Educational futures: Conflicting visions for Acirema “The Possible”

The year is 2070, yes, the 50th anniversary of the Roaring Year 2020. The United States of Acirema (Williams, 1997) was dealing with political discord, a struggling economy, a pandemic, and social unrest. Schiro (2013) published a book titled Curriculum Theory: Conflicting Visions and Enduring Conce...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Policy Futures in Education 2023-06, Vol.21 (5), p.546-557
1. Verfasser: Rogers, Richard H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 557
container_issue 5
container_start_page 546
container_title Policy Futures in Education
container_volume 21
creator Rogers, Richard H
description The year is 2070, yes, the 50th anniversary of the Roaring Year 2020. The United States of Acirema (Williams, 1997) was dealing with political discord, a struggling economy, a pandemic, and social unrest. Schiro (2013) published a book titled Curriculum Theory: Conflicting Visions and Enduring Concerns, which focused on four curriculum ideologies/visions: scholar academic, social efficiency, learner centered, and social reconstruction. Aciremas became very adamant on the futures of education and society, and the country quickly became known as the Divided States of Acirema with citizens being divided by their beliefs/visions for education and society. The four visions are best understood through the lens of four former high school friends who each live in different states. To begin with, George treasures the cultural values and knowledge from the past, wants to end the political discord, and unite the United States of Acirema. In contrast, Wally is learning new skills based on society needs, which enables him to be marketable in a struggling economy and the age of artificial intelligence. Next, Covid, who is the narrator, loves his state and is able to learn and live based on his personal interests and beliefs; therefore, this allowed him to conduct an ethnographic study (Fetterman, 1998; Hammersley and Atkinson, 1995) during the pandemic with the goal of uniting Acirema. Last, Justice is committed to ending social unrest by focusing on equality in her state and improving society for all. As Schiro (2013) clearly states in his thesis, these ideologies have conflicting visions for educational futures and are struggling with the ideal of syncretism (Berner U, 2001; Ezenweke and Kanu, 2012). After taking the ideology survey (Schiro, 2013) and discovering your beliefs and values, Covid, the narrator, will ask you to join him by using the Public Values Model (Rogers, 2020) to create syncretism where we can all live together as the United States of Acirema.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/14782103211055353
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_14782103211055353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1382672</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_14782103211055353</sage_id><sourcerecordid>EJ1382672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-65a376fb44614dc880095ccb7685347b3c8786071d193d7286e8970e022f23633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UN1KwzAYDaLgnD6AF0JeoDNf0vzUuzHmVAZ6Ma9LmiYzo1slaQXv9iD6cnsSWyoiCH4338c53zkHDkKXQCYAUl5DKhUFwigA4ZxxdoRGPZb04PGv-xSdxbghhHWjRmgxL1ujG1_vdIVd27TBxhs8q3eu8qbxuzV-87FjI3Z1wFPjg91qfNh_rF4sfqpj9EVlD_vPc3TidBXtxfceo-fb-Wp2lywfF_ez6TIxlKsmEVwzKVyRpgLS0ihFSMaNKaRQnKWyYEZJJYiEEjJWSqqEVZkkllDqKBOMjREMviZ04cG6_DX4rQ7vOZC8byL_00SnuRo0Nnjz8z9_AKaokLTjJwMf9drmm7oNXRnxH8MvycxnPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Educational futures: Conflicting visions for Acirema “The Possible”</title><source>Sage Symposium Collection</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Rogers, Richard H</creator><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Richard H</creatorcontrib><description>The year is 2070, yes, the 50th anniversary of the Roaring Year 2020. The United States of Acirema (Williams, 1997) was dealing with political discord, a struggling economy, a pandemic, and social unrest. Schiro (2013) published a book titled Curriculum Theory: Conflicting Visions and Enduring Concerns, which focused on four curriculum ideologies/visions: scholar academic, social efficiency, learner centered, and social reconstruction. Aciremas became very adamant on the futures of education and society, and the country quickly became known as the Divided States of Acirema with citizens being divided by their beliefs/visions for education and society. The four visions are best understood through the lens of four former high school friends who each live in different states. To begin with, George treasures the cultural values and knowledge from the past, wants to end the political discord, and unite the United States of Acirema. In contrast, Wally