An aesthetics of the human: Peru’s Ojo que Llora memorial
This article examines the role of an aesthetics of memorialization in symbolic reparations for victims of gross violations of human rights. By looking at the production, aesthetics and reception of the Ojo que Llora (Eye that Cries), a memorial cited as a symbolic reparation by the Inter-American Co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Visual communication (London, England) England), 2019-08, Vol.18 (3), p.353-377 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 377 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 353 |
container_title | Visual communication (London, England) |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Greeley, Robin Adele Orwicz, Michael R |
description | This article examines the role of an aesthetics of memorialization in symbolic reparations for victims of gross violations of human rights. By looking at the production, aesthetics and reception of the Ojo que Llora (Eye that Cries), a memorial cited as a symbolic reparation by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case of Castro Castro v Peru (2006), the authors investigate tensions around concepts of ‘victim’, ‘perpetrator’, and the blurring of the lines between those two categories. In doing so, the article considers how the Ojo que Llora came to embody varying definitions of victim, perpetrator, and the human as these came into tension across legal, political, social, and aesthetic fields. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1470357219842610 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1470357219842610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1470357219842610</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1470357219842610</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-80b0c00f0a7be099e46525ae43c7f46b5aebcbf0792473af849f6080c962e6333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j81KxDAUhYMoOI7uXeYFojc_TRpdDYOOQmFc6LqkIXFa2kaTduHO1_D1fBIzjCvB1fng3HM5B6FLCleUKnVNhQJeKEZ1KZikcIQWVAlKOKPiOHO2yd4_RWcpdQBUC8oW6HY1YuPStHNTaxMOHmfEu3kw4w1-cnH-_vxKeNsF_D47XPUhGjy4IcTW9OfoxJs-uYtfXaKX-7vn9QOptpvH9aoilnExkRIasAAejGocaO2ELFhhnOBWeSGbjI1tPCjNhOLGl0J7CSVYLZmTnPMlgsNfG0NK0fn6LbaDiR81hXo_vv47PkfIIZLMq6u7MMcxN_z__gdKcliR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>An aesthetics of the human: Peru’s Ojo que Llora memorial</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Greeley, Robin Adele ; Orwicz, Michael R</creator><creatorcontrib>Greeley, Robin Adele ; Orwicz, Michael R</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the role of an aesthetics of memorialization in symbolic reparations for victims of gross violations of human rights. By looking at the production, aesthetics and reception of the Ojo que Llora (Eye that Cries), a memorial cited as a symbolic reparation by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case of Castro Castro v Peru (2006), the authors investigate tensions around concepts of ‘victim’, ‘perpetrator’, and the blurring of the lines between those two categories. In doing so, the article considers how the Ojo que Llora came to embody varying definitions of victim, perpetrator, and the human as these came into tension across legal, political, social, and aesthetic fields.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-3572</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-3214</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1470357219842610</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Visual communication (London, England), 2019-08, Vol.18 (3), p.353-377</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-80b0c00f0a7be099e46525ae43c7f46b5aebcbf0792473af849f6080c962e6333</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7523-9679</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1470357219842610$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470357219842610$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greeley, Robin Adele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orwicz, Michael R</creatorcontrib><title>An aesthetics of the human: Peru’s Ojo que Llora memorial</title><title>Visual communication (London, England)</title><description>This article examines the role of an aesthetics of memorialization in symbolic reparations for victims of gross violations of human rights. By looking at the production, aesthetics and reception of the Ojo que Llora (Eye that Cries), a memorial cited as a symbolic reparation by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case of Castro Castro v Peru (2006), the authors investigate tensions around concepts of ‘victim’, ‘perpetrator’, and the blurring of the lines between those two categories. In doing so, the article considers how the Ojo que Llora came to embody varying definitions of victim, perpetrator, and the human as these came into tension across legal, political, social, and aesthetic fields.</description><issn>1470-3572</issn><issn>1741-3214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j81KxDAUhYMoOI7uXeYFojc_TRpdDYOOQmFc6LqkIXFa2kaTduHO1_D1fBIzjCvB1fng3HM5B6FLCleUKnVNhQJeKEZ1KZikcIQWVAlKOKPiOHO2yd4_RWcpdQBUC8oW6HY1YuPStHNTaxMOHmfEu3kw4w1-cnH-_vxKeNsF_D47XPUhGjy4IcTW9OfoxJs-uYtfXaKX-7vn9QOptpvH9aoilnExkRIasAAejGocaO2ELFhhnOBWeSGbjI1tPCjNhOLGl0J7CSVYLZmTnPMlgsNfG0NK0fn6LbaDiR81hXo_vv47PkfIIZLMq6u7MMcxN_z__gdKcliR</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Greeley, Robin Adele</creator><creator>Orwicz, Michael R</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7523-9679</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>An aesthetics of the human: Peru’s Ojo que Llora memorial</title><author>Greeley, Robin Adele ; Orwicz, Michael R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-80b0c00f0a7be099e46525ae43c7f46b5aebcbf0792473af849f6080c962e6333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greeley, Robin Adele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orwicz, Michael R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Visual communication (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greeley, Robin Adele</au><au>Orwicz, Michael R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An aesthetics of the human: Peru’s Ojo que Llora memorial</atitle><jtitle>Visual communication (London, England)</jtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>353</spage><epage>377</epage><pages>353-377</pages><issn>1470-3572</issn><eissn>1741-3214</eissn><abstract>This article examines the role of an aesthetics of memorialization in symbolic reparations for victims of gross violations of human rights. By looking at the production, aesthetics and reception of the Ojo que Llora (Eye that Cries), a memorial cited as a symbolic reparation by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case of Castro Castro v Peru (2006), the authors investigate tensions around concepts of ‘victim’, ‘perpetrator’, and the blurring of the lines between those two categories. In doing so, the article considers how the Ojo que Llora came to embody varying definitions of victim, perpetrator, and the human as these came into tension across legal, political, social, and aesthetic fields.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1470357219842610</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7523-9679</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-3572 |
ispartof | Visual communication (London, England), 2019-08, Vol.18 (3), p.353-377 |
issn | 1470-3572 1741-3214 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1470357219842610 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List |
title | An aesthetics of the human: Peru’s Ojo que Llora memorial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A17%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20aesthetics%20of%20the%20human:%20Peru%E2%80%99s%20Ojo%20que%20Llora%20memorial&rft.jtitle=Visual%20communication%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Greeley,%20Robin%20Adele&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=353&rft.epage=377&rft.pages=353-377&rft.issn=1470-3572&rft.eissn=1741-3214&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1470357219842610&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1470357219842610%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1470357219842610&rfr_iscdi=true |