Effects of Temporary Mark Withholding on Academic Performance

Although feedback engagement is important for learning, students often do not engage with provided feedback to inform future assignments. One factor for low feedback uptake is the easy access to grades. Thus, systematically delaying the grade release in favor of providing feedback first—temporary ma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychology learning and teaching 2021-11, Vol.20 (3), p.405-419
Hauptverfasser: Kuepper-Tetzel, Carolina E., Gardner, Paul L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 419
container_issue 3
container_start_page 405
container_title Psychology learning and teaching
container_volume 20
creator Kuepper-Tetzel, Carolina E.
Gardner, Paul L.
description Although feedback engagement is important for learning, students often do not engage with provided feedback to inform future assignments. One factor for low feedback uptake is the easy access to grades. Thus, systematically delaying the grade release in favor of providing feedback first—temporary mark withholding—may increase students’ engagement with feedback. We tested the hypothesis that temporary mark withholding would have positive effects on (a) future academic performance (Experiments 1 and 2) and (b) feedback engagement (Experiment 2) in authentic psychology university settings. For Experiment 1, 116 Year 2 students were randomly assigned to either a Grade-before-feedback or Feedback-before-grade condition for their report in semester 1 and performance was measured on a similar assessment in semester 2. In Experiment 2, a Year 3 student cohort (t) was provided with feedback on their lab report before marks were released in semester 1 (mark withholding group, N = 97) and compared to the previous Year 3 cohort (t-1) where individual feedback and grades were released simultaneously (historical control group, N = 90). Using this multi-methodological approach, we reveal positive effects of temporary mark withholding on future academic performance and students’ feedback engagement in authentic higher education settings. Practical implications are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1475725721999958
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1475725721999958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1314798</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1475725721999958</sage_id><sourcerecordid>EJ1314798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-fb0184b57891f3053d447c9bd2474b24687ef1828ebb973380fca3d7eaed77693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMFKAzEQDaJgqb17EfIDq8kmu0kOHkqpVqnooeJxSbKTdmt3U5L14N-bZUVEcBiY4c28x8xD6JKSa0qFuKFcFCJPSVWKQp6gyQBlA3b6qz9Hsxj3JAUvSk7yCbpdOge2j9g7vIH26IMOn_hJh3f81vS7nT_UTbfFvsNzq2toG4tfIDgfWt1ZuEBnTh8izL7rFL3eLTeLVbZ-vn9YzNeZZYr1mTOESm4KIRV1jBSs5lxYZeqcC25yXkoBjspcgjFKMCaJs5rVAjTUQpSKTREZdW3wMQZw1TE0bbq0oqQaHKj-OpAoVyMFQmN_1pePlKVVNcyzcR71Fqq9_whd-uB_vS-5ymNO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Temporary Mark Withholding on Academic Performance</title><source>Sage Symposium Collection</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Kuepper-Tetzel, Carolina E. ; Gardner, Paul L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuepper-Tetzel, Carolina E. ; Gardner, Paul L.</creatorcontrib><description>Although feedback engagement is important for learning, students often do not engage with provided feedback to inform future assignments. One factor for low feedback uptake is the easy access to grades. Thus, systematically delaying the grade release in favor of providing feedback first—temporary mark withholding—may increase students’ engagement with feedback. We tested the hypothesis that temporary mark withholding would have positive effects on (a) future academic performance (Experiments 1 and 2) and (b) feedback engagement (Experiment 2) in authentic psychology university settings. For Experiment 1, 116 Year 2 students were randomly assigned to either a Grade-before-feedback or Feedback-before-grade condition for their report in semester 1 and performance was measured on a similar assessment in semester 2. In Experiment 2, a Year 3 student cohort (t) was provided with feedback on their lab report before marks were released in semester 1 (mark withholding group, N = 97) and compared to the previous Year 3 cohort (t-1) where individual feedback and grades were released simultaneously (historical control group, N = 90). Using this multi-methodological approach, we reveal positive effects of temporary mark withholding on future academic performance and students’ feedback engagement in authentic higher education settings. Practical implications are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1475-7257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-7257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2057-3022</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1475725721999958</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Assignments ; Comparative Analysis ; Educational Strategies ; Feedback (Response) ; Foreign Countries ; Futures (of Society) ; Grades (Scholastic) ; Higher Education ; Learner Engagement ; Learning Processes ; Psychology ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Psychology learning and teaching, 2021-11, Vol.20 (3), p.405-419</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-fb0184b57891f3053d447c9bd2474b24687ef1828ebb973380fca3d7eaed77693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-fb0184b57891f3053d447c9bd2474b24687ef1828ebb973380fca3d7eaed77693</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0830-7915</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1475725721999958$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1475725721999958$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,22073,27924,27925,43621,43622,44853,45241</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1314798$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuepper-Tetzel, Carolina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Paul L.