Extraperitoneal Access to the Abdominal Aorta

The authors report their experience with the use of the extraperitoneal ap proach to the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in 52 patients, observed between 1980 and 1989. In all the cases a left paramedian incision was done. In 35 pa tients with aortoiliac occlusive disease some type of aortoiliac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vascular surgery 1992-06, Vol.26 (5), p.363-368
Hauptverfasser: De Toledo, Francisco Victor, Pereira De Araujo, Adalberto, Werneck, Eduardo, Batista, Rogerio Veras, Torres, Antonio Barra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 368
container_issue 5
container_start_page 363
container_title Vascular surgery
container_volume 26
creator De Toledo, Francisco Victor
Pereira De Araujo, Adalberto
Werneck, Eduardo
Batista, Rogerio Veras
Torres, Antonio Barra
description The authors report their experience with the use of the extraperitoneal ap proach to the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in 52 patients, observed between 1980 and 1989. In all the cases a left paramedian incision was done. In 35 pa tients with aortoiliac occlusive disease some type of aortoiliac or aortofemoral bypass was done. In 14 cases of infrarenal aneurysm of the abdominal aorta, aorto-aortic replacement was done in 5, aortoiliac bypass in 7, and aortofemoral bypass in 2 patients. In 3 patients with occlusive disease of the iliac arteries, throm boendarterectomy was performed. The results with extraperitoneal approach to the abdominal aorta and its main branches in the 52 patients were considered very good, when compared with those when the transperitoneal route was used in 72 cases. In the evaluation of results the authors used the following parameters: blood and fluid loss, operative time, intensive care unit time, pulmonary and cardiac complications, postoperative ileus, beginning or oral feeding, time of hospitalization, and mortality. The extraperitoneal group was associated with less blood less (1,120 mL) than that with the transperitoneal route (1,850 mL) (p
doi_str_mv 10.1177/153857449202600505
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_153857449202600505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_153857449202600505</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_153857449202600505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-216f0a18d0faa54b43e190b72252af0f4df70a0b3664b47949561f8b91a42fec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9jz1LxEAQhrdQ8Dz9A1YpbOPN7GdShuP8gAMbrcNks6s5cknYXUH_vTkiNoLTDMy8zwsPYzcId4jGbFCJQhkpSw5cAyhQZ2wFIHnOC6Eu2GWMBwAURpkVy3efKdDkQpfGwVGfVda6GLM0ZundZVXTjsduON3HkOiKnXvqo7v-2Wv2er972T7m--eHp221zy3XKuUctQfCogVPpGQjhcMSGsO54uTBy9YbIGiE1vPTlLJUGn3RlEiSe2fFmvGl14YxxuB8PYXuSOGrRqhPkvVfyRm6XaCJoqXeBxpsF39JJebBYo5tllikN1cfxo8w68X_ir8Bqshe9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extraperitoneal Access to the Abdominal Aorta</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>De Toledo, Francisco Victor ; Pereira De Araujo, Adalberto ; Werneck, Eduardo ; Batista, Rogerio Veras ; Torres, Antonio Barra</creator><creatorcontrib>De Toledo, Francisco Victor ; Pereira De Araujo, Adalberto ; Werneck, Eduardo ; Batista, Rogerio Veras ; Torres, Antonio Barra</creatorcontrib><description>The authors report their experience with the use of the extraperitoneal ap proach to the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in 52 patients, observed between 1980 and 1989. In all the cases a left paramedian incision was done. In 35 pa tients with aortoiliac occlusive disease some type of aortoiliac or aortofemoral bypass was done. In 14 cases of infrarenal aneurysm of the abdominal aorta, aorto-aortic replacement was done in 5, aortoiliac bypass in 7, and aortofemoral bypass in 2 patients. In 3 patients with occlusive disease of the iliac arteries, throm boendarterectomy was performed. The results with extraperitoneal approach to the abdominal aorta and its main branches in the 52 patients were considered very good, when compared with those when the transperitoneal route was used in 72 cases. In the evaluation of results the authors used the following parameters: blood and fluid loss, operative time, intensive care unit time, pulmonary and cardiac complications, postoperative ileus, beginning or oral feeding, time of hospitalization, and mortality. The extraperitoneal group was associated with less blood less (1,120 mL) than that with the transperitoneal route (1,850 mL) (p&lt;0.01). The operative time was longer with