is learning new skills based on society needs, which enables him to be marketable in a struggling economy and the age of artificial intelligence. Next, Covid, who is the narrator, loves his state and is able to learn and live based on his personal interests and beliefs; therefore, this allowed him to conduct an ethnographic study (Fetterman, 1998; Hammersley and Atkinson, 1995) during the pandemic with the goal of uniting Acirema. Last, Justice is committed to ending social unrest by focusing on equality in her state and improving society for all. As Schiro (2013) clearly states in his thesis, these ideologies have conflicting visions for educational futures and are struggling with the ideal of syncretism (Berner U, 2001; Ezenweke and Kanu, 2012). After taking the ideology survey (Schiro, 2013) and discovering your beliefs and values, Covid, the narrator, will ask you to join him by using the Public Values Model (Rogers, 2020) to create syncretism where we can all live together as the United States of Acirema.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1478-2103</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-2103</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/14782103211055353</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Beliefs ; COVID-19 ; Curriculum ; Educational Attitudes ; Educational Change ; Futures (of Society) ; Ideology ; Pandemics ; Social Change ; Social Justice ; Social Stratification ; Social Values</subject><ispartof>Policy Futures in Education, 2023-06, Vol.21 (5), p.546-557</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-65a376fb44614dc880095ccb7685347b3c8786071d193d7286e8970e022f23633</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4939-5213</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/14782103211055353$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14782103211055353$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,22052,27901,27902,43597,43598,44829,45217</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1382672$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Richard H</creatorcontrib><title>Educational futures: Conflicting visions for Acirema “The Possible”</title><title>Policy Futures in Education</title><description>The year is 2070, yes, the 50th anniversary of the Roaring Year 2020. The United States of Acirema (Williams, 1997) was dealing with political discord, a struggling economy, a pandemic, and social unrest. Schiro (2013) published a book titled Curriculum Theory: Conflicting Visions and Enduring Concerns, which focused on four curriculum ideologies/visions: scholar academic, social efficiency, learner centered, and social reconstruction. Aciremas became very adamant on the futures of education and society, and the country quickly became known as the Divided States of Acirema with citizens being divided by their beliefs/visions for education and society. The four visions are best understood through the lens of four former high school friends who each live in different states. To begin with, George treasures the cultural values and knowledge from the past, wants to end the political discord, and unite the United States of Acirema. In contrast, Wally is learning new skills based on society needs, which enables him to be marketable in a struggling economy and the age of artificial intelligence. Next, Covid, who is the narrator, loves his state and is able to learn and live based on his personal interests and beliefs; therefore, this allowed him to conduct an ethnographic study (Fetterman, 1998; Hammersley and Atkinson, 1995) during the pandemic with the goal of uniting Acirema. Last, Justice is committed to ending social unrest by focusing on equality in her state and improving society for all. As Schiro (2013) clearly states in his thesis, these ideologies have conflicting visions for educational futures and are struggling with the ideal of syncretism (Berner U, 2001; Ezenweke and Kanu, 2012). After taking the ideology survey (Schiro, 2013) and discovering your beliefs and values, Covid, the narrator, will ask you to join him by using the Public Values Model (Rogers, 2020) to create syncretism where we can all live together as the United States of Acirema.