Critical Pedagogy and assessment in higher education: The ideal of ‘authenticity’ in learning
Current forms of marketisation in university systems create pressures towards purely ends-focused expectations among students and have implications for learning and assessment processes. The potential harm that these trends have on ‘learning’ should be resisted by educators and students alike. Criti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Active learning in higher education 2018-03, Vol.19 (1), p.9-21 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 21 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 9 |
container_title | Active learning in higher education |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Serrano, Maria Martinez O’Brien, Mark Roberts, Krystal Whyte, David |
description | Current forms of marketisation in university systems create pressures towards purely ends-focused expectations among students and have implications for learning and assessment processes. The potential harm that these trends have on ‘learning’ should be resisted by educators and students alike. Critical Pedagogy approaches offer one way of conceptualising and implementing such resistance in the interests of ‘authenticity’ in learning. However, the issue becomes sharpest at the point of assessment. Here, the ideals of Critical Pedagogy can collide with student expectations of final degree success. By addressing the question of ‘authenticity’ for assessment in relation to Critical Pedagogy, this article explores the challenges posed by this conundrum and draws upon interviews conducted with module leaders who apply recognisably (although not explicitly) Critical Pedagogy principles in their teaching and in the types of assessment they use. The themes that emerged present a picture of the kinds of potential that Critical Pedagogy influenced forms of assessment have for supporting authenticity in learning, as well as the difficulties involved in its application. It also helps to trace out the possible boundaries for further inquiry. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1469787417723244 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1469787417723244</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1169894</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1469787417723244</sage_id><sourcerecordid>EJ1169894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-463dce416c822ab7c9154b928365507b99dbaf22dc53037b7bda363ed707a0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWwZ4PkCwT8Fztmh6ryp0qw6D6a2E7iqk2QnS666zHgej0JjopYILGaN_ree9IMQteU3FKq1B0VUqtCiaQZZ0KcoAlNW8Yky0-TTjgb-Tm6iHFFCFVMFBMEs-AHb2CN352Fpm92GDqLIUYX48Z1A_Ydbn3TuoCd3RoYfN_d42XrsLcuxfoaH_afsB3aZPbGD7vD_msMrR2EznfNJTqrYR3d1c-couXjfDl7zhZvTy-zh0VmOOFDJiS3xgkqTcEYVMpomotKs4LLPCeq0tpWUDNmTZ78qlKVBS65s4ooIDWfInKsNaGPMbi6_Ah-A2FXUlKOHyr_fihFbo4RF7z5tc9fKZW60CPPjjxC48pVvw1dOuD_vm-CGXGx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Critical Pedagogy and assessment in higher education: The ideal of ‘authenticity’ in learning</title><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Serrano, Maria Martinez ; O’Brien, Mark ; Roberts, Krystal ; Whyte, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Serrano, Maria Martinez ; O’Brien, Mark ; Roberts, Krystal ; Whyte, David</creatorcontrib><description>Current forms of marketisation in university systems create pressures towards purely ends-focused expectations among students and have implications for learning and assessment processes. The potential harm that these trends have on ‘learning’ should be resisted by educators and students alike. Critical Pedagogy approaches offer one way of conceptualising and implementing such resistance in the interests of ‘authenticity’ in learning. However, the issue becomes sharpest at the point of assessment. Here, the ideals of Critical Pedagogy can collide with student expectations of final degree success. By addressing the question of ‘authenticity’ for assessment in relation to Critical Pedagogy, this article explores the challenges posed by this conundrum and draws upon interviews conducted with module leaders who apply recognisably (although not explicitly) Critical Pedagogy principles in their teaching and in the types of assessment they use. The themes that emerged present a picture of the kinds of potential that Critical Pedagogy influenced forms of assessment have for supporting authenticity in learning, as well as the difficulties involved in its application. It also helps to trace out the possible boundaries for further inquiry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1469-7874</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2625</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1469787417723244</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Active Learning ; Barriers ; Critical Theory ; Familiarity ; Foreign Countries ; Higher Education ; Humanities ; Independent Study ; Institutional Characteristics ; Interviews ; Learning Modules ; Learning Processes ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Social Sciences ; Student Educational Objectives ; Student Evaluation ; Student Motivation ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher Surveys</subject><ispartof>Active learning in higher education, 2018-03, Vol.19 (1), p.9-21</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-463dce416c822ab7c9154b928365507b99dbaf22dc53037b7bda363ed707a0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-463dce416c822ab7c9154b928365507b99dbaf22dc53037b7bda363ed707a0f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1469787417723244$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1469787417723244$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1169894$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Serrano, Maria Martinez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Brien, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Krystal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whyte, David</creatorcontrib><title>Critical Pedagogy and assessment in higher education: The ideal of ‘authenticity’ in learning</title><title>Active learning in higher education</title><description>Current forms of marketisation in university systems create pressures towards purely ends-focused expectations among students and have implications for learning and assessment processes. The potential harm that these trends have on ‘learning’ should be resisted by educators and students alike. Critical Pedagogy approaches offer one way of conceptualising and implementing such resistance in the interests of ‘authenticity’ in learning. However, the issue becomes sharpest at the point of assessment. Here, the ideals of Critical Pedagogy can collide with student expectations of final degree success. By addressing the question of ‘authenticity’ for assessment in relation to Critical Pedagogy, this article explores the challenges posed by this conundrum and draws upon interviews conducted with module leaders who apply recognisably (although not explicitly) Critical Pedagogy principles in their teaching and in the types of assessment they use. The themes that emerged present a picture of the kinds of potential that Critical Pedagogy influenced forms of assessment have for supporting authenticity in learning, as well as the difficulties involved in its application. It also helps to trace out the possible boundaries for further inquiry.