Fuzzytechie languaging and consilience: Dataphilosophy and transdisciplinary digital force for justice
Digitalization of our educational systems is moving faster and deeper into our institutions. I applaud it because it has the potential to save time and effort, allowing me to spend more time on the most important part of my work as a scholar. But I am regularly sick to my stomach about what I applau...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Policy futures in education 2020-05, Vol.18 (4), p.453-466 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 466 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 453 |
container_title | Policy futures in education |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Reinertsen, Anne B |
description | Digitalization of our educational systems is moving faster and deeper into our institutions. I applaud it because it has the potential to save time and effort, allowing me to spend more time on the most important part of my work as a scholar. But I am regularly sick to my stomach about what I applaud, because there is no potential and any news or justice in it unless I conquer it. Moreover, unless I do- conquer that is, it works as much against (non)knowledges as the opposite, and this is speeding up. Hence, I speculate with the concepts of speed and force. I ask, how is it possible to add or speed up and strengthen digital diversity for justice to highlight the entangled contours of knowledges, inequality, equality and quality in education? My gut feeling tells me that my subjective professionalism is under siege and that I need to take back the concept of objectivity to survive. It is paradoxically slow but fast, paradoxically objective but subjective, strong but weak. It implies a liberating loss of control to importance. Education becoming eventicized, professionals and teachers becoming transdisciplinary dataphilosophers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1478210319900599 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1478210319900599</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1253848</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1478210319900599</sage_id><sourcerecordid>EJ1253848</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-320e775b08e013aa5a74feefd125a65b00de16337f9e0f76baa901dfc8eabf1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1PwzAMjRBIjMGdC1L-QMFp1qblhsY2QJO4wLnyUqfLVNIqaQ_br6dlCCEkfLCt9_z8xdi1gFshlLoTM5XFAqTIc4Akz0_YZISiETv9lZ-zixB2AHKwbMLMsj8c9h3prSVeo6t6rKyrOLqS68YFW1tymu75I3bYbm3dhKbd7r_4zqMLpQ3atrV16Pe8tJXtsOam8ZpGz3d96KymS3ZmsA509R2n7H25eJs_RevX1fP8YR3pOEm7SMZASiUbyAiERExQzQyRKUWcYDrgUJJIpVQmJzAq3SDmIEqjM8KNEVpOGRz7at-E4MkUrbcfw2qFgGL8U_H3T4Pk5ighb_VP-eJlGCmzWTbw0ZEPWFGxa3rvhgv-7_cJ6c10Tw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fuzzytechie languaging and consilience: Dataphilosophy and transdisciplinary digital force for justice</title><source>Sage Symposium Collection</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Reinertsen, Anne B</creator><creatorcontrib>Reinertsen, Anne B</creatorcontrib><description>Digitalization of our educational systems is moving faster and deeper into our institutions. I applaud it because it has the potential to save time and effort, allowing me to spend more time on the most important part of my work as a scholar. But I am regularly sick to my stomach about what I applaud, because there is no potential and any news or justice in it unless I conquer it. Moreover, unless I do- conquer that is, it works as much against (non)knowledges as the opposite, and this is speeding up. Hence, I speculate with the concepts of speed and force. I ask, how is it possible to add or speed up and strengthen digital diversity for justice to highlight the entangled contours of knowledges, inequality, equality and quality in education? My gut feeling tells me that my subjective professionalism is under siege and that I need to take back the concept of objectivity to survive. It is paradoxically slow but fast, paradoxically objective but subjective, strong but weak. It implies a liberating loss of control to importance. Education becoming eventicized, professionals and teachers becoming transdisciplinary dataphilosophers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1478-2103</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-2103</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1478210319900599</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Educational Benefits ; Educational Philosophy ; Educational Quality ; Electronic Learning ; Epistemology ; Equal Education ; Higher Education ; Influence of Technology ; Interdisciplinary Approach ; Justice ; Scholarship ; Technology Uses in Education</subject><ispartof>Policy futures in education, 2020-05, Vol.18 (4), p.453-466</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-320e775b08e013aa5a74feefd125a65b00de16337f9e0f76baa901dfc8eabf1c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0467-4515</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1478210319900599$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1478210319900599$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21806,22060,27911,27912,43608,43609,44840,45228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1253848$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reinertsen, Anne B</creatorcontrib><title>Fuzzytechie languaging and consilience: Dataphilosophy and transdisciplinary digital force for justice</title><title>Policy futures in education</title><description>Digitalization of our educational systems is moving faster and deeper into our institutions. I applaud it because it has the potential to save time and effort, allowing me to spend more time on the most important part of my work as a scholar. But I am regularly sick to my stomach about what I applaud, because there is no potential and any news or justice in it unless I conquer it. Moreover, unless I do- conquer that is, it works as much against (non)knowledges as the opposite, and this is speeding up. Hence, I speculate with the concepts of speed and force. I ask, how is it possible to add or speed up and strengthen digital diversity for justice to highlight the entangled contours of knowledges, inequality, equality and quality in education? My gut feeling tells me that my subjective professionalism is under siege and that I need to take back the concept of objectivity to survive. It is paradoxically slow but fast, paradoxically objective but subjective, strong but weak. It implies a liberating loss of control to importance. Education becoming eventicized, professionals and teachers becoming transdisciplinary dataphilosophers.