To whom do people reply in comment sections? Effects of attitude (un)congeniality, age, confidence, and knowledge

Phenomena like echo chambers and societal polarization have often been linked to an individual preference for like-minded information (selective exposure). This view has been challenged recently: behavior on comment sections in online forums suggests the opposite dynamic, with users more likely to r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:New media & society 2024-04
Hauptverfasser: Buder, Jürgen, Said, Nadia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title New media & society
container_volume
creator Buder, Jürgen
Said, Nadia
description Phenomena like echo chambers and societal polarization have often been linked to an individual preference for like-minded information (selective exposure). This view has been challenged recently: behavior on comment sections in online forums suggests the opposite dynamic, with users more likely to reply to attitudinally uncongenial content. Three experimental studies (total N = 1524) explore boundary conditions of this uncongeniality bias by measuring participants’ tendency to reply to comments on climate science. Studies 1 (student sample) and 2 (non-student sample) replicate the uncongeniality bias. However, Study 3 (representative for age and gender in Germany) yielded a surprising congeniality bias (a preference for replying to congenial comments) which was driven by participants with higher age. Further results across studies suggest that high confidence increases engagement (general likelihood to reply) but reduces antagonism (likelihood to reply to uncongenial content). Conversely, high knowledge reduces engagement but increases the uncongeniality bias.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/14614448241247214
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_14614448241247214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1177_14614448241247214</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-76152f2e2079d458eb39d5e36b4c9e6f8722e955d74b08b7dce452fa04737643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkD1PwzAYhC0EEqXwA9g8gtSA7byJkwmhqnxIlVi6R479uhgSO8Suqv57UtGN6R6d7m44Qm45e-BcykcOJQeASgAXIAWHMzI7epnMeXF-4mPgklzF-MUYL0HWM_KzCXT_GXpqAh0wDB3SEYfuQJ2nOvQ9-kQj6uSCj090Ze3EkQZLVUou7QzSu52_18Fv0TvVuXRYULXFxVT21hn0emLlDf32Yd-h2eI1ubCqi3hz0jnZvKw2y7ds_fH6vnxeZ1oAS5kseSGsQMFkbaCosM1rU2BetqBrLG0lhcC6KIyEllWtNBphKigGMpcl5HPC_2b1GGIc0TbD6Ho1HhrOmuNlzb_L8l-7Nl6d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>To whom do people reply in comment sections? Effects of attitude (un)congeniality, age, confidence, and knowledge</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Buder, Jürgen ; Said, Nadia</creator><creatorcontrib>Buder, Jürgen ; Said, Nadia</creatorcontrib><description>Phenomena like echo chambers and societal polarization have often been linked to an individual preference for like-minded information (selective exposure). This view has been challenged recently: behavior on comment sections in online forums suggests the opposite dynamic, with users more likely to reply to attitudinally uncongenial content. Three experimental studies (total N = 1524) explore boundary conditions of this uncongeniality bias by measuring participants’ tendency to reply to comments on climate science. Studies 1 (student sample) and 2 (non-student sample) replicate the uncongeniality bias. However, Study 3 (representative for age and gender in Germany) yielded a surprising congeniality bias (a preference for replying to congenial comments) which was driven by participants with higher age. Further results across studies suggest that high confidence increases engagement (general likelihood to reply) but reduces antagonism (likelihood to reply to uncongenial content). Conversely, high knowledge reduces engagement but increases the uncongeniality bias.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-4448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/14614448241247214</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>New media &amp; society, 2024-04</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-76152f2e2079d458eb39d5e36b4c9e6f8722e955d74b08b7dce452fa04737643</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0872-3487</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buder, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Said, Nadia</creatorcontrib><title>To whom do people reply in comment sections? Effects of attitude (un)congeniality, age, confidence, and knowledge</title><title>New media &amp; society</title><description>Phenomena like echo chambers and societal polarization have often been linked to an