</description><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Educational Attitudes</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Futures (of Society)</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Social Change</subject><subject>Social Justice</subject><subject>Social Stratification</subject><subject>Social Values</subject><issn>1478-2103</issn><issn>1478-2103</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UN1KwzAYDaLgnD6AF0JeoDNf0vzUuzHmVAZ6Ma9LmiYzo1slaQXv9iD6cnsSWyoiCH4338c53zkHDkKXQCYAUl5DKhUFwigA4ZxxdoRGPZb04PGv-xSdxbghhHWjRmgxL1ujG1_vdIVd27TBxhs8q3eu8qbxuzV-87FjI3Z1wFPjg91qfNh_rF4sfqpj9EVlD_vPc3TidBXtxfceo-fb-Wp2lywfF_ez6TIxlKsmEVwzKVyRpgLS0ihFSMaNKaRQnKWyYEZJJYiEEjJWSqqEVZkkllDqKBOMjREMviZ04cG6_DX4rQ7vOZC8byL_00SnuRo0Nnjz8z9_AKaokLTjJwMf9drmm7oNXRnxH8MvycxnPQ</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Rogers, Richard H</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4939-5213</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Educational futures: Conflicting visions for Acirema “The Possible”</title><author>Rogers, Richard H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-65a376fb44614dc880095ccb7685347b3c8786071d193d7286e8970e022f23633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Educational Attitudes</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Futures (of Society)</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Social Change</topic><topic>Social Justice</topic><topic>Social Stratification</topic><topic>Social Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Richard H</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Policy Futures in Education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rogers, Richard H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1382672</ericid><atitle>Educational futures: Conflicting visions for Acirema “The Possible”</atitle><jtitle>Policy Futures in Education</jtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>546</spage><epage>557</epage><pages>546-557</pages><issn>1478-2103</issn><eissn>1478-2103</eissn><abstract>The year is 2070, yes, the 50th anniversary of the Roaring Year 2020. The United States of Acirema (Williams, 1997) was dealing with political discord, a struggling economy, a pandemic, and social unrest. Schiro (2013) published a book titled Curriculum Theory: Conflicting Visions and Enduring Concerns, which focused on four curriculum ideologies/visions: scholar academic, social efficiency, learner centered, and social reconstruction. Aciremas became very adamant on the futures of education and society, and the country quickly became known as the Divided States of Acirema with citizens being divided by their beliefs/visions for education and society. The four visions are best understood through the lens of four former high school friends who each live in different states. To begin with, George treasures the cultural values and knowledge from the past, wants to end the political discord, and unite the United States of Acirema. In contrast, Wally is learning new skills based on society needs, which enables him to be marketable in a struggling economy and the age of artificial intelligence. Next, Covid, who is the narrator, loves his state and is able to learn and live based on his personal interests and beliefs; therefore, this allowed him to conduct an ethnographic study (Fetterman, 1998; Hammersley and Atkinson, 1995) during the pandemic with the goal of uniting Acirema. Last, Justice is committed to ending social unrest by focusing on equality in her state and improving society for all. As Schiro (2013) clearly states in his thesis, these ideologies have conflicting visions for educational futures and are struggling with the ideal of syncretism (Berner U, 2001; Ezenweke and Kanu, 2012). After taking the ideology survey (Schiro, 2013) and discovering your beliefs and values, Covid, the narrator, will ask you to join him by using the Public Values Model (Rogers, 2020) to create syncretism where we can all live together as the United States of Acirema.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/14782103211055353</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4939-5213</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1478-2103
ispartof Policy Futures in Education, 2023-06, Vol.21 (5), p.546-557
issn 1478-2103
1478-2103
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_14782103211055353
source Sage Symposium Collection; SAGE Complete
subjects Beliefs
COVID-19
Curriculum
Educational Attitudes
Educational Change
Futures (of Society)
Ideology
Pandemics
Social Change
Social Justice
Social Stratification
Social Values
title Educational futures: Conflicting visions for Acirema “The Possible”
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T06%3A09%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Educational%20futures:%20Conflicting%20visions%20for%20Acirema%20%E2%80%9CThe%20Possible%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Policy%20Futures%20in%20Education&rft.au=Rogers,%20Richard%20H&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=546&rft.epage=557&rft.pages=546-557&rft.issn=1478-2103&rft.eissn=1478-2103&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/14782103211055353&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ1382672%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1382672&rft_sage_id=10.1177_14782103211055353&rfr_iscdi=true