Assessing Individual Differences in Spatial Strategies

This research examined the strategies, emotions, and beliefs described by participants completing a complex three dimensional spatial task. After completing the task, participants examined a video of themselves performing the task. During the video performance, participants completed a thought listi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2002-09, Vol.46 (12), p.998-1001
Hauptverfasser: Sims, Valerie K, Smith, Hana S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1001
container_issue 12
container_start_page 998
container_title Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
container_volume 46
creator Sims, Valerie K
Smith, Hana S.
description This research examined the strategies, emotions, and beliefs described by participants completing a complex three dimensional spatial task. After completing the task, participants examined a video of themselves performing the task. During the video performance, participants completed a thought listing exercise designed to elicit strategies used, as well participants' beliefs about their own adequacy and the degree of difficulty of the task. These data were coded by two independent observers. Strategies, beliefs, and emotions reported were predicted both by the sex of the participant and the success at the task. Unsuccessful males and females did not differ from one another in their reported strategies, beliefs, or emotions. However, successful males reported many more specific strategies, whereas successful females reported greater emotional regulation. Additionally, trial and error was identified by successful females as their main strategy. Guidelines for eliciting spatial strategies follow.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/154193120204601213
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_154193120204601213</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_154193120204601213</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_154193120204601213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c833-c19177d5cf44c7d011d3fc30a95f5c6197c12dc1088dc041b47889beda40d5ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j8tqwzAUREVpoW7aH-jKP-DmXj0saxnSVyDQRbI3ih5GIXWCrlPo39cm3RW6GhjmDDOMPSI8IWo9RyXRCOTAQdaAHMUVKzjWplJQ62tWTIFqStyyO6I9ABdayILVC6JAlPquXPU-fSV_tofyOcUYcuhdoDL15eZkhzTamyHbIXQp0D27ifZA4eFXZ2z7-rJdvlfrj7fVcrGuXCNE5dCM47xyUUqnPSB6EZ0Aa1RUrkajHXLvEJrGO5C4k7ppzC54K8Er68WM8Uuty0eiHGJ7yunT5u8WoZ2Ot3-Pj9D8ApHtQrs_nnM_TvyP-AHAnVe8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Individual Differences in Spatial Strategies</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Sims, Valerie K ; Smith, Hana S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sims, Valerie K ; Smith, Hana S.</creatorcontrib><description>This research examined the strategies, emotions, and beliefs described by participants completing a complex three dimensional spatial task. After completing the task, participants examined a video of themselves performing the task. During the video performance, participants completed a thought listing exercise designed to elicit strategies used, as well participants' beliefs about their own adequacy and the degree of difficulty of the task. These data were coded by two independent observers. Strategies, beliefs, and emotions reported were predicted both by the sex of the participant and the success at the task. Unsuccessful males and females did not differ from one another in their reported strategies, beliefs, or emotions. However, successful males reported many more specific strategies, whereas successful females reported greater emotional regulation. Additionally, trial and error was identified by successful females as their main strategy. Guidelines for eliciting spatial strategies follow.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-9312</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1071-1813</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-5067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/154193120204601213</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2002-09, Vol.46 (12), p.998-1001</ispartof><rights>2002 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c833-c19177d5cf44c7d011d3fc30a95f5c6197c12dc1088dc041b47889beda40d5ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/154193120204601213$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/154193120204601213$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sims, Valerie K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Hana S.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Individual Differences in Spatial Strategies</title><title>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</title><description>This research examined the strategies, emotions, and beliefs described by participants completing a complex three dimensional spatial task. After completing the task, participants examined a video of themselves performing the task. During the video performance, participants completed a thought listing exercise designed to elicit strategies used, as well participants' beliefs about their own adequacy and the degree of difficulty of the task. These data were coded by two independent observers. Strategies, beliefs, and emotions reported were predicted both by the sex of the participant and the success at the task. Unsuccessful males and females did not differ from one another in their reported strategies, beliefs, or emotions. However, successful males reported many more specific strategies, whereas successful females reported greater emotional regulation. Additionally, trial and error was identified by successful females as their main strategy. Guidelines for eliciting spatial strategies follow.</description><issn>1541-9312</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><issn>2169-5067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j8tqwzAUREVpoW7aH-jKP-DmXj0saxnSVyDQRbI3ih5GIXWCrlPo39cm3RW6GhjmDDOMPSI8IWo9RyXRCOTAQdaAHMUVKzjWplJQ62tWTIFqStyyO6I9ABdayILVC6JAlPquXPU-fSV_tofyOcUYcuhdoDL15eZkhzTamyHbIXQp0D27ifZA4eFXZ2z7-rJdvlfrj7fVcrGuXCNE5dCM47xyUUqnPSB6EZ0Aa1RUrkajHXLvEJrGO5C4k7ppzC54K8Er68WM8Uuty0eiHGJ7yunT5u8WoZ2Ot3-Pj9D8ApHtQrs_nnM_TvyP-AHAnVe8</recordid><startdate>200209</startdate><enddate>200209</enddate><creator>Sims, Valerie K</creator><creator>Smith, Hana S.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200209</creationdate><title>Assessing Individual Differences in Spatial Strategies</title><author>Sims, Valerie K ; Smith, Hana S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c833-c19177d5cf44c7d011d3fc30a95f5c6197c12dc1088dc041b47889beda40d5ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sims, Valerie K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Hana S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sims, Valerie K</au><au>Smith, Hana S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing Individual Differences in Spatial Strategies</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle><date>2002-09</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>998</spage><epage>1001</epage><pages>998-1001</pages><issn>1541-9312</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><eissn>2169-5067</eissn><abstract>This research examined the strategies, emotions, and beliefs described by participants completing a complex three dimensional spatial task. After completing the task, participants examined a video of themselves performing the task. During the video performance, participants completed a thought listing exercise designed to elicit strategies used, as well participants' beliefs about their own adequacy and the degree of difficulty of the task. These data were coded by two independent observers. Strategies, beliefs, and emotions reported were predicted both by the sex of the participant and the success at the task. Unsuccessful males and females did not differ from one another in their reported strategies, beliefs, or emotions. However, successful males reported many more specific strategies, whereas successful females reported greater emotional regulation. Additionally, trial and error was identified by successful females as their main strategy. Guidelines for eliciting spatial strategies follow.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/154193120204601213</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1541-9312
ispartof Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2002-09, Vol.46 (12), p.998-1001
issn 1541-9312
1071-1813
2169-5067
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_154193120204601213
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Assessing Individual Differences in Spatial Strategies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T13%3A19%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Individual%20Differences%20in%20Spatial%20Strategies&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Human%20Factors%20and%20Ergonomics%20Society%20Annual%20Meeting&rft.au=Sims,%20Valerie%20K&rft.date=2002-09&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=998&rft.epage=1001&rft.pages=998-1001&rft.issn=1541-9312&rft.eissn=2169-5067&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/154193120204601213&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_154193120204601213%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_154193120204601213&rfr_iscdi=true