Effects of Temporary Mark Withholding on Academic Performance
Although feedback engagement is important for learning, students often do not engage with provided feedback to inform future assignments. One factor for low feedback uptake is the easy access to grades. Thus, systematically delaying the grade release in favor of providing feedback first—temporary ma...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychology learning and teaching 2021-11, Vol.20 (3), p.405-419 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 419 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 405 |
container_title | Psychology learning and teaching |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Kuepper-Tetzel, Carolina E. Gardner, Paul L. |
description | Although feedback engagement is important for learning, students often do not engage with provided feedback to inform future assignments. One factor for low feedback uptake is the easy access to grades. Thus, systematically delaying the grade release in favor of providing feedback first—temporary mark withholding—may increase students’ engagement with feedback. We tested the hypothesis that temporary mark withholding would have positive effects on (a) future academic performance (Experiments 1 and 2) and (b) feedback engagement (Experiment 2) in authentic psychology university settings. For Experiment 1, 116 Year 2 students were randomly assigned to either a Grade-before-feedback or Feedback-before-grade condition for their report in semester 1 and performance was measured on a similar assessment in semester 2. In Experiment 2, a Year 3 student cohort (t) was provided with feedback on their lab report before marks were released in semester 1 (mark withholding group, N = 97) and compared to the previous Year 3 cohort (t-1) where individual feedback and grades were released simultaneously (historical control group, N = 90). Using this multi-methodological approach, we reveal positive effects of temporary mark withholding on future academic performance and students’ feedback engagement in authentic higher education settings. Practical implications are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1475725721999958 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1475725721999958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1314798</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1475725721999958</sage_id><sourcerecordid>EJ1314798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-fb0184b57891f3053d447c9bd2474b24687ef1828ebb973380fca3d7eaed77693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMFKAzEQDaJgqb17EfIDq8kmu0kOHkqpVqnooeJxSbKTdmt3U5L14N-bZUVEcBiY4c28x8xD6JKSa0qFuKFcFCJPSVWKQp6gyQBlA3b6qz9Hsxj3JAUvSk7yCbpdOge2j9g7vIH26IMOn_hJh3f81vS7nT_UTbfFvsNzq2toG4tfIDgfWt1ZuEBnTh8izL7rFL3eLTeLVbZ-vn9YzNeZZYr1mTOESm4KIRV1jBSs5lxYZeqcC25yXkoBjspcgjFKMCaJs5rVAjTUQpSKTREZdW3wMQZw1TE0bbq0oqQaHKj-OpAoVyMFQmN_1pePlKVVNcyzcR71Fqq9_whd-uB_vS-5ymNO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Temporary Mark Withholding on Academic Performance</title><source>Sage Symposium Collection</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Kuepper-Tetzel, Carolina E. ; Gardner, Paul L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuepper-Tetzel, Carolina E. ; Gardner, Paul L.</creatorcontrib><description>Although feedback engagement is important for learning, students often do not engage with provided feedback to inform future assignments. One factor for low feedback uptake is the easy access to grades. Thus, systematically delaying the grade release in favor of providing feedback first—temporary mark withholding—may increase students’ engagement with feedback. We tested the hypothesis that temporary mark withholding would have positive effects on (a) future academic performance (Experiments 1 and 2) and (b) feedback engagement (Experiment 2) in authentic psychology university settings. For Experiment 1, 116 Year 2 students were randomly assigned to either a Grade-before-feedback or Feedback-before-grade condition for their report in semester 1 and performance was measured on a similar assessment in semester 2. In Experiment 2, a Year 3 student cohort (t) was provided with feedback on their lab report before marks were released in semester 1 (mark withholding group, N = 97) and compared to the previous Year 3 cohort (t-1) where individual feedback and grades were released simultaneously (historical control group, N = 90). Using this multi-methodological approach, we reveal positive effects of temporary mark withholding on future academic performance and students’ feedback engagement in authentic higher education settings. Practical implications are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1475-7257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-7257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2057-3022</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1475725721999958</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Assignments ; Comparative Analysis ; Educational Strategies ; Feedback (Response) ; Foreign Countries ; Futures (of Society) ; Grades (Scholastic) ; Higher Education ; Learner Engagement ; Learning Processes ; Psychology ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Psychology learning and teaching, 2021-11, Vol.20 (3), p.405-419</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-fb0184b57891f3053d447c9bd2474b24687ef1828ebb973380fca3d7eaed77693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-fb0184b57891f3053d447c9bd2474b24687ef1828ebb973380fca3d7eaed77693</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0830-7915</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1475725721999958$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1475725721999958$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,22073,27924,27925,43621,43622,44853,45241</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1314798$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuepper-Tetzel, Carolina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Paul L.