individual preference for like-minded information (selective exposure). This view has been challenged recently: behavior on comment sections in online forums suggests the opposite dynamic, with users more likely to reply to attitudinally uncongenial content. Three experimental studies (total N = 1524) explore boundary conditions of this uncongeniality bias by measuring participants’ tendency to reply to comments on climate science. Studies 1 (student sample) and 2 (non-student sample) replicate the uncongeniality bias. However, Study 3 (representative for age and gender in Germany) yielded a surprising congeniality bias (a preference for replying to congenial comments) which was driven by participants with higher age. Further results across studies suggest that high confidence increases engagement (general likelihood to reply) but reduces antagonism (likelihood to reply to uncongenial content). Conversely, high knowledge reduces engagement but increases the uncongeniality bias.</description><issn>1461-4448</issn><issn>1461-7315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkD1PwzAYhC0EEqXwA9g8gtSA7byJkwmhqnxIlVi6R479uhgSO8Suqv57UtGN6R6d7m44Qm45e-BcykcOJQeASgAXIAWHMzI7epnMeXF-4mPgklzF-MUYL0HWM_KzCXT_GXpqAh0wDB3SEYfuQJ2nOvQ9-kQj6uSCj090Ze3EkQZLVUou7QzSu52_18Fv0TvVuXRYULXFxVT21hn0emLlDf32Yd-h2eI1ubCqi3hz0jnZvKw2y7ds_fH6vnxeZ1oAS5kseSGsQMFkbaCosM1rU2BetqBrLG0lhcC6KIyEllWtNBphKigGMpcl5HPC_2b1GGIc0TbD6Ho1HhrOmuNlzb_L8l-7Nl6d</recordid><startdate>20240422</startdate><enddate>20240422</enddate><creator>Buder, Jürgen</creator><creator>Said, Nadia</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0872-3487</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240422</creationdate><title>To whom do people reply in comment sections? Effects of attitude (un)congeniality, age, confidence, and knowledge</title><author>Buder, Jürgen ; Said, Nadia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-76152f2e2079d458eb39d5e36b4c9e6f8722e955d74b08b7dce452fa04737643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buder, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Said, Nadia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>New media &amp; society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buder, Jürgen</au><au>Said, Nadia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>To whom do people reply in comment sections? Effects of attitude (un)congeniality, age, confidence, and knowledge</atitle><jtitle>New media &amp; society</jtitle><date>2024-04-22</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>1461-4448</issn><eissn>1461-7315</eissn><abstract>Phenomena like echo chambers and societal polarization have often been linked to an individual preference for like-minded information (selective exposure). This view has been challenged recently: behavior on comment sections in online forums suggests the opposite dynamic, with users more likely to reply to attitudinally uncongenial content. Three experimental studies (total N = 1524) explore boundary conditions of this uncongeniality bias by measuring participants’ tendency to reply to comments on climate science. Studies 1 (student sample) and 2 (non-student sample) replicate the uncongeniality bias. However, Study 3 (representative for age and gender in Germany) yielded a surprising congeniality bias (a preference for replying to congenial comments) which was driven by participants with higher age. Further results across studies suggest that high confidence increases engagement (general likelihood to reply) but reduces antagonism (likelihood to reply to uncongenial content). Conversely, high knowledge reduces engagement but increases the uncongeniality bias.</abstract><doi>10.1177/14614448241247214</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0872-3487</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1461-4448
ispartof New media & society, 2024-04
issn 1461-4448
1461-7315
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_14614448241247214
source SAGE Complete
title To whom do people reply in comment sections? Effects of attitude (un)congeniality, age, confidence, and knowledge
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T10%3A55%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=To%20whom%20do%20people%20reply%20in%20comment%20sections?%20Effects%20of%20attitude%20(un)congeniality,%20age,%20confidence,%20and%20knowledge&rft.jtitle=New%20media%20&%20society&rft.au=Buder,%20J%C3%BCrgen&rft.date=2024-04-22&rft.issn=1461-4448&rft.eissn=1461-7315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/14614448241247214&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1177_14614448241247214%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true