An aesthetics of the human: Peru’s Ojo que Llora memorial

This article examines the role of an aesthetics of memorialization in symbolic reparations for victims of gross violations of human rights. By looking at the production, aesthetics and reception of the Ojo que Llora (Eye that Cries), a memorial cited as a symbolic reparation by the Inter-American Co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Visual communication (London, England) England), 2019-08, Vol.18 (3), p.353-377
Hauptverfasser: Greeley, Robin Adele, Orwicz, Michael R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 377
container_issue 3
container_start_page 353
container_title Visual communication (London, England)
container_volume 18
creator Greeley, Robin Adele
Orwicz, Michael R
description This article examines the role of an aesthetics of memorialization in symbolic reparations for victims of gross violations of human rights. By looking at the production, aesthetics and reception of the Ojo que Llora (Eye that Cries), a memorial cited as a symbolic reparation by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case of Castro Castro v Peru (2006), the authors investigate tensions around concepts of ‘victim’, ‘perpetrator’, and the blurring of the lines between those two categories. In doing so, the article considers how the Ojo que Llora came to embody varying definitions of victim, perpetrator, and the human as these came into tension across legal, political, social, and aesthetic fields.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1470357219842610
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1470357219842610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1470357219842610</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1470357219842610</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-80b0c00f0a7be099e46525ae43c7f46b5aebcbf0792473af849f6080c962e6333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j81KxDAUhYMoOI7uXeYFojc_TRpdDYOOQmFc6LqkIXFa2kaTduHO1_D1fBIzjCvB1fng3HM5B6FLCleUKnVNhQJeKEZ1KZikcIQWVAlKOKPiOHO2yd4_RWcpdQBUC8oW6HY1YuPStHNTaxMOHmfEu3kw4w1-cnH-_vxKeNsF_D47XPUhGjy4IcTW9OfoxJs-uYtfXaKX-7vn9QOptpvH9aoilnExkRIasAAejGocaO2ELFhhnOBWeSGbjI1tPCjNhOLGl0J7CSVYLZmTnPMlgsNfG0NK0fn6LbaDiR81hXo_vv47PkfIIZLMq6u7MMcxN_z__gdKcliR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>An aesthetics of the human: Peru’s Ojo que Llora memorial</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Greeley, Robin Adele ; Orwicz, Michael R</creator><creatorcontrib>Greeley, Robin Adele ; Orwicz, Michael R</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the role of an aesthetics of memorialization in symbolic reparations for victims of gross violations of human rights. By looking at the production, aesthetics and reception of the Ojo que Llora (Eye that Cries), a memorial cited as a symbolic reparation by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case of Castro Castro v Peru (2006), the authors investigate tensions around concepts of ‘victim’, ‘perpetrator’, and the blurring of the lines between those two categories. In doing so, the article considers how the Ojo que Llora came to embody varying definitions of victim, perpetrator, and the human as these came into tension across legal, political, social, and aesthetic fields.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-3572</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-3214</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1470357219842610</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Visual communication (London, England), 2019-08, Vol.18 (3), p.353-377</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-80b0c00f0a7be099e46525ae43c7f46b5aebcbf0792473af849f6080c962e6333</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7523-9679</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1470357219842610$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470357219842610$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greeley, Robin Adele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orwicz, Michael R</creatorcontrib><title>An aesthetics of the human: Peru’s Ojo que Llora memorial</title><title>Visual communication (London, England)</title><description>This article examines the role of an aesthetics of memorialization in symbolic reparations for victims of gross violations of human rights. By looking at the production, aesthetics and reception of the Ojo que Llora (Eye that Cries), a memorial cited as a symbolic reparation by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case of Castro Castro v Peru (2006), the authors investigate tensions around concepts of ‘victim’, ‘perpetrator’, and the blurring of the lines between those two categories. In doing so, the article considers how the Ojo que Llora came to embody varying definitions of victim, perpetrator, and the human as these came into tension across legal, political, social, and aesthetic fields.</description><issn>1470-3572</issn><issn>1741-3214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j81KxDAUhYMoOI7uXeYFojc_TRpdDYOOQmFc6LqkIXFa2kaTduHO1_D1fBIzjCvB1fng3HM5B6FLCleUKnVNhQJeKEZ1KZikcIQWVAlKOKPiOHO2yd4_RWcpdQBUC8oW6HY1YuPStHNTaxMOHmfEu3kw4w1-cnH-_vxKeNsF_D47XPUhGjy4IcTW9OfoxJs-uYtfXaKX-7vn9QOptpvH9aoilnExkRIasAAejGocaO2ELFhhnOBWeSGbjI1tPCjNhOLGl0J7CSVYLZmTnPMlgsNfG0NK0fn6LbaDiR81hXo_vv47PkfIIZLMq6u7MMcxN_z__gdKcliR</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Greeley, Robin Adele</creator><creator>Orwicz, Michael R</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7523-9679</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>An aesthetics of the human: Peru’s Ojo que Llora memorial</title><author>Greeley, Robin Adele ; Orwicz, Michael R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-80b0c00f0a7be099e46525ae43c7f46b5aebcbf0792473af849f6080c962e6333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greeley, Robin Adele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orwicz, Michael R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Visual communication (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greeley, Robin Adele</au><au>Orwicz, Michael R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An aesthetics of the human: Peru’s Ojo que Llora memorial</atitle><jtitle>Visual communication (London, England)</jtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>353</spage><epage>377</epage><pages>353-377</pages><issn>1470-3572</issn><eissn>1741-3214</eissn><abstract>This article examines the role of an aesthetics of memorialization in symbolic reparations for victims of gross violations of human rights. By looking at the production, aesthetics and reception of the Ojo que Llora (Eye that Cries), a memorial cited as a symbolic reparation by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case of Castro Castro v Peru (2006), the authors investigate tensions around concepts of ‘victim’, ‘perpetrator’, and the blurring of the lines between those two categories. In doing so, the article considers how the Ojo que Llora came to embody varying definitions of victim, perpetrator, and the human as these came into tension across legal, political, social, and aesthetic fields.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1470357219842610</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7523-9679</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-3572
ispartof Visual communication (London, England), 2019-08, Vol.18 (3), p.353-377
issn 1470-3572
1741-3214
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1470357219842610
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title An aesthetics of the human: Peru’s Ojo que Llora memorial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A17%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20aesthetics%20of%20the%20human:%20Peru%E2%80%99s%20Ojo%20que%20Llora%20memorial&rft.jtitle=Visual%20communication%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Greeley,%20Robin%20Adele&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=353&rft.epage=377&rft.pages=353-377&rft.issn=1470-3572&rft.eissn=1741-3214&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1470357219842610&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1470357219842610%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1470357219842610&rfr_iscdi=true