</description><subject>Educational Benefits</subject><subject>Educational Philosophy</subject><subject>Educational Quality</subject><subject>Electronic Learning</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Equal Education</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Influence of Technology</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Approach</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Scholarship</subject><subject>Technology Uses in Education</subject><issn>1478-2103</issn><issn>1478-2103</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UE1PwzAMjRBIjMGdC1L-QMFp1qblhsY2QJO4wLnyUqfLVNIqaQ_br6dlCCEkfLCt9_z8xdi1gFshlLoTM5XFAqTIc4Akz0_YZISiETv9lZ-zixB2AHKwbMLMsj8c9h3prSVeo6t6rKyrOLqS68YFW1tymu75I3bYbm3dhKbd7r_4zqMLpQ3atrV16Pe8tJXtsOam8ZpGz3d96KymS3ZmsA509R2n7H25eJs_RevX1fP8YR3pOEm7SMZASiUbyAiERExQzQyRKUWcYDrgUJJIpVQmJzAq3SDmIEqjM8KNEVpOGRz7at-E4MkUrbcfw2qFgGL8U_H3T4Pk5ighb_VP-eJlGCmzWTbw0ZEPWFGxa3rvhgv-7_cJ6c10Tw</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Reinertsen, Anne B</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0467-4515</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Fuzzytechie languaging and consilience: Dataphilosophy and transdisciplinary digital force for justice</title><author>Reinertsen, Anne B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-320e775b08e013aa5a74feefd125a65b00de16337f9e0f76baa901dfc8eabf1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Educational Benefits</topic><topic>Educational Philosophy</topic><topic>Educational Quality</topic><topic>Electronic Learning</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Equal Education</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Influence of Technology</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Approach</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Scholarship</topic><topic>Technology Uses in Education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reinertsen, Anne B</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Policy futures in education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reinertsen, Anne B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1253848</ericid><atitle>Fuzzytechie languaging and consilience: Dataphilosophy and transdisciplinary digital force for justice</atitle><jtitle>Policy futures in education</jtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>453</spage><epage>466</epage><pages>453-466</pages><issn>1478-2103</issn><eissn>1478-2103</eissn><abstract>Digitalization of our educational systems is moving faster and deeper into our institutions. I applaud it because it has the potential to save time and effort, allowing me to spend more time on the most important part of my work as a scholar. But I am regularly sick to my stomach about what I applaud, because there is no potential and any news or justice in it unless I conquer it. Moreover, unless I do- conquer that is, it works as much against (non)knowledges as the opposite, and this is speeding up. Hence, I speculate with the concepts of speed and force. I ask, how is it possible to add or speed up and strengthen digital diversity for justice to highlight the entangled contours of knowledges, inequality, equality and quality in education? My gut feeling tells me that my subjective professionalism is under siege and that I need to take back the concept of objectivity to survive. It is paradoxically slow but fast, paradoxically objective but subjective, strong but weak. It implies a liberating loss of control to importance. Education becoming eventicized, professionals and teachers becoming transdisciplinary dataphilosophers.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1478210319900599</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0467-4515</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1478-2103 |
ispartof | Policy futures in education, 2020-05, Vol.18 (4), p.453-466 |
issn | 1478-2103 1478-2103 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1478210319900599 |
source | Sage Symposium Collection; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Educational Benefits Educational Philosophy Educational Quality Electronic Learning Epistemology Equal Education Higher Education Influence of Technology Interdisciplinary Approach Justice Scholarship Technology Uses in Education |
title | Fuzzytechie languaging and consilience: Dataphilosophy and transdisciplinary digital force for justice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T01%3A16%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fuzzytechie%20languaging%20and%20consilience:%20Dataphilosophy%20and%20transdisciplinary%20digital%20force%20for%20justice&rft.jtitle=Policy%20futures%20in%20education&rft.au=Reinertsen,%20Anne%20B&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=453&rft.epage=466&rft.pages=453-466&rft.issn=1478-2103&rft.eissn=1478-2103&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1478210319900599&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ1253848%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1253848&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1478210319900599&rfr_iscdi=true |