the transperitoneal route. The intensive care unit time was less with the extraperitoneal approach (1.6 days) than with the transperitoneal route (3 days). The cardiopulmonary support time was longer the transperitoneal (2.5 days) than in the extraperitoneal group (1.3 days). Postoperative ileus was not observed in the extraperitoneal group but was present in several cases in the trans peritoneal group. The period of time for the patients to start a solid diet was significantly less in the extraperitoneal group. Finally, the number of deaths was smaller in the extraperitoneal group. Their experience cooroborates the similar conclusions of other authors that the extraperitoneal access is the better option in elective aortic reconstruction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-2835</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/153857449202600505</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VASUA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Medical sciences ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</subject><ispartof>Vascular surgery, 1992-06, Vol.26 (5), p.363-368</ispartof><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-216f0a18d0faa54b43e190b72252af0f4df70a0b3664b47949561f8b91a42fec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/153857449202600505$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/153857449202600505$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21802,27907,27908,43604,43605</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5333318$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Toledo, Francisco Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira De Araujo, Adalberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werneck, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batista, Rogerio Veras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Antonio Barra</creatorcontrib><title>Extraperitoneal Access to the Abdominal Aorta</title><title>Vascular surgery</title><description>The authors report their experience with the use of the extraperitoneal ap proach to the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in 52 patients, observed between 1980 and 1989. In all the cases a left paramedian incision was done. In 35 pa tients with aortoiliac occlusive disease some type of aortoiliac or aortofemoral bypass was done. In 14 cases of infrarenal aneurysm of the abdominal aorta, aorto-aortic replacement was done in 5, aortoiliac bypass in 7, and aortofemoral bypass in 2 patients. In 3 patients with occlusive disease of the iliac arteries, throm boendarterectomy was performed. The results with extraperitoneal approach to the abdominal aorta and its main branches in the 52 patients were considered very good, when compared with those when the transperitoneal route was used in 72 cases. In the evaluation of results the authors used the following parameters: blood and fluid loss, operative time, intensive care unit time, pulmonary and cardiac complications, postoperative ileus, beginning or oral feeding, time of hospitalization, and mortality. The extraperitoneal group was associated with less blood less (1,120 mL) than that with the transperitoneal route (1,850 mL) (p&lt;0.01). The operative time was longer with the transperitoneal route. The intensive care unit time was less with the extraperitoneal approach (1.6 days) than with the transperitoneal route (3 days). The cardiopulmonary support time was longer the transperitoneal (2.5 days) than in the extraperitoneal group (1.3 days). Postoperative ileus was not observed in the extraperitoneal group but was present in several cases in the trans peritoneal group. The period of time for the patients to start a solid diet was significantly less in the extraperitoneal group. Finally, the number of deaths was smaller in the extraperitoneal group. Their experience cooroborates the similar conclusions of other authors that the extraperitoneal access is the better option in elective aortic reconstruction.