The legal justification for donor optimisation procedures

The legal justification for donor optimisation procedures

Current organ procurement policies in the UK include ante-mortem interventions to facilitate organ donation. However, a clear and unambiguous legal framework for these procedures does not currently exist. The Human Tissue Act (HTA) 2004 does not provide authority for donor optimisation procedures be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical ethics 2016-12, Vol.11 (4), p.122-129
1. Verfasser: Brown, Sarah-Jane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 129
container_issue 4
container_start_page 122
container_title Clinical ethics
container_volume 11
creator Brown, Sarah-Jane
description Current organ procurement policies in the UK include ante-mortem interventions to facilitate organ donation. However, a clear and unambiguous legal framework for these procedures does not currently exist. The Human Tissue Act (HTA) 2004 does not provide authority for donor optimisation procedures before death, and there are a number of difficulties in encompassing these procedures within the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 provisions on best interests. This article proposes a system of specific advance consent to enable best interests to take on its ascribed role as the legal justification for donor optimisation procedures.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1477750916657665
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1477750916657665</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1477750916657665</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1477750916657665</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2385-75f7f31ab051978c522b8e3ab2fe40f373318b22065570180fcb52da417ae0ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1T01PwzAMjRBIjMGdY_9AwU6aJj2iiS9pEpchcauSNBmpuqZK2gP_nkzjhLTDsy0_P9uPkHuEB0QhHrESQnBosK65yLggKxRclgj4dZnrTJdH_prcpNQDcJmxIs3u2xaD3auh6Jc0e-eNmn0YCxdi0YUxxzDN_uDTqT3FYGy3RJtuyZVTQ7J3f3lNPl-ed5u3cvvx-r552paGMsnzTSccQ6WBYyOk4ZRqaZnS1NkKHBOModSUQs25AJTgjOa0UxUKZUFptiZw2mtiSCla107RH1T8aRHao_X2v_UsKU-SpPa27cMSx_zh-flfB1FYcQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The legal justification for donor optimisation procedures</title><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Brown, Sarah-Jane</creator><creatorcontrib>Brown, Sarah-Jane</creatorcontrib><description>Current organ procurement policies in the UK include ante-mortem interventions to facilitate organ donation. However, a clear and unambiguous legal framework for these procedures does not currently exist. The Human Tissue Act (HTA) 2004 does not provide authority for donor optimisation procedures before death, and there are a number of difficulties in encompassing these procedures within the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 provisions on best interests. This article proposes a system of specific advance consent to enable best interests to take on its ascribed role as the legal justification for donor optimisation procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-7509</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-101X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1477750916657665</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Clinical ethics, 2016-12, Vol.11 (4), p.122-129</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2385-75f7f31ab051978c522b8e3ab2fe40f373318b22065570180fcb52da417ae0ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2385-75f7f31ab051978c522b8e3ab2fe40f373318b22065570180fcb52da417ae0ab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1477750916657665$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1477750916657665$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brown, Sarah-Jane</creatorcontrib><title>The legal justification for donor optimisation procedures</title><title>Clinical ethics</title><description>Current organ procurement policies in the UK include ante-mortem interventions to facilitate organ donation. However, a clear and unambiguous legal framework for these procedures does not currently exist. The Human Tissue Act (HTA) 2004 does not provide authority for donor optimisation procedures before death, and there are a number of difficulties in encompassing these procedures within the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 provisions on best interests. This article proposes a system of specific advance consent to enable best interests to take on its ascribed role as the legal justification for donor optimisation procedures.</description><issn>1477-7509</issn><issn>1758-101X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1T01PwzAMjRBIjMGdY_9AwU6aJj2iiS9pEpchcauSNBmpuqZK2gP_nkzjhLTDsy0_P9uPkHuEB0QhHrESQnBosK65yLggKxRclgj4dZnrTJdH_prcpNQDcJmxIs3u2xaD3auh6Jc0e-eNmn0YCxdi0YUxxzDN_uDTqT3FYGy3RJtuyZVTQ7J3f3lNPl-ed5u3cvvx-r552paGMsnzTSccQ6WBYyOk4ZRqaZnS1NkKHBOModSUQs25AJTgjOa0UxUKZUFptiZw2mtiSCla107RH1T8aRHao_X2v_UsKU-SpPa27cMSx_zh-flfB1FYcQ</recordid><startdate>201612</startdate><enddate>201612</enddate><creator>Brown, Sarah-Jane</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201612</creationdate><title>The legal justification for donor optimisation procedures</title><author>Brown, Sarah-Jane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2385-75f7f31ab051978c522b8e3ab2fe40f373318b22065570180fcb52da417ae0ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, Sarah-Jane</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Clinical ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, Sarah-Jane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The legal justification for donor optimisation procedures</atitle><jtitle>Clinical ethics</jtitle><date>2016-12</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>122</spage><epage>129</epage><pages>122-129</pages><issn>1477-7509</issn><eissn>1758-101X</eissn><abstract>Current organ procurement policies in the UK include ante-mortem interventions to facilitate organ donation. However, a clear and unambiguous legal framework for these procedures does not currently exist. The Human Tissue Act (HTA) 2004 does not provide authority for donor optimisation procedures before death, and there are a number of difficulties in encompassing these procedures within the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 provisions on best interests. This article proposes a system of specific advance consent to enable best interests to take on its ascribed role as the legal justification for donor optimisation procedures.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1477750916657665</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1477-7509
ispartof Clinical ethics, 2016-12, Vol.11 (4), p.122-129
issn 1477-7509
1758-101X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1477750916657665
source SAGE Journals
title The legal justification for donor optimisation procedures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T14%3A23%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20legal%20justification%20for%20donor%20optimisation%20procedures&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20ethics&rft.au=Brown,%20Sarah-Jane&rft.date=2016-12&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=122&rft.epage=129&rft.pages=122-129&rft.issn=1477-7509&rft.eissn=1758-101X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1477750916657665&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1477750916657665%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1477750916657665&rfr_iscdi=true