | 1541-9312 1071-1813 2169-5067 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_154193120905301806 |
source | Access via SAGE |
title | Verbal Time Production as a Secondary Task: Which Metrics and Target Intervals are Most Sensitive to Workload for Fine Motor Laparoscopic Training Tasks? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T01%3A50%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Verbal%20Time%20Production%20as%20a%20Secondary%20Task:%20Which%20Metrics%20and%20Target%20Intervals%20are%20Most%20Sensitive%20to%20Workload%20for%20Fine%20Motor%20Laparoscopic%20Training%20Tasks?&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Human%20Factors%20and%20Ergonomics%20Society%20Annual%20Meeting&rft.au=Grant,%20Russell%20C.&rft.date=2009-10&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=1191&rft.epage=1195&rft.pages=1191-1195&rft.issn=1541-9312&rft.eissn=2169-5067&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/154193120905301806&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_154193120905301806%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_154193120905301806&rfr_iscdi=true |