Reparative interpellation: public art’s Indigenous and non-human publics

This article considers the multiple ways in which public art interpellates viewers as settlers, Indigenous and non-human subjects. It could be argued that much public artwork in the late 20th and early 21st century has a ‘reparative’ function through its socially-engaged, community-specific and cons...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of visual culture 2022-04, Vol.21 (1), p.69-84
1. Verfasser: Robinson, Dylan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 84
container_issue 1
container_start_page 69
container_title Journal of visual culture
container_volume 21
creator Robinson, Dylan
description This article considers the multiple ways in which public art interpellates viewers as settlers, Indigenous and non-human subjects. It could be argued that much public artwork in the late 20th and early 21st century has a ‘reparative’ function through its socially-engaged, community-specific and consciousness-raising aspects. To do so, however, would be to conflate the reparative with the recognition of injustice rather than understand it as the action of repair. The author asserts that for public art to engage in reparative work necessitates interrupting the normative forms and materialities of public art that interpellate the ‘public’ as settler subjects. How, he asks, might the reparative potential of public art be re-envisioned through a consideration of Indigenous and non-human publics?
doi_str_mv 10.1177/14704129221088299
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_14704129221088299</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_14704129221088299</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_14704129221088299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-cbd421fed7dff360f423604974262ca92767b97a683c3feb210795965a8176c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UEtOwzAQtRBIlMIB2PkCLh7HsWN2qOJTVAkJwTpyHLukSp3ITpDYcQ2ux0nqqN0hsZl5M_PeaOYhdA10ASDlDXBJOTDFGNCiYEqdoBlIDiRBfppwmpOJcI4uYtxSyqbODD2_2l4HPTSfFjd-sKG3bZvKzt_ifqzaxmAdht_vn4hXvm421ndjxNrX2HeefIw77Y-8eInOnG6jvTrmOXp_uH9bPpH1y-NqebcmhhV8IKaqOQNna1k7lwnqOEuRK8mZYEYrJoWslNSiyEzmbJUekipXItcFSGHybI7gsNeELsZgXdmHZqfDVwm0nMwo_5iRNIuDJuqNLbfdGHw68R_BHiBgX8c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reparative interpellation: public art’s Indigenous and non-human publics</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Robinson, Dylan</creator><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Dylan</creatorcontrib><description>This article considers the multiple ways in which public art interpellates viewers as settlers, Indigenous and non-human subjects. It could be argued that much public artwork in the late 20th and early 21st century has a ‘reparative’ function through its socially-engaged, community-specific and consciousness-raising aspects. To do so, however, would be to conflate the reparative with the recognition of injustice rather than understand it as the action of repair. The author asserts that for public art to engage in reparative work necessitates interrupting the normative forms and materialities of public art that interpellate the ‘public’ as settler subjects. How, he asks, might the reparative potential of public art be re-envisioned through a consideration of Indigenous and non-human publics?</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-4129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2994</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/14704129221088299</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Journal of visual culture, 2022-04, Vol.21 (1), p.69-84</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-cbd421fed7dff360f423604974262ca92767b97a683c3feb210795965a8176c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-cbd421fed7dff360f423604974262ca92767b97a683c3feb210795965a8176c53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2763-5500</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/14704129221088299$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14704129221088299$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21800,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Dylan</creatorcontrib><title>Reparative interpellation: public art’s Indigenous and non-human publics</title><title>Journal of visual culture</title><description>This article considers the multiple ways in which public art interpellates viewers as settlers, Indigenous and non-human subjects. It could be argued that much public artwork in the late 20th and early 21st century has a ‘reparative’ function through its socially-engaged, community-specific and consciousness-raising aspects. To do so, however, would be to conflate the reparative with the recognition of injustice rather than understand it as the action of repair. The author asserts that for public art to engage in reparative work necessitates interrupting the normative forms and materialities of public art that interpellate the ‘public’ as settler subjects. How, he asks, might the reparative potential of public art be re-envisioned through a consideration of Indigenous and non-human publics?</description><issn>1470-4129</issn><issn>1741-2994</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UEtOwzAQtRBIlMIB2PkCLh7HsWN2qOJTVAkJwTpyHLukSp3ITpDYcQ2ux0nqqN0hsZl5M_PeaOYhdA10ASDlDXBJOTDFGNCiYEqdoBlIDiRBfppwmpOJcI4uYtxSyqbODD2_2l4HPTSfFjd-sKG3bZvKzt_ifqzaxmAdht_vn4hXvm421ndjxNrX2HeefIw77Y-8eInOnG6jvTrmOXp_uH9bPpH1y-NqebcmhhV8IKaqOQNna1k7lwnqOEuRK8mZYEYrJoWslNSiyEzmbJUekipXItcFSGHybI7gsNeELsZgXdmHZqfDVwm0nMwo_5iRNIuDJuqNLbfdGHw68R_BHiBgX8c</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Robinson, Dylan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2763-5500</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Reparative interpellation: public art’s Indigenous and non-human publics</title><author>Robinson, Dylan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-cbd421fed7dff360f423604974262ca92767b97a683c3feb210795965a8176c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Dylan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of visual culture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robinson, Dylan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reparative interpellation: public art’s Indigenous and non-human publics</atitle><jtitle>Journal of visual culture</jtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>69-84</pages><issn>1470-4129</issn><eissn>1741-2994</eissn><abstract>This article considers the multiple ways in which public art interpellates viewers as settlers, Indigenous and non-human subjects. It could be argued that much public artwork in the late 20th and early 21st century has a ‘reparative’ function through its socially-engaged, community-specific and consciousness-raising aspects. To do so, however, would be to conflate the reparative with the recognition of injustice rather than understand it as the action of repair. The author asserts that for public art to engage in reparative work necessitates interrupting the normative forms and materialities of public art that interpellate the ‘public’ as settler subjects. How, he asks, might the reparative potential of public art be re-envisioned through a consideration of Indigenous and non-human publics?</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/14704129221088299</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2763-5500</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-4129
ispartof Journal of visual culture, 2022-04, Vol.21 (1), p.69-84
issn 1470-4129
1741-2994
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_14704129221088299
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Reparative interpellation: public art’s Indigenous and non-human publics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T12%3A10%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reparative%20interpellation:%20public%20art%E2%80%99s%20Indigenous%20and%20non-human%20publics&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20visual%20culture&rft.au=Robinson,%20Dylan&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=69-84&rft.issn=1470-4129&rft.eissn=1741-2994&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/14704129221088299&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_14704129221088299%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_14704129221088299&rfr_iscdi=true