Critical Pedagogy and assessment in higher education: The ideal of ‘authenticity’ in learning

Current forms of marketisation in university systems create pressures towards purely ends-focused expectations among students and have implications for learning and assessment processes. The potential harm that these trends have on ‘learning’ should be resisted by educators and students alike. Criti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Active learning in higher education 2018-03, Vol.19 (1), p.9-21
Hauptverfasser: Serrano, Maria Martinez, O’Brien, Mark, Roberts, Krystal, Whyte, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 21
container_issue 1
container_start_page 9
container_title Active learning in higher education
container_volume 19
creator Serrano, Maria Martinez
O’Brien, Mark
Roberts, Krystal
Whyte, David
description Current forms of marketisation in university systems create pressures towards purely ends-focused expectations among students and have implications for learning and assessment processes. The potential harm that these trends have on ‘learning’ should be resisted by educators and students alike. Critical Pedagogy approaches offer one way of conceptualising and implementing such resistance in the interests of ‘authenticity’ in learning. However, the issue becomes sharpest at the point of assessment. Here, the ideals of Critical Pedagogy can collide with student expectations of final degree success. By addressing the question of ‘authenticity’ for assessment in relation to Critical Pedagogy, this article explores the challenges posed by this conundrum and draws upon interviews conducted with module leaders who apply recognisably (although not explicitly) Critical Pedagogy principles in their teaching and in the types of assessment they use. The themes that emerged present a picture of the kinds of potential that Critical Pedagogy influenced forms of assessment have for supporting authenticity in learning, as well as the difficulties involved in its application. It also helps to trace out the possible boundaries for further inquiry.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1469787417723244
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1469787417723244</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1169894</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1469787417723244</sage_id><sourcerecordid>EJ1169894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-463dce416c822ab7c9154b928365507b99dbaf22dc53037b7bda363ed707a0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWwZ4PkCwT8Fztmh6ryp0qw6D6a2E7iqk2QnS666zHgej0JjopYILGaN_ree9IMQteU3FKq1B0VUqtCiaQZZ0KcoAlNW8Yky0-TTjgb-Tm6iHFFCFVMFBMEs-AHb2CN352Fpm92GDqLIUYX48Z1A_Ydbn3TuoCd3RoYfN_d42XrsLcuxfoaH_afsB3aZPbGD7vD_msMrR2EznfNJTqrYR3d1c-couXjfDl7zhZvTy-zh0VmOOFDJiS3xgkqTcEYVMpomotKs4LLPCeq0tpWUDNmTZ78qlKVBS65s4ooIDWfInKsNaGPMbi6_Ah-A2FXUlKOHyr_fihFbo4RF7z5tc9fKZW60CPPjjxC48pVvw1dOuD_vm-CGXGx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Critical Pedagogy and assessment in higher education: The ideal of ‘authenticity’ in learning</title><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Serrano, Maria Martinez ; O’Brien, Mark ; Roberts, Krystal ; Whyte, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Serrano, Maria Martinez ; O’Brien, Mark ; Roberts, Krystal ; Whyte, David</creatorcontrib><description>Current forms of marketisation in university systems create pressures towards purely ends-focused expectations among students and have implications for learning and assessment processes. The potential harm that these trends have on ‘learning’ should be resisted by educators and students alike. Critical Pedagogy approaches offer one way of conceptualising and implementing such resistance in the interests of ‘authenticity’ in learning. However, the issue becomes sharpest at the point of assessment. Here, the ideals of Critical Pedagogy can collide with student expectations of final degree success. By addressing the question of ‘authenticity’ for assessment in relation to Critical Pedagogy, this article explores the challenges posed by this conundrum and draws upon interviews conducted with module leaders who apply recognisably (although not explicitly) Critical Pedagogy principles in their teaching and in the types of assessment they use. The themes that emerged present a picture of the kinds of potential that Critical Pedagogy influenced forms of assessment have for supporting authenticity in learning, as well as the difficulties involved in its application. It also helps to trace out the possible boundaries for further inquiry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1469-7874</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2625</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1469787417723244</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Active Learning ; Barriers ; Critical Theory ; Familiarity ; Foreign Countries ; Higher Education ; Humanities ; Independent Study ; Institutional Characteristics ; Interviews ; Learning Modules ; Learning Processes ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Social Sciences ; Student Educational Objectives ; Student Evaluation ; Student Motivation ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher Surveys</subject><ispartof>Active learning in higher education, 2018-03, Vol.19 (1), p.9-21</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-463dce416c822ab7c9154b928365507b99dbaf22dc53037b7bda363ed707a0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-463dce416c822ab7c9154b928365507b99dbaf22dc53037b7bda363ed707a0f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1469787417723244$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1469787417723244$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1169894$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Serrano, Maria Martinez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Brien, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Krystal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whyte, David</creatorcontrib><title>Critical Pedagogy and assessment in higher education: The ideal of ‘authenticity’ in learning</title><title>Active learning in higher education</title><description>Current forms of marketisation in university systems create pressures towards purely ends-focused expectations among students and have implications for learning and assessment processes. The potential harm that these trends have on ‘learning’ should be resisted by educators and students alike. Critical Pedagogy approaches offer one way of conceptualising and implementing such resistance in the interests of ‘authenticity’ in learning. However, the issue becomes sharpest at the point of assessment. Here, the ideals of Critical Pedagogy can collide with student expectations of final degree success. By addressing the question of ‘authenticity’ for assessment in relation to Critical Pedagogy, this article explores the challenges posed by this conundrum and draws upon interviews conducted with module leaders who apply recognisably (although not explicitly) Critical Pedagogy principles in their teaching and in the types of assessment they use. The themes that emerged present a picture of the kinds of potential that Critical Pedagogy influenced forms of assessment have for supporting authenticity in learning, as well as the difficulties involved in its application. It also helps to trace out the possible boundaries for further inquiry.