</description><subject>Active Learning</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Critical Theory</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Humanities</subject><subject>Independent Study</subject><subject>Institutional Characteristics</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Learning Modules</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Student Educational Objectives</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Student Motivation</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Surveys</subject><issn>1469-7874</issn><issn>1741-2625</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWwZ4PkCwT8Fztmh6ryp0qw6D6a2E7iqk2QnS666zHgej0JjopYILGaN_ree9IMQteU3FKq1B0VUqtCiaQZZ0KcoAlNW8Yky0-TTjgb-Tm6iHFFCFVMFBMEs-AHb2CN352Fpm92GDqLIUYX48Z1A_Ydbn3TuoCd3RoYfN_d42XrsLcuxfoaH_afsB3aZPbGD7vD_msMrR2EznfNJTqrYR3d1c-couXjfDl7zhZvTy-zh0VmOOFDJiS3xgkqTcEYVMpomotKs4LLPCeq0tpWUDNmTZ78qlKVBS65s4ooIDWfInKsNaGPMbi6_Ah-A2FXUlKOHyr_fihFbo4RF7z5tc9fKZW60CPPjjxC48pVvw1dOuD_vm-CGXGx</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Serrano, Maria Martinez</creator><creator>O’Brien, Mark</creator><creator>Roberts, Krystal</creator><creator>Whyte, David</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Critical Pedagogy and assessment in higher education: The ideal of ‘authenticity’ in learning</title><author>Serrano, Maria Martinez ; O’Brien, Mark ; Roberts, Krystal ; Whyte, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-463dce416c822ab7c9154b928365507b99dbaf22dc53037b7bda363ed707a0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Active Learning</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Critical Theory</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Humanities</topic><topic>Independent Study</topic><topic>Institutional Characteristics</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Learning Modules</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Student Educational Objectives</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Student Motivation</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Serrano, Maria Martinez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Brien, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Krystal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whyte, David</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Active learning in higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Serrano, Maria Martinez</au><au>O’Brien, Mark</au><au>Roberts, Krystal</au><au>Whyte, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1169894</ericid><atitle>Critical Pedagogy and assessment in higher education: The ideal of ‘authenticity’ in learning</atitle><jtitle>Active learning in higher education</jtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>9-21</pages><issn>1469-7874</issn><eissn>1741-2625</eissn><abstract>Current forms of marketisation in university systems create pressures towards purely ends-focused expectations among students and have implications for learning and assessment processes. The potential harm that these trends have on ‘learning’ should be resisted by educators and students alike. Critical Pedagogy approaches offer one way of conceptualising and implementing such resistance in the interests of ‘authenticity’ in learning. However, the issue becomes sharpest at the point of assessment. Here, the ideals of Critical Pedagogy can collide with student expectations of final degree success. By addressing the question of ‘authenticity’ for assessment in relation to Critical Pedagogy, this article explores the challenges posed by this conundrum and draws upon interviews conducted with module leaders who apply recognisably (although not explicitly) Critical Pedagogy principles in their teaching and in the types of assessment they use. The themes that emerged present a picture of the kinds of potential that Critical Pedagogy influenced forms of assessment have for supporting authenticity in learning, as well as the difficulties involved in its application. It also helps to trace out the possible boundaries for further inquiry.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1469787417723244</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1469-7874 |
ispartof | Active learning in higher education, 2018-03, Vol.19 (1), p.9-21 |
issn | 1469-7874 1741-2625 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1469787417723244 |
source | SAGE Journals |
subjects | Active Learning Barriers Critical Theory Familiarity Foreign Countries Higher Education Humanities Independent Study Institutional Characteristics Interviews Learning Modules Learning Processes Resistance (Psychology) Social Sciences Student Educational Objectives Student Evaluation Student Motivation Teacher Attitudes Teacher Surveys |
title | Critical Pedagogy and assessment in higher education: The ideal of ‘authenticity’ in learning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T16%3A44%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Critical%20Pedagogy%20and%20assessment%20in%20higher%20education:%20The%20ideal%20of%20%E2%80%98authenticity%E2%80%99%20in%20learning&rft.jtitle=Active%20learning%20in%20higher%20education&rft.au=Serrano,%20Maria%20Martinez&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=9-21&rft.issn=1469-7874&rft.eissn=1741-2625&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1469787417723244&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ1169894%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1169894&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1469787417723244&rfr_iscdi=true |