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</subject><issn>0042-2835</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9jz1LxEAQhrdQ8Dz9A1YpbOPN7GdShuP8gAMbrcNks6s5cknYXUH_vTkiNoLTDMy8zwsPYzcId4jGbFCJQhkpSw5cAyhQZ2wFIHnOC6Eu2GWMBwAURpkVy3efKdDkQpfGwVGfVda6GLM0ZundZVXTjsduON3HkOiKnXvqo7v-2Wv2er972T7m--eHp221zy3XKuUctQfCogVPpGQjhcMSGsO54uTBy9YbIGiE1vPTlLJUGn3RlEiSe2fFmvGl14YxxuB8PYXuSOGrRqhPkvVfyRm6XaCJoqXeBxpsF39JJebBYo5tllikN1cfxo8w68X_ir8Bqshe9A</recordid><startdate>19920601</startdate><enddate>19920601</enddate><creator>De Toledo, Francisco Victor</creator><creator>Pereira De Araujo, Adalberto</creator><creator>Werneck, Eduardo</creator><creator>Batista, Rogerio Veras</creator><creator>Torres, Antonio Barra</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Westminster</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920601</creationdate><title>Extraperitoneal Access to the Abdominal Aorta</title><author>De Toledo, Francisco Victor ; Pereira De Araujo, Adalberto ; Werneck, Eduardo ; Batista, Rogerio Veras ; Torres, Antonio Barra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-216f0a18d0faa54b43e190b72252af0f4df70a0b3664b47949561f8b91a42fec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Toledo, Francisco Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira De Araujo, Adalberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werneck, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batista, Rogerio Veras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Antonio Barra</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Toledo, Francisco Victor</au><au>Pereira De Araujo, Adalberto</au><au>Werneck, Eduardo</au><au>Batista, Rogerio Veras</au><au>Torres, Antonio Barra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Extraperitoneal Access to the Abdominal Aorta</atitle><jtitle>Vascular surgery</jtitle><date>1992-06-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>363</spage><epage>368</epage><pages>363-368</pages><issn>0042-2835</issn><coden>VASUA9</coden><abstract>The authors report their experience with the use of the extraperitoneal ap proach to the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in 52 patients, observed between 1980 and 1989. In all the cases a left paramedian incision was done. In 35 pa tients with aortoiliac occlusive disease some type of aortoiliac or aortofemoral bypass was done. In 14 cases of infrarenal aneurysm of the abdominal aorta, aorto-aortic replacement was done in 5, aortoiliac bypass in 7, and aortofemoral bypass in 2 patients. In 3 patients with occlusive disease of the iliac arteries, throm boendarterectomy was performed. The results with extraperitoneal approach to the abdominal aorta and its main branches in the 52 patients were considered very good, when compared with those when the transperitoneal route was used in 72 cases. In the evaluation of results the authors used the following parameters: blood and fluid loss, operative time, intensive care unit time, pulmonary and cardiac complications, postoperative ileus, beginning or oral feeding, time of hospitalization, and mortality. The extraperitoneal group was associated with less blood less (1,120 mL) than that with the transperitoneal route (1,850 mL) (p&lt;0.01). The operative time was longer with the transperitoneal route. The intensive care unit time was less with the extraperitoneal approach (1.6 days) than with the transperitoneal route (3 days). The cardiopulmonary support time was longer the transperitoneal (2.5 days) than in the extraperitoneal group (1.3 days). Postoperative ileus was not observed in the extraperitoneal group but was present in several cases in the trans peritoneal group. The period of time for the patients to start a solid diet was significantly less in the extraperitoneal group. Finally, the number of deaths was smaller in the extraperitoneal group. Their experience cooroborates the similar conclusions of other authors that the extraperitoneal access is the better option in elective aortic reconstruction.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/153857449202600505</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-2835
ispartof Vascular surgery, 1992-06, Vol.26 (5), p.363-368
issn 0042-2835
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_153857449202600505
source SAGE Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Medical sciences
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels
title Extraperitoneal Access to the Abdominal Aorta
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T06%3A42%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extraperitoneal%20Access%20to%20the%20Abdominal%20Aorta&rft.jtitle=Vascular%20surgery&rft.au=De%20Toledo,%20Francisco%20Victor&rft.date=1992-06-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=363&rft.epage=368&rft.pages=363-368&rft.issn=0042-2835&rft.coden=VASUA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/153857449202600505&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_153857449202600505%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_153857449202600505&rfr_iscdi=true