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Temporary Mark Withholding on Academic Performance</title><title>Psychology learning and teaching</title><description>Although feedback engagement is important for learning, students often do not engage with provided feedback to inform future assignments. One factor for low feedback uptake is the easy access to grades. Thus, systematically delaying the grade release in favor of providing feedback first—temporary mark withholding—may increase students’ engagement with feedback. We tested the hypothesis that temporary mark withholding would have positive effects on (a) future academic performance (Experiments 1 and 2) and (b) feedback engagement (Experiment 2) in authentic psychology university settings. For Experiment 1, 116 Year 2 students were randomly assigned to either a Grade-before-feedback or Feedback-before-grade condition for their report in semester 1 and performance was measured on a similar assessment in semester 2. In Experiment 2, a Year 3 student cohort (t) was provided with feedback on their lab report before marks were released in semester 1 (mark withholding group, N = 97) and compared to the previous Year 3 cohort (t-1) where individual feedback and grades were released simultaneously (historical control group, N = 90). Using this multi-methodological approach, we reveal positive effects of temporary mark withholding on future academic performance and students’ feedback engagement in authentic higher education settings. Practical implications are discussed.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Assignments</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Educational Strategies</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Futures (of Society)</subject><subject>Grades (Scholastic)</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>1475-7257</issn><issn>1475-7257</issn><issn>2057-3022</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMFKAzEQDaJgqb17EfIDq8kmu0kOHkqpVqnooeJxSbKTdmt3U5L14N-bZUVEcBiY4c28x8xD6JKSa0qFuKFcFCJPSVWKQp6gyQBlA3b6qz9Hsxj3JAUvSk7yCbpdOge2j9g7vIH26IMOn_hJh3f81vS7nT_UTbfFvsNzq2toG4tfIDgfWt1ZuEBnTh8izL7rFL3eLTeLVbZ-vn9YzNeZZYr1mTOESm4KIRV1jBSs5lxYZeqcC25yXkoBjspcgjFKMCaJs5rVAjTUQpSKTREZdW3wMQZw1TE0bbq0oqQaHKj-OpAoVyMFQmN_1pePlKVVNcyzcR71Fqq9_whd-uB_vS-5ymNO</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Kuepper-Tetzel, Carolina E.</creator><creator>Gardner, Paul L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0830-7915</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Effects of Temporary Mark Withholding on Academic Performance</title><author>Kuepper-Tetzel, Carolina E. ; Gardner, Paul L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-fb0184b57891f3053d447c9bd2474b24687ef1828ebb973380fca3d7eaed77693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Assignments</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Educational Strategies</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Futures (of Society)</topic><topic>Grades (Scholastic)</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuepper-Tetzel, Carolina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Paul L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Psychology learning and teaching</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuepper-Tetzel, Carolina E.</au><au>Gardner, Paul L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1314798</ericid><atitle>Effects of Temporary Mark Withholding on Academic Performance</atitle><jtitle>Psychology learning and teaching</jtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>405-419</pages><issn>1475-7257</issn><eissn>1475-7257</eissn><eissn>2057-3022</eissn><abstract>Although feedback engagement is important for learning, students often do not engage with provided feedback to inform future assignments. One factor for low feedback uptake is the easy access to grades. Thus, systematically delaying the grade release in favor of providing feedback first—temporary mark withholding—may increase students’ engagement with feedback. We tested the hypothesis that temporary mark withholding would have positive effects on (a) future academic performance (Experiments 1 and 2) and (b) feedback engagement (Experiment 2) in authentic psychology university settings. For Experiment 1, 116 Year 2 students were randomly assigned to either a Grade-before-feedback or Feedback-before-grade condition for their report in semester 1 and performance was measured on a similar assessment in semester 2. In Experiment 2, a Year 3 student cohort (t) was provided with feedback on their lab report before marks were released in semester 1 (mark withholding group, N = 97) and compared to the previous Year 3 cohort (t-1) where individual feedback and grades were released simultaneously (historical control group, N = 90). Using this multi-methodological approach, we reveal positive effects of temporary mark withholding on future academic performance and students’ feedback engagement in authentic higher education settings. Practical implications are discussed.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1475725721999958</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0830-7915</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1475-7257
ispartof Psychology learning and teaching, 2021-11, Vol.20 (3), p.405-419
issn 1475-7257
1475-7257
2057-3022
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1475725721999958
source Sage Symposium Collection; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Academic Achievement
Assignments
Comparative Analysis
Educational Strategies
Feedback (Response)
Foreign Countries
Futures (of Society)
Grades (Scholastic)
Higher Education
Learner Engagement
Learning Processes
Psychology
Undergraduate Students
title Effects of Temporary Mark Withholding on Academic Performance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A31%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Temporary%20Mark%20Withholding%20on%20Academic%20Performance&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20learning%20and%20teaching&rft.au=Kuepper-Tetzel,%20Carolina%20E.&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=405-419&rft.issn=1475-7257&rft.eissn=1475-7257&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1475725721999958&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ1314798%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1314798&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1475725721999958&rfr_iscdi=true