Deplatformization and the governance of the platform ecosystem

This article analyzes deplatformization as an implied governance strategy by major tech companies to detoxify the platform ecosystem of radical content while consolidating their power as designers, operators, and governors of that same ecosystem. Deplatformization is different from deplatforming: it...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:New media & society 2023-12, Vol.25 (12), p.3438-3454
Hauptverfasser: Van Dijck, José, de Winkel, Tim, Schäfer, Mirko Tobias
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3454
container_issue 12
container_start_page 3438
container_title New media & society
container_volume 25
creator Van Dijck, José
de Winkel, Tim
Schäfer, Mirko Tobias
description This article analyzes deplatformization as an implied governance strategy by major tech companies to detoxify the platform ecosystem of radical content while consolidating their power as designers, operators, and governors of that same ecosystem. Deplatformization is different from deplatforming: it entails a systemic effort to push back encroaching radical right-wing platforms to the fringes of the ecosystem by denying them the infrastructural services needed to function online. We identify several deplatformization strategies, using Gab as an example of a platform that survived its relegation and which subsequently tried to build an alternative at the edge of the mainstream ecosystem. Evaluating deplatformization in terms of governance, the question that arises is who is responsible for cleansing the ecosystem: corporations, states, civil society actors, or all three combined? Understanding the implied governance of deplatformization is imperative to assess the higher stakes in future debates concerning Internet governability.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/14614448211045662
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_14614448211045662</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_14614448211045662</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_14614448211045662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-68e2d53619f8cd9b7e75b97485ddbb2e265cb5e5acddb33de9f41a68ae4eca703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_gLd8gdSd_ZtcBKlahYIXPYfN7mxNSbJlNwr105vYehI8zczj_QbeI-Qa6AJA6xsQCoQQBQOgQirFTshs0nLNQZ4e98lwTi5S2lIKSuhyRm7vcdeawYfYNV9maEKfmd5lwztmm_CJsTe9xSz4H-XXmaENaZ8G7C7JmTdtwqvjnJO3x4fX5VO-flk9L-_WueVMD7kqkDnJFZS-sK6sNWpZl1oU0rm6ZsiUtLVEaex4c-6w9AKMKgwKtEZTPidw-GtjSCmir3ax6UzcV0CrqYDqTwEjszgwyWyw2oaPMUyb_gG-AcscXEs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deplatformization and the governance of the platform ecosystem</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Van Dijck, José ; de Winkel, Tim ; Schäfer, Mirko Tobias</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Dijck, José ; de Winkel, Tim ; Schäfer, Mirko Tobias</creatorcontrib><description>This article analyzes deplatformization as an implied governance strategy by major tech companies to detoxify the platform ecosystem of radical content while consolidating their power as designers, operators, and governors of that same ecosystem. Deplatformization is different from deplatforming: it entails a systemic effort to push back encroaching radical right-wing platforms to the fringes of the ecosystem by denying them the infrastructural services needed to function online. We identify several deplatformization strategies, using Gab as an example of a platform that survived its relegation and which subsequently tried to build an alternative at the edge of the mainstream ecosystem. Evaluating deplatformization in terms of governance, the question that arises is who is responsible for cleansing the ecosystem: corporations, states, civil society actors, or all three combined? Understanding the implied governance of deplatformization is imperative to assess the higher stakes in future debates concerning Internet governability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-4448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/14614448211045662</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>New media &amp; society, 2023-12, Vol.25 (12), p.3438-3454</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-68e2d53619f8cd9b7e75b97485ddbb2e265cb5e5acddb33de9f41a68ae4eca703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-68e2d53619f8cd9b7e75b97485ddbb2e265cb5e5acddb33de9f41a68ae4eca703</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0499-9045</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/14614448211045662$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14614448211045662$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Dijck, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Winkel, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäfer, Mirko Tobias</creatorcontrib><title>Deplatformization