</description><subject>Active Learning</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Critical Theory</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Humanities</subject><subject>Independent Study</subject><subject>Institutional Characteristics</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Learning Modules</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Student Educational Objectives</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Student Motivation</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Surveys</subject><issn>1469-7874</issn><issn>1741-2625</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWwZ4PkCwT8Fztmh6ryp0qw6D6a2E7iqk2QnS666zHgej0JjopYILGaN_ree9IMQteU3FKq1B0VUqtCiaQZZ0KcoAlNW8Yky0-TTjgb-Tm6iHFFCFVMFBMEs-AHb2CN352Fpm92GDqLIUYX48Z1A_Ydbn3TuoCd3RoYfN_d42XrsLcuxfoaH_afsB3aZPbGD7vD_msMrR2EznfNJTqrYR3d1c-couXjfDl7zhZvTy-zh0VmOOFDJiS3xgkqTcEYVMpomotKs4LLPCeq0tpWUDNmTZ78qlKVBS65s4ooIDWfInKsNaGPMbi6_Ah-A2FXUlKOHyr_fihFbo4RF7z5tc9fKZW60CPPjjxC48pVvw1dOuD_vm-CGXGx</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Serrano, Maria Martinez</creator><creator>O’Brien, Mark</creator><creator>Roberts, Krystal</creator><creator>Whyte, David</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Critical Pedagogy and assessment in higher education: The ideal of ‘authenticity’ in learning</title><author>Serrano, Maria Martinez ; O’Brien, Mark ; Roberts, Krystal ; Whyte, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-463dce416c822ab7c9154b928365507b99dbaf22dc53037b7bda363ed707a0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Active Learning</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Critical Theory</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Humanities</topic><topic>Independent Study</topic><topic>Institutional Characteristics</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Learning Modules</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Student Educational Objectives</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Student Motivation</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Serrano, Maria Martinez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Brien, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Krystal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whyte, David</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Active learning in higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Serrano, Maria Martinez</au><au>O’Brien, Mark</au><au>Roberts, Krystal</au><au>Whyte, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1169894</ericid><atitle>Critical Pedagogy and assessment in higher education: The ideal of ‘authenticity’ in learning</atitle><jtitle>Active learning in higher education</jtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>9-21</pages><issn>1469-7874</issn><eissn>1741-2625</eissn><abstract>Current forms of marketisation in university systems create pressures towards purely ends-focused expectations among students and have implications for learning and assessment processes. The potential harm that these trends have on ‘learning’ should be resisted by educators and students alike. Critical Pedagogy approaches offer one way of conceptualising and implementing such resistance in the interests of ‘authenticity’ in learning. However, the issue becomes sharpest at the point of assessment. Here, the ideals of Critical Pedagogy can collide with student expectations of final degree success. By addressing the question of ‘authenticity’ for assessment in relation to Critical Pedagogy, this article explores the challenges posed by this conundrum and draws upon interviews conducted with module leaders who apply recognisably (although not explicitly) Critical Pedagogy principles in their teaching and in the types of assessment they use. The themes that emerged present a picture of the kinds of potential that Critical Pedagogy influenced forms of assessment have for supporting authenticity in learning, as well as the difficulties involved in its application. It also helps to trace out the possible boundaries for further inquiry.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1469787417723244</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1469-7874
ispartof Active learning in higher education, 2018-03, Vol.19 (1), p.9-21
issn 1469-7874
1741-2625
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1469787417723244
source SAGE Journals
subjects Active Learning
Barriers
Critical Theory
Familiarity
Foreign Countries
Higher Education
Humanities
Independent Study
Institutional Characteristics
Interviews
Learning Modules
Learning Processes
Resistance (Psychology)
Social Sciences
Student Educational Objectives
Student Evaluation
Student Motivation
Teacher Attitudes
Teacher Surveys
title Critical Pedagogy and assessment in higher education: The ideal of ‘authenticity’ in learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T16%3A44%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Critical%20Pedagogy%20and%20assessment%20in%20higher%20education:%20The%20ideal%20of%20%E2%80%98authenticity%E2%80%99%20in%20learning&rft.jtitle=Active%20learning%20in%20higher%20education&rft.au=Serrano,%20Maria%20Martinez&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=9-21&rft.issn=1469-7874&rft.eissn=1741-2625&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1469787417723244&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ1169894%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1169894&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1469787417723244&rfr_iscdi=true