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Temporary Mark Withholding on Academic Performance</title><title>Psychology learning and teaching</title><description>Although feedback engagement is important for learning, students often do not engage with provided feedback to inform future assignments. One factor for low feedback uptake is the easy access to grades. Thus, systematically delaying the grade release in favor of providing feedback first—temporary mark withholding—may increase students’ engagement with feedback. We tested the hypothesis that temporary mark withholding would have positive effects on (a) future academic performance (Experiments 1 and 2) and (b) feedback engagement (Experiment 2) in authentic psychology university settings. For Experiment 1, 116 Year 2 students were randomly assigned to either a Grade-before-feedback or Feedback-before-grade condition for their report in semester 1 and performance was measured on a similar assessment in semester 2. In Experiment 2, a Year 3 student cohort (t) was provided with feedback on their lab report before marks were released in semester 1 (mark withholding group, N = 97) and compared to the previous Year 3 cohort (t-1) where individual feedback and grades were released simultaneously (historical control group, N = 90). Using this multi-methodological approach, we reveal positive effects of temporary mark withholding on future academic performance and students’ feedback engagement in authentic higher education settings. Practical implications are discussed.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Assignments</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Educational Strategies</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Futures (of Society)</subject><subject>Grades (Scholastic)</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>1475-7257</issn><issn>1475-7257</issn><issn>2057-3022</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMFKAzEQDaJgqb17EfIDq8kmu0kOHkqpVqnooeJxSbKTdmt3U5L14N-bZUVEcBiY4c28x8xD6JKSa0qFuKFcFCJPSVWKQp6gyQBlA3b6qz9Hsxj3JAUvSk7yCbpdOge2j9g7vIH26IMOn_hJh3f81vS7nT_UTbfFvsNzq2toG4tfIDgfWt1ZuEBnTh8izL7rFL3eLTeLVbZ-vn9YzNeZZYr1mTOESm4KIRV1jBSs5lxYZeqcC25yXkoBjspcgjFKMCaJs5rVAjTUQpSKTREZdW3wMQZw1TE0bbq0oqQaHKj-OpAoVyMFQmN_1pePlKVVNcyzcR71Fqq9_whd-uB_vS-5ymNO</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Kuepper-Tetzel, Carolina E.</creator><creator>Gardner, Paul L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0830-7915</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Effects of Temporary Mark Withholding on Academic Performance</title><author>Kuepper-Tetzel, Carolina E. ; Gardner, Paul L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-fb0184b57891f3053d447c9bd2474b24687ef1828ebb973380fca3d7eaed77693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Assignments</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Educational Strategies</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Futures (of Society)</topic><topic>Grades (Scholastic)</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuepper-Tetzel, Carolina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Paul L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Psychology learning and teaching</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuepper-Tetzel, Carolina E.</au><au>Gardner, Paul L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1314798</ericid><atitle>Effects of Temporary Mark Withholding on Academic Performance</atitle><jtitle>Psychology learning and teaching</jtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>405-419</pages><issn>1475-7257</issn><eissn>1475-7257</eissn><eissn>2057-3022</eissn><abstract>Although feedback engagement is important for learning, students often do not engage with provided feedback to inform future assignments. One factor for low feedback uptake is the easy access to grades. Thus, systematically delaying the grade release in favor of providing feedback first—temporary mark withholding—may increase students’ engagement with feedback. We tested the hypothesis that temporary mark withholding would have positive effects on (a) future academic performance (Experiments 1 and 2) and (b) feedback engagement (Experiment 2) in authentic psychology university settings. For Experiment 1, 116 Year 2 students were randomly assigned to either a Grade-before-feedback or Feedback-before-grade condition for their report in semester 1 and performance was measured on a similar assessment in semester 2. In Experiment 2, a Year 3 student cohort (t) was provided with feedback on their lab report before marks were released in semester 1 (mark withholding group, N = 97) and compared to the previous Year 3 cohort (t-1) where individual feedback and grades were released simultaneously (historical control group, N = 90). Using this multi-methodological approach, we reveal positive effects of temporary mark withholding on future academic performance and students’ feedback engagement in authentic higher education settings. Practical implications are discussed.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1475725721999958</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0830-7915</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1475-7257 |
ispartof | Psychology learning and teaching, 2021-11, Vol.20 (3), p.405-419 |
issn | 1475-7257 1475-7257 2057-3022 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1475725721999958 |
source | Sage Symposium Collection; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Academic Achievement Assignments Comparative Analysis Educational Strategies Feedback (Response) Foreign Countries Futures (of Society) Grades (Scholastic) Higher Education Learner Engagement Learning Processes Psychology Undergraduate Students |
title | Effects of Temporary Mark Withholding on Academic Performance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A31%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Temporary%20Mark%20Withholding%20on%20Academic%20Performance&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20learning%20and%20teaching&rft.au=Kuepper-Tetzel,%20Carolina%20E.&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=405-419&rft.issn=1475-7257&rft.eissn=1475-7257&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1475725721999958&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ1314798%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1314798&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1475725721999958&rfr_iscdi=true |