Assessing Individual Differences in Spatial Strategies
This research examined the strategies, emotions, and beliefs described by participants completing a complex three dimensional spatial task. After completing the task, participants examined a video of themselves performing the task. During the video performance, participants completed a thought listi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2002-09, Vol.46 (12), p.998-1001 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1001 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 998 |
container_title | Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Sims, Valerie K Smith, Hana S. |
description | This research examined the strategies, emotions, and beliefs described by participants completing a complex three dimensional spatial task. After completing the task, participants examined a video of themselves performing the task. During the video performance, participants completed a thought listing exercise designed to elicit strategies used, as well participants' beliefs about their own adequacy and the degree of difficulty of the task. These data were coded by two independent observers. Strategies, beliefs, and emotions reported were predicted both by the sex of the participant and the success at the task. Unsuccessful males and females did not differ from one another in their reported strategies, beliefs, or emotions. However, successful males reported many more specific strategies, whereas successful females reported greater emotional regulation. Additionally, trial and error was identified by successful females as their main strategy. Guidelines for eliciting spatial strategies follow. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/154193120204601213 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_154193120204601213</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_154193120204601213</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_154193120204601213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c833-c19177d5cf44c7d011d3fc30a95f5c6197c12dc1088dc041b47889beda40d5ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j8tqwzAUREVpoW7aH-jKP-DmXj0saxnSVyDQRbI3ih5GIXWCrlPo39cm3RW6GhjmDDOMPSI8IWo9RyXRCOTAQdaAHMUVKzjWplJQ62tWTIFqStyyO6I9ABdayILVC6JAlPquXPU-fSV_tofyOcUYcuhdoDL15eZkhzTamyHbIXQp0D27ifZA4eFXZ2z7-rJdvlfrj7fVcrGuXCNE5dCM47xyUUqnPSB6EZ0Aa1RUrkajHXLvEJrGO5C4k7ppzC54K8Er68WM8Uuty0eiHGJ7yunT5u8WoZ2Ot3-Pj9D8ApHtQrs_nnM_TvyP-AHAnVe8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Individual Differences in Spatial Strategies</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Sims, Valerie K ; Smith, Hana S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sims, Valerie K ; Smith, Hana S.</creatorcontrib><description>This research examined the strategies, emotions, and beliefs described by participants completing a complex three dimensional spatial task. After completing the task, participants examined a video of themselves performing the task. During the video performance, participants completed a thought listing exercise designed to elicit strategies used, as well participants' beliefs about their own adequacy and the degree of difficulty of the task. These data were coded by two independent observers. Strategies, beliefs, and emotions reported were predicted both by the sex of the participant and the success at the task. Unsuccessful males and females did not differ from one another in their reported strategies, beliefs, or emotions. However, successful males reported many more specific strategies, whereas successful females reported greater emotional regulation. Additionally, trial and error was identified by successful females as their main strategy. Guidelines for eliciting spatial strategies follow.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-9312</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1071-1813</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-5067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/154193120204601213</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2002-09, Vol.46 (12), p.998-1001</ispartof><rights>2002 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c833-c19177d5cf44c7d011d3fc30a95f5c6197c12dc1088dc041b47889beda40d5ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/154193120204601213$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/154193120204601213$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sims, Valerie K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Hana S.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Individual Differences in Spatial Strategies</title><title>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</title><description>This research examined the strategies, emotions, and beliefs described by participants completing a complex three dimensional spatial task. After completing the task, participants examined a video of themselves performing the task. During the video performance, participants completed a thought listing exercise designed to elicit strategies used, as well participants' beliefs about their own adequacy and the degree of difficulty of the task. These data were coded by two independent observers. Strategies, beliefs, and emotions reported were predicted both by the sex of the participant and the success at the task. Unsuccessful males and females did not differ from one another in their reported strategies, beliefs, or emotions. However, successful males reported many more specific strategies, whereas successful females reported greater emotional regulation. Additionally, trial and error was identified by successful females as their main strategy. Guidelines for eliciting spatial strategies follow.</description><issn>1541-9312</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><issn>2169-5067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j8tqwzAUREVpoW7aH-jKP-DmXj0saxnSVyDQRbI3ih5GIXWCrlPo39cm3RW6GhjmDDOMPSI8IWo9RyXRCOTAQdaAHMUVKzjWplJQ62tWTIFqStyyO6I9ABdayILVC6JAlPquXPU-fSV_tofyOcUYcuhdoDL15eZkhzTamyHbIXQp0D27ifZA4eFXZ2z7-rJdvlfrj7fVcrGuXCNE5dCM47xyUUqnPSB6EZ0Aa1RUrkajHXLvEJrGO5C4k7ppzC54K8Er68WM8Uuty0eiHGJ7yunT5u8WoZ2Ot3-Pj9D8ApHtQrs_nnM_TvyP-AHAnVe8</recordid><startdate>200209</startdate><enddate>200209</enddate><creator>Sims, Valerie K</creator><creator>Smith, Hana S.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200209</creationdate><title>Assessing Individual Differences in Spatial Strategies</title><author>Sims, Valerie K ; Smith, Hana S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c833-c19177d5cf44c7d011d3fc30a95f5c6197c12dc1088dc041b47889beda40d5ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sims, Valerie K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Hana S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sims, Valerie K</au><au>Smith, Hana S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing Individual Differences in Spatial Strategies</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle><date>2002-09</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>998</spage><epage>1001</epage><pages>998-1001</pages><issn>1541-9312</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><eissn>2169-5067</eissn><abstract>This research examined the strategies, emotions, and beliefs described by participants completing a complex three dimensional spatial task. After completing the task, participants examined a video of themselves performing the task. During the video performance, participants completed a thought listing exercise designed to elicit strategies used, as well participants' beliefs about their own adequacy and the degree of difficulty of the task. These data were coded by two independent observers. Strategies, beliefs, and emotions reported were predicted both by the sex of the participant and the success at the task. Unsuccessful males and females did not differ from one another in their reported strategies, beliefs, or emotions. However, successful males reported many more specific strategies, whereas successful females reported greater emotional regulation. Additionally, trial and error was identified by successful females as their main strategy. Guidelines for eliciting spatial strategies follow.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/154193120204601213</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1541-9312 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2002-09, Vol.46 (12), p.998-1001 |
issn | 1541-9312 1071-1813 2169-5067 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_154193120204601213 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List |
title | Assessing Individual Differences in Spatial Strategies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T13%3A19%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Individual%20Differences%20in%20Spatial%20Strategies&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Human%20Factors%20and%20Ergonomics%20Society%20Annual%20Meeting&rft.au=Sims,%20Valerie%20K&rft.date=2002-09&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=998&rft.epage=1001&rft.pages=998-1001&rft.issn=1541-9312&rft.eissn=2169-5067&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/154193120204601213&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_154193120204601213%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_154193120204601213&rfr_iscdi=true |