and the governance of the platform ecosystem</title><title>New media &amp; society</title><description>This article analyzes deplatformization as an implied governance strategy by major tech companies to detoxify the platform ecosystem of radical content while consolidating their power as designers, operators, and governors of that same ecosystem. Deplatformization is different from deplatforming: it entails a systemic effort to push back encroaching radical right-wing platforms to the fringes of the ecosystem by denying them the infrastructural services needed to function online. We identify several deplatformization strategies, using Gab as an example of a platform that survived its relegation and which subsequently tried to build an alternative at the edge of the mainstream ecosystem. Evaluating deplatformization in terms of governance, the question that arises is who is responsible for cleansing the ecosystem: corporations, states, civil society actors, or all three combined? Understanding the implied governance of deplatformization is imperative to assess the higher stakes in future debates concerning Internet governability.</description><issn>1461-4448</issn><issn>1461-7315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_gLd8gdSd_ZtcBKlahYIXPYfN7mxNSbJlNwr105vYehI8zczj_QbeI-Qa6AJA6xsQCoQQBQOgQirFTshs0nLNQZ4e98lwTi5S2lIKSuhyRm7vcdeawYfYNV9maEKfmd5lwztmm_CJsTe9xSz4H-XXmaENaZ8G7C7JmTdtwqvjnJO3x4fX5VO-flk9L-_WueVMD7kqkDnJFZS-sK6sNWpZl1oU0rm6ZsiUtLVEaex4c-6w9AKMKgwKtEZTPidw-GtjSCmir3ax6UzcV0CrqYDqTwEjszgwyWyw2oaPMUyb_gG-AcscXEs</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Van Dijck, José</creator><creator>de Winkel, Tim</creator><creator>Schäfer, Mirko Tobias</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0499-9045</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>Deplatformization and the governance of the platform ecosystem</title><author>Van Dijck, José ; de Winkel, Tim ; Schäfer, Mirko Tobias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-68e2d53619f8cd9b7e75b97485ddbb2e265cb5e5acddb33de9f41a68ae4eca703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Dijck, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Winkel, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäfer, Mirko Tobias</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>New media &amp; society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Dijck, José</au><au>de Winkel, Tim</au><au>Schäfer, Mirko Tobias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deplatformization and the governance of the platform ecosystem</atitle><jtitle>New media &amp; society</jtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3438</spage><epage>3454</epage><pages>3438-3454</pages><issn>1461-4448</issn><eissn>1461-7315</eissn><abstract>This article analyzes deplatformization as an implied governance strategy by major tech companies to detoxify the platform ecosystem of radical content while consolidating their power as designers, operators, and governors of that same ecosystem. Deplatformization is different from deplatforming: it entails a systemic effort to push back encroaching radical right-wing platforms to the fringes of the ecosystem by denying them the infrastructural services needed to function online. We identify several deplatformization strategies, using Gab as an example of a platform that survived its relegation and which subsequently tried to build an alternative at the edge of the mainstream ecosystem. Evaluating deplatformization in terms of governance, the question that arises is who is responsible for cleansing the ecosystem: corporations, states, civil society actors, or all three combined? Understanding the implied governance of deplatformization is imperative to assess the higher stakes in future debates concerning Internet governability.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/14614448211045662</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0499-9045</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1461-4448
ispartof New media & society, 2023-12, Vol.25 (12), p.3438-3454
issn 1461-4448
1461-7315
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_14614448211045662
source Access via SAGE
title Deplatformization and the governance of the platform ecosystem
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T00%3A09%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deplatformization%20and%20the%20governance%20of%20the%20platform%20ecosystem&rft.jtitle=New%20media%20&%20society&rft.au=Van%20Dijck,%20Jos%C3%A9&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3438&rft.epage=3454&rft.pages=3438-3454&rft.issn=1461-4448&rft.eissn=1461-7315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/14614448211045662&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_14614448211045662%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_14614448211045662&rfr_iscdi=true