Drawing from justice theories to support targets of online harassment

Drawing from justice theories to support targets of online harassment

Most content moderation approaches in the United States rely on criminal justice models that sanction offenders via content removal or user bans. However, these models write the online harassment targets out of the justice-seeking process. Via an online survey with US participants (N = 573), this re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:New media & society 2021-05, Vol.23 (5), p.1278-1300
Hauptverfasser: Schoenebeck, Sarita, Haimson, Oliver L, Nakamura, Lisa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1300
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1278
container_title New media & society
container_volume 23
creator Schoenebeck, Sarita
Haimson, Oliver L
Nakamura, Lisa
description Most content moderation approaches in the United States rely on criminal justice models that sanction offenders via content removal or user bans. However, these models write the online harassment targets out of the justice-seeking process. Via an online survey with US participants (N = 573), this research draws from justice theories to investigate approaches for supporting targets of online harassment. We uncover preferences for banning offenders, removing content, and apologies, but aversion to mediation and adjusting targets’ audiences. Preferences vary by identities (e.g. transgender participants on average find more exposure to be undesirable; American Indian or Alaska Native participants on average find payment to be unfair) and by social media behaviors (e.g. Instagram users report payment as just and fair). Our results suggest that a one-size-fits-all approach will fail some users while privileging others. We propose a broader theoretical and empirical landscape for supporting online harassment targets.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1461444820913122
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1461444820913122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1461444820913122</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1461444820913122</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-61f3ec1e63e9dda6a12384649fe093abde20b202a6d300148fe4a01d778ac4d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLxDAQhYMouK7ePeYPVDNJTNujrKsrLHjRc5ltJt2WbVOSFPHf22X3JHiaYd57w8dj7B7EA0CeP4I2oLUupChBgZQXbHE8ZbmCp8vzftSv2U2MnRBgdF4u2Pol4Hc7NNwF3_Nuiqmtiac9-dBS5MnzOI2jD4knDA2lyL3jfji0A_E9BoyxpyHdsiuHh0h357lkX6_rz9Um2368va-et1mtpEqZAaeoBjKKSmvRIEhVaKNLR6JUuLMkxU4KicaqmVAXjjQKsHleYK2tUEsmTn_r4GMM5KoxtD2GnwpEdayh-lvDHMlOkYgNVZ2fwjAT_u__BWVgXSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Drawing from justice theories to support targets of online harassment</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Schoenebeck, Sarita ; Haimson, Oliver L ; Nakamura, Lisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Schoenebeck, Sarita ; Haimson, Oliver L ; Nakamura, Lisa</creatorcontrib><description>Most content moderation approaches in the United States rely on criminal justice models that sanction offenders via content removal or user bans. However, these models write the online harassment targets out of the justice-seeking process. Via an online survey with US participants (N = 573), this research draws from justice theories to investigate approaches for supporting targets of online harassment. We uncover preferences for banning offenders, removing content, and apologies, but aversion to mediation and adjusting targets’ audiences. Preferences vary by identities (e.g. transgender participants on average find more exposure to be undesirable; American Indian or Alaska Native participants on average find payment to be unfair) and by social media behaviors (e.g. Instagram users report payment as just and fair). Our results suggest that a one-size-fits-all approach will fail some users while privileging others. We propose a broader theoretical and empirical landscape for supporting online harassment targets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-4448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1461444820913122</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>New media &amp; society, 2021-05, Vol.23 (5), p.1278-1300</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-61f3ec1e63e9dda6a12384649fe093abde20b202a6d300148fe4a01d778ac4d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-61f3ec1e63e9dda6a12384649fe093abde20b202a6d300148fe4a01d778ac4d03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8688-1595</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1461444820913122$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461444820913122$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schoenebeck, Sarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haimson, Oliver L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Lisa</creatorcontrib><title>Drawing from justice theories to support targets of online harassment</title><title>New media &amp; society</title><description>Most content moderation approaches in the United States rely on criminal justice models that sanction offenders via content removal or user bans. However, these models write the online harassment targets out of the justice-seeking process. Via an online survey with US participants (N = 573), this research draws from justice theories to investigate approaches for supporting targets of online harassment. We uncover preferences for banning offenders, removing content, and apologies, but aversion to mediation and adjusting targets’ audiences. Preferences vary by identities (e.g. transgender participants on average find more exposure to be undesirable; American Indian or Alaska Native participants on average find payment to be unfair) and by social media behaviors (e.g. Instagram users report payment as just and fair). Our results suggest that a one-size-fits-all approach will fail some users while privileging others. We propose a broader theoretical and empirical landscape for supporting online harassment targets.</description><issn>1461-4448</issn><issn>1461-7315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLxDAQhYMouK7ePeYPVDNJTNujrKsrLHjRc5ltJt2WbVOSFPHf22X3JHiaYd57w8dj7B7EA0CeP4I2oLUupChBgZQXbHE8ZbmCp8vzftSv2U2MnRBgdF4u2Pol4Hc7NNwF3_Nuiqmtiac9-dBS5MnzOI2jD4knDA2lyL3jfji0A_E9BoyxpyHdsiuHh0h357lkX6_rz9Um2368va-et1mtpEqZAaeoBjKKSmvRIEhVaKNLR6JUuLMkxU4KicaqmVAXjjQKsHleYK2tUEsmTn_r4GMM5KoxtD2GnwpEdayh-lvDHMlOkYgNVZ2fwjAT_u__BWVgXSg</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Schoenebeck, Sarita</creator><creator>Haimson, Oliver L</creator><creator>Nakamura, Lisa</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8688-1595</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Drawing from justice theories to support targets of online harassment</title><author>Schoenebeck, Sarita ; Haimson, Oliver L ; Nakamura, Lisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-61f3ec1e63e9dda6a12384649fe093abde20b202a6d300148fe4a01d778ac4d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schoenebeck, Sarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haimson, Oliver L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Lisa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>New media &amp; society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schoenebeck, Sarita</au><au>Haimson, Oliver L</au><au>Nakamura, Lisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Drawing from justice theories to support targets of online harassment</atitle><jtitle>New media &amp; society</jtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1278</spage><epage>1300</epage><pages>1278-1300</pages><issn>1461-4448</issn><eissn>1461-7315</eissn><abstract>Most content moderation approaches in the United States rely on criminal justice models that sanction offenders via content removal or user bans. However, these models write the online harassment targets out of the justice-seeking process. Via an online survey with US participants (N = 573), this research draws from justice theories to investigate approaches for supporting targets of online harassment. We uncover preferences for banning offenders, removing content, and apologies, but aversion to mediation and adjusting targets’ audiences. Preferences vary by identities (e.g. transgender participants on average find more exposure to be undesirable; American Indian or Alaska Native participants on average find payment to be unfair) and by social media behaviors (e.g. Instagram users report payment as just and fair). Our results suggest that a one-size-fits-all approach will fail some users while privileging others. We propose a broader theoretical and empirical landscape for supporting online harassment targets.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1461444820913122</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8688-1595</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1461-4448
ispartof New media & society, 2021-05, Vol.23 (5), p.1278-1300
issn 1461-4448
1461-7315
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1461444820913122
source SAGE Complete
title Drawing from justice theories to support targets of online harassment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T18%3A32%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Drawing%20from%20justice%20theories%20to%20support%20targets%20of%20online%20harassment&rft.jtitle=New%20media%20&%20society&rft.au=Schoenebeck,%20Sarita&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1278&rft.epage=1300&rft.pages=1278-1300&rft.issn=1461-4448&rft.eissn=1461-7315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1461444820913122&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1461444820913122%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1461444820913122